The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

:globalistlocated: Lotta fluoride moving through the glowieverse. Welcome to Friday Hell. Hold onto your :manhattan3: while I poke the global surveillance bear. :terryno:

TL;DR: :glowing::glowinthedark::globalistlocated::plasticbottle::fluoride::drinkfluoride::manhattan3: INDEPENDENT FEDERATED TRUST AND SAFETY (but first I talk about mirroring for a couple of paragraphs)

A lot of the URLs can be mirrored to your instance locally and read/replied to/reposted on your instance without making you look at the glowie servers. Paste the URLs into the search bar, they'll show up on your instance. This should probably be easier in most FEs.⁰

:zerocool::acidburn::lordnikon: You know what's better than archive.today links? Mirroring the shit onto a few dozen fedi instances. You put, e.g., wedistribute.org/2025/02/iftas… into the search bar, it is mirrored to your instance. If you reply to it or repost it (or you are on Pleroma and you smash dat like), it is mirrored to instances where someone follows you. :phantomphreak::plague::cereal:

:glowing: IFTAS is making another push for centralizing fedi. IFTAS is a surveillance/steering organization that has enough overlap with Newsmast, the Social Web Foundation, Oliphant, FediMod, indieweb.social, hachyderm.io, that they are effectively the same organization. (Sockpuppets are bad when you're LITERALLY HARASSING JOURNALISTS but it is fine to use orgs as sockpuppets. These people spin up 501(c)(3)s faster than most of us spin up domains. The orgs are, not coincidentally, all based in .us/.de/.uk/.ca.) Here's who they are: about.iftas.org/advisory/ .

:glowinthedark: The organizations get government/corporate funding through organizations like nlnet or the Social Web Foudnation ( socialwebfoundation.org/2025/0… ) or the Ford Foundation through the DIIF. They use this sort of thing as a mechanism to pay themselves, so Newsmast "buys" indieweb.social from Tim Chambers ( timothychambers.net/2025/03/27… ), who was a member of IFTAS ( about.iftas.org/2024/07/12/tim… , "Tim has been at the forefront of pioneering strategies that leverage technology to promote social good and a healthier social web. [⋯] Tim’s deep understanding of the disinformation landscape further strengthens his value to the IFTAS Advisory Board." ). The Executive Director of IFTAS is employed by Newsmast and it should probably be really fuckin' easy to call this a conflict of interest. I don't know how much money they move like this: my concern is not with hustlers using tax dollars and "charitable" contributions to get paid for forcing their politics, you know, I don't like it but my main concern right now is that they are trying to kill fedi.

:threeletteragentglowsobright: IFTAS has recently been hand-wringing about the ratio of jannies to humans going and pushing the coop model. They've also been very interested in regulation, trotting out the "Oh, it's not the 'wild west' any more! You can't just write whatever you want on the *internet*!" See attached, and see the IFTAS founder's push: jaz.co.uk/2026/03/13/there-are… . Jaz-Michael King, head of IFTAS, incidentally, lists Newsmast as his employer. They are creating a fake problem to force their solution. This is part of the (also attached) broader strategy from the .us/.de/.uk/.ca governments to stamp out "misinformation" on fedi: the .de government refers to fedi as "The Hydra on the Web" and expresses frustration that they can't use NetzDG as a pretext to take down random Peertube instances. (They did indeed say the quiet part out loud and it's in the PDF.)

:glowing: IFTAS's "CSAM detector" (attachment scanner) "ran out of funding" right when the USAID faucet ran dry. ( wedistribute.org/2025/02/iftas… ) Before they did, they grabbed about 1.86M files from fedi: about.iftas.org/2025/03/27/con… . (In addition to things like requiring access to a server admin account for "CARIAD", cariad.fedicheck.iftas.org/ , a closed-source tool to show you something that fba.ryona.agency / fed.dembased.xyz will already show you, for free, with source, and without requiring you to give them access to read an admin account. Anyone wanna spend a minute spinning up a new instance and checking to see what requests they make exactly?) It's one thing for them to say "Oh, you're unsafe, you said a hate speech" but it's another *entirely* for them to say "You don't use the CSAM protection!" (I don't know about other admins, but speaking of USAID, very few pedos have been visible from here since that dried up. Either they finally, with extremely coincidental timing, realized that I put heads on pikes, or maybe there was not a coincidence.) This is gonna be the wedge. It's easy to say "I don't stop people from discussing their opinions, even if you don't like their opinions", but nobody on the network actually wants to host anyone's CP bin.

:glowinthedark: Oliphant's blocklist is dead now. "Note: As of April 15, 2026, the Oliphant Unified Tier 0 Blocklist has been retired. There are numerous instructions on this page to create your own, but we're moving to a more FIRES-centric model, and I want to support that going forward. Rather than combining various blocklists here, I'd prefer to forward FIRES datasets as a better alternative to sharing moderation advisories, as it is a living protocol." writer.oliphant.social/oliphan… . FIRES is a spinoff of the new Fedimod shit out of *Germany* because YSHL. It is done by IFTAS member Emilia Smith ( hachyderm.io/@thisismissem , github.com/thisismissem ), or at least she's running the Github org. It is worth noting who was on the Oliphant blocklist at "tier 0" from the beginning. (Say what you want about Seirdy but he's at least transparent about his notes.) FSE is always top of all of these goddamn lists, before they got arround to adding Pieville or Gab or whatever explicitly angry racist instances: why is that? (Well, why the fuck do you *think*?)

