The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
CHAT CONTROL IS BACK → Today the urgent procedure for Chat Control 1.0 was passed.
NEXT UP: The EU Parliament is voting on Thursday.
If Chat Control passes: your messages, pictures, videos will all be scanned because the law will allow it - this removes privacy and welcomes mass surveillance in the EU.
Share this post, make some noise, and let's fight for our right to privacy. ✊🏻♥️🇪🇺
Pictured: Parliament President Roberta Metsola (EPP) who revived Chat Control 1.0!
This entry was edited (6 days ago)
reshared this
Becca
in reply to Tuta • • •SkyBlitz
in reply to Becca • • •bitterseeds
in reply to Becca • • •https://nerdculture.de/users/beringboegh
in reply to Tuta • • •Great guy
Synnef 🤍💙💛
in reply to Tuta • • •chat control 1.0 does not *require* scanning, it's the exact same bill that expired in April that only *allowed* it... but to be blunt, if it's allowed every big tech, data hungry company will take the opportunity again
i don't use twitter and can't see replies but i hope that post is getting annihilated with backlash
like every single supporter of chat control they try to frame it in a nice way like in this case "discussing europe's efforts to protect children" 
Tuta
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •BOplaid
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •nitter.catsarch.com/EP_Preside…
Synnef 🤍💙💛
in reply to BOplaid • • •Dagnabbit, Pascaline ! 💥
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •@synnef
Mentioning the children was only to make people feel bad about what could happen to them without chat control.
Chat control is perfect for the criminals, governments, and techbros: they stay out of sight using other communication methods.
@Tutanota
Bogdan Buduroiu
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •skaphle
in reply to Bogdan Buduroiu • • •Synnef 🤍💙💛
in reply to skaphle • • •@skaphle @budududuroiu it *is* abuse of the parliamentary process!
this is what is currently happening: patrick-breyer.de/en/procedura… tl;dr the EPP, the EU council and the parliament president (which is from EPP) pushed a vote for urgent procedure into the parliament (which succeeded on Tuesday, yesterday) to allow revoting on the expired chat control 1.0 regulation (which happens on Thursday, tomorrow) to reenable it
i also find it funny that one of the MEPs who was vocal about this manouver was cut off from his criticism *exactly* 1 minute after he was given his turn, which is allowed in theory but honestly sounds more like censorship in this case. this is what the MEP posted on twitter nitter.catsarch.com/MartinSonn…
Procedural Trick Before Summer Recess Pushes EU Parliament Towards Capitulation on "Chat Control"
Patrick BreyerDoerk
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •@synnef Unfortunately this doesn’t make anything better. As for now it’s just about voluntarily scanning your messages. But the voluntariness comes from the providers like Meta, Google etc. not from the users.
I’m wondering what would happen if som day not so far in the future we read the message that the EU parliament has decided to enforce chat control for all communications? What would we do? What would we be able to do?
Synnef 🤍💙💛
in reply to Doerk • • •@NebulaTide correct, it's not like the likes of meta/google *won't* take the chance to legally break encryption even when it's only allowed, not enforced
if this ever goes further into dystopia i think the future is self hosting, federation and decentralization. for example, matrix using E2EE is immune to chat control by design because you can host your own server, the same way mastodon is immune to age verification since you can just host it yourself
it'd take a lot more effort from authoritarian regimes to censor those, and FLOSS in general, out of existence
Doerk
in reply to Synnef 🤍💙💛 • • •@synnef Unfortunately this is not what most of the people will do. Today ~90 % of my contacts have at least Signal installed so I can contact them even though most of them actively use WhatsApp. When Signal is no longer an Option, they will just shrug and go on using WhatsApp.
And what comes next? Will encryption be prohibited? Will they try to establish CSS so that you can’t trust your own devices anymore?
Synnef 🤍💙💛
in reply to Doerk • • •🔥 Mireille Sillander 🔥
in reply to Tuta • • •Ragna
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
Netscape Navigator
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ reshared this.
bbbhltz
in reply to Tuta • • •Wow. Really thought we wouldn't see him in public for a bit longer. Just like a few other somewhat forgotten celebs (e.g. Joseph Gordon-Levitt) , Ashton is probably a "friend of a friend" of Peter Thiel who really wants to "protect the children."
Kutcher has worked with Thiel before to help Airbnb...
Gemma 👽
in reply to Tuta • • •Oh no, it was "WSocial".
Speed demon 🇪🇺 🇳🇴🇺🇦🇵🇸
in reply to Tuta • • •Speed demon 🇪🇺 🇳🇴🇺🇦🇵🇸
in reply to Speed demon 🇪🇺 🇳🇴🇺🇦🇵🇸 • • •Elena Rossini 🌈
in reply to Tuta • • •this is terrible!
BTW may I suggest a better photo to illustrate this (maybe a future post?), from a recent meeting of Metsola with Mark Zuckerberg at Meta HQ: instagram.com/p/DY1GdzFMfHj
Roberta Metsola on Instagram: "Great to connect with @meta’s Mark Zuckerberg @zuck in Palo Alto to discuss the next frontiers in Artificial Intelligence development and the work MEPs are doing in the @europeanparliament to protect vulnerable users online,
InstagramPlan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ reshared this.
