🚨 ID checks to get online could become the new norm 🚨
A new amendment would give the UK government sweeping powers to block access to lawful information and communications.
That's unless we submit our identification to a bounty of providers.
Tell your MP to stop this broad and repressive law ⬇️
action.openrightsgroup.org/no-…
#privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #digitalID #onlinesafety #ukpolitics #ukpol
No ID Checks for Web Access
Take action! What’s the problem? The Government has proposed amendments to the Children Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which would give Ministers the power to restrict access to "internet services".Open Rights Group
reshared this
Open Rights Group
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •New powers would let Ministers pick and choose what should be restricted, as well as impose curfews on access.
All without having to prove sites are harmful for children.
They don’t just cover social media, but all 'Internet services’ – blogs, websites, online games and more.
This is overreach.
lbc.co.uk/article/under-16-soc…
#privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #digitalID #onlinesafety #ukpolitics #ukpol
Lords-backed under-16 social media ban to be overturned as Labour prepares its own measures | LBC
Chay Quinn (LBC)Open Rights Group
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •All adults would have to do a digital ID check to establish their age with third-parties so they can access any service.
If you don't, you could face blocks or time restricted curfews.
These powers could be used by any government in the UK to restrict access to almost any online service you could imagine.
#privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #digitalID #onlinesafety #ukpolitics #ukpol
Open Rights Group
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •This is no longer about banning under-16s from social media.
It’s about control over all information and forcing adults to go through digital ID checks to access the Internet.
Forcing us to submit our identity or biometric data to an array of different providers poses significant privacy risks.
#privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #digitalID #onlinesafety #ukpolitics #ukpol
reshared this
Azuaron, Shannon Prickett and GhostOnTheHalfShell reshared this.
RevK
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •reshared this
Aral Balkan and Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷 reshared this.
Garbage Data 🦝
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •Callista Graves
in reply to Garbage Data 🦝 • • •@anomalocarididae and now the state of California has decided to start down this road with their requirements of operating systems to have an age attestation mechanism touching every conceivable piece of software.
Imagine this, I need to search the Apt repository for dumb-app, but I need to verify my age! So, curl, ls, less, more, wc plus thousands of little binaries in a Unix like system.
Governor Newsom is trash.
ramshackle
in reply to Callista Graves • • •StoneBear
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •It's also about making a barrier to entry for new providers that (mostly Amerikaanse) BigTech have already cleared, thus allowing them to corner the market. #fuckBigTech
Relevant: goblincorps.com/ageless-linux.… (the "The Quiet Part" tab expands on my point)
Ageless Linux: Software for Humans of Indeterminate Age
goblincorps.comNorry Nowt
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •punIssuer
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •it never gets old, huh?
Comic by John Jonik, 2005...
reshared this
Shannon Prickett and Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈 reshared this.
:🍪:Semele
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •Mercurial
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •Markie 🤸
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •I love you, I'm proud of you.
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •all isps are directly linked to a legal identity or entity.
This is redundant.
IainB
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •exactly what i said they would do.
Protect the children is always the excuse to destroy privacy.
they actually don't care at all about children, for proof their representative in the US was a pedophile.
plan-A (゚ヮ゚)
in reply to Open Rights Group • •inon
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •omar
in reply to Open Rights Group • • •What about Epstein networks with all the information in clear available and people identified which would deserve more scrutiny and effort?
Show us how real you are about protecting children.