The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
Heads-up for anyone who doesn't want their posts scraped and handed over to an LLM.
alpaca.gold/@seldo/11628609961…
(Quote replaced with link since I was blocked.)
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
reshared this
mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)
in reply to Cassandrich • • •reshared this
Cassandrich and Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Hashbangperl
in reply to mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Cassandrich • • •More context:
reshared this
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, María Arias de Reyna and Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
DB
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Cassandrich
in reply to DB • • •reshared this
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 and Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@lawyersgunsnmoney he them goes and insults everyone here who values privacy even the slightest to top it all off.
Then criticized the Fediverse and pointing reason why he left.
Just typical harassment/abuser "You are the problem, not me! It's all your fault."
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
GunChleoc
in reply to Yvan ー イボん 🗺️ • • •DB
in reply to GunChleoc • • •DB
in reply to Cassandrich • • •For awareness:
@mastodonmigration
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
wyatt
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to wyatt • • •Dopes The Frogman
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Faraiwe
in reply to Cassandrich • • •holy fuck, how is that individual, instance AND client still NOT BANNED???
Cc @stux
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
tired
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
in reply to tired • • •To sell to others 🤷
Cassandrich
in reply to Yvan ー イボん 🗺️ • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@YvanDaSilva @xri Like, if you have techbro brain and someone in your replies says something insightful in a way you haven't heard before, it has a chance of breaking thru and making you reconsider things.
But if you get it "summarized" by replacing it with a blend of the closest commonly-repeated stuff from your corpus, you're gonna interpret it as "oh yeah, just more of the same complaints I've already dismissed".
It's basically "turning your audience into yes-men as a service", which sounds like his peers would love it.
Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
in reply to Cassandrich • • •🌸 lumi-nhac 🌱
in reply to Cassandrich • • •princess pancake
in reply to Cassandrich • • •that sounds like "blocking" here means not appearing on someone else's feed
The Mastodon API is publicly available and blocking the author of the app or the instance won't do anything
Cassandrich
in reply to princess pancake • • •In the case of this app, it scrapes from its user's feed, so if you block its user, you will not be in the feed it scrapes.
These techbros want us to believe their "it's silly to have norms if the machine can't enforce them" bullshit. Here, whatever blocking we can do is a statement of our disapproval of their attempts to bypass our consent and reduce the damage, not a surrender of our standing to demand they stop doing things that technical measures fundamentally can't stop.
Cassandrich
2026-03-25 11:23:59
sarah tonin
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@natty so you need to block every single user who uses this, and they definitely won't all report it
nice
at least the search engine projects are few and far between and have generally few accounts needed to block, but this is every user which is significantly worse
princess pancake
in reply to sarah tonin • • •ActivityPub - Mastodon documentation
docs.joinmastodon.orgCassandrich
in reply to princess pancake • • •Cassandrich
in reply to sarah tonin • • •Roknrol
in reply to Cassandrich • • •princess pancake
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to princess pancake • • •effika
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich reshared this.
Luisf
in reply to Cassandrich • • •what a shithead
ah yes of course, wanting privacy and consent to be respected is "being a tedious bastard"
Queer Naèl
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Barmaid
in reply to Queer Naèl • • •@Lisoo on va bloquer les utilisateurs connus de l'application en question mais ça ne va pas suffire.
--milia, admin
Shalien
in reply to Barmaid • • •https://corneill.es/users/ilusenn
in reply to Cassandrich • • •I was thinking "maybe we should have reacted differently" but turns out this hypocrite techbro really doesn't give a shit about consent, so give him hell
WishGate
in reply to Cassandrich • • •The issue is that you would have to block every single account using their app, if you want to keep control over this, which doesn't sound scalable.
I'm not sure how an efficient protection against that would look like, though.
Cassandrich
in reply to WishGate • • •Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
in reply to Cassandrich • • •that escalated very quickly.
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
khm
in reply to Yvan ー イボん 🗺️ • • •tedious bastards who want to use social media to socialize with each other instead of minmaxing the Engagement
CC: @dalias@hachyderm.io
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Keen Grasp
in reply to khm • • •🎯 exactly this. Everything about being human, filed under "tedium," and the only thing we can consider "not tedium" is Number Go Up.
