How Similar Is Trump to Mussolini?
gopher://magical.fish/0/news/theconversation/2025/04/2025-04-26 00-42-54 80 years after Benito Mussolinis death what can democracies today learn from his fascist rise
theconversation.com/80-years-a…
(C) The Conversation
This story was originally published by The Conversation and is unaltered.
Published and (C) by The Conversation
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0.
. . . . . . . . . .
80 years after Benito Mussolini’s death, what can democracies today learn from his fascist rise?
['Matthew Sharpe']
Date: 2025-04-26 00:42:54+00:00
This Monday marks 80 years since Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was killed in an Italian village towards the end of the Second World War in 1945. The following day, his body was publicly desecrated in Milan.
Given the scale of Adolf Hitler’s atrocities, our image of fascism today has largely been shaped by Nazism. Yet, Mussolini preceded Hitler. Il Duce, as Mussolini was known, was Hitler’s inspiration.
Today, as commentators, bloggers and scholars are debating whether the governments of US President Donald Trump, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Russian President Vladimir Putin are “fascist”, we can learn from Il Duce’s career about how democracies fail and dictators consolidate autocratic rule.
The early years
The term “fascist” itself originated around the time of Mussolini’s founding in 1914 of the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, a militaristic group promoting Italy’s entry into the First World War.
Mussolini had been raised in a leftist family. Before WWI, he edited and wrote for socialist newspapers. Yet, from early on, the young rebel was also attracted to radically anti-democratic thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche, George Sorel, and Wilfred Pareto.
When WWI broke out, Mussolini broke from the socialists, who opposed Italy’s involvement in the conflict. Like Hitler, he fought in the war. Mussolini considered his front-line experience as formative for his future ideas around fascism. His war experience led him to imagine making Italy great again – an imperial power worthy of the heritage of ancient Rome.
In March 1919, Mussolini formed the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento in Milan. This group brought together a motley collection of war veterans, primarily interested in fighting the socialists and communists. They were organised in squadristi (squads), which would become known for their black shirts and violence – they forced many of their targets to drink castor oil.
The political success of Mussolini’s fascist ideals, however, was neither instant nor inevitable. In the 1919 Italian elections, Mussolini received so few votes, communists held a mock funeral march outside his house to celebrate his political death.
The rise to power and the march on Rome
Fascism became a part of national political life in 1920-21, following waves of industrial and agricultural strikes and worker occupations of land and factories.
As a result, rural and industrial elites turned to the fascist squadristi to break strikes and combat workers’ organisations. Fascist squads also overturned the results of democratic elections in Bologna and Cremona, preventing left-wing candidates from assuming office.
Mussolini’s political capital, remarkably, was boosted by this violence. He was invited to enter Prime Minister Ivanoe Bonomi’s first government in July 1921.
The following October, fascists occupied the towns of Bolzano and Trento. The liberals, socialists and Italian monarchy were indecisive in the face of these provocations, allowing Mussolini to seize the moment. Mustering the fascist squads, he ordered the famous “march on Rome” in late October 2022 to demand he be appointed prime minister.
All the evidence suggests if the government had intervened, the march on Rome would have disbanded. It was a bold piece of political theatre. Nevertheless, fearing civil war — and the communists more than the black shirts — King Victor Emmanuel III caved in without a shot being fired.
Mussolini was made leader of a new government on October 31, 1922.
The consolidation of dictatorship
Like Hitler in 1933, Mussolini’s rule started as the head of a coalition government including non-fascist parties. Yet, with the repressive powers of the state now at his disposal, Mussolini exploited the division among his rivals and gradually consolidated power.
In 1923, the communist party was targeted with mass arrests and the fascist squads were brought under official state control as a paramilitary force. Mussolini began to use state powers to surveil all non-fascist political parties.
In the 1924 general election, with fascist militia menacingly manning the polls, Il Duce won 65% of the vote.
