#eu
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Kent Navalesi ☕️

@KentNavalesi I would argue that Europeans are also unaware that the US can be very rule heavy compared to Europe, like for instance for construction. Most Europeans villas would run afoul of US zoning laws, or homeowner association rules. Elevators are another domain where US regulations have strangled the market, and of course trains.
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

those regulations also include other perks like:

- Prices you see in the store or online are final (no hidden fees).

- You get European movies and content on Netflix and other platforms

- When you order something, you get info when it will be delivered

- When you buy food, you know it’s safe to eat

- 2 years of free warranty for gadgets and electronics

- Your kid can go to school or get a degree regardless of your financial situation

… and that’s just scratching the surface

in reply to Fabio Manganiello

They're trying, at least...

But those 10 different connectors and adapters are still 10 different cables, they just all have usb-c plugs on now so you can't see the difference anymore.

Example: The multi-port 140W usb-c charger I bought last year came with a cable that would only charge at 10W. Different but identical looking cable, 60W.

Example: My Noco (so, not some Ali special) battery booster has a usb-c charging port, but only charges at the typical 7W of a micro-usb connection.

in reply to Fabio Manganiello

One might also point to small things like data roaming or consumer protection stuff like @iamkonstantin lists, and ask: which of these would likely have passed even without an EU? Most, I think.

Some things like enforcing standards like USB-C, *could* have happened without EU, but EU makes it more likely.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

One might point out that the chinese were first in mandating micro-USB for phones. Then EU came along mandating USB-C.

Also, one may acknowledge the (very small) benefits like phone connectors and roaming, larger benefits like climate policies (impotent, but still), and more, and still think that the downsides of bureaucracy, bad democracy deficit and ingrained, foundational neoliberalism equals net negative.

in reply to Fabio Manganiello

I'm a federalist, but even I have to recognise the EU is beyond reform, Europe needs a post-EU, federal future.

A monetary union lacking fiscal and investment structures means a structurally dysfunctional EU. A EU Commission that cannot be held responsible by it's constituents is structurally dysfunctional. A democratically elected EU parliament that can't draft laws is structurally dysfunctional. The Euro being a low-value Deutsche Mark, pushing Southern, deficit nations like Italy into endless austerity (causing the rise of populism), while keeping German exports strong, is structurally dysfunctional. Having strict budget deficit rules which cause perpetual austerity after periods of economic crisis, yet loosening those deficit rules only for military spending, is structurally dysfunctional.

No amount of USB-C and no roaming fees will cover the fact that the EU is at an impasse, and the current Brussels political class is invested in the status quo, that will lead to the unravelling of the Euro and the EU itself.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

I do not want to see a weak EU/Europe.

What I do want to see is politics for the people, far too much is still pleasing the criminal trump.

Lobbyists, stop pandering to them, kick them out of Brussels.

Why you say. Think Epsteins web of corruption was definitely not the only one.

Take the illegally transferred millions back from Hungary.

Ensure those who approved that transfer are appropriately punished

Stop LIES surveillance is not needed to protect children. Privacy is a right

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

in reply to Fabio Manganiello

ukpol, "brexit benefits"

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

Here in the US, its basically baked in to Republican politicians and business owners to complain about regulations. But what they forget (or ignore) is, most regulations aren't just dreamt up by someone trying to make life difficult. Most are there either to make things work (standards) or a reaction to people/businesses doing bad things (polluting, defrauding, etc). If companies choose community over higher profits, we wouldn't need so many regulations.
in reply to Fabio Manganiello

@cstross mmm, yes, I used to have one cable, a lightning cable, and it did everything. Now I have a cupboard full of USB-C cables. Some do 100W, some don’t, some do display port alt mode.

Did you know it’s possible to get a USB-C cable that only does USB2? I didn’t, until I only got USB2 speeds on my SSD.

Calling USB-C a standard is like calling all 4 legged animals dogs.

in reply to Charlie Stross

@cstross And I do get that, but I think this is a case of careful what you wish for. Lots of battery powered electronics now come with a USB-C charge cable that you want to throw in the bin, because it will get mixed up with all your other cables and you will use it and spend 30 minutes wondering why your device is slow/doesn't work. Of particular joy to those performing tech support for parents.

Apple tried to stop shipping cables with everything, and people got pissed about that too.