I personally consider "I asked ChatGPT to generate a response to you" not witty but a form of an insult. Don't do that please. If that is how you want to talk to people at least don't tell me. It's offensive.
reshared this
⇧
reshared this
FräuleinInformation (Klarname)
in reply to tante • • •publictorsten
in reply to tante • • •mastodon.social/@warandpeas/11…
War and Peas 🧿
2026-03-24 13:15:27
SnoopJ
in reply to tante • • •aburka 🫣
in reply to SnoopJ • • •reshared this
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 and morgan reshared this.
Hannah (With a snake problem 🐍)
in reply to tante • • •Sensitive content
"I asked ChatGPT" sounds like "I don't even really care what I write to you."
The only response should be "Not wasting my time with someone that does not want to have an honest talk."
pela0
in reply to tante • • •Perkele
in reply to tante • • •Juffo-Wup
in reply to tante • • •I am encountering more and more "helpful" people that AI-splain answers.
"I heard that you asked about xyz. I don't know the answer, but I asked chatgpt for you, and it said...."
WTF? Jusk keep quiet, if I wanted a slop answer I could ask the slop-o-mat myself!
Tanek Rune
in reply to tante • • •I realize that the only way I could respond to that would be: "cool, but I didn't ask chatgpt. What's your response?"
Then I could watch their brain short circuit having to internalize and paraphrase chatgpt. Or at least, they'd be leery to mention that ever again.
Femme Malheureuse
in reply to tante • • •Being Left Behind Enjoyer
in reply to tante • • •dbu
in reply to Being Left Behind Enjoyer • • •We used it when people adked trivial questions they should just have looked up themselves.
Ben 🏴☠️
in reply to Being Left Behind Enjoyer • • •reshared this
Being Left Behind Enjoyer and Deadly Headshot reshared this.
Justin M
in reply to Ben 🏴☠️ • • •Dan Leech
in reply to tante • • •Reginald
in reply to tante • • •In the movie "A Soldier's Story," the black Captain Davenport visits the white camp commandant's home. The commandant's wife brings the commandant a drink on the hot day, and solicitously offers to "have someone bring you a drink" to Davenport.
Yes, she maintains propriety towards an officer reporting to her husband, but no, she absolutely will not personally hand a drink to a black man.
Same energy.
Guillaume Ross
in reply to tante • • •Plan-A
in reply to tante • — (0.0.0.0) •@tante I make my own LLM and learn it with feeds that I scrape from the net to regard that or fallback to cloud DataBase if not covered and no need for internet nor API ... yes , the prompt context is only point of failure but after correcting the thing you have your good answer ; )
Note that I only scrape public domains. Legally with a simple http request to text.
The feed goes into another app the halllucination checker with 5 metrics.
But if you scrape official docs and manpages you can't have any hallucination.
From there it is really the context of your prompt.
Imran Nazar ~ عمران نزر
in reply to Plan-A • • •Magnus Ahltorp
in reply to Plan-A • • •Rupert V/
in reply to Plan-A • • •Plan-A
in reply to Rupert V/ • •Lauri Kotilainen
in reply to tante • • •For me, the absolute worst context is a work discussion where someone says this. To me, it communicates ”I don’t know this subject, and now it’s your job to figure out if this tracks with reality.”
I’ve made it a personal policy to ignore the contents that follow those words _and_ inform the person speaking of it too.
Plan-A
in reply to Lauri Kotilainen • •Philipp Alexander Vollmer
in reply to tante • • •stux⚡️
in reply to tante • • •Agreed
I explicitly note in emails that there was no use of AI/LLM’s in any way, just to make it clear
John Maxwell
in reply to tante • • •Plan-A
in reply to tante • — (0.0.0.0) •People make me mad with Gemini told me as well you know, but I don't call that proper AI hygiene.
And if it's for ransacking servers by abusing them there is a red line, the difference between my idea and your perception and I agree it is what happens most around us. Is not the same thing.
Something a proper LLM user can not do is reach the internet.
yes laugh.
bbbhltz
in reply to tante • • •Plan-A
in reply to tante • •Dave Rahardja
in reply to tante • • •LoseFriendsandAlienatePeople
in reply to tante • • •Nicole Parsons
in reply to tante • • •The tech industry spent years and billions to create real world products to help businesses get ahead.
futurism.com/future-society/da…
nypost.com/2026/03/25/business…
forbes.com/sites/phoebeliu/202…
Now the entire industry has been subsumed into furthering fossil fuel funded fascism, scams, & state surveillance data harvesting.
theguardian.com/technology/202…
washingtonexaminer.com/policy/…
techradar.com/pro/very-signifi…
theguardian.com/technology/202…
reuters.com/technology/britain…
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
sfchronicle.com/tech/article/p…
1/
From CBS to TikTok, US media are falling to Trump’s allies. This is how democracy crumbles | Owen Jones
Owen Jones (the Guardian)rozie
in reply to tante • • •Why? Because it suggests you are not smart enough to do something? Or some other reason?
I guess it is transparent. It provides help (the best given person can give, probably), the source and instructions how to get it by yourself in the future. If you don't like it, you can just ignore the answer. Or person.
Plan-A
in reply to rozie • •like this
rozie likes this.
Rupert V/
in reply to tante • • •pookiesorcery
in reply to tante • • •Hidde
in reply to tante • • •chomwitt
in reply to tante • • •divVerent
in reply to tante • • •Gaëtan Perrault
in reply to tante • • •putting aside the general hate for these systems, there's actually a clear breakdown in comms if that's how they're choosing to respond.
You're talking to or emailing them because you need some type of information or consensus. ChatGPT cannot generate information or provide consensus. At best it can link to information that exists but isn't somehow visible. Which is a different failing.
Like, we already have enough BS email conversation, I don't need you to use the BS machine to generate more. If you're not using ChatGPT to respond in a structured way, you're just burying other failures in BS.
Which is definitely its own form of failure.
Plan-A
in reply to tante • •Mason Loring Bliss
in reply to tante • • •Crystal_Fish_Caves
in reply to Mason Loring Bliss • • •@mason
👌 corrolary to;
"I fart in your general direction"
Esme Ciredutemps
in reply to tante • • •Crystal_Fish_Caves
in reply to tante • • •"I asked chatgpt to respond because you mean so little to me I dont care if you get impersonal inaccurate information and am hoping you take the hint and kindly fuck off and die in a corner.
K?"
is what I would mean if I ever said that to anyone. Actually I would kindof like to have that opportunity.
the elder sea
in reply to tante • • •@tante
Brie Mmm reshared this.
David Mankins
in reply to tante • • •In this particular circumstance, I don’t think you’re being very fair to the person who told you that they’d sought an answer to a question you asked, and what they found when they did so.
They even took the trouble to tell you the source of what they found, allowing you to judge the credibility of the information.
Of course, you may have thought their choice of resource was not consistent with your way of thinking, and perhaps you assumed that they follow you closely enough to know this (not an unreasonable assumption, if a bit self-centered).
At least you had the decency not to call out the person whose help you rejected and subject them to a pile-on resulting from your own mistaken reading of their reply.