Skip to main content


Some good news about #Mastodon, there has been a very significant bit of code added which will automatically fetch all the replies in a thread. This means everyone will be able to see a thread's whole conversation no matter which server they are on! 🥳

The code has just been "merged" which means it should become available in the next update to Mastodon, hopefully within the next few months.

(Those who want the technical details can see the Pull Request at github.com/mastodon/mastodon/p…)

(Via @rolle)

in reply to Fedi.Tips

Almost!

This Pull Request only deals with public posts. It doesn't include follower-only-posts or -replies, since there was no time and no solution on how to tackle those sensibly.
However, recieving 99% of the replies and context is much better, than only a tiny fraction.

in reply to Your Weirdness

Follower-only posts are always going to be hidden to most people becuse it's a restricted post visibility, people are deliberately hiding their replies if they use it.

It's the public/unlisted replies that most people are missing when a public conversation is incomplete.

This entry was edited (21 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

I'm trying to understand...

Why would I not see all replies already with the current Mastodon version?
=>Some are not shown because they come from servers that are blocked by my home instance.
=>Some are not shown because they com from accounts that are blocked by me.
=>(Further reasons?)

I guess it is not the purpose of the update to circumvent measures like the above-mentioned blocks. So, what kind of replies do I currently not see and can be seen with the new version?

@rolle

in reply to Trötifant

At the moment, if there's a reply from an account that your server has not "noticed" then it may not be visible in the thread.

There's a whole list of scenarios where a server might notice an account or post:

fedi.tips/which-posts-and-acco…

TL:DR - To preserve resources, servers only show accounts and posts they have noticed. This keeps server costs low enough that anyone can start and run their own server, but has the side-effect of not showing everything from every server.

This entry was edited (21 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

Thanks! I misunderstood that this discovery limit would only apply to my timeline.
in reply to Fedi.Tips

@Voka Since this is merged, I'd start updating that post on the Fedi Tips website! 😀
in reply to Robert W. Gehl

That's what they will be testing in the real world before it is deployed. They already ran tests before merging this, but actually trying it out may reveal more stuff to tweak/fix.

Looking through the discussions about this feature, avoiding strain on server resources was one of the things that delayed this feature so long.

It may not be that bad though, this is just anecdotal but see here: neuromatch.social/@elduvelle/1…

This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
in reply to Robert W. Gehl

@rwg @Voka That's one of my concerns, too. I don't *need* to see everything especially if it's going to raise my hosting costs.

My other concern is whether my posts will be visible from - and whether I'll see posts from - servers I have blocked. I presume public posts are generally readable (e.g. via RSS) but I'm not clear on the details.

in reply to ScottMGS

@ScottMGS

Resources: Reading through the discussions on this feature, one of the things holding it up was a concern about using up too many resources. The reason it's happening now is because they think they have solved this, but they're going to test it first in the real world on a small number of servers to make sure.

Blocks: That's somewhat a separate issue as the efficacy of blocks for hiding public posts depends on things like activating authorized fetch: fedi.tips/authorized-fetch

in reply to Fedi.Tips

still missing the often requested but denied export and migration feature to move one's mastodon to a new server
in reply to Joerg Droege

@nafcom

You can already move accounts (fedi.tips/transferring-your-ma…).

If you mean moving posts, the posts remain on your old server and redirect people to your new account.

Moving Mastodon posts was attempted by Firefish but the moved posts were clones of the originals and they broke all of the discussion threads on the originals. Also the moving process overwhelmed the server as it involved potentially thousands of posts being added to the server at once from a single account.

in reply to Fedi.Tips

@nafcom The posts don't remain on your old server if it's being shut down, which is probably the main reason why people move to other servers. The current migration process is almost useless in that scenario
in reply to Robert Kingett

@WeirdWriter you mean the link github.com/mastodon/mastodon/p… that is on the OG toot? There you go. (I'm trying to make a joke on how threads are still broken)
@nafcom @FediTips @rolle
This entry was edited (21 hours ago)
in reply to João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)

Where can I find the Github issue link for the often requested but denied export and migration feature to move one's mastodon to a new server @jt_rebelo @nafcom @FediTips @rolle
in reply to Robert Kingett

@WeirdWriter @jt_rebelo @nafcom

I think they mean post migration, which has an issue at github.com/mastodon/mastodon/i…

in reply to Fedi.Tips

yes, my bad. Already added that issue and the previous one I had bookmarked (the problem on github between "issues" and "discussions" had its own meta since the beginning) to my answer. Thank you both
@WeirdWriter @nafcom
in reply to Fedi.Tips

it is important to point out that this is very experimental, behind a feature flag, and there will be a need for more changes to get it in front of people.
Also we don’t recommend activating it yet, this may have significant performance implications or bugs.

@rolle

in reply to Renaud Chaput

@renchap

Oh right, thanks for the info!

From the merge thread I thought it was ready to go but just needed a front end to avoid the need for manual page refreshes?

