I am an environmentalist, but I'm not a climate activist. I used to be - I even used to ring strangers' doorbells on behalf of Greenpeace.
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2025/10/11/cyb…
1/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But a quarter century ago, I fell in with the Electronic Frontier Foundation and became a lifelong digital rights activist, and switched to cheering on environmental activists from the sidelines of their fight:
eff.org
Over the decades, there've been many moments where I've been struck by parallels between climate activism and tech activism. In both cases, the foundational challenge is getting people to care about looming catastrophic effects of bad policies.
2/
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Frontier FoundationCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
In both cases, those policies and their effects are highly abstract and technical, and are downstream of a huge, weird, cross-cutting set of contingencies and circumstances, which makes it hard for anyone to truly take their measure. You don't just have to master the technical issues - you have to get your arms around the economic, social and political issues, too. Bad tech policy and bad climate policy are both wicked problems, hard to define and even harder to solve.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Whether we're talking about tech or the climate, there is a surefire way to get people to care about these issues: simply do nothing, allow these problems to get worse, and worse still, until millions of peoples' lives have been ruined. Then, of course, people will care. If we do nothing about fire debt and rising temperatures, then everyone who lives in the urban-wildlife interface will lose their homes and possibly their lives to a wildfire.
4/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
And if we do nothing about surveillance, manipulation and monopoly, then eventually everyone will find their pay slashed, their freedoms curtailed, their identities stolen, and their pockets picked by a tech monopolist or an opportunistic predator living off of the monopolist's weakened, vulnerable victims.
In some important sense, the job of an activist is to raise the salience and convey the urgency of these issues *before* those consequences are upon us.
5/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Both climate and tech activists use storytelling to do this, and I've written novels that are cautionary tales about what happens if we get climate wrong *and* if we get tech wrong, as well as novels that are meant to inspire hope for the kind of world we could have if we get them right.
Both climate and tech activists have to contend with bullshit neoliberal "solutions" that propose to solve the problem by deploying technologically outlandish policies.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Tech activists have to fight with people who say we can solve the commercial surveillance problem by "getting consent" to spy on people. Environmental activists have to fight with people who say we can control emissions with garbage "carbon credits" that make Elon Musk into a centibillionaire by selling indulgences to SUV manufacturers that fill our roads and our skies with ever-mounting clouds of CO2 and carcinogenic exhaust:
pluralistic.net/2021/11/24/no-…
7/
Pluralistic: 24 Nov 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Both climate and tech activists have to show people that this crisis stems from systemic dysfunctions, not individual consumption choices. We have to get our supporters to stop focusing on agonizing about whether they should use a plastic straw or agonizing about whether they should quit Facebook, and focus instead on using politics to shatter the power of the giant, wildly profitable corporations that got us into this crisis.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
We need to smash oil companies like Chevron and Exxon, and we have to smash oily rag companies like Facebook and Google:
pluralistic.net/2021/04/05/zuc…
Beyond these parallels, both climate and tech activism have some actual commonalities. The biggest barrier to getting good tech *or* climate policy is the power of the cartel that dominates each sector.
9/
Pluralistic: 05 Apr 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Cartels aren't just contrivances for raising prices - they're even better at capturing their regulators. A hundred small and medium-sized companies are a hopeless rabble, unable to agree on anything - especially what they want from regulators. But five giant companies find it very easy to come to agreement, and they are aslosh in monopoly cash, which they can mobilize to get their way in policy forums:
pluralistic.net/2022/06/05/reg…
10/
Regulatory Capture – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But there's another, more hopeful parallel between tech and climate: after decades of vapor lock, both have seen rapid global improvement. Solar is *racing* ahead of all expectations. Globally, we're getting more power from solar than we are from coal. Solar is cheaper than any form of fossil fuel. Solar gets better every day, and we're figuring out how to overcome some of the serious challenges to solar, like finding all the materials we'll need for a solar transition.
