Skip to main content


Sometime in your life, you might encounter an entitled insufferable controlling and abusive busybody, who has to intrude with overly judgmental accusations and deranged attempts to punish you over simple disagreements or nothing at all

There's a number of ways to deal with them

Some terrible, some ok...

Some spectacular:

πŸ˜‚

This entry was edited (2 days ago)

reshared this

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I've found that behaving exactly as if they're not even there - as if they're both invisible and inaudible - also works, pushing their anger over the threshold past which it collapses into futile exasperation.

I've only once encountered a full-fledged Karen in the wild, and simply ignored her. Admittedly this was partly because I just didn't have the spoons that day for an argument, but it worked a treat!

in reply to The Sleight Doctor πŸƒ

@ApostateEnglishman

that's one good way. the important thing is to *never* match their energy. they're irrationally angry. if you respond with anger it becomes a farcical bonfire of inanity, or something worse

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I think it depends on how good a snap judge of character you are. There are definitely some folks who'll be so surprised by your matching and/or exceeding their energy, they'll instantly back down.

But generally speaking you're right: it's a better bet to stay calm and rational with those who are angry and irrational.

in reply to Kierkegaanks regretfully

(rant) I’d like to see a public trial of the coding cunts that forces a word like β€œme” into β€œmedia” just by pressing space when you are thping normally, but won’t change thping into typing after five attempt of hitting y
in reply to Kierkegaanks regretfully

the secretion is to embrace the autocorrect misfires
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

i can handle typos, but i struggle with the software chimichangas out a whole wallpaper
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Just need to learn to speak autocorrect. "I struggle when the software changes out a whole word."
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I love this guy.

I have to say, while neither deadly nor particularly world-shattering, sanctimony is one of those things that has become the bane of my everyday existence.

There’s a lot of it about. Clearly people get some secret pleasure from being sanctimonious. And there’s no political orientation that’s free of it.

Social media is drowning in it.

in reply to Madeleine Morris

@Remittancegirl

yeah when i posted this i had the secret agenda of calling out behavior i've seen out there on social media, and then the fantasy sequence of the perfect reaction to it in the video. i'm inspired

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

that poor confused dog πŸ˜‚ (the closer one). It's face as it looks between the guy and the giggling camera person πŸ˜‚
I wonder what the original issue was? something about going down a private dock?
in reply to IHateFireworks

@ProcessParsnip

yes

here's the original source of the video with some commentary (anonymous sources so who knows about veracity) that this woman and her husband confront anyone who goes near their houseboat:

mastodon.social/@benroyce/1150…

and the dogs look so nonplussed. i think they're used to this sort of thing

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I love him!
But unfortunately I can't understand what _she_ said. He broke a law by doing _what_?
in reply to Horst Trumtins Electro Shark

i linked to the original source of the video in this comment:

mastodon.social/@benroyce/1150…

it happened in seattle last year and the indication (from anonymous accounts, so not 100% certain and i can't find a news source) is that this woman and her husband are a menace to anyone who goes near their houseboat

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@populistensohn a close friend lived in a floating home in Seattle for some years. They did have a problem with people going out of their way to walk down their (dead end) dock, staring into everyone's homes. They called them 'looky-loos' and it wasn't allowed but folks invaded their privacy all the time anyway

So if it's that situation? I kinda get it. If it's a through way/the signs aren't clear/he turned right around and left without being nosey? Fair reaction.

in reply to Noodlemaz

@noodlemaz @populistensohn

yeah for all we know this guy did do something inconsiderate. i would tend to think no, only because someone of such demonstrated emotional intelligence would also not be the kind of person to transgress like that, but that is a highly speculative statement on my part

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

good reaction, people is made so inflexible and judgemental by stress and unhappiness. πŸ₯²
in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora

we're all miserable to some extent

the entitlement to dump that on others though... πŸ™„

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

it isn't entitlmenet, but a mental issue: the pandemic of loneliness can erode some people's self-control and the only solution is reestablishing a rich, serene social life. She needs to live in a better environment to get back healthy.

