Trump’s FTC targets advertising boycotts in potential boost for Elon Musk’s X Report: Proposed condition on ad merger would ban boycotts based on politics. arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…
If this isn't a first amendment, slam dunk, laughed out of the court room loss for Trump's FTC, we're in deeper shit than I thought, and I think we're drowning in it over our heads.
Define political? Is racist hate speech political? Because after 1 year of Musk, trying to uncover evidence of old Twitter censoring "conservatives," he found nothing.
Brian Tatosky
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Chris Ferguson
in reply to Ars Technica • • •bstow
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Lord Tom Klopf of CZ
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Thomas Traynor
in reply to Ars Technica • • •qantravon
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Q.H. Stone
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Journalists should be calling this what it is: corruption. Doing special favors for your biggest donors is the definition of corruption.
Once again our press lets us down.
SpaceLifeForm
in reply to Ars Technica • • •It is pure nonsense.
One can boycott due to lack of money.
This is just a cover for legal extortion.
Ask Elmo.
Lee 🌏
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Is racist hate speech political?
Because after 1 year of Musk, trying to uncover evidence of old Twitter censoring "conservatives," he found nothing.