11/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It turns out that a lot of the challenges on that front boil down to the fact that recycling old cleantech uses up a lot of energy. But as solar gets cheaper and more efficient, we have a *lot* of energy, and we can take apart an old solar panel that ran at 20% efficiency and use its recovered materials to make *two* solar panels that each run at 40% efficiency:
pluralistic.net/2024/08/06/wit…
12/
Pluralistic: Circular battery self-sufficiency (06 Aug 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Then there's tech. The past half-decade has seen more global action on tech regulation than the previous 40 years. Not all of it is good - plenty of it is as stupid as pinning your hopes on carbon capture or fusion reactors - but governments all over the world have got the bit in their teeth and they're champing at it:
pluralistic.net/2025/08/07/the…
For both climate and tech, Trump is turning out to be a (mixed) blessing in disguise.
13/
Pluralistic: Good ideas are popular (07 Aug 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Sure, he's killing decarbonization in the US, but he's also alienating America's (former) allies so quickly and thoroughly that many countries are moving closer to China's orbit. Again, that's a mixed blessing, but one *very* positive impact of Trump's beliigerence is that it has lit a fire under the leaders of other (formerly) friendly countries, spurring big, ambitious programs to escape US-based tech companies:
pluralistic.net/2025/01/15/bea…
14/
Pluralistic: Canada shouldn’t retaliate with US tariffs; Picks and Shovels Chapter One (Part 6 – CONCLUSION) (15 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Back in the first Trump administration, tariffs on Chinese solar panels led Chinese manufacturers to *flood* countries in the global south with solar panels that were *so* cheap that whole regions solarized, virtually overnight.
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Pakistan - one of the countries suffering the most from a changing climate, and most at risk from future changes - is now a solar nation, so much so that its national power company is in danger of going bust because everyone's making their own electricity rather than buying it from the grid.
Meanwhile, Putin's invasion of Ukraine pushed Europe - all of it, but especially Germany - into a galloping solar transition of its own.
16/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Virtually every high rise in Germany is now dotted (or even covered) with cheap, easy to hang balcony solar panels. Europe is *way* ahead of its energy transition goals:
electrek.co/2025/09/30/solar-l…
Putin's not the only dictator pushing Europe to enact rapid changes in order to escape US Big Tech silos, building a "Eurostack" of open, transparent, made-in-the-EU applications and services that are meant to replace American tech platforms:
pluralistic.net/2025/06/25/eur…
17/
Solar leads EU electricity generation as renewables hit 54%
Michelle Lewis (Electrek)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Another, unhappier commonality between tech and climate: it's not just that both are getting *better* faster than we'd thought possible, it's also that they're both getting *worse* faster than we'd feared.
On climate, virtually every bad thing that showed up in our models is breaking faster than we thought it would. The permafrost is melting faster and it's releasing more methane than we'd anticipated.
18/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The gulf stream and jet stream are bother getting more screwy, more quickly than predicted. Sure, we're decarbonizing and solarizing faster than we thought we could - but the world is falling apart faster than we thought it would, too:
billmckibben.substack.com/p/so…
And I don't have to tell you what's happening with tech. Technofascism is ascendant. ICE is using our devices to round up our neighbors and send them to torture prisons.
19/
Something extraordinary just happened
Bill McKibben (The Crucial Years)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Trump is using our social media posts to hunt down "the radical left" as a prelude to mass purges. Seven AI companies are now a third of the S&P 500, and they're losing money even faster than they are emitting carbon, and the crash on the horizon is gonna make 2008 look like a walk in the park:
pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/eco…
20/
Pluralistic: The real (economic) AI apocalypse is nigh (27 Sep 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
What's more, tech and cleantech are merging. The enshittification that has turned every platform to shit can now turn every part of the cleantech stack into a pile of shit, too. If Apple can pull the ICEBlock app out of your phone, then a solar inverter company can also remotely shut down your solar array and leave you in the dark:
pluralistic.net/2025/10/06/ame…
21/
Pluralistic: Apple’s unlawful evil (06 Oct 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
For all of this century, I've been a tech activist, but it's turning out that being a tech activist has an awful lot in common with being a climate activist, and sometimes - as when we're fighting to keep EVs from being bricked by their manufacturers or to prevent rent-seeking with inverters - they're literally the same thing.
