The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@EUCommission It took me a good 30 seconds to be sure this wasn't a satire account


Europe, the AI Continent.

One year ago, we launched the AI Continent Action Plan. Since then, we have made huge strides:

✅ 19 AI factories are now live across EU countries.
✅ We established the AI Skills Academy to train experts.
✅ The AI Omnibus is cutting costs for business.
✅ We have earmarked €1 billion to support AI adoption in industry.

We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe.

Here's how 👉 link.europa.eu/nj3VH9


The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@EUCommission there is no wrench emoji big enough for this post


Europe, the AI Continent.

One year ago, we launched the AI Continent Action Plan. Since then, we have made huge strides:

✅ 19 AI factories are now live across EU countries.
✅ We established the AI Skills Academy to train experts.
✅ The AI Omnibus is cutting costs for business.
✅ We have earmarked €1 billion to support AI adoption in industry.

We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe.

Here's how 👉 link.europa.eu/nj3VH9


The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Europe, the AI Continent.

One year ago, we launched the AI Continent Action Plan. Since then, we have made huge strides:

✅ 19 AI factories are now live across EU countries.
✅ We established the AI Skills Academy to train experts.
✅ The AI Omnibus is cutting costs for business.
✅ We have earmarked €1 billion to support AI adoption in industry.

We are building a secure and innovative AI future for Europe.

Here's how 👉 link.europa.eu/nj3VH9

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Reid

@reiddragon AI is objectively useful and actually superpowers productivity if used properly, if we dont manage to make our own alternatives we'll end up falling behind the USA and China. We need an alternative that's not a dystopian

I am mostly against the usage of AI and tech in general in education where it's not really needed (ex. students with disabilities or for coding classes) and in art, but for productivity? That is awesome

@Reid
in reply to European Commission

Burning the planet to generate unverified bullshit; stealing from creators; poisoning the whole process of generation, presentation, teaching, and usage of knowledge; helping to fire qualified professionals by the thousands, to replace them with unqualified babbling machines; inflating an irresponsible investment bubble until it bursts, resulting in unprecedented damage.

You're proud of your work of utter destruction? You fools. You're enemies of humankind.

"#AI" #EU #EUpol

#eu #eupol #ai

reshared this

in reply to European Commission

making easier for the bros to spoil our environment, render us jobless, propagate disinformation, cause mental health issues and even suicides, etc. for a plagiarism machine that barely does an acceptable job at the 3-4 real use cases is surely not the way to go. Why are you pushing for something no one wants (would you want to live near a datacenter? Me neither). Why don't we use this money to make europeans lives better? You don't care about anything but money, and that's gross.
in reply to European Commission

here's a suggestion before spending a bazillion on "AI".

Make it (much) easier to start small businesses.

Like, €100 instead of €1000s, and a clearly defined list of paperwork, that can be processed at a single govt agency in under 1 hour, in 1 country.

Then, simplify the byzantine pan-EU tax arrangements so this small business can just pay tax once, instead of needing to spend €4000/year on accountant support, and filing in multiple countries.

And when you've achieved that marvel of bureaucratic enlightenment, by all means circle back and examine the detritus of whatever Yucatan-sized crater the US AI industry has imploded into, to see if anything of actual value can be forged from the slag.

in reply to dch

@dch 100%, to open a small business in Romania you either go through a paid service or you do it yourself and run around the city to like 3 or 4 govt agencies because they couldn't possibly handle this entirely online.

You often get berated at from a tired, overworked minimum wage woman in her 60s that your paperwork is missing something or you ticked the wrong box or whatever.

@dch
in reply to dch

@dch @alextecplayz Some years ago, pre-Brexit, I had a long taxi ride in the Val d'Aosta. The driver and his brother imported fancy stone from Switzerland and had needed a EC incorporated company. They registered in England and made a yearly visit to their accountants in Windsor. By all accounts this was the least bureaucratic approach available to them, and they were very pleased with the arrangement.
in reply to dch

@dch one of my favourites was told to me by the CFO of a multinational in mud-1990s. Filing company accounts in Spain was very onerous if done digitally, but there was an exemption if you filed manually. So the P&L, Balance Sheet etc were prepared on the accounts system, and then transcribed by a small accounting firm for filing.

Nothing matched Greek bureaucracy though.

@dch
in reply to European Commission

Your dishonest AF AI propaganda fails to mention that you're recklessly abolishing our rights as citizens *and* authors/creators, shamelessly selling our data to fascists that seek to destroy democracy and freedom, and at the same time fuel GHG emissions.