Tuta
in reply to Elena Rossini 🌈 • • •Elena Rossini 🌈
in reply to Tuta • • •BOplaid
in reply to Tuta • • •don't forget to pass it through a nitter instance
Esther Payne
in reply to Tuta • • •wait he's back?
After having to step down for a while due to supporting Danny Masterson?
sandywb14
in reply to Tuta • • •McWabbit 🇺🇦🍋🌻🍉
in reply to Tuta • • •zvan
in reply to Tuta • • •Bogdan Buduroiu
in reply to Tuta • • •Koos Swart
in reply to Tuta • • •I replied to her on bluesky to stop talking to kutcher and zuck
eYz
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Tuta • — (0.0.0.0/ 0) •Don't bother to assemble a reply to me as I know you yourself are a storefront.
`Da Elf
in reply to Tuta • • •Eelco Mulder 🇪🇺
in reply to Tuta • • •Ik heb je gemaild @bartgroothuis
🤨
Stem je hier inderdaad mee in?
#chatcontrol #chatcontrol10 #fightchatcontrol
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Eelco Mulder 🇪🇺 • — (0.0.0.0/ 0) •Dit stond op geen een Europese politieke partij op de agenda.
En volgende verkiezingen gaan drastisch zijn door deze maatregelen en andere dingen
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ • — (0.0.0.0/ 0) •xs4me2
in reply to Tuta • • •LNSY
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
Dr. Seltsam 🌎🎶🌳
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Dr. Seltsam 🌎🎶🌳 • — (0.0.0.0/ 0) •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕
in reply to Dr. Seltsam 🌎🎶🌳 • — (0.0.0.0/ 0) •Why Delta chat specifically? because you like it? It does not require my needs in terms of security.
Dr. Seltsam 🌎🎶🌳
in reply to Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ • • •Choose whatever you want and fits your needs.
@Tutanota
Kierkethumbs up convincingly
in reply to Tuta • • •Dr. Seltsam 🌎🎶🌳
in reply to Tuta • • •Q. Edwards
in reply to Tuta • • •https://mastodon.social/users/SecoasecasMouse
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
reshared this
Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ and Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷 reshared this.
remoteControl
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
BryTheDonut 🍩
in reply to Tuta • • •Boosh22
in reply to Tuta • • •Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕ likes this.
🏳️⚧️ShadesofRaye🩼
in reply to Tuta • • •chazbot
in reply to Tuta • • •NKT
Unknown parent • • •Chris
in reply to Tuta • • •So that is what the EU understands by "democreativity."
It's disgusting.
youtube.com/watch?v=RNKFnOJnQp…
Chatkontrolle - Mikro abgestellt statt Demokratie
Martin Sonneborn (YouTube)Jens Finkhäuser
Unknown parent • • •@onepict @cairobraga Yeah, he also previously buddied up to Ylva Johansson who was a driving force behind ChatControl.
Which, by the way, was also backed by convicted former MEP Eva Kaili, who became more infamous for her corruption in the Qatargate scandal.
ChatControl is supported by *exceedingly* sleazy people.
Llevickas
in reply to Tuta • • •_K05TY_
in reply to Tuta • • •persistentdreamergames
in reply to Tuta • • •That_Damn_Frank
in reply to Tuta • • •Rimas
in reply to Tuta • • •@Tutanota, do you think it's fair to post a screenshot of a three-year-old Twitter post like this and not clarify it's age?
@dcoderlt
Fam
in reply to Tuta • • •zeitverschreib ⁂
in reply to Tuta • • •skaphle
in reply to zeitverschreib ⁂ • • •zeitverschreib ⁂
in reply to skaphle • • •@skaphle Governments change or can be changed.
@Tuta
occurrent
in reply to Tuta • • •Fucking Ashton Kutcher always being involved with this kind of shit.
#terrble-vibes
Cy
in reply to Tuta • • •I will have Ashton Kutcher's head!!
in minecraft
[size=small]because minecraft has heads you can collect[/size]
LukefromDC
in reply to Tuta • • •None of your stuff will be scanned if you refuse to use compliant apps.
Signal will surely refuse to scan anything, delete any messengers that do attempt to introduce scanning. Dump Facebook, IG, all the rest of that.
If this law allows and incentivises but does not actually REQUIRE scanning, there will be plenty of "dodgy" sites and apps that refuse
Be sure to keep your local filesystem isolated from the Internet-with or without Chat Control in force.
Angie
in reply to Tuta • • •ASHTON KUTCHER IS IN THE EPSTEIN EMAILS.
ASHTON KUTCHER DEFENDED DANNY MASTERSTON, A CONVICTED RAPIST.
IN 2003, ASHTON KUTCHER TWEETED ABOUT HILLARY DUFF (WHO WAS FIFTEEN AT THE TIME) THAT EVERY MAN WAS WAITING FOR HER TO TURN 18.
ASHTON KUTCHER WANTS TO "PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN."