Skip to main content


34 years ago today, the #SovietUnion officially ceased to exist. December 26, 1991

Apologies to #tankies (not really) but it was a very good thing

Not liking the #Soviet Union has nothing to do with loving #capitalism or loving the #West, it's about despising #imperialism

Anyone who has a problem with my sentiment:

Talk to someone who lived in #EasternEurope or under the Soviet umbrella

We must defeat #plutocracy in the West

The Soviet way is not the way

Happy #SovietUnionCollapseDay

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

The best thing would be the collapse of the American empire and yes i have lived 4 years in eastern Europe at those days
in reply to Fou

you can dislike the usa and the ussr/ russia at the same time

in fact, you should

disliking one doesn't mean you have to automatically like the other, and that attitude is a very absurd approach to understanding or talking about our world

i'm not disagreeing with you, i'm expanding on your comment, because unfortunately there are a lot of people with this "rah rah your team versus my team" attitude out there

the only real conflict in the world is the powers that be vs the people

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

There has never been, and I fear there never will be, a political system that prioritises people above all else.

Political systems are human constructs and, as such, are imperfect and subject to human influence.

Therefore, in theory, poor people are always called upon to choose the lesser evil, while rich people are called upon to choose the most favourable option.

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@foufoutos

Those of us who remember the Cold War are well-familiar with this principle, and the idea of the Third Way, or Non-Alignment, in which other nations can elect to remain outside the US/USSR football game and tighten relations with each other.

@Fou
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@foufoutos 🇺🇸 is a nice country, but as a 🇲🇽 I found in rare occasions good Americans. Most of the Americans I've came across were MAGA fans. It is a disease that I also see in my 🇲🇽 with Cartels, for example. I've met cool Russians but that doesn't make ussr or today's Russia better. There are also nasty people over there. It's up to us, nice people, to stand against those schmucks
@Fou
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Exactly, and Putin can stop his whining about how Nato stole the CCCP republics, because the former eastblock countries could not run faster and further away as they did, getting rid of the Soviet suppression.
in reply to xs4me2

@xs4me2
The reason why Soviet blocks ran to NATO was because of the aggression of Russia.

The obnoxious trope that Russia became aggressive because the West broke promise is blind by the fact that NATO is now expanding because of Russia’s war on Ukraine.

Countries like George, which is the one that sticks in my mind, feel especially this way. Others might be constrained by autocracy within their country or that they don’t have any cards to play

in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell

@GhostOnTheHalfShell @xs4me2

It's a stupid lie for people brainwashed by Rossiya-1 living in Ryazan

The absurdity is morons in the West buying into it, from the troll accounts who have found the hilarity of such Western morons on social media who hear and believe with zero thought

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@GhostOnTheHalfShell

Indeed, and seemingly also from the opportunistic grifting Trump dynasty, the Trump administration, their cronies and the oligarchs that got them elected.

in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell

@GhostOnTheHalfShell
Indeed, because people want to live in freedom and not under the thumb of a suppressive regime.
Democracy is a threat to dictators like Putin.
in reply to xs4me2

@xs4me2 also, remember how the entity known as the USSR ceased to be? The USSR became a thing of the past when Boris Yeltzin pulled Russia out. Russia, of all the former Soviet republics, is in no position to expect anyone to still care about any "understandings" that may have existed between "the West" and the Soviet Union.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Не просто хорошо но даже очень! I was in Moscow then kinda смутно.
in reply to karamazov1879

@karamazov1879 Могут произойти и другие хорошие вещи. И они уже происходят. Но сначала нам нужно пережить эту ночь.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

The best insight into politics that I picked up over this year was from a YouTube channel / podcast called “ what is politics?”

He reduces left and right to explicit behavior.

The left is distinguished by a government that confers equality social, political and in economic decision-making. Equality and prosperity are inseparable

The right wing is distinguished by a government that confers evermore decision-making power to wealth. They ask you to compromise freedom and prosperity

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell

Anyone who tells you that you need to compromise between freedom and prosperity, which is something the Germans and Stalin, and every other autocrat offers, are rightwing by definition

Only those who demand and demonstrate equality in decision-making are left-wing

Therefore, all of us should be asking of politicians or anyone else what is my decision-making power here, where what power do I have in this process?

If somebody says we’ll bring you jobs. They are offering you bait

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell

@GhostOnTheHalfShell I think if you showed this to people on the right they would heartily agree with the first premise, and be like wait what now? to the second cuz they be thick like that.
in reply to Christmas Lights

what is the "social right"?

dimwits who say trans people don't deserve rights, for example?

these are merely morons and bigots used by agendas that rob them, but they don't care, because their ignorant hate is more important to them

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Christmas Lights

are you talking about my reference to trans rights?

then that is the simple fact trans people deserve their basic human rights everyone deserves

i only used it as an example because the "social right," the bigots and morons that they are, don't want that, and then they are used by plutocrat agendas because that's an easy aspect of their stupidity and hate to pander to

so this "social right" you refer to is nothing but loser zombies used for agendas

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

What exactly is it that the social right don't want, and why don't they matter for a definition of "left" and "right" political terms?
What about the social left?
@GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

I am asking you to defend your rejection of my terms.
I'm not sure what you are saying exactly.
I was asking @GhostOnTheHalfShell how the social spectrum is defined in the left-right framework he describes. And you butted in with a point. But I'm not sure what that point is exactly. That the social spectrum isn't real? Or what?
in reply to Christmas Lights

@light @GhostOnTheHalfShell

🤣

so hello and welcome to mastodon

you *mentioned me* in your reply to ghost

the only one butting in here with a lame "just asking questions" shtick is you, and you don't even understand how mastodon works

try again someday, with better understanding next time, of how mastodon works and the topics you're injecting yourself into

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

You were automatically mentioned because you were part of the thread, dipshit. I didn't make a conscious decision to include you. That being said, if you have something constructive to say, you are welcome to say it.
I am fully aware of how the *fediverse* (NOT "Mastodon") works.
in reply to Christmas Lights

@light
The point of the definition I am using is one categorizes people by their behavior:

A left-wing person is egalitarian. They do not tolerate one or a few dictating to the many.

Right wing person defines who is subordinate to whom.

I would hope I would not have to explain that the Republican Party is by every measure right wing. But the Democratic Party (leadership) is also right wing, because they sit atop a hierarchy of fundraising and political patronage.

..

in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell

@light
The standard corporate business structure of CEOs and managers dictating to the rank and file what to do, when to do it and how long to do it and how much they’re going to get compensated for is right wing because by definition this is a dominance hierarchy.

A worker co-op would be the example of the opposite, but even here you would have to look at the actual political dynamics.

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

But which basic human rights are trans people being denied? That's what I don't get.
in reply to Christmas Lights

"which basic human rights are trans people being denied?"

what the fuck?

i'm glad you just woke up from your coma

now i kindly ask that you pay attention to the news on issues you are injecting commentary into, that you don't even seem to understand

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Wow, that's insulting. Fuck you.
I don't pay that much attention to the news because it's mostly just doom and gloom that I can't change.
So tell me, know-it-all, what human rights are trans people being denied?
There's the attempt to take guns away from them in the states. But that postdates the introduction of the "#TransRightsAreHumanRights" slogan by many years.
No one has the right to dictate how other people think, including how they define "man" and "woman". So that's not it.
in reply to Christmas Lights

then it's very simple:

if you don't give a fuck enough to understand what you inject your "just asking questions" troll line into, then shut the fuck up

'No one has the right to dictate how other people think, including how they define "man" and "woman"'

yup

saw you coming a mile away

🖕

fuck you, bigot

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

If freedom of thought is bigotry then may the world be full to the brim with bigotry.
Fuck you, tyrant.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

The other day Youtube offered me the opening theme for "Neon Genesis Evangelion" only redone for the USSR.

Don't ask me why.

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Watch Mister Jones about the Holodomor. The Soviet Union was as evil and psychotic as the Nazis. Seven million Ukrainians murdered.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Russia has, and always will be a malignant superpower. Communism has nothing to do with it, although giving the state absolute control did allow Stalin to be the tyrant he was. It's completely fine to criticize Russia, while simultaneously supporting Communism as an idea.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

а негр слева у тебя таки армянин или киргиз? Или тебе всё равно
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Since capitalism had more than enough time to try and proof itself. So anti-imperialism will win with this crowd. Do they host foreign military bases, by any chance?
in reply to Gutmensch.

the soviet union, and now russia, is the last vast european colonial empire in the world. it is no different than the others were, and is not special merely because it is contiguous on land

it is the same as the british empire, spanish empire, etc

those are dead

but the russian empire is still murdering for expansion, it's acting like the year is 1825 instead of 2025

this doesn't mean we excuse other malicious actors today

but it also doesn't mean we make excuses for russia

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Gutmensch.

@impooortant

yes, there were and are many empires all over the world, today and in the past

since many people focus on the negative effects of the history of european imperialism, i limited my scope on purpose to draw a contrast between how the traditional focus of ire is on the other european powers, but somehow russia seems to get treated differently. i am not sure why. so yes, i am limiting my scope on purpose to draw attention to that discrepancy

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

I am a bit disappointed with the supposedly anti-imperialist comrades in these countries. When those among them who hoped for a different socialism were quieted their struggle lost all momentum.
in reply to Gutmensch.

i dislike all isms

capitalism, communism, socialism, anarchism, libertarianism, etc, etc

people put hope in magic ideas solving all problems, and those ideas always fail in the usual ways to abuse of power

i am utterly unimpressed with isms. i simply wish people cared enough to simply right wrongs

we just need more people to fucking care

which is not demonstrated with constructing castles in the sky

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Gutmensch.

@impooortant

then for both of us, we are only foolish dreamers in another way

for flags and isms will be with us still for some time, unfortunately

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

I would consider the USA as a colonial empire as well. Their focus is not necessarily on expansion but on controlling fossil fuels. Since the convicted felon in the White House, it seems to be about expansion as well (e.g. threats to invade Canada and Greenland)
in reply to Truls

@truls46

i have no argument with you

*unless* criticism of russia means an immediate shift to criticism of the usa

i don't think you are doing that, i am merely noting that some do

the principled approach is to condemn russia. and condemn the usa. both

and we must beware those who wish to limit criticism of russia, or the usa, by changing the topic

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

"the principled approach is to condemn russia. and condemn the usa. both" - yes, that's what I wanted to say.

There is no difference between Putin and the convicted felon in the White House.

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

the GBR & FRA are still functioning colonial powers, empires. They are far from dead. The difference to RUS is Putin picked up the expansion drive again. So the active expansion in Europe is only driven by RUS.
@impooortant
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

I think we will disagree on this point. But that is ok. IMO RUS is very much different from other "empires" as they historically only annex & then disregard any infrastructure & build up. They count km & heads, beyond those numbers they have no interest. While other empires integrate as much as possible, turn their annexed country into a satelite of their own even implement their culture but most of all build it up & make it function as best as possible. @impooortant
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to mantis

@mantis

"Hating both, in such geopolitical climates, is contrarian at best"

😂

"i hate the usa so i love russia automatically"

or

"i hate russia so i love the usa automatically"

that's edgelord braindead contrarianism

being critical of both is not

and the nazis built the autobahn. does anyone defend nazism on that basis?

no. but it's the same "advancement" basis you hilariously use to defend the obscenity that was the USSR

it's dead. as that brutal imperialist monster should be

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

>and the nazis built the autobahn. does anyone defend nazism on that basis?

Yes. The right-wing does, many libertarians like Mises critique the Nazi ideology for its atrocities against the European Jews but acknowledge its necessity to preserve European civilization. [1] The only reason such an argument is not adopted by the popular is because of the defeat of Nazi Germany by the Soviets in a war the Nazis had started. He who controls the present controls the past.

I am sure you can critique both and I can see very well that you do, but that's the most you can do as an individual. So long as you don't name a precise way forward without the current superpowers, you are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the Polish Armia Krajowa in WWII. Otherwise, an alliance with the West is against Russia, and an alliance with Russia is against the West. The only successful example of non-interventionism sofar is China, a much more successful socialist experiment that learnt from Soviet mistakes.

[1]: mises.org/mises-daily/foundati…

in reply to mantis

mises is for libertarian morons

your argument is it's ok to defend nazis because libertarian morons try to defend nazis on "necessity to preserve European civilization" racist fascist bullshit?

😂

and have you ever heard of this you fuckwit?:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%…

the nazis and the ussr started wwii *together, on the same side*

so what are you?

a libertarian moron? or a vatnik troll?

fuck off, you ignorant lying shitstain

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

Again, horseshoe theory has been widely discredited. The Nazis and Bolsheviks were ideological nemeses, in theory and practice. A couple of pages in Mein Kampf should get you there.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop was the last pact of the WWII allies with Nazi Germany. [1] The Western empires and later allies of the Soviets had multiple pacts with the Nazis. [1] The West refused collective security with the USSR against the Nazis and had invaded the Soviets during their Bolshevik revolution. [2] German, French, British, and American troops were on Soviet territories [3]. Read about the Munich Agreement and the Anti-Comintern pact. It was always and is always gonna be one the side over the other, the West was always pragmatic in pursuing its own self-interests and so will Russia.

and P.S.: insults won't get you anywhere.

[1]: stanislavs.org/the-complete-li…
[2]: researchgate.net/publication/3…
[3]: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_i…

in reply to mantis

you pathetic lying ignorant

wwii was *started* by the ussr and nazi germany, according to their imperialist plan, in their pact, to invade poland together

any other moronic bullshit you want to try to sell today you fuckin vatnik idiot for anyone to laugh at?

and i'm not insulting you

you are a pathetic, lying, ignorant. objectively so

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to mantis

Modern societies are not driven by the sense of doing the right thing. Morality & politics are like water & oil, they only mix when the right conditions are met. All societies, modern and ancient alike, have required some sort of governing and planning with their increasing complexities. So, "disliking all isms" basically means you dislike the state of affairs but don't know what to do.

#marxism #socialism #capitalism

(2/2)

in reply to Angelina

@Angelina

i see they excluded belarus, russia, and kazakhstan (any others?)

turkmenistan indeed