Do you feel miserable very often?

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora

If that is just a "mental issue", then doesn't that just make every shitty behavior explicable with the same label?

Misogyny - oh, mental issue
Racism - yup, mental issue
Rapist - mental issue for sure
Murderer - ditto

Oh well, nothing to do here, I guess

@benroyce

in reply to Matthew Loxton

@mloxton I think non-confrontational discussions benefit the health of both parties. "Karen's" are overstressed, emotional women, so active listening is often a good start to de-escalate tensions and find common ground. If you manage to establish a lighthearted, polite relationship, the other person might become less callous and more incline to forgive any future mistake.

Kindness and a smile may even help preventing legal litigations.πŸ˜‰

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora
Nice
You understand that is a circular and self-defeating argument, though, right?

Like if "Karen" freaks out and delivers a racist diatribe because of being overstressed and emotional and needs active listening, de-escalation, and common ground, then when "Amanda" yells at her for being an entitled racist shithouse, we shouldn't criticize Amanda, and everyone, including Karen, should understand that Amanda is overstressed, emotional, and needs ...

Do you see this?
@benroyce

in reply to Matthew Loxton

@mloxton I understand your concern, but my point isn't to condone or excuse abusive behavior. 😬 Rather, it's to acknowledge that de-escalation techniques can be effective in reducing tensions and promoting constructive dialogue, even in difficult situations. Matthew, active listening and empathy are tools to prevent and sedate conflict, not a replacement for accountability! πŸ™‚

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora
There are a ton of techniques that could be effective, but you are assuming that some large number of people have the spoons to do these techniques on the nearly half of the population trying hard to be as obnoxious as they can as a form of ingroup value signaling to their fellow fascists.

None of us are the calm, unemotional, and fully regulated clinicians that can do that. We are ALL overstressed and the best we can manage is to yell at Karens and say how shitty

@benroyce

in reply to Matthew Loxton

@mloxton could you explain why are you using the term "fascist" here and now?
Seems out of place in this discussion about daily quarrels which can be easily handled with some common sense.

If you let your instincts control your mouth, if you label your interlocutor "fascist" or in any other libelious way, you'll never be able to achieve a serene and productive discussion.

In particular, yelling is a manifestation of verbal violence and the last thing you should do.

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora
Because, Lorenzo, the "here" we are talking about is America, and the "now" is the midst of a fascist takeover and destruction of the society

What you are talking about is an ideal situation in an ideal environment with everyone but the "Karen" staying calm, using complex psychosocial de-escalation tools, and staying regulated in the face of a large chunk of the rest of the population eagerly throwing their aggression around and beating up on BIPoC and LGBTQ+ people

@benroyce

in reply to Matthew Loxton

@mloxton America isn't the world. πŸ˜…
You are discussing with an Italian. We're literally the inventors of fascism.

No fascist is involved. Matthew, my people died, don't reuse the term for futile things.

---

Listening and questioning without yelling isn't complex. You only need basic self-control. If you fail, call the police, report any abuse and wait in silence if necessary.

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@mloxton try to be humble. The only way to understand what the others really think is to listen.

If you can't listen, you'll never learn anything, you'll never understand people, you'll never have a peaceful life.

You have two ears but only one mouth after all.

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

Matthew's problem with your words here is you show care and concern for the aggressor in this situation, and not the victim. This renders your concerns and observations specious

Also: in the USA, the hyperaggressive entitlement in the video is pretty much Trump supporters. Matthew's connection makes sense to me as an American

But I have an honest and sincere question for you, not a troll or flame:

Why, when you watch this video, is your concern for the aggressor?

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @mloxton
OoooKay.
Overstressed. And. Emotional. Women. Hope you’re single.

Look son, I live with a great deal of stress. HOWEVER as I am an ADULT who is in charge of their emotions I go out of my way to not be a wretched example of humanity who equates ownership with superiority.
This woman is, in simple terms, an asshole. They come in all shapes sizes colors and genders and being an asshole is a personal decision.

in reply to Catherine is not complacent

@CatDragon every human is different. Emotion is a wonderful form of intelligence, only more difficult to control. There is nothing wrong in being emotional.