Faraiwe
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Cassandrich
in reply to Faraiwe • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Faraiwe
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
The Orange Theme
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Mark Down
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Cassander
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Just block the whole alpaca gold domain, since he's the owner:
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Light
in reply to Cassander • • •How would that work?
>[you'd have to block] Me personally, and also anyone who uses the app. It's just a mastodon client, fetching the timeline. It looks like every other mastodon client.
@dalias
EllenMarch2
in reply to Cassander • • •Cassander
in reply to EllenMarch2 • • •EllenMarch2
in reply to Cassander • • •Jadus
in reply to Cassander • • •smeg
in reply to Cassander • • •Cassander
in reply to smeg • • •XANTRONIX
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
The Orange Theme
in reply to XANTRONIX • • •Crow
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Charo del Genio
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Andreas
in reply to Charo del Genio • • •@paraw
You can't.
Every instance admin would have to intercept API requests and check the origin if it is the Zeitgeist instance and block them.
But you can also just grab the code and run your own instance.
The vibe-coding author mentioned to add #noindex and #nobots support but based on his messages and reactions this won't happen.
Sissas
in reply to Cassandrich • • •"And anyone who uses the app" these dudes will never understand consensual opt-in
alpaca.gold/@seldo/11628620271…
Laurie Voss
2026-03-24 21:10:38
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Lykrast
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Furbland's Very Cool Account™ reshared this.
Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
Unknown parent • • •jiub
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Graham Downs
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Funny, I was just thinking the other day it would be really nice if Mastodon gave me the option of opting IN to have my posts scraped by an LLM.
Because I remember that cool Twitter game a few months ago where you could ask ChatGPT to analyse your Twitter profile and tell you all about yourself, and it was often way off, sometimes on the nose, and always hilarious.
I tried to do that with my Mastodon profile, and it told me sorry, it is unable to access my Mastodon profile because it's been blocked.
https://ohai.social/users/robchapman
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Siegfried.
in reply to Cassandrich • • •And does blocking really help?
sortius
in reply to Cassandrich • • •fan boy 🪭
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to fan boy 🪭 • • •@notyourfanboy "Welcome to the real world, where anyone can rob your house by smashing your windows and climbing inside."
Do you see how deranged that sounds?
We expect people not to do this because it's antisocial, illegal, and wrong. Not because there's some technical measure (which of course is impossible) preventing it.
smeg reshared this.
tian2992
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@notyourfanboy while I agree with the pushback against non-consensual scrapping, systems based only on good faith are unsustainable. Of course robbing a house is unethical and antisocial yet we still base the idea of home security expecting there will be bad actors that will do it.
Same as with scrapping public fediverse content, it is already probably happening, more extensively and way less visibly that’s someone openly advertising their actions.
Cassandrich
in reply to tian2992 • • •HollieK
in reply to Cassandrich • • •As far as I can tell, he's removed the options to block from the "three dots," probably because he doesn't want everyone to just block him. Is there another way that we can access the block option for this slop domain?
Childless Bambino
in reply to HollieK • • •HollieK
in reply to Childless Bambino • • •@kendricklmao8
They're greyed out - if I hover over the dots all it shows is a box saying Menu, and nothing else. I can't click on the box - it's not clickable.
Thanks for the advice, though. I'll try again later.
HollieK
in reply to HollieK • • •Childless Bambino
in reply to HollieK • • •Yvan ー イボん 🗺️
in reply to HollieK • • •If you want to block another domain, there is also alpaca.blue
maelstrom
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Blocking the author won't help because it's based on who is using the client. Author said they'd add noindex support, so you can add that flag and your posts should no longer show up.
If your instance doesn't support that, there's also #nobots. Disclaimer: I have not checked the code to see if this has been added yet
#nobots
dzsr
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
Unknown parent • • •Vysogota
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Hashbangperl
in reply to Cassandrich • • •I guess by work he means "make me money from others creativity"
dexternemrod
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Because of this insult:
alpaca.gold/@seldo/11628629571… I wanted to report the account. Turns out, the person is the admin of the server. So I blocked alpaca.gold for my account.
Laurie Voss
2026-03-24 21:34:17
Cassandrich
in reply to dexternemrod • • •dexternemrod
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to dexternemrod • • •@dexternemrod A lot of folks don't understand how reporting works on fedi. When you report a post/account, you're reporting it to the moderation staff for *your own instance*, regardless of where the account you're reporting lives. Your mods can then block the account from appearing to anyone on your instance, limit it so it only shows up to ppl looking for it (kinda like a shadowban), or just keep track of the report for making future moderation decisions about the user or the instance they came from.
You can also choose to forward the report (anonymized to protect you from retaliation if the remote admins are aligned with the abuse, but even then they can sometimes guess) to the reported account's instance and/or the instances of anyone else included in the post's @'s. This might get them banned from their own instance if the instance owner doesn't approve of what they're doing, and it might help other instances block them if their instance doesn't act.
https://kolektiva.social/users/MHowell
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@MHowell @dexternemrod See also:
Cassandrich
2026-03-25 11:23:59
dexternemrod
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@MHowell
+1
That Dud Bloke
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Gemma ⭐️🔰🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🎐
in reply to Cassandrich • • •dragonfrog
in reply to Cassandrich • • •The Orange Theme
in reply to dragonfrog • • •jbaggs
in reply to The Orange Theme • • •Cassandrich
in reply to jbaggs • • •The Orange Theme
in reply to Cassandrich • • •reshared this
Cassandrich and viq reshared this.
Eli the Bearded
in reply to Cassandrich • • •DoomsdaysCW
in reply to Cassandrich • • •I blocked and reported. It seems to me that mining folks' posts would be a violation of some server terms (I believe it is a violation of Kolektiva's terms). Many folks have their posts set to auto-delete, so this definitely seems like Seldo's product would be recording posts that would otherwise disappear. I also noticed that some folks from Kolektiva are following that account.
#LLMs #Fediverse #Datamining #AutoDelete #Safety #Security
dr 🛠️🛰️📡🎧
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to dr 🛠️🛰️📡🎧 • • •adingbatponder 👾
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to adingbatponder 👾 • • •@adingbatponder This person (seldo) made a web-based social media client that logs into your Mastodon/Bsky/etc. accounts, grabs everything in your feed, and sends it off to an "AI" service for them to turn into a "summary" so you can "catch up on what people are posting" without actually reading it.
When challenged about lack of consent to have our writing turned over to "AI" companies for them to process and keep and incorporate into their models, his response was very hostile and suggested blocking him so he can't see our posts. That only solves the problem for his use of his client, not the problem of other people potentially using it.
MrGrumpyMonkey
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
Unknown parent • • •@IceWolf Of course anyone who can read them *can* do that. That's always possible. Just like, despite the movie industry pretending all the hellish DRM they impose makes it impossible, anyone can record movies off Netflix just by pointing a camera at their screen. It's impossible to keep someone from copying and sharing copies of something they can see.
This doesn't mean it's socially acceptable or legal. What the AI companies are doing and what the people like seldo feeding our data to them are doing is absolutely illegal, unethical, and a deep violation of privacy and consent. And they need to experience consequences for it.
Jens Jäger
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Jens Jäger • • •Dr. Bruce Simpson
Unknown parent • • •Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed AtAnarchic Teapot ⚧️
in reply to Cassandrich • • •❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻
in reply to Cassandrich • • •thanks for the heads up.
What a jerk he is
Cassandrich
Unknown parent • • •@drwho @mek2600 @gunchleoc @YvanDaSilva @lawyersgunsnmoney Unless you have users on your instance using his AI-scraper client, he's not making any http connections to your instance.
He and his app's users are following you from their own instances, so your posts get federated there, and then they're letting the app log in to their instances and scrape everything from there.
The only use of IP blocking is if you're worried you have local users who might try out his app.
GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Ben Todd
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Cassandrich • •Cassandrich
in reply to Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Cassandrich • — (0.0.0.0) •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Cassandrich • — (0.0.0.0) •There are 8 other users on that server >>> don't give them a chance it could be all his with other mails.