:threeletteragentglowsobright: So IFTAS builds these things, then conducts these polls: "Which do you want, this, this, or this?" All of the options are, of course, things they want to push; for example, "What if you had automated threat-sharing? What if you had an automated blocklist?" They give you four choices and all of the options are things they want to push, in some cases things they have already developed. When their 2026 needs assessment survey comes around, I suggest you take it. (There's probably some funding requirement that demands that they do a survey, so they do one to show that it's super important that they get funding; in either case, it's also a classic "manufacturing consent" maneuver, it is old as shit.)

:glowing: You may be familiar with Newsmast ( newsmastfoundation.org/about/ ). I had never heard of them until I wrote an MRF that automatically added #ukraine #russia #elonmusk #trump #uspol #putin #economy #antifa to every post on FSE; IDIFTL. ( git.freespeechextremist.com/gi… ) To my surprise, a series of bots started reposting everything on FSE. Even shit like @whereverbot and @lainbot. I also started getting scraped by backend.newsmast.org, which is looking for not just posts but tracking follower/following relationships. (Larger write-up fsebugoutzone.org/objects/377a… , media.freespeechextremist.com/… ). I wouldn't be surprised if the fedi "OSINT" scraper tool (remember the one that was like, "IT EXPOSES WHO TALKS TO WHO" and people just used it for fun instead of being terrified?) from a couple of years back was a prototype for this.

:glowinthedark: There are a lot of instances that are socks used by the IFTAS crowd. For example, the eleven instances¹ that were part of the Fediverse Governance paper ( github.com/fediverse-governanc… ) or instances where they don't even bother to change the links so their "About" page just links to Newsmast's "About" page: fsebugoutzone.org/objects/e67f… .

:terrywat: So I mention, like, "They aren't really against centralization. I took the survey they gave last year and the questions ranged from 'completely irrelevant' to 'insulting'; the main problem was that they were looking for a conclusion and the survey assumed the conclusion. That is, the survey existed to validate the thing they wanted to push. It was stuff like 'Do you suffer mental health problems because of unmoderated content?' and 'Would an automated blocking system help you block better?'" fsebugoutzone.org/notice/B33Gl… .

:terrylol2: Dots connected this week: the 2023 "Fediverse Governance" paper, IFTAS (Independent Federated Trust and Safety), Newsmast (the organization that is responsible for scraping fedi and also people's following/follower lists to build a social map of fedi), . I can't be the only one to have noticed these people are all the same group, but I have never heard anyone mention it: fsebugoutzone.org/notice/B5Ke0… . Jon Pincus, outspoken IFTAS tendril and member of the "Disinformation Defense League" (which wants a tax on targeted ad revenue to be earmarked for journos, I SHIT YOU NOT), has been bending cwebber's ear; cwebber's now on social.coop (which pulled in $20,000 per month last time I checked), one of the original eleven¹ instances that were part of the original fediverse governance paper (coauthored by Kissane ahead of the founding of IFTAS). A lot of these things that came out of nowhere, they were astroturfed by these people.

:threeletteragentglowsobright: Here's an example: why all the press about the "CSAM problem" on fedi, where did that come from? These people built a detector, they want to create demand for the detector, so they reach a few tendrils out.

:glowing: hachyderm.io is another great example of the astroturfing. They show up out of nowhere, have a bunch of tech celebrities on there, then the admin starts making these impassioned declarations about how fedi "needs to do $x" or "won't survive without $y".

:glowingthedark: cosocial.ca was the topic of this thread where phnt (I should tag people that were involved but I also think, like, maybe they will get spammed) posted this:

fluffytail.org/objects/caa22ad…

> The sleezy kind of freedom haters. They are too afraid of backlash that play these dumb masquerading games to look like "the good guys trying to save this network". Their goal is to just turn this place into another corporate Twatter place nobody asked for.

This is accurate. If you have noticed that these people get hostile and instance-block you if you ever question their premise (as happened in that thread when phnt asked some pretty obviously good-faith questions), this is because they are pushing an agenda. People interact with them and exclaim, "How annoying! He refused to explain what he meant, he instance-blocked me for asking why or questioning the approach!" They are trying to present "Choose the color of the bikeshed!" as a choice before you've agreed to let them build a house. The style of interaction is driven by the motives: you think you're talking to a person, but you are talking to an agenda.

They are trying to push an agenda. The agenda is to kill fedi by turning it into a centrally controlled system, these are the mechanics.

There, that's it, that's my tinfoil screed. No action item. Please see my recent posts/reposts over the last four days for more information.

⁰ FediBBS, you type a comma, like you just do `, $url`, but very few things are "easy" on FediBBS. I think, like, this should probably be done in a similar way to the thing I suggested to feld where it's just an object lookup and the frontend. Several of the repos mentioned here are mirrored to git.freespeechextremist.com/ now and I think revolver should probably include some kind of "import/mirror git repo" feature in v2, or anyway I have "git support" in there somewhere, so, like, while FediBBS can just do tarball upload, a server that can absorb git repos and let you clone from any node, that'd be cool; I did this with IPFS but IPFS is, as I have mentioned and you may have noticed, slow and terrible and shitty and unreliable and painful.