Sometimes stressed people display arrogance as a defensive behaviour, but personal improvement requires healthy social relationships.
It's one of the ways the self-destructive spiral of isolation feeds off itself.

Show kindness to break the spiral and your interlocutor may stop seeing everything in a negative light. πŸ™‚

@benroyce

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

why do you do this?

why do you speak in defense of a bully?

why do you frame aggressive behavior as something to explain, rather than condemn?

why do you use waffle words like "emotional" for what is clearly abuse?

why?

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Would you call a newborn a bully? Of course not.
Her demeanour isn't innate, but acquired through a combination of overemotional temperament and hostile social environment.

Insulting her or condemning her won't make her a better person. She will remain a torn for society and you will keep feeling hatred.

However, in a kinder, safer, friendly social environment she wouldn't feel the need to bully. She would become a resource for society and you would find serenity.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

i can listen to every single one of your observations

i can agree with every single one of them

and none of them changes the fact we have an abuser, and a victim

and this is the most important observation, to say anything coherent on the topic

so why do you think you're saying anything useful on the topic by being unable to see, or selectively avoiding, the most important point on the topic?

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I'm open to assist, could you please point at what you find incoherent? What were your expectations when I started discussing with you? What do you think my words lack?

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

You're lacking nothing in your analysis of the reasons behind the abuser's behavior. I agree with every single one of them

If we were analyzing her behavior in a vacuum it would be a quality conversation

But you are failing to note that once the abuser commits an act of abuse, all of the care and concern you demonstrate should flow to the victim of the abuse. To continue to grant attention and concern for the abuser is counterproductive to your own stated concerns

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

when something dire happens, both the victim and the abuser need the same amount of attention, because both are at risk of becoming a burden to society: the victim must receive adequate help, compensation and protection; the abuser proportional punishment, sanctioning and rehabilitation in a healthy environment.

In this case, the victim handled everything well and apparently nothing noteworthy needs to be done, saving everyone's time.

Did I remember everyone this time? πŸ™‚

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

good. now go further

your analysis and concern before this comment began and ended with the abuser. all of your attention was on them

if you truly cared about fighting the problem you're concerned with, you would scope your analysis to include the victim up front. and you would conclude with consequences for the abuser for their unacceptable behavior, and care and concern for the victim in dealing with their abuse

this is the true path to solving the problem

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

the world is trapped in a cycle of violence

the solution is not merely analyzing the psychology of those committing violence against others

in fact that's cut and dry and obvious

the solution is consequences for those committing violence

i don't think you're making excuses for them, but you're at that doorway. with where your attention is focused and the rationalizations you present

this is very sore for americans

because this mode of thought is why we have trump

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

the world goes beyond America: you're talking with an Italian, a sovereign country of the European Union. Healthcare and education are free, Trump isn't our president, guns are heavily regulated, verbal and physical aggressions are sanctioned, love is encouraged, differences are tolerated, Fascism and Nazism are history. πŸ™‚

Studying and describing doesn't imply endorsement. πŸ˜…
I think punishments are OK ...if aimed at rehabilitation... but vendetta is always detrimental.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

i wasn't changing the topic, i was explaining why you're getting so much negativity, and why you think an absurd redirect to fascism isn't so absurd

people rationalizing an abuser, and ignoring victims, is our problem

in america

and your problem, in italy

the entire world

very simply:

in this little video, your focus, your attention, is all wrong

(and i don't think lesbians would take kindly to your description of how wonderful life in italy is under meloni)

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I find this discussion to be quite calming and positive. Don't worry Ben, if I'll stop feeling at ease, I'll just stop answering.

What I described you isn't related to Italy in particular, but to all sovereign nations of the European Union. Those are just the basic rights and expectations everyone has here.πŸ™‚

All same-sex couples have my full sympathy, as I see the toll of religious limitations by the Vatican and by the imperative necessity to increase in-land natality.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

oh yes, this is a useful conversation, i am enjoying it. we are both speaking dispassionately, so we can arrive at a clearer understanding of each other's positions, which is what i am seeking in engaging with you

a thought for you:

italy will become like america if enough italians think like you about entitled abusers like in the video above

your analysis of the video is how america rationalizes trump

the truth is the woman in the video needs condemnation

period

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

like most Italians and Europeans, we hold no prejudice toward your local politicians. The hate you have for any of them is yours only.

We handle crime differently: eg. a prison in Sweden is akin to a hotel with education and rehabilitation. Re-offenders are only 16%.
We don't yell, we aim at forgiving: discuss→question→understand→punish→help→cure→rehab→work→improve.

You have my full sympathy, if you don't like your country's ideology, the EU welcomes everybody. πŸ™‚

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

🀦

i mean this with every fibre of my being, and i am pretty sure you're not listening, but final warning:

your attitude is the gateway to a european trump taking over europe

you have to take a hard stand

there are people in this world you can reeducate- but some you cannot

they are malicious, not broken

your attitude towards them enables them. they will take advantage of your kindness while they laugh at you

i fear you intend to learn this truth the hard way

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

what makes you think they're malicious and not ill or overstressed? What's your personal definition of malevolence and evil?

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

"there are people in this world you can reeducate- but some you cannot"

i specifically referenced that i believe both exist: the malicious who will take advantage of your kindness, and the broken who can be helped

you are the one who is denying the existence of a real category of people, not i

you are the one who needs to rework your mental framework about the issue, not i

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

why are you on the defensive? Why do you think other people won't consider you malicious exactly as you consider them malicious?πŸ˜…

If you hold prejudice against some women, those women may react by seeing you as an adversary. You should at least attempt to be the mature side and break the negative spiral of diffidence.
If then you realize your interlocutor(s) repeatedly abuse your kindness, only then exclude them from your social environment. Your health is a priority.πŸ˜‰

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

"why are you on the defensive? Why do you think other people won't consider you malicious exactly as you consider them malicious?"

i stopped reading here

what the fuck are you on about?

🀣

you responded thoughtfully throughout this thread so i though this was a good interaction, but now you've gone to something that sounds bad faith or desperate to admit something you don't want to admit

just admit it

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I'm open, are you feeling the need for me to say something in particular?

I'll say whatever you want if that makes you feel better and more focused.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

correct me if i am wrong, but we are not lying in bed together preparing to have sex

you say what you believe. it is wrong or it is right. and thus i will agree or disagree

such that the content of this comment of yours is further confirming my suspicion that you're just trolling and playing games, and not engaging in good faith

my friend:

enjoy yourself

have a nice giggle at the expense of everyone engaging you while you are unserious

everyone has their needs

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

> correct me if i am wrong, but we are not lying in bed together preparing to have sex

You are wrong: we aren't in bed and we won't have sex.😬

The feeling I had is that you wanted me to say something very specific. If you tell me what, we can continue the discussion from there.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

then engage me on the topic. don't accuse me of being defensive, or whisper sweet nothings. this is moving the discussion to an emotional realm. i view that behavior of yours to be a deflection, a tacit admission by you that you understand my points but refuse to admit them out of stubbornness, thus your diversion. and thus rendering this discussion closed because you moved it into farce. you can move it out of farce, or continue with emotional hilarity, closing it
This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

if you were on the defensive, this was my fault, not yours. I just asked why you had this behaviour and offered to solve the issue in any way possible. I'm sorry if I've stressed you out in any way.

Emotions are the topic of this discussion: when two yell at each others on the sidewalk, the issue is clearly emotional. The lack of self-control is caused by emotions. They're humans, not robots.πŸ™‚

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

"defensive"

"stressed"

🀣 🀣 🀣

are you perhaps projecting?

or maybe it is gaslighting?

here is my emotional frame right now my friend:

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

are you getting emotional lorenzo? do you need me to soothe you?

I'll say whatever you want if that makes you feel better and more focused.