22/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The great James Boyle has described the transformational power of the word "ecology." Without that word, there's no obvious connection between, say, the campaign to save the ozone layer and the campaign to save endangered owls. The fate of charismatic nocturnal avians is not readily understood as being of a piece with the gaseous composition of the upper atmosphere. The word "ecology" makes the connection, and so transforms a thousand issues into a movement
23/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I think something like that is happening again. There's a inchoate movement groping its way to understanding that it *is* a movement - that the problems of labor exploitation, fascism, climate degradation, surveillance, authoritarianism and genocide are all connected to each other by the fact that they are caused by extreme concentrations of wealth and power.
24/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Highly concentrated wealth and power is dangerous in and of itself, because even the most benign billionaire isn't infallible, and the stupid decisions of very rich people are *far* more consequential than the stupid decisions you or I make. Our mistakes make the people around us unhappy. Billionaires' mistakes - like their dilettanteish obsession with "education reform" - can ruin a whole generation:
pluralistic.net/2021/07/26/agg…
25/
Pluralistic: 26 Jul 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
And of course, the kind of person who amasses billions is pretty much never a *benign* person. The story you have to tell yourself in order to become a billionaire makes you into a literal psychopath:
pluralistic.net/2025/08/18/see…
26/
Pluralistic: Zuckermuskian solopsism (18 Aug 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
We don't have a word for this new anti-enshittification, anti-oligarch, anti-carbon baron movement yet, but perhaps that word might be "solidarity." Solidarity is the opposite of fascism. The solidarinet is the opposite of the enshitternet. Solidarity is what stops disasters from becoming catastrophes:
locusmag.com/Perspectives/2017…
27/
Cory Doctorow: Be the First One to Not Do Something that No One Else Has Ever Not Thought of Doing Before
Locus OnlineCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I'm on a tour with my new book *Enshittification*!
Catch me next in #Brooklyn, #NewOrleans and #Chicago!
Full schedule with dates and links at:
pluralistic.net/tour
eof/
Pluralistic: Announcing the Enshittification tour (30 Sep 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netBredroll
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow
in reply to Bredroll • • •pettter
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Susanna the Artist 🌻
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Susanna the Artist 🌻 • • •Sensitive content
miguel
in reply to Susanna the Artist 🌻 • • •@superflippy@mastodon.xyz
@pluralistic@mamot.fr
I was radicalized when the FBI showed up at my door because I had contributed to an online forum discussing DES replacments (I was arguing in favor of Rijndael) and held clearance.
Apparently this combined with my contributions to the Sierra Club made me a "security risk".
reshared this
Isard reshared this.
Arik
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I think that if you have to split your content into 28 parts and then send them individually one by one - then it's the wrong medium for the content.
I personally like the comments and boosts from your account, but these threads are... ridiculous.
Luckily my instance allows me to filter them out.
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Arik • • •@arikb
The first line of my bio is "I post long threads."
Here's notes on why, and how to manage long threads in your client, and places to get my work elsewhere if you don't like long threads in your client:
pluralistic.net/2023/04/16/how…
How To Make the Least-Worst Mastodon Threads – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netArik
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I read it. Your post says:
> "...Mastodon, a service where I exclusively post long threads..."
and here lies the problem. If you were only posting these long threads, I would have simply unfollowed you and problem solved. I'm not a masochist, I read your blog posts on your blog.
However, you also boost messages and reply to messages, which enriches my timelines with things I do want to see, from one of my favourite authors. I don't want to lose that.
The filter is a compromise.