¹ The Individual Eleven:

cosocial.ca/ | fedilist.com/instance/cosocial…
hcommons.social/ | fedilist.com/instance/hcommons…
hachyderm.io/ | fedilist.com/instance/hachyder…
masto.donte.com.br/ | fedilist.com/instance/masto.do…
mspsocial.net/ | fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia…
piaille.fr/ | fedilist.com/instance/piaille.…
sfba.social/ | fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc…
social.coop/ | fedilist.com/instance/social.c…
tooting.ch/ | fedilist.com/instance/tooting.…
wandering.shop/ | fedilist.com/instance/wanderin…
woof.group/ | fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro…
the_hydra_on_the_web--challenges_associated_with_extremist_use_of_the_fediverse.pdf
Mapping-Fediverse-Communities-1.pdf
fedimod.png
glowie.png
linkitylank.png
spread_anarchy.jpg
racialslurs.png
hellallyourfamily.jpg
fuckedupshit.jpg
newsmast-glowies.png

$locklime reshared this.

in reply to pistolero

>Here's who they are: about.iftas.org/advisory/

Worth noting that this list of members used to be pretty public and was accessible from the front page if I remember correctly. Or maybe even was the front page. But at some point, it became hidden and is now linked nowhere on the front page.

>Jon Pincus, outspoken IFTAS tendril and member of the "Disinformation Defense League"

He's also the author of "Nexus of Privacy". A blog that keeps talking about how Bluesky is a part of the Fediverse, how bad Mastodon is with supposed harassment prevention and keeps trying to say how Fediverse should be built. Now seemingly somewhat successfully when he's in IFTAS.

Here's one such gem: privacy.thenexus.today/unsafe-…

>FSE is always top of all of these goddamn lists, before they got arround to adding Pieville or Gab or whatever explicitly angry racist instances: why is that?

Seems like you get blocked a lot. Maybe you should think why that is?

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Phantasm

@phnt

> He's also the author of "Nexus of Privacy". A blog that keeps talking about how Bluesky is a part of the Fediverse

holy fucking shti what

You literally cannot be anonymous on Busky.

I have seen people get into arguments with him on here and he did the "Ho ho ho, these people exist to fill my blocklist" thing but I couldn't find it; some people on some instances always take the bait, *always*.

> Here's one such gem: privacy.thenexus.today/unsafe-…

Dear god.

Nah, this is the type of thing I'm talking about, though, like, they all get into a Discord and then they coordinate a push. "People need to perceive IFTAS as the white savior of the feddy verse, so we need to just keep hammering how unsafe it is here."

> Seems you get blocked a lot. Maybe you should think why that is?

:bruceforsythe:

in reply to pistolero

@phnt

> Here's one such gem: privacy.thenexus.today/unsafe-…

See, this shit looks like infighting until you realize that IFTAS is a glowie hydra and Ore0h is not necessarily ideologically different but a member of a competing organization: privacy.thenexus.today/the-bad… .

in reply to pistolero

This is a good analysis, and I can confirm that there is indeed some coordination between the organizations and people you mentioned. I wouldn't call it a conspiracy, though. I know some of them well enough to conclude that it is a not a single organization, but a loose group. Some of them seem to be fake, but others seem to be sincere in their convictions.

I'd like to share a couple of additional links you may find interesting:

- about.iftas.org/yoel/

Remember this guy? Given the timing, I suspect that some of these projects were supposed to be sinecures for former Twitter employees.

- codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pul…

This is a draft of a FEP about mandatory CSAM scanning. As one of the FEP repo maintainers, I immediately raised concerns about privacy, centralization, etc. That made me persona non grata at W3C.

in reply to silverpill

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@silverpill

> This is a good analysis, and I can confirm that there is indeed some coordination between the organizations and people you mentioned.

:bigbosssalute: Thank ye.

> I wouldn't call it a conspiracy, though.

I'm a fuckin' lunatic, I'll call it one.

> I know some of them well enough to conclude that it is a not a single organization, but a loose group.

The thing is they put out tendrils without acknowledging the coordination or any other kind of transparency about who decided what and when and why. Like, Seirdy puts out his receipts, IFTAS just declares things and then calls people enemies of progress and says "Well, you can't just have a website where people say whatever they want": this behavior is as good as an acknowledgement of an agenda that they don't want to publicize.

> others seem to be sincere in their convictions.

Oh, yeah, I mean, I can acknowledge that. I think a lot of them are sincere in their convictions the way Bob McNamara was, though. "Taquiyya is praxis." I don't doubt that there are some that hear these things they're saying and agree with them and push them.

> - about.iftas.org/yoel/

Am I missing something? It's just a photo of the guy's head.

> Remember this guy? Given the timing, I suspect that some of these projects were supposed to be sinecures for former Twitter employees.

That is interesting.

> - codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pul…
> This is a draft of a FEP about mandatory CSAM scanning. As one of the FEP repo maintainers, I immediately raised concerns about privacy, centralization, etc. That made me persona non grata at W3C.

*Very* interesting.

Evan Prodromou, "Board member at CoSocial.ca. Research Director, Social Web Foundation." says:

> This conversation is not very fruitful, so I'm withdrawing the PR. I'm going to rework this proposal and submit it to the SocialCG directly instead.

And Jaz shows up as well. Very interesting conversation; worth reading.

The citation without noting connections is very interesting.
yoel.png

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill

> I wouldn’t call it a conspiracy though.

I doubt the bankers of the 1910s were without justification for their security and privacy in the matter, when making plans that affect people they have no right stance making those decisions for. But we can call it “how business is done in this time and place,” and the real problem seems to remain; people who think they know better than the admins are using underhanded tactics to politicize the adoption of technologies, with a motte and bailey for centralized control over all kinds of security beneath the veneer of CSAM concerns.

in reply to silverpill

Filtered word: nsfw

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt Curiously, Gleason was supportive of the proposal, although at the time he already moved to Nostr (IIRC).