Will it appear in the updates/nightlys?

in reply to Fedi.Tips

as it is merged it will be in the next nightly, but disabled by default. If all works well it will go into a release, but right now we need to test it in the wild first before making any plans
in reply to Renaud Chaput

@renchap

Sounds like the perfect approach 👍

Thanks for taking the time to provide this info!

in reply to Fedi.Tips

Hallelujah! More than 6 years since it was explicitly reported, github.com/mastodon/mastodon/i…, for such a basic functionality that Pleroma, and probably many other fedi platforms, has had since so long... Jesus is coming 👍
This entry was edited (19 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

ahh you're spoiling the big update news for the next edition of Trunk & Tidbits 😜
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

@andypiper

Must be an amazing feeling to see the devs finally closing your issue today! 😀

in reply to Fedi.Tips

This is a great improvement, thanks!

"This means everyone will be able to see a thread's whole conversation no matter which server they are on! 🥳 "

#Mastodon

in reply to Fedi.Tips

given that an update rolled out literally a day or two ago and before that I think it was a week it should be sooner I would think
in reply to ꓤ uɐᗡ

@dannotdaniel

I am trying to manage people's expectations, as updates have sometimes taken months to appear 😅

Also, there's an additional thing that one of the devs @renchap has just pointed out, there may be tweaks needed before actual general release as its real world performance still needs to be checked.

in reply to Fedi.Tips

that seems like a significant hurdle but if it's in develop I think that means it'll be on the main instance soon which is a pretty excellent test
This entry was edited (19 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

Oh hey, now Smithereen isn't the only fediverse software that does this 😅
in reply to Fedi.Tips

this is amazing news and one of the limitations of Mastodon that bothered me the most.
in reply to Fedi.Tips

Will this obsolete github.com/nanos/FediFetcher ?
in reply to Astro

@astro
When the feature is actually deployed, it might reduce the need for it. However it may be a few months until that happens.
in reply to Fedi.Tips

@astro
See this reply from @michael
mstdn.thms.uk/@michael/1141501…
in reply to Fedi.Tips

why is merged in airquotes? what did actually happen?
This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
in reply to yetzt

@yetzt
Yes it did actually happen! It's just in quotes because my account is aimed at a non-technical audience, and the rest of the sentence explains what merging means.
in reply to manisha

Yes, indeed! Thank you so much to @jonny for your work on this, a lot of people all over the Fediverse are very happy to see it!
This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

I have the idea that things are already working like that. The only replies I don't see are from people I have muted and blocked, or vice versa. And I'm not on a super large server (around 500 active accounts). Anyway, it should have some advantages for smaller servers I suppose. The only issue I have is that spam will also be fetched.
in reply to joene 🏴🍉

You might be seeing a lot of replies but perhaps not all of them. It will also vary a lot depending on whether your server has noticed the people in the replies. There might be some threads where you don't see so many of the replies.

The idea of this feature is to take away the randomness of it, and let everyone see the same thread regardless of where they are or which accounts their server has noticed.

This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips

p.s. More info from one of Mastodon's core developers @renchap :

Fetch All Replies will be in the next experimental version of Mastodon (aka the "nightly" version). It will be disabled by default, but will be tested to see how it behaves on a small number of real servers. Once the developers are confident it works okay, they will release it fully to everyone.

Server admins are free to use nightly versions at their own risk, so you may see this on some servers before the "official" release.

in reply to Fedi.Tips

So in order for me to see all replies to a given post, will the feature need to be enabled on my server, on the original poster's server, or both?
in reply to Fedi.Tips

now they just need to fix their thundering herd problem mastodon.social/@hyc/111178941…
in reply to Fedi.Tips

I can't believe Mastodon is finally becoming a proper social media. This partial view of threads was really frustrating and keeping me from engaging in discussions and conversations. Really looking forward to the update.
in reply to Fedi.Tips

That’s great news!

Does this also work in reverse? I sometimes stumble on replies but can not see the original post (have to jump to the original instance to see it)

in reply to Wu Evar 🇺🇦

@maschinentraum

It should show you the entire thread when you click on it, you may need to reload the page.

By the way, I think you can already do this if you just want to see the post being replied to? If you click on a reply to focus on it and then reload the page, you should see the post its replying to appear above?

in reply to Fedi.Tips

thanks. When I see this it reminds me to drop some money to my instance.
in reply to Fedi.Tips

I for one do not look forward to this. Having threads look different from different accounts was one of the last "charming" qualities of this place. It's slowly but surely turning itself into a less efficient Twitter. 😕
in reply to Peter H. Fröhlich

@phf

This isn't imposing the same thread on everyone. User blocks and server blocks still prevent particular posts being visible for example, as do user filters etc. Admins of servers have ultimate control over what is visible on their servers.

All this feature does is make servers notice the public non-blocked posts in threads that their users are wanting to browse.

in reply to Fedi.Tips

By Grabthar’s Hammer, what a development.

Hooray from a tiny instance.