Then, in June, socialist leader Giacomo Matteotti was kidnapped and murdered by black shirts. When investigations pointed to Mussolini’s responsibility, he at first denied any knowledge of the killing. Months later, however, Mussolini proudly admitted responsibility for the deed, celebrating the fascists’ brutality. He faced no legal or political consequences.
The last nail in the coffin of Italy’s enfeebled democracy came in late 1926. Following an assassination attempt in which Mussolini’s nose was grazed (he wore a bandage for a time afterwards), Mussolini definitively banned all political opposition.
The “lesser evil”
Following his death in April 1945, Mussolini’s dictatorship was often portrayed as “dictatorship-lite”, a “lesser evil” compared to Nazism or Stalinist Russia. This narrative, bolstered by German crimes against Italians in the last months of the war, has understandably been embraced by many Italians.
Yet, Mussolini’s was the first regime to advertise itself as totalitarian. Styling himself as a “man of destiny”, Mussolini claimed that fascism embodied the “spiritual renewal” of the Italian people.
His goal of making Italy a power again required total control of the state. His 1932 “Doctrine of Fascism” describes the need “to exercise power and to command” all administrative, policing, and judicial institutions. This included censorship of the press and educational institutions.
While portraying fascism as a “populist” movement, Mussolini also shut down independent trade unions, bailed out big banks, and prevented the right to strike. As a result, economic inequality between Italians actually grew wider under his rule.
Mussolini also pursued an imperialist dream by invading Ethiopia. Defying international conventions, Il Duce’s troops used chemical weapons and summary executions to quell acts of resistance. Over 700,000 Ethiopians are estimated by scholars to have been killed by the invaders, with around 35,000 forced into internment camps.
Mussolini’s fascists ran over 30 concentration camps from 1926–45, almost all of them offshore. Some 50–70,000 Libyans alone died in camps set up under Italy’s brutal colonial regime from 1929–34. Many more died through executions, starvation and ethnic cleansing.
When the notorious SS leader Heinrich Himmler visited Libya in in 1939, he deemed the Italian colony a successful model to emulate.
And after Mussolini’s forces aided the Axis invasions of Yugoslavia, Albania and Russia in the Second World War, more than 80,000 more prisoners were interned in camps. At the camp on the Croatian Island of Rab, more than 3,000 prisoners died in grossly inhumane conditions in 1942–43, at a mortality rate higher than the Nazi camp at Buchenwald.
From late 1943, Italian fascists also participated in the rounding up of over 7,000 Italian Jews to transfer to Auschwitz. Almost all of them were murdered.
Following the war, even with Il Duce dead, few perpetrators faced justice for these atrocities.
Lessons for democracies after 80 years
The infamy of the crimes associated with the word “fascism” has meant that few people today claim the label – even those attracted to the same kinds of authoritarian, ethnonationalist politics.
Mussolini, even more than Hitler, can seem a bombastic fool, with his uniform, theatrical gestures, stylised hyper-masculinity and patented steely jaw.
Yet, one of the lessons of Mussolini’s career is that such political adventurists are only as strong as the democratic opposition allows. To fail to take them seriously is to enable their success.
Mussolini pushed his luck time and again between 1920 and 1926. As the wonderful recent teleseries of his ascent, Mussolini, Figlio del Seculo shows, time and again, the opposition failed to concertedly oppose the fascists’ attacks on democratic norms and institutions. Then it was too late.
Democracies mostly fall over time, by a thousand cuts and shifts of the goalposts of what is considered “normal”. Fascism, moreover, depends in no small measure on shameless political deception, including the readiness to conceal its own most radical intentions.
Fascist “strongmen” like Mussolini accumulate power thanks to people’s inabilities to believe that the barbarisation of political life – including open violence against opponents – could happen in their societies.
And there is a final, unsettling lesson of Mussolini’s career. Il Duce was a skilled propagandist who portrayed himself as leading a popular revolt to restore respectable values. He was able to win widespread popular support, including among the elites, even as he destroyed Italian democracy.
Yet, if the monarchy, military, other political parties and the church had attempted a principled, united opposition to fascism early enough, most of Mussolini’s crimes would likely have been avoided.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
magical.fish/1/feeds/news/thec…
80 years after Benito Mussolini’s death, what can democracies today learn from his fascist rise?
Mussolini’s rise shows that strongmen are only as powerful as the democratic opposition allows. Failing to take them seriously enables their success.The Conversation
𝕕𝕚𝕒𝕟𝕒 🏳️⚧️🦋 likes this.
Tom Grzybow reshared this.
harry haller
in reply to David • • •Creation of the National Fascist Party
Main articles: Fascism and Italian Fascism
By the time he returned from Allied service in World War I, there was very little left of Mussolini the socialist. Indeed, he was now convinced that socialism as a doctrine had largely been a failure. In 1917, Mussolini got his start in politics with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5 (The equivalent of 6000 pounds today), to keep anti war protestors at home and publish pro war propaganda. This help was authorized by Sir Samuel Hoare.[52] — web.archive.org/web/2015020803…
Yes, wikipedia has deleted that...
Recruited by MI5: the name's Mussolini. Benito Mussolini | Benito Mussolini | The Guardian - www.theguardian.com — theguardian.com/world/2009/oct…
Recruited by MI5: the name's Mussolini. Benito Mussolini
Tom Kington (The Guardian)Digit
in reply to David • • •"vigilantia et unita oppositio."
yup. this is no time for pitchforks vs torches. the hour is later than we think. and, we can still mend this.
pal
in reply to David • • •In fact, if we compare the 3 fascist regimes European:
* Mussolini in italy
* Salazar in Portugal
* Franco in Spain
The common elements are:
* regime supported by the great Bourgeoisie of the country
* a charismatic leader
* an anti-communist and reactionary policy
* the use of police and militia forces to suppress internal revolts
*a desire for colonial expansion
These are characteristics found in the Macron regime... but not yet in Trump
David
in reply to David • • •Do you not get news about the USA where you live? The Trump regime has all those characteristics. Yes, strange as it may seem, to many people Trump has charisma. As for colonies, he wants to take land from Denmark and Panama, and he wants all of Canada.
When I read the article I posted, I seriously wondered if Trump has read about Mussolini and is very consciously trying to follow his plan.
like this
Susan ✶✶✶✶ and Tom Grzybow like this.
pal
in reply to David • • •Very sorry to contradict you, but
* his regime is not supported by the great Bourgeoisie of the country (wich support the Democrats instead)
* he doesn't use the police or a militia forces to suppress internal revolts
* and what you call "a desire for colonial expansion" is only a commercial desire to have free shipping. He even removes US troops from Syria
so he is not a fascist what ever you want he is
(From my point of view he is even trying to stop the wars were US are, even if it's not (still) a success)
in reference to your article :
where do you see a militaristic group ?
do you think that Trump had been raised in a leftist family ?
He is not "invited to rule" but was elected !
He didn't wrote any book about fascism or totalisarism
nor has invaded any country
he is not the creator of guantanamo or others camps
nothing in common with Mussolini (he s just a capitalist who want to make more money with the labor of others as every ones)
Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •^ Obvious propaganda. Trump himself says he wants to expand the US to include Canada and Greenland - and has said so many times. And as for the “Bourgeoisie”, this pseudointellectual term cannot hide the fact that Trump’s government is almost exclusively headed by Billionaires who favor tax-breaks and semi-military action against migrants…
"where do you see a militaristic group?" -- ICE, of course."
"he is not the creator of guantanamo or others camps" -- “creator” is misleading _he is using these camps, which is virtually the same thing, he “creates” their usage every day.
As for “elected” - people have been known to make mistakes. Sometimes terrible mistakes.
pal
in reply to David • • •He said the same thing with Panama, but when BlackRock bought the two Chinese ports, he said he had achieved his goal!
To have a lot of money doesn’t make you a member of the bourgeoisie ( who are more the first families)
ICE is a regular police and not a milicia
to my knowledge he doesn’t use any of theses camps on the US territory (what doesn Obama for his part)
mistake may be, but it seems to me that the process of election give always a mistake (by given the power to somone else)
Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •ICE is a regular police and not a milicia - you are mischaracterizing ICE. They are highly militarized, and you are intentionally misleading in your portrait. Lying.