You traitors will be prosecuted for your crimes.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to European Commission

Please make a screenshot of all the comments and send it to your superior. Ask them to send it to their superiors, until it reaches those in charge.

Here are people who know a thing or two about tech begging you to stop your PR and listen for once!

We can't afford to fall for every snake oil grift US Big Tech throws at us! We need the EU and those in charge to be really smart now, because as others have written, there's a lot at stake! Dare to resist the hype, for all our sakes!

in reply to پویان Pouyan

Hi @i! AI Factories are hubs for innovation, bringing together computing power, data, and talent to create advanced AI models. They connect universities, industries, and supercomputing centers to develop AI solutions for areas like health, climate, and manufacturing. You can find more information here: link.europa.eu/8xyx8t
in reply to European Commission

please, please, please with sugar on top: don't do this. I can see every day at work what AI is doing and long story short: it is nothing good. I'd rather see a unified European Health Insurance or unified European retirement fonds. One social system for all member states. That would be something to be proud of, not wasting our ressources on AI.
in reply to jess :3

Hi @peachymist! Artificial intelligence already plays a crucial role in our daily lives, and as AI develops, it holds even greater potential to improve the lives of EU citizens: enhancing disease prevention, reducing traffic fatalities, anticipating cyber threats, and much more. That's why we are proposing rules and actions for AI, enabling us to harness its full potential and maximise its benefits.
in reply to European Commission

@European Commission @jess :3 No matter what you explain them and that it exists for decades ago they will hate those 2 letters A and I .. and part of it is very true but we don't want chat control , age verification or other privacy infringing new 'Law's' as AI exists since decades you turn around the subject to tell us what we knew already (I use a LLM myself, self made and running local host) those AI you implement reduce privacy. I won't give my medical records to your systems as all systems can be hacked and one day our data will be everywhere it already happens as I speak.
You are not ready to implement it by far but to start learn about it would be a more pleasant message and always leave the decisions to the people.

You impose things people loath.

So a good education starting from yourself about subjects and then make information to the people and let them decide is shortly said.

That money should be used to help the weakest of society and we want no new laws without vote of all the people of EU

This is no democracy but vote to some people and they make a coalition that is not of them the majority but ok it's not Right but you act as fascists.
Read Mussolini's book and discover the resemblances.

in reply to European Commission

Do i understand you correctly that you will abolish any copyright, intellectual property and non-tamper laws immediately? Because thats what this means. Or you just create a second tier law for tech-lords who are allowed to break said laws and degrade literally everyone else - in that case we can assume this is a power grab by corruption.
in reply to European Commission

And how exactly do you plan your budgets for all those that are replaced with AI?

Also thank you for supporting AI, I really love speaking to AI instead of human on Customer Support.
It works exactly how one would expect - it doesn't.

Yes, we shall innovate in AI, but not fund its adoption in industry. That's on those who use it.

Use the money for defense and moving from Microslop's & Google's products to Open-Source

This entry was edited (23 hours ago)
in reply to European Commission

Read. The. Room.

A *lot* of the people on Mastodon are creators who have had their intellectual property stolen to feed the generative AI models, with at least one of the billionaires involved openly admitting/bragging that his business model would not be profitable if they had to pay fair royalties for that intellectual property.

A lot of people on Mastodon are deeply concerned about the environmental damage, AI hallucinations, theft of personal/corporate data, and sundry other issues.

There are forms of analytical AI that are useful (e.g. analysis of medical images) and do not involve any of the above. You do not appear to be referring to such analytical models.

in reply to JulesJones

"A lot of the people on Mastodon are creators who have had their intellectual property stolen to feed the generative AI models, with at least one of the billionaires involved openly admitting/bragging that his business model would not be profitable if they had to pay fair royalties for that intellectual property."


For several years I have held back from publishing most of my writings and papers and algorithms due to this AI theft machine. I am holding out hope for the bubble to burst or for court rulings that favor creators who litigate over their IP being stolen by these evil tech lords.

AI hoovering has caused a massive chilling effect on my speech and code because once I put it out there the tech bros can steal it and deny me credit or payment, making it trivial for others to steal my work as well.

in reply to European Commission

Make Europe a science continent instead!
AI as in "we scan you and all your data without you being able to prevent this" is horrible, nobody wants that.
AI as a mathematical algorithm can be helpful in lots of applications - as any other algorithm. But this doesn't need pushing AI methods, just a solid funding of science! Scientists will use the method with the best results for their applications!