Also, some strange things started to happen in the aftermath of closing that PR. I started seeing vague posts expressing moderation concerns on Codeberg and SocialHub (in this thread, for example: socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…). People suddenly started talking about adding a CoC, etc etc. But every time I asked what this is about, there was silence.

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill
>Curiously, Gleason was supportive of the proposal, although at the time he already moved to Nostr (IIRC).

That's because 4 years ago when the MRF was created, is also around the time when Fedi was being flooded with nonces (and also after the Matrix channel arc failed). The whole point of the MRF was that you could plug it into something like PhotoDNA, because Poast moderation was getting tired of dealing with nonces on TLs. Gleason was always supportive of things like this and I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't also pushing something like that on Nostr considering how nonce infested that network is.

> I started seeing vague posts expressing moderation concerns on Codeberg and SocialHub (in this thread

Kinda reminds me of this which I was reading two days ago, but it is unrelated.
socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @phnt

> Curiously, Gleason was supportive of the proposal

Is that curious?

> Also, some strange things started to happen in the aftermath of closing that PR. I started seeing vague posts expressing moderation concerns on Codeberg and SocialHub (in this thread, for example: socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…). People suddenly started talking about adding a CoC, etc etc. But every time I asked what this is about, there was silence.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT

in reply to pistolero

@silverpill @phnt Okay, well, to be fair, the timestamp on the "Scope of the socialhub policy" post is August 1, 2023, and the "PhotoDNA Attestation extension" is from August 4, but I think that was possibly preemptive, because he posted this on August 18:

socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…

> Thanks. So, if I have a problem with how someone is behaving in PRs on codeberg, what do I do next?

And then in socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/… and socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/… , he made it explicit that this was about the PhotoDNA discussion.

And he directly retreats into "But think of the optics of not thinking of the children!"

> I ended up withdrawing the PR. I had adapted the proposal in the Stanford Internet Observatory’s Child Safety report into a FEP to start the discussion process. I was attacked personally in the comments, and the FEP wasn’t allowed to be merged. I don’t think it helped our movement to have such vigorous opposition to developing CSAM filtering standards.

in reply to pistolero

Reminds me of what Chapman says in the first essay I ever read on Meaningness;

"... you could recognize sociopaths and eject them. Geeks may be pretty good at the recognizing, but are lousy at the ejecting. Mops don’t recognize sociopaths, and anyway don’t care. Mops have little investment in the subculture, and can just walk away when sociopaths ruin it. By the time sociopaths show up, mops are numerically most of the subculture."

meaningness.com/geeks-mops-soc…

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill

in reply to pistolero

(1/2)

@p
> I don't know if you scrolled up and saw OP

Being a stickler for checking context, I certainly did. My take is pretty much the same as @silverpill's.

There is a troubling dynamic at work, where states, political parties and legacy media realise the party is over, and are scrambling to hoard what power they can as the neo-liberal, state-corporate order continues to fall apart around them. Some of what you're seeing will be them putting thumbs on the scale.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Strypey

(2/2)

But most (*not* all) of the people you identify seem like genuine actors to me. Somewhat captured by indenti-Moonie discourse to different extents. But mostly looking for ways that the fediverse can collectively regulate itself. As a bulwark *against* attempts by states and other power players to impose inappropriate regulation on us from above.

We're at an equivalent inflection point to the one that produced S230. A bit of net history worth studying (or revising) for all of us.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @silverpill @icedquinn @fish @phnt

> Being a stickler for checking context, I certainly did. My take is pretty much the same as @silverpill's.

:bigbosssalute:

> states, political parties and legacy media realise the party is over, and are scrambling to hoard what power they can

I should float my "LLMs are replacement for both propaganda outlets and surveillance systems and there is no government on earth that is prohibited from running an army of chatbots" thing past you. I don't think they think the party is over; I think that's why they're racing to fund LLMs. (That's a bit of a digression.⁰)

⁰ Quoted from different thread at fsebugoutzone.org/notice/B5G4g… :

> There are no "can't use amassed LLM sockpuppets to manufacture consent or to conduct massive real-time surveillance campaigns" restrictions against the government (and even when there are restrictions like that, the 2007 warrantless wiretapping and PRISM and the Biden Twitter/Facebook thing demonstrate that the government doesn't really care when there are restrictions) and you can see that the PRC and US are aggressively pouring money into this while governments that don't have much fear of uprisings are making minimal investments. (The room full of Russkies posting at boomers on Facebook is probably going to be replaced with LLMs from Yandex, but Russia's been half-assing their influence campaigns last 20-ish years at least.) That's going to be a qualitative shift in government and that is bigger than clickbait journos getting the ax. I showed you, right, on consumer hardware, it'll do a passable job at summarizing my notifications. You look at the NSA's exabytes under the desert in Utah, you look at the top500.org/lists/top500/2025/1… and the US, which had been slipping in the rankings, suddenly ate the top 10 again, China went from owning the top slot to #24. And where you saw only governments before, you see Microsoft and NVidia. (OpenAI has, at current revenue levels, an order of magnitude gap between their $250B commitment to minimum buy for Azure and their revenue of about $3-4B/month. Microsoft already owns 27% and will acquire them unless they get a big contract. They are talking Q4 IPO and they're discussing advertising; advertising will not make up the shortfall and is a dry-hump for businesses that have run out of ideas. But "persuasive reasoning based on natural language analysis" is, in the case of LLMs, dual-purpose: they are eyeing government contracts.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt This article contains a very accurate description of the process fedi is undergoing right now. The conclusion is disappointing, though. Obviously, I didn't read the book, so maybe "Be slightly evil" means something else, but I think there is absolutely no reason to be evil. "Geeks" (to borrow terminology from the article) do not lose because they are not evil. They lose because they don't want to be in charge, and nature fills the vacuum with grifters and sociopaths.
in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt

> nature fills the vacuum with grifters and sociopaths.