"first families" sounds nice. King of the Bourgeoisie is more accurate. Get your "family values" out of here.
pal
in reply to David • • •ice.gov/
bad faith does not make a good comment
ICE
www.ice.govDavid
in reply to David • • •The term bourgeoisie is used by those who divide humanity into two groups: bourgeoisie and proletariat. The proletariat work for the bourgeoisie.
Trump is the most powerful, and most dangerous, person in the world. Most people outside France don't know who Macron is, or care.
The second most dangerous person is Xi, then Putin. Germany has the largest economy in Europe, and the UK has the largest military. Sorry, but I'm just not worried about France and Macron.
Also, what's the deal with mentioning fascism in Italy, Portugal, and Spain, and not mentioning Germany and Hitler? Was Hitler not fascist?
Or are you just trying to defend Trump?
pal
in reply to David • • •I don't but making false assertions doesn't make any good
and yes bourgeoisie is against proletariat that is the point for fascism
(it seems that a lot of people confuse fascism and dictatorship or authoritarianism, but they are different concepts)
pal
in reply to David • • •Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •it seems that a lot of people confuse fascism and dictatorship or authoritarianism
Such as yourself. Trumo is the leader of the elite bourgeoisie, and has successfully captured the (false) consciousness of much of the proletariat - the lumpenproletariat.
But we need not and should not digress into simple-minded Marxist terminology, but instead focus upon the facts of the matter. Who is subjugating whom, and who is profiting from this dynamic. All this is very clear.
Digit
in reply to David • • •I don't know if that narcissist needs that kind of aggrandising going around. Better he faces the horror, he's a puppet? Or is that when he snaps and turns Hitlarian? He'd still be getting played. The strings are pulled from the shadows.
(I probably tell this little story too often... or not often enough...)
In 2004, in a pub, an ex-colleague of Trump's told us what it was like working with him. Told us what a joke he is, what a narcissist, being played by psychopaths, agents, priming him for a puppet presidency. ...
It sounded absurd... at the time. And then, a little over a decade later, the absurd happened.
Like the not-great, not-late comedian Brian Conley said: "IT'S A PUPPET!".
Easier to stay out of the groupthink with this revealing knowledge from an insider. ... Does not mean it's magically not a concern of fascistic rise in abuses of power and jingoism and eugenics etc, just from being aware. But does save a lot of wasted time and effort.
... show moreI don't know if that narcissist needs that kind of aggrandising going around. Better he faces the horror, he's a puppet? Or is that when he snaps and turns Hitlarian? He'd still be getting played. The strings are pulled from the shadows.
(I probably tell this little story too often... or not often enough...)
In 2004, in a pub, an ex-colleague of Trump's told us what it was like working with him. Told us what a joke he is, what a narcissist, being played by psychopaths, agents, priming him for a puppet presidency. ...
It sounded absurd... at the time. And then, a little over a decade later, the absurd happened.
Like the not-great, not-late comedian Brian Conley said: "IT'S A PUPPET!".
Easier to stay out of the groupthink with this revealing knowledge from an insider. ... Does not mean it's magically not a concern of fascistic rise in abuses of power and jingoism and eugenics etc, just from being aware. But does save a lot of wasted time and effort. Especially because many in groupthinks, especially the polarised combative ones, will not only not heed such information, but take it as an attack from the other, that needs thwarting, by any atrocity at all, seen as a necessary virtue, digging their heels in all the more stubbornly... until it all gives and the karmic elastic snaps back.
No time for "this is fine", nor defeatist self fulfilling prophecies of inescapable doom. We can still mend this. Impossible? No. Necessary.
Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •There are some efforts, but they are pale:
apnews.com/article/chris-murph…
Sen. Chris Murphy's 'emergency' message about Trump is persuading voters
Mary Clare Jalonick (AP News)pal
in reply to David • • •what makes Bourgeoisie is not to work for them (there are many people who have other people who work for them) but that they are a class of people who recognize themselves as a class that does not work but has “capital”
do you think that Warren Buffett estimate that Trump is from his class ?