No to AI slop, surveillance & abuse, yes to a right to privacy & digital security!

in reply to Tero Hänninen

@cstross @0xtero

The costs and farms are stupendously overblown and conflated.
There is bad faith on both sides of the argument

The WAAAAH DATACENTRES mob conveniently ignores the current data centres ~50% of which are iclouds, AWS, dropbox, office365 and yes, mastodon, same issues, but oh these are the "good" data centres 🙄

Also while growth projection are nasty...model distilation and algo improvement MAY reduce the load significantly. Tech improves. Have you tested the water pressure tank on your steam car?
Its a safety issue.

Placing AI Data centres in orbit removes the heat, carbon and energy issue, but forest folk aren't happy about that either (Not a big fan of that either but for different reasons than you)
There is a small test inference engine up there already since December BTW.

Copyright and artist exploitation?
Oh yes, did you delete you pirated MP3 and MP4s? 🙄 Same folks who 4 years ago were chanting "Information wants to be free" are now guardians of corporate copyright.

So, yeah.
Ai is useful, x10 is real if you actually git gud.
#aislop #ai #llm #luddites #neoluddites

in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

@n_dimension @cstross @0xtero I don't trust you wulfy - and I don't like the tone of your arguments, seems exactly like tech bros who talk down to others.

But anyways, if you distill the model, there's no need for a data center, so who cares.

Might just need one or two data centers for training purposes.

Regarding putting things into orbit - the costs would be silly at best unless you do all kinds of jugglery like ship the model with 100 other useful things

Last comment /ignore

in reply to European Commission

these are not achievements. If you want public support, provide concrete evidence of how AI is delivering *net* benefit to UN Sustainable Development Goals. Tell us how AI is helping people and planet, not how businesses are saving money by laying off people or constructing new data centers that overheat the planet for memes.
in reply to European Commission

Full press here btw: ec.europa.eu/commission/pressc…
Not sure why yall made multiple link jumps.

The "AI Skills Academy" looks to be describing training people on working with Neural Networks. What they will do once they leave the slopcademy is a question left to the people I guess.

What's interesting is the "support AI adoption", which is what the "AI Omnibus" is supporting. Why? No, I'm serious. Why? Is the company test-bed the USA not enough to see that this is a bad direction to take?

in reply to European Commission

No, seriously. Take a stand on this nonsense. It's built on stolen work and hidden labour, it's burning up our already scarce resources at a terrifying rate, it's really really bad for people's brains and even if it worked (which it doesn't) it would put billions of people out of work in a really short timescale. Who's going to pay taxes then? How does society cope when you wipe out the incomes of a huge tranche of its working population and give them... nothing in return?

We don't need this stuff, and we're certainly not ready for it, even IF it worked.

in reply to European Commission

Curious to hear how building our digital sovereignty from American BigTech is going!

Turning off all Big Tech solutions being used by all governments and vital infrastructure in Europe would have us descend into total chaos!

However, the EU Commission is apparently more concerned with FOMO in missing the race to the abyss with AI slop!

This entry was edited (21 hours ago)
in reply to European Commission

I don’t know if this account is actually monitored, or just a publishing place, but you may have noticed that this post has received almost overwhelmingly negative responses.

You could disregard this as Mastodon bias, but keep in mind that the biggest bias on Mastodon is that people who understand and built core parts of the information technology that you use every day are massively over represented. This is probably the only place you will get a lot of replies from people who both understand technology and do not have a financial incentive to hype things to get large amounts of government funding.

EDIT: I should add, I used machine learning during my PhD and there are a lot of problems for which it is a really good fit. But, in the current climate, it’s generally safe to interpret ‘AI’ as meaning ‘machine learning applied to a problem where machine learning is the wrong solution’. It isn’t a technology, it’s a branding term, and it’s a branding term used almost exclusively for things that have no social benefit.

This entry was edited (7 hours ago)
in reply to David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

@david_chisnall
And speaking as an AI positive person, in the sense one can do really nice this with it, when used responsibly by competent people, not when used as a hype buzz word.

WTF are "AI factories"?

"Skills academy"? Aren't university curricula not enough?

And if it's such a great help for industry, why does it need subsidies for adoption?
@EUCommission

in reply to European Commission

:wojak_cursed:​ please reconsider your choices... There are many fields in which AI is ethical and useful, here are a few (of the many) where it isn't:
- Age verification
- Text generation
- Art generation
- Music generation
- Surveilance

Please refrain from making any implications that you are spending OUR tax payer money in those fields.