🀣 🀣 🀣

the condescending and patronizing gaslighting can work both ways my good friend

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

yeah, wht not. Please say 10 times the following:

"I will not accuse random people on the road to be evil fascists"

"Stressed out and self-entitled women are not part of a greater plot, they're just people like you and me"

"The world goes beyond the USA"

If you gaslight me enough in this way, you'll end convincing yourself too my good friendo.πŸ‘ 🀣

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

i deeply apologize

i must defer to the vast benevolence and wisdom of those who express sympathy and care for entitled abusers

🀣 🀣 🀣

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

everyone benefits from care and a healthier social environment, regardless if they were victims or abusers.πŸ™‚

The goal is to solve a social issue. Sympathy, on the other hand, is always optional. πŸ˜‰

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

yes lorenzo, i see your wisdom

we embrace those with malice in their hearts and then they won't shoot us

of course, i have been so silly

🀣 🀣 🀣

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

*she may actually shoot you if you attempt to embrace her without her consent, regardless of the supposed malice in her heart.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon "Golden rule: respect β†’ more respect"

You realize, of course, what you cite as a golden rule is twaddle.

So.too, then, the insanity of treating bad-faith actors as anything other than what they show themselves to be.

Take a simple test case: Will being respectful to ICE prevent them from kidnapping you?

reshared this

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon
I agree malicious people (e.g. sociopaths and psychopaths) exist, but I'm sorry to say even superficial reading about pre WWII German history suggests forgiving takes such as Ancora's will abound even as people are being taken from their homes to their deaths.
in reply to Steve Holden

@holdenweb please avoid superficial readings. Forgiveness is the only thing that prevents war and allows for welfare and for humanity's progress. Forgiveness is the reason why modern Germans and Italians are not persecuted for the sins of Nazism and Fascism.

Hate is a vicious cycle and the strong aren't those who fuel it, but those who break it through immense sacrifice, prioritizing humanity's progress over personal pride.

@benroyce @CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @holdenweb @CatDragon

if you spoke those words before wwii in italy or germany you would get laughed at and then machine gunned

you're delusional

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon They also have a rather fervent, on-the-edge-of-fascistic, belief in the altruism of the powerful which belies practical experience.
in reply to Steve Holden

@holdenweb we just put peace over personal pride. We understood that self-development cannot happen in a toxic social environment.

@benroyce @CatDragon

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@holdenweb we were talking about a normal unarmed Karen quarreling on a street.

When you hear the sound of a machine gun, the time of discussion is likely over.
Different environments have different dynamics. My proposal of de-escalation through discussion was mainly aimed at the daily life, not at warzones.😬

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

but you'll notice that multiple people have alighted on your words with a political angle

because the woman in the video is the base behavior of the GOP in america, the enablers of fascism with the mentality in the video above

such that their behavior is malice that needs opposition, not confusion that needs soothing

while you are busy soothing her, she is picking up a machine gun

this is what you do not understand

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

by GOP you mean the Republicans or something alike? Are you sure she is affiliated with this specific (violent?) political party and actively participates in it?

She already has dogs nearby for self-defense and they appear to be calm. It doesn't appear to be in a mental state so low to use lethal force for a quarrel. Both interlocutors appear to be non-violent.

@holdenweb @CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @holdenweb @CatDragon

the behavior you see in the video is the entitled abusive behavior of the average GOP voter. yes: the republicans

building off this behavior is a fascist movement that such behavior enables

do you understand now?

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

so, everyone who yells and quarrels in the streets presenting a complains is a member of the GOP?

Sounds a bit extreme. Maybe she's just only stressed...

@holdenweb @CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon I haven't seen anyone suggesting they can divine party membership, merely that she would likely be in sympathy with the Republicans, and therefore feel her entitled behaviour is acceptable. With which sentiment I agree. I lived in the US for two decades.. Most Europeans don't experience the same levels of privilege and prejudice.
in reply to Steve Holden

@holdenweb okay, but then it's just speculation, maybe she belongs to the opposite political party, you can't know. Furthermore, it is not necessarily true that she likes politics, perhaps she doesn't care about the rest of humanity and lives alone with her dogs.