There's no vacuum if no one needs to be in charge. If you make it impossible to make money on fedi then you can maintain the network without the sociopaths showing up. They're showing up because they want to coalesce influence and they don't like the idea of a side-channel.

Someone that is an experienced fedi admin and that has familiarity with FidoNet should try to get an interview with Tom Jennings. (I try to bother the dude as little as possible but it's tomjennings at tldr.nettime.org.) FidoNet basically kept their shit together until the Internet displaced BBSs.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn
> its like those funny island nations with real republics because the country is so irrelevant it's not stuffed with lobbyists

Name one. Every country with an identifiable government or other power centre is stuffed with lobbyists. We certainly do in Aotearoa, and I get the impression smaller Pacific nations are the same.

@fish @phnt @p @silverpill

pistolero reshared this.

in reply to Strypey

(2/2)

As I said in 2024;

"It’s also worth reflecting on the Achilles Heel of the Indymedia project; it’s lack of a sustainable economic base, and the resulting dependence on donations and volunteer time to keep its growing infrastructure running.

For the grander vision that animated Indymedia to be realized, sharing economic solidarity strategies like forming Platform Cooperatives will be just as important as promoting the potential of decentralized technologies ..."

disintermedia.net.nz/indymedia…

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill
> "Geeks" ... do not lose because they are not evil ... They lose because they don't want to be in charge, and nature fills the vacuum

I agree. In the context of the article, I think "be slightly evil" means being willing to be in charge, eg organising a process for identifying and ejecting sociopaths. With full respect for due process and principles of natural justice, so it doesn't become a tool of sociopaths (ie "slightly evil" not actually evil).

@p @icedquinn @fish @phnt

in reply to Light

@light
> This is just yet more division

Maybe, or is it a legitimate example of the paradox of tolerance? Where tolerating sociopaths in the fediverse dev community (instead of identifying and ejecting them) ends up reducing the capacity of the community to be inclusive?

@p @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @light @p@fsebugoutzone.org @icedquinn @phnt @silverpill

> The mops, when properly squeezed, produce liquid capital, i.e. money. None of those groups have any clue about how to extract and manipulate any of those forms of capital. The sociopaths quickly become best friends with selected creators.

Yes, maybe - instead of becoming super elitist and build exclusive clubs: invest in economic literacy.

It can be done in ways that target just mops and incentivizes them to improve if they wanna "save"?

in reply to 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇨🇦)

@strypey @light @icedquinn @phnt @silverpill

...not to become evil, but use it to support the positive and - at the same time - leverage the support gained from hopefully nurtured and slowly "growing up" mops to build moat against assholes who try to come and steal it.

That way the "new cool" can literally continue growing and take over the entire world and finally get rid of the asshats.

If that isnt learned, the pattern described will just repeat endlessly until it is learned sadly :/

in reply to 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇨🇦)

@strypey @light @icedquinn @phnt @silverpill

The author admits - and here is what has to change - the economic literacy needs to exist - it can be an alternative one but:

> Anyway, horribly, geeks need sociopaths—if the New Thing is ever going to be more than a geeky hobby, or a brief fad that collapses under the weight of the mop invasion.

...that's the problem!

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @light @fish @phnt @silverpill that isn't what popper wrote even though it is deeply misquoted.

the paradox of tolerance is an open society always contains the possibility that people vote away their open society. it is the sine qua non of an open society. once you have thought police "to protect democracy" you no longer have an open society. and have extinguished your liberal democracy.

the society protects from violence against extreme opinions and vigilance protects against voting the extreme opinions in to place. you can't get rid of it without no longer having the thing you are trying to protect.

nobody seems to have ever read the book.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

(1/?)

@icedquinn
> nobody seems to have ever read the book

I admit I haven't (I must), but I did investigate what Popper actually said;

"If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them."

libertarianism.org/columns/par…

@fish @phnt @p @silverpill @light

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @fish @phnt @silverpill @light
if you read the book, the context of this claim is after 25% of the book goes on about how much popper hates plato and spent chapters reiterating "plato's republic is authoritarian as fuck, actually"

the stuff about limited tolerance is spoken in direct context of people exiting a classical authoritarian society and discussing the dangers of grognards sliding society directly back in to hierarchical strong man cultures.

people don't read it and decide it means calling randos nazis but it was spoken with the very real and ongoing concern throughout time of people rotting democracy back in to dictatorships.

poppers smugness is that if violence is off the table, then reason holds for the best argument, and the best argument is empirically the open society, so they have the advantage of self-demonstrating being the best outcome and not needing special favor.

the whole book is very much against authoritarian solutions to problems. unlimited tolerance is spoken next to societies that literally did the "someone is a threat to our power with their words, kill them" behavior people actually misquote the paradox to justify.

in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

@icedquinn
> it was spoken with the very real and ongoing concern throughout time of people rotting democracy back in to dictatorships

Like now. Notably in the US and UK, but also in various other liberal democracies. Some historical context;

The late 1990s began a process of deepening the democratic revolution, in response to the state-corporate system brought into place by the corporatist movement whose goals are articulated in the Powell Memo;

masterplanpodcast.com/

in reply to Strypey

(3/?)