I understand corporate lobbyists are trying to convince you that this is what the European peoole want, but trust us, we are the technicians who run the technology you use. They do NOT want that.

in reply to Kahia, a.k.a The Anarchivist

Hi @kahianyaaa! AI already plays a crucial role in our daily lives. As it develops, AI holds even greater potential to improve the lives of EU citizens: enhancing disease prevention, reducing traffic fatalities, anticipating cyber threats, and much more. That's why we are proposing rules and actions for AI, enabling us to harness its full potential and maximise its benefits.
in reply to European Commission

La IA ya sé ha usado para decidir cuantos miles de niños mueren y cuantos no en guerras. ¿Ya se usa la IA europea para decidir objetivos militares o cuanto falta para eso? El uso en medicina e investigación de LLMs es algo minoritario, y hasta ahora las IA's han matado más personas que las que ha salvado. ¿Cuanta agua habéis robado al consumo humano para eso, a cuanta gente le habéis cuadruplicado el precio de la electricidad y el agua potable, a cuantas habéis dejado sin trabajo?
in reply to European Commission

Could you please describe the measures you are taking to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of AI?

Also, how are you mitigating the adverse impacts on workers? On intellectual property rights? On the arts? On the psycho-intellectual development of young people? On access to factual information?

in reply to European Commission

Seriously? You want to (1) destroy the only planet we have, (2) give loads of technical wealth to people who already have more than they know what to do with, at the expense of everyone else, (3) support the wholesale theft of all original work in order to make those people richer? Stop believing their hype and hypocrisy.
in reply to European Commission

I did read through those "let's show some actionism" buzzword PDFs and statements that sound like wishful thinking like "The race for leadership in AI is far from over."

You come up with this NOW?!

I see exactly nothing to address the problems to make AI different and better. On what material to train? How to get the consent of creators to train your AIs with? Or is copyright infringement for AI training now fine? Who will label and tag? Poor people in Africa again, right? Also copyright infringement when using generative AI (which actually is what you refer too). Not addressed.
Because you guys don't even have the insight.
You hear AI and think €€€, and that's it. But then.

The financial / economic side - how do get ram, storage, GPU/AI accelerators, even the material resources for it - for the totally unrealistic scenario you want to build those components here in Europe (we are 40 years behind in this sector).

Energy consumption? Realistic approach? Hello?

Did I mention I miss every realistic insight?

What you suddenly (by being 15 years behind) want to achieve now all at once, is repeating the same mistakes again. Trying to catch-up with China and the US to do exactly the same. I see nothing about trying a different, a better approach. Instead I see how you totally ignore the odds. Why even bother then?

The whole thing is doomed to fail clearly, if you start this as naive as you do.

in reply to European Commission

this is one of the worst decisions ever taken in the context of European research funding. You are pumping taxpayer money into machines for training useless models and the companies applying for computing time do not even have to undergo the kind of application procedure that peer-reviewed computational science has to go through. You have substantially reduced the amount of time available to European science and weakened us at a time where we could outperform the competition.
in reply to tschew

case in point: from the point of view of computational science the exascale supercomputer Jupiter Booster is not an exascale machine because only 30-45% of the computing time will be available to science via EuroHPC calls with another small part through national calls. The rest is given to "AI" through an application procedure which is laughable compared to what peer-reviewed computational science has to go through. eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/large-sca… vs eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/eurohpc-j…
This entry was edited (6 hours ago)
in reply to European Commission

this post is making be ashamed to be a citizen of the european union when otherwise i was mostly a big fan of it.

i think "AI" is used as a marketing term by corrupt business people, selling overpriced general purpose tools that just don't deliver on any of their promises, meanhile undermining scientists developing machine learning algorithms with real usecases and measurable positive effects.

so as long as the EU is using scammers' terminology it is dead to me.

in reply to

Large Language Models struggle with factuality, have a negative effect on their users' memory and problem solving ability and by being so general purpose are also unbelievably inefficient in terms of ressource usage. those aren fundamental issues with all LLMs, not something that can be iteratively improved. LLM companies are lying to you and they have to because they are hundreds of billions deep into a downward financial spiral from fraud and false promises.
in reply to European Commission

A more or less virtualised society to reference or even lead real life with… And you believe it to be a good idea? 😏 🧠🔨 #BrainMush It’ll be a proverbial straight jacket to control everything deemed detrimental to our current and flawed economic system. To many it’s a magic box of tricks to get what they want against better judgement and it will be a moloch of a Ponzi scheme money pit. An illusion of control at best. 🤷‍♀️
in reply to European Commission

Here is a mild version. I think he does a reasonable job of explaining in a way a layperson can understand.

Unfortunately .... things are worse than he puts forward.

youtube.com/watch?v=ahRMR_9kqb…