FCC chairman unconvincingly claims he never threatened ABC station licenses
Brendan Carr would like you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…
Brendan Carr would like you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…
reshared this
Chris Ferguson
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Rusty Skunk
in reply to Ars Technica • • •If this was an NYT headline it'd be something like, "FCC Chairman Brendan Carr denies claims by Democrats of misconduct"
Good on y'all for actually calling a spade a spade.
Pēteris Krišjānis
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Barry
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Maria Langer | 📝 💎 🛥️
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Michael Vilain
in reply to Ars Technica • • •He's playing his role as Joseph Goebbels surrogate well. Goebbels committed suicide once Hitler died in his bunker, after taking the life of his children with cyanide capsules.
I wonder if anyone is sending Carr links to Goebbels Wikipedia entry. I wonder if his kids have seen such entries.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_G…
At least Trump will get to pick out his favorite lamp post.
Nazi politician and Propaganda Minister (1897–1945)
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Arena Cops 🇺🇦✌
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Trump only picks the best liars!
Because he's an expert at it! 🤔😎
afwaller
in reply to Ars Technica • • •In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.
[…]
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Roknrol
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Luna chan
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Fuse Views
in reply to Ars Technica • • •"FCC chairman unconvincingly claims he never threatened ABC station licenses..."
I had to do a "double take" when reading this toot's headline; I thought it was written by @theonion