Skip to main content

pleroma - Link to source
>Microsoft will enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA)
in reply to mangeurdenuage :gondola_head: 🌿

Q.U.I.N.N.
akkoma - Link to source
Q.U.I.N.N.
• •
2fa is at least not malicious
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

Q.U.I.N.N.
akkoma - Link to source
Q.U.I.N.N.
• •
i would use it more but places like discord use 2fa as an excuse to deny account support. so i leave it off in case i forget the password (i do not have anywhere to store 'scratch codes' and other such easily lost shit.)
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

mangeurdenuage :gondola_head: 🌿
pleroma - Link to source
mangeurdenuage :gondola_head: 🌿
• •
@icedquinn Depends on how it's done. If you require me to have a phone to have 2FA I consider you should be stoned.
If you tell me to have a nitro key or any hardware compatible 2FA system that is offline, even a optical disc with a keyfile on it could work, I have no issues with that.
@Q.U.I.N.N.
in reply to mangeurdenuage :gondola_head: 🌿

Q.U.I.N.N.
akkoma - Link to source
Q.U.I.N.N.
• •
its usually a magic link to your email address. which is kind of crap considering smtp-to-smtp has no actual guarantees of security whatsoever.
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

Q.U.I.N.N.
akkoma - Link to source
Q.U.I.N.N.
• •
the phone number thing is literally just data cattle. twitter lost some lawsuit about that. turned out everyone ignoring NIST is because it was never about security in the first place.
⇧