BTW, I hate party politics and politicians in general.

> Most Europeans don't experience the same levels of privilege and prejudice.

Don't forget we have mafia...πŸ˜…

@benroyce @CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @holdenweb @CatDragon

Steve Holden:

you see, our error is not extending all care and sympathy to abusive entitled insufferable people, and making every excuse possible for their obviously wrong behavior

this is apparently some sort of road to peace

🀦

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

You and I
See eye to eye
And all agree
We need both eyes to see

So why are so many people blind?

And who's blinding them?

in reply to Steve Holden

@holdenweb

i think lorenzo is just having a laugh

they engage very eloquently and coherently, but the basis of their argument seems to be a pretty obvious rank troll position

regardless, it was an enjoyable engagement

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

so your reaction to the road quarrel would be to:

1. insult the Karen for your personal satisfaction
2. arrest her
3. punish her without re-educating her
4. publicly marking her as evil fascist
5. ostracise her
6. leave her alone with her mental conditions (if present) without helping her in any way
7. repeat from point 1 when she repeats her mistakes

Seems a bit too much for a random annoying person on the road. Also, wouldn't solve any issue whatsoever.🀦

@holdenweb @CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon As a former citizen of the EU (who by choice would have remained so) I suggest your depiction is roseate and somewhat unrealistic.

We can have sympathy with those whose lives have been damaged to the point they are {socio,psycho}pathic, but not at the expense of those who are damaged by their behaviour.

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I'd like to see a world where violence is only a sad memory. I also acknowledge the importance of protecting and understanding the victims of any kind of violence, either physical or social. My vision of punishment for the culprits starts for re-education where possible, guaranteeing relief to all families involved. It all starts from mental care, tolerable living conditions and healthier environments, so to starve the roots of crime, like solitude, stress, desperation.

@CatDragon

in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora @CatDragon

right but you ignore the phenomenon of malice

you can provide for everyone's physical, emotional, psychological and other needs completely

there will still be abusers

an unfortunate aspect of human nature

some will choose abuse, regardless of all other factors

we can not engineer that out of the human spirit

so when an abuser abuses, the first thought, the first action, must be condemnation and punishment. job #1

everything else you speak of is secondary

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@CatDragon if a person consistently chooses to abuse others and has clearly no reason to do so, then said person isn't healthy and has severe mental issues like ASPD, sociopathy, psychopathy. Their behaviour is caused by brain damage, deformities or by genetic anomalies.

Punishment has almost no effect on these people as they are biologically incapable of feeling shame and guilt, they need strong medicines and qualified professionals to not harm society.πŸ™‚ πŸ‘‹

in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok @LorenzoAncora @mloxton

in fact it was a style of charity:

he both extricated himself from the situation and communicated to her effectively, if she was listening, how absurd the situation and her behavior was

absolutely masterful

in reply to Matthew Loxton

@mloxton sometimes the behaviours you listed are linked to mental issues like ASPD or psychopathy, but this requires diagnosis by a professional. They can be treated (only by a qualified psychologist) if necessary.

Regardless, a healthy environment is always prerequisite for any cure and to prevent mental issues.

@benroyce

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Lorenzo Ancora

@LorenzoAncora

everyone is miserable to some degree. that's just life. frustration is normal

how we deal with it is the question

and putting personal frustration onto others is not acceptable

it would be nice if we had a magic wand to provide the solution you cite. but that's not possible. every fleeting interaction is not a scenario where the attacked person is responsible for the attacker's frustration

rather it's the responsibility of insufferable assholes to not be insufferable assholes

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

🀣 i thought my mother was a drama llama but this guy deserves an Oscar!!!!! high school theatre class wasn't wasted on him!!!
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Lol, I wanna send this guy into a town hall our local GOP congressperson is *finally* having: "OMG, you're not even answering our questions, OMG you're so stupid!!!"
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I've known lots of people called Karen and they've all been lovely.