The corporatists responded with 9/11 and the US-led invasion of the Middle East, based on the necon plan laid out in reports by Project for a New American Century;

militarist-monitor.org/profile…

As well as erecting a new layer of US secret police, starting with the PATRIOT Act, and the creation of the US Department of Homeland Security (under which ICE operates).

This was a pretty effective distraction for pro-democracy groups, who mostly took the bait and pivoted to the antiwar movements.

in reply to Strypey

(4/?)

But the pro-democracy movements came back with a vengance after the Arab Spring. Whatever we might think of that particular set of movements, there's no question that it inspired radicals to return to pro-democracy campaigning. Starting with the Indignados in Spain, Occupy and its offshoots (including ours in Aotearoa), the Umbrella movement in HK, the Sunshine movement in Taiwan, and the Pirate Parties in the EU. Particular in Iceland, after the Pots and Pans uprising.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

(5/?)

Capital had held onto centralised power worldwide since the deal made with aristocracies in the 1600s, and the creation of the corporation. See @Rushkoff's Life Inc. book for details of that history.

Capitalists needed a way to defend against the existential threat posed by the free internet and the new waves of democratisation movements it had enabled. So they entered into a technofeudalist alliance with SillyCon Valley (already infested with capitalists), to manage public opinion.

in reply to Strypey

(7/?)

In the face of this, capitalists did what they always do when they panic, and formed an alliance with the only people willing to be their stormtroopers against both the pro-democracy movement and establishment liberalism; actual fascists.

Pretty much *exactly* the same set of circumstances that led to the events of the 1940s, in which Karl Popper wrote The Open Society and Its Enemies.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

(8/?)

So having laid out the geo-historical context, let's bring all this back to the fediverse.

We are, amongst other things, a movement against DataFarming platforms, which have always been tools of capitalists and corporatists. That makes us, by definition, enemies of the technofascist alliance between capitalists - including the richest men in the world who almost all own DataFarming platforms - centre-right politicians, and actual fascists.

in reply to Strypey

(9/?)

The very existence of the fediverse is an existential threat to the source of DataFarmers' wealth. This in itself made us a target for all manner of sociopaths from day 0.

But now we're also a threat to the technofascists ability to manufacture consent at scale, and to sow division between the various political factions and subcultures to whom their technofascism is an existential threat. So we're now a target for a whole new range of sociopaths.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

(11/?)

Which brings me to an author whose books might contain more actionable intelligence for us than Popper's; M. Scott Peck. Peck is best known for the self-help book The Road Less Traveled (1978). But the pair of books that interest me here were published in the 1980s; People of the Lie (1983) and The Different Drum (1987).

People of the Life is all about sociopaths. How to identify and defend ourselves against them, both personally and collectively. Different Drum is about community.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

(12/?)

My favourite section of The Different Drum lays out 4 stages in the life cycle of community;

* pseudocommunity - everyone is on their best behaviour

* chaos - conflict arises and everyone tries to escape it, mainly by blaming everyone else

* emptiness - everyone lets go of their preconceptions, ideological impositions, judgements of others, and so on. Engaging with each other in the here and now.

* community - conflict is resolved and genuine collective progress can be made

in reply to Strypey

(13/?)

Importantly, Peck points out that this is not a one-off process, but one that recurs, over and over again, for as long as a community exists. Sooner or later community always drifts back into pseudo-community, conflict arises and chaos ensues. Successful, long-lasting communities are those whose members get good at recognising this when it occurs, and leading the group through emptiness, and back to community.

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @strypey @silverpill @light
Tweets having 140 character limit made sense before smartphones, when we used Twitter via sms (text 40404) . Not sure why Mastodon castrates itself for any reason other than fetish.

Does any Mastodon instance have Twitter-like text messaging or did they ever? I remember statusnet had xmpp built in but I don't think we ever had proper texting set up. (Maybe this is something revolver should consider)

As long as Mastodon is wearing a chastity belt, the char length be 140 instead of 280 (tweets 2.0 - now twice as much) / 500 (toots are almost twice as big as tweets 2.0 but 500 is a nice round number) because it's a number that actually makes sense

maybe they can get government funding from EU to implement sms integration to make it easier for the government to protect their users.

in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@sampler @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @silverpill @strypey

> when we used Twitter via sms

I joined in the brief window when there was a website but all these people were using SMS and before phone numbers became compulsory to join, so I have a rare Twitter account that has no phone number associated.

> Not sure why Mastodon castrates itself for any reason other than fetish.

They get confused a lot. "It's like Twitter but it's also like email but if email didn't have Nazis!"

> because it's a number that actually makes sense

There are only three good kinds of number: primes, powers of two, and powers of two less one. (It's a flag, not a float, so Mersenne primes are just good, not better. Three itself is also a good number because it is a Mersenne prime. FSE's initial character limit was 4096 and everyone made fun of me because I had lowered it from 5000 so I made it 8192 and I still hit the limit sometimes so now it is 16384 and this is fine so far. I rarely have more than 16kB to say, although it's 16384 *characters* and thus could be much larger because UTF-8.)

> maybe they can get government funding from EU to implement sms integration to make it easier for the government to protect their users.

This will help Mastodong add age verification.
character_limit.jpg
sign.png
themastodonisconfused.png
toot.png

in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

@sampler @icedquinn @fish @strypey @silverpill @light The reason is Gargron was autistic about his vision of a Twitter replacement and posts longer than 500 chars look ugly in the UI. It's a problem that will never get fixed because Mastodon desperately wants to be a Twitter alternative including the way it looks and displays threads.