Warren Buffett on Class Warfare, 'It's My Class, the Rich Class, Making War, And We're Winning'?
Jordan Liles (Snopes.com)David
in reply to David • • •As for ICE:
The FBI are the national police force, and investigate and make arrests for all sorts of federal crimes. Other federal police agencies are more restricted in their authority and responsibilities. These include the Secret Service, the US Marshals Service, the ATF, ICE, and the DEA. Some agencies that are not primarily involved in law enforcement also investigate certain crimes. These include the Forest Service and the Postal Service.
ICE can make arrests, but only for violations of laws related to customs and immigration.
BTW,
@Tom Grzybow wrote
I think you may be confused about the English words "militia" and "militaristic."
You may think that "militaristic' mean
... show moreAs for ICE:
The FBI are the national police force, and investigate and make arrests for all sorts of federal crimes. Other federal police agencies are more restricted in their authority and responsibilities. These include the Secret Service, the US Marshals Service, the ATF, ICE, and the DEA. Some agencies that are not primarily involved in law enforcement also investigate certain crimes. These include the Forest Service and the Postal Service.
ICE can make arrests, but only for violations of laws related to customs and immigration.
BTW,
@Tom Grzybow wrote
I think you may be confused about the English words "militia" and "militaristic."
You may think that "militaristic' means "military." It does not. It means "similar to military." The US Army has sergeants and captains, but so do police forces. Police forces are similar to military organizations.
"Militia," here in the USA, can mean an organization like the National Guard, but now it more often means a rebel army that fights against the government, like the Proud Boys.
Here in the USA now, the line between military and police is becoming blurry. Police--even local police--are becoming more like military organizations, and the military is used more and more for policing. This worries us because we have always seen this as a characteristic of fascism. When we see it, we think of Hitler's Germany.
David
in reply to David • • •Not in English.
pal
in reply to David • • •no I don't confuse : Fascism need militia (not militaristic), in every fascist states you have those militias ruled by the "leader" (Brown shirt, Black shirt ...) that can have a militaristic form but that are not regular (not led by the state)
it seems that the definitions are very different even in english
britannica.com/topic/fascism
britannica.com/topic/dictators…
britannica.com/topic/authorita…
Fascism | Definition, Meaning, Characteristics, Examples, & History | Britannica
Encyclopedia BritannicaAndrew Pam
in reply to David • • •pal
in reply to David • • •or do you confuse with the previous one? 😀
Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •ICE is serving the purpose of the Brown Shirts. And in fact , Hitler's Brown Shirts were not civilians.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabt…
Nazi Party's original paramilitary wing
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)David
in reply to David • • •Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •David
in reply to David • • •The problem we all want to avoid is the concentration of power. It's not that the wrong people rule; it's how few people rule all the others. We want to diffuse power, not concentrate it.
Trump believes we here in the US want one strong person to take control and solve our problems for us. A friend of mine from Siberia thinks Russians brought Putin to power because that's what they wanted.
I don't think a strong leader can solve my problems because the problem I want to solve is too much power in too few hands.
pal
in reply to David • • •that is a confusion !
the Brown shirt was the SA, not the SS
the SS was the regular army, the SA was the militia of the nazi parti (even before they was at the governement)
Fascism need the mixing with the rich/industrials/bourgeoisie
Dictatoship only need to take the absolute power without effective constitutional limitations.
authoritarianism need the submission to authority and the repression of individual freedom of thought and action
but in your case in USA, you only have someone who want to change the actual policy that goes to globalism to a new policy that goes to nationalism (don't take care of the rest of the world)
David
in reply to David • • •𝕕𝕚𝕒𝕟𝕒 🏳️⚧️🦋
in reply to David • • •pal
in reply to David • • •I just say that he's not fascist but he's not my cup of tea
Digit
in reply to David • • •Tom Grzybow
in reply to David • • •