I wish people would start to use the word "cunt" if that's what they really mean

in reply to Amateur Human

same, as to "karen"

as to c***, i know elsewhere like australia it's practically a term of endearment

but the word wouldn't fly in the usa though

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

lmao. You gotta love the #Ozzie's
Same deal your mate might call your mate that British pub....

But wtf Americans?
Effectively calling everyone called #karen a cunt because it's less offensive than actually calling a cunt a cunt?!
It's not like they've a shortage of other words.

What a bunch of fannies ;)

in reply to h4nd / UntouchedCupOfTea

no barking, no growling, no wagging tails, no excitement... this is their life πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ray Gulick, he/him/wtf πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ βŒπŸ‘‘

@rgulick

that's the best part. he completely shut her down. she was completely baffled by the reaction, because the absurdity of the reaction perfectly distilled her own absurdity

in reply to Ray Gulick, he/him/wtf πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ βŒπŸ‘‘

@rgulick

she wasn't in any danger. the guy was completely in control of his over the top performance

but you are correct that from the accusatory asshole's point of view- because they lack the emotional intelligence, they might view themselves under a dire threat

which is an interesting commentary on the fabulousness of his response- maybe not so fabulous if the accusatory asshole got even more upset. luckily in this scenario she was just utterly confused by his reaction

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

and the oscar goes to that man: πŸ† 🀣

Genuine question: why the censored karen word? Is it considered an insult?

in reply to tuga

@tuga @void

almost as if that would create a bunch of fragile people who can't deal with the simple discomforts and disagreements of life

oh wait...

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

That dog looks so embarrassed, I can't believe she would put them in that situation πŸ˜…
in reply to Hyperlink Your Heart

worse, the dogs look like they are used to this as a daily occurrence
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Seems like something Bugs Bunny would do! πŸ‘

I believe it was Dear Abby who once offered similar advice to a man who had unintentionally jostled a woman who went ballistic. No matter how much he apologized, she wasn't having it. Abby suggested the next time sincere apologies don't work, to try apologizing as hysterically as the other party is behaving. "I'M 😭 SOOOOOO 😭 SORRRRRR-EEEEEEEE!!!"

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I had almost this exact k*ren interaction once about 15 years (minus the epic sarcastic freakout, which is a serious missed opportunity).

It was also a man and the dock was not actually private. The guy just claimed it was private because he felt entitled to do so for some reason. He also left his house to follow us to the dock and just walked around right next to us for about 15 mins occasionally repeating his initial claim.

25% of Americans are absolute freaks.

in reply to djsf

"i am entitled to make deranged accusations of fabricated transgressions"

🀦

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

A while back (I think my daughter was 7 at the time) someone came to our house and informed us that she and her friends had been climbing on the big bank of USPS locking mailboxes at the other end of the street, and that it was a federal offense to tamper with Postal Service equipment. This person had the tone of someone who was doing us a huge favor because she could have just had our child packed off to prison. I was raised in New England, so I did the New England thing of saying "Oh, okay" with a completely flat affect and ending the interaction, not really processing anything I'd just heard. Spouse, however, turned to our daughter and said, loud enough for everyone to hear, "That woman is angry and ridiculous and full of shit, and if she EVER approaches you again, you come tell me immediately."
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

It's like the Southern "Well bless your heart!" but with the extreme conservation of energy that comes from generations of pulling rocks out of the soil.
in reply to E. C. Bigribs

@eedly

grew up within earshot of i84, in the same 1860s farmhouse my mom grew up in, now living in western ny

and thanks for giving me PTSD flashback to endless stone walls!

πŸ˜†

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Between the Merritt and I-95, routinely shadowed to the town line by cops in Westport, Wilton, Darien, New Canaan...