The actual solution would be to widen the post view and decrease post text size, but that is too much to ask.

in reply to Phantasm

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@phnt @sampler @fish @icedquinn @light @silverpill @strypey

> posts longer than 500 chars look ugly in the UI

They look just fine in FediBBS. He should try having a better frontend. (Tweetdeck has always sucked.)
fedibbs.gif

in reply to pistolero

> WE HAVE TO GET YOU MORE LETTERS

If multi-post threads really bother you I can switch to my Friendica account. I keep forgetting I have it, and I *hate* the cludgy interface with a burning passion. But if you *really* need me to ...

> He should try having a better frontend. (Tweetdeck has always sucked.)

The default Masto interface is modelled on Pinafore and has been for years. Although the one modeled on TD is still there as an opt-in.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

> If multi-post threads really bother you

Not really, it just seems like at some point, tagging overhead eats the limit. Even Twitter stopped doing that, like, tags and links stopped counting towards the character limit. Mastodon *could* do the former because tags are an extra field (and more or less unconstrained).

I do think that it does make threads harder to read and participate in (by increasing the likelihood of duplication: if you have two paragraphs and the second one covers something relevant to the first, but people that go chronologically see the first one and then write a different version of your second paragraph before finding your second paragraph; this can compound, it is very funny when it does), but I'm just pokin' yer ribs, I ain't tore up.

> The default Masto interface is modelled on Pinafore and has been for years. Although the one modeled on TD is still there as an opt-in.

Ah. I mean...you see the UI that I wrote and use, I'm not sure what Pinafore *is*. (And if it gives you an idea, I used to use the bitlbee Twitter backend as my only Twitter interface. Until they killed off *all* alternative clients, you could have a reasonable time with Twitter by treating it like an IRC channel.)

in reply to pistolero

(1/?)

@p
> tags and links stopped counting towards the character limit

In Mastodon there's now a cap on how many characters each tag, link and @mention use up. One of the few benefits of this is limiting people's ability to spam me with massive numbers of links, tags and/or @mentions.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

@p
> people that go chronologically see the first one and then write a different version of your second paragraph

Even if posts don't include a clear indicator of a multi-post reply, as mine do, all people need to do to avoid replying out of context is to click on the post and check it. Even for standalone posts in ongoing threads, this is basic good sense, to avoid replying to a thread about jazz ('hep cats') with an OT comment about a furry companion : P

in reply to Strypey

(3/3)

@p
> I'm not sure what Pinafore *is*

Single-column, third-party client;

github.com/nolanlawson/pinafor…

I used it for years, to avoid Mastodon's bonkers TweetDeck-inspired hell-UI. The only somewhat active fork I know of is Enafore;

github.com/enafore/enafore

> I used to use the bitlbee Twitter backend as my only Twitter interface

GNU social was the closest thing I regularly used to Titter (and my fediverse posts were puppeted there). Then a Mastodon cross-poster, until that stopped working.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light Using *character* count to limit *tags* is really effin' stupid, especially given that you could just limit the number of tags if you cared about that. Doing it by character count is, like...you could do this in nginx already anyway. It's really stupid.
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light For one thing, short names on short instances producing short tags. They've enshrined as behavior some half-assed incorrect encoding of the *intended* behavior and this is how you end up with crusty, shitty behavior that is *mandated* because otherwise it doesn't *work*.

This is why Mastodon should be completely ignored by protocol implementors: they want to be the Mastodon Network, fine, let them. Stop letting them stomp on protocol design because someone on a jithub issue whined until someone did the dumbest fucking implementation that solved half of the wrong problem. It is time to cut them loose.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

> Ignoring what the implementation used by the vast majority of people in the network is not how protocol standardisation works.

Neither is allowing them to dictate the protocol by letting them ignore the process and then forcing other implementers to play catch-up. At some point, you just let them do whatever and give them "best effort as long as it's not too much of a pain in the ass".

> But you do you.

I can't be stopped.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @sampler @silverpill @light Eventually that will be the case when they decide to do something dumb. A good example of what is to come is the quote "consent" they decided to do. Nobody but Mastodon cared to implement it fully yet and those that implemented it, implemented it partially so quotes actually work and plan to use the "consent" revocation differently than what Mastodon wants.

If they make a change that causes a full on network split that is hard to deal with, few developers would care enough to fix it I think. Same with ActivityPub 2.0 being backwards incompatible. Before this thread I genuinely don't remember the last time I had a pleasant interaction with someone using Mastodon that isn't from this Fediverse part. Loosing Mastodon means nothing to me.

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @fish @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light i do think fedi in general is a failure and nostr is technically more competent. my only meaningful complaint is that type codes should have been strings. they still could become strings given json supports that.

the fact that there is a range of service options over there (some discord-likes, some twitter-likes, some IRC-likes and even a whatcd style invitation pyramid server) that all mostly just do the thing is kind of damning.

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @light

>It is time to cut them loose.

It is becoming clear that this is not going to happen. Just look at the list of "Consent-respecting quote posts" implementers: codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src…

Pleroma is next: git.pleroma.social/pleroma/ple…

I don't think it will be any different with FASPs and encryption.

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @light

> Just look at the list of "Consent-respecting quote posts" implementers

You don't have to spend much effort convincing me that people keep spreading their cheeks for the Masterdong; I think they should not and intend to not do so myself.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @silverpill

> i don't really get the point of what that spec is meant to do.