I used to think CT was the global leader in stone walls until I visited Inisheer in the Aran Islands, where they have been using a (presumably finite but who can say) collection of stones to partition, unpartition, and repartition the same two square miles of limestone into half-acre configurations for millennia.

in reply to E. C. Bigribs

@eedly

CT is the global leader in new haven style pizza. i mean, apizza

and i had no idea, that's insane:

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I recall seeing a goat in the middle of one enclosure, finishing off whatever limited grass was there. When she was done, she walked in a straight line toward the three-foot stone wall, and then right up the face of it and down into the next enclosure like it was level ground.
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

We had a discussion, spouse and I, about getting goats to keep a hillside of Himalayan blackberries at bay at our old place. My argument against was that they would quickly develop their own set of priorities that had nothing to do with eating thorny vines on a steep incline, and if we didn't devote a significant amount of mental and physical energy to the project, we'd be known as People Whose Goats Had Outsmarted Them.

My thesis wasn't carrying much weight, until spouse noticed a number of "found your damn goat in my yard again" posts in the small-town Facebook group. So, I guess thanks for that one, Meta.

in reply to E. C. Bigribs

I do love goats, butβ€”like ravens and nuclear fusionβ€”I respect their abilities too much to try to bend them to my will.
in reply to E. C. Bigribs

@eedly

everyone has to follow professor lawler

yeah yeah she's an accomplished astronomer

more importantly SHE GOT GOATS

🀭

mastodon.social/@sundogplanets…


It's pretty doomy in here. Here, have some goats (and a bonus llama and horse+goat-backscratcher)
in reply to E. C. Bigribs

@uc I mean, a fair bit of religion is pretty much based on wanting to speak with the manager.

@benroyce

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Might make a great Southwest Airlines "Wanna get away?" commercial. πŸ˜„

ispot.tv/ad/AEjj/southwest-air…

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

I saw this and had a giggle. Saw it again and had another giggle. He matched her energy and that was it.
in reply to Dopes The Frogman

@macacator

it's spectacular

certainly not advisable in all scenarios

but he read this situation right and knocked it out of the ballpark

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

🚨Not advisable in ALL "Karen" encounters🚨

Because you'll come across a Karen or Kyle and they will not be in the mood for that shit and they'll just shoot ya.

in reply to Dopes The Frogman

exactly

she didn't know how to deal with him so he completely shut her down by confusing her, matching her absurdity with absurdity

but

another even less emotionally intelligent abusive busybody might panic in the dimness of their cranium and then as you say... 😬

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Gahdamn, somebody get this man an Oscar.

Or at the very least a voice acting role, his range is impeccable!

in reply to mastodonphan

@mast0d0nphan

the giggling of the person holding the phone (sounds like maybe his daughter?) tells me this is his bread and butter. he's a natural

in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

funny thing is people with autism are usually sticklers about rules especially if they’re laws because that’s how they function and are taught to function/cope in a confusing worldβ€”especially in high density populated urban areas. Things that seem stupid to some are lifelines to others. I don’t know the full story, I don’t know these people and Reddit users aren’t always the best source. Or she had a nervous breakdown or a home invasion. Where’s the empathy & kindness?
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Nicky🦨✌️

as you say, there are perfectly good reasons for behavior which is not ideal (also bad reasons, you should acknowledge that)

but it's not the responsibility of people who are attacked to navigate that behavior successfully. they are being attacked

as for empathy and kindness, i think his reaction is that: he communicates the absurdity of the situation, and goes on with his day

many other reactions are possible which are far worse

it's dangerous for her to behave as she does

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

what you are asking for is a maturity, nuance, and understanding in the behavior of random people on the street to being attacked

this is not an extremely hard ask, this is an impossible ask

to the same degree you ask for understanding for her attacking behavior, you are granting to the attacked individual no understanding in how they are able to process an absurd attack on them

rather, the attacker should not be attacking people

this is their responsibility, no one else's

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Deb Nam-Krane
God bless you for your patience. I decided about a decade ago that I had better things to do than engage people who seem to willfully misunderstand. But you seem like you're in general more optimistic about people, LOL
in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston I just treat social media as a dumping ground of random engagement on any and all topics. I find it relaxing. That's not for everyone!
in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok

from the original thread (linked elsewhere in this thread, where the video was originally posted) apparently her and her husband aggressively go after anyone who gets near their houseboat

it's anonymous social media accusations so who knows how truthful it is

but it seems to be the motivation

⇧