:terrymad: Quote-posts are the cancer that is killing /b/
<img class=" title=":mastodon:"/> But we have to make them because otherwise we're forcing marginalized people to take screenshots if they want to be passive-aggressive at a thread.

SOON:
<img class=" title=":mastodon:"/> Just whatever
:npc: [takes screenshots of consent-disrespecting quote-tweets]

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@silverpill i do sort of see the pain in how fedi (and void screaming platforms in general) make for terrible topical conversations though. the amount of times i'll say something about compiler errors or whatever and people ignore the OP and dive in to shit about the jews is like sure, whatever, i miss web forums but they're not coming back :blobcatpain:
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @silverpill

> fedi (and void screaming platforms in general)

Using fedi as a void-screaming platform is a mistake; that doesn't stop Masto but it is a way to make yourself miserable using the platform and also a way to make the platform suck.

> i'll say something about compiler errors or whatever and people ignore the OP and dive in to shit about the jews

Sure, that sucks. That is a matter of shitty people using a good platform and there is no way to hack around that.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @silverpill

> threaded presentations also let you cut off and ignore a branch thats not relevant.

This is mostly a frontend problem. "Fuck this subthread" should be a per-user deal. Webshits don't know how anything worked before Jesus "Google" Christ came from the sky to give them goddamn AJAX and they can't do shit about shit. Mail clients solved this and you don't need to implement it on the SMTP/IMAP backend, you put it in the client and let the client do killfiles. Even shitty email clients can deal with loading 1,000-message threads and displaying them at once: how many fedi clients can show you 100 posts at a time without making both the backend and the browser chug nuts?

> mastodon't is inherently a void screaming platform.

The solution to this is to not use Mastodong.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @silverpill
>mastodon't is inherently a void screaming platform.
Mostly because Twitter is also that and Mastodon wants to be Twitter. You can't have a meaningful discussion in 500 chars, because it limits your expression into sentences with keywords more than a proper way of typing out your thoughts. Or you are forced to do 🧵1/♾ like has been the case in this thread. People made virtual thread composers that let you write a post and then convert it to 🧵1/♾ once you are finished. And people made the inverse for people that are used to writing 🧵1/♾.

Doesn't help that 🧵1/♾ people should at some point just write a blogpost, because nobody is reading a twenty reply thread.

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @Inginsub @icedquinn @silverpill

> "We must not claim to prevent what we cannot prevent." (Many fediverse developers don't understand this.)

No, this is explicitly the approach. "People think followers-only posts can't ever be seen by non-followers so we need to hack around it because otherwise we'll get cancelled by Are0h." Many such cases. Sad!

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @silverpill i think what mastodonters want is just Willow[1] and a soviet style closed city.

[1]: willowprotocol.org/

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light

git.pleroma.social/pleroma/ple…


This does not implement anything meaningful in the spec and only makes quotes work on Mastodon (because they even fucked up that which worked for years before their attempt).

Trust me when I say that if the proper workflow as envisioned by Mastodon gets implemented in Pleroma, it gets patched out by most larger Pleroma instances almost immediately. Myself included, so if Nicole doesn't make it a toggle, I will. Nobody but Mastodon wants this, and I don't want the Twitter copy of hidden replies either.

in reply to Phantasm

@silverpill @fish @icedquinn @light @sampler @strypey
>Myself included, so if Nicole doesn't make it a toggle, I will. Nobody but Mastodon wants this, and I don't want the Twitter copy of hidden replies either.

That is not to say that I hate the "feature" completely. To me Pleroma is about choice, so if the Mastodon way™ is implemented (which it probably will), I don't have a problem with it as long as it is an optional feature, because clearly someone wants it. Same way signed fetch is a toggle. Doesn't really matter which way. Disabling it in the backend and returning revoked/non-approved quotes as normal instead of some "hidden" field in MastoAPI, or having a toggle in the frontend that makes "hidden" quotes the normal ones.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light Good to know that you're against fully supporting Masto-quotes. But I don't see a meaningful opposition anywhere in the network. Like, what's the plan? Let Mastodon/W3C do their thing until incompatibilities accumulate and the network splits? That's exactly what they want, to defederate "problematic" implementations into a tiny echo chamber.
in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light The Fediverse part I care about does not include Mastodon as I've said above. I loose almost nothing if they stop federating tomorrow. So if they want to split from me into some normie mainstream network, their loss, I didn't care anyway. This Fediverse will continue to exist and arguably be better without them.

But to answer your question properly in the perspective of someone helping with server development and not a user, I've been vocal about the issues with new proposals as you've probably seen many times already and I will continue to do so. But it's not like someone at Mastodon actually cares about criticism, they are the GNOME of this network. W3C is a different beast and so far has been focused on things nobody cares about (C2S and OAuth2 discovery for C2S). If they decide to do something stupid, like pushing more JSON-LD, I've been also vocal about that, but not like I can do much than that when Evan blocked me over the grant disagreement and he's mostly the one running the show. @a is the only one sane there even with the JSON-LD enthusiasm. So far they only introduced E2EE which is still half-baked and not a proper spec anyway (key distribution is missing completely), while being something very few will care about I think. If you want E2EE messaging, just use XMPP or one of the other 5+ apps for it.

If incompatibilities arise, like the quotes one, they will get fixed eventually like I've done previously with other servers. The quote issue has been very down on my list of things to do and I didn't have a good idea of how to fix the UX, so that's why I didn't touch it at all. But if the incompatibilities are too big, at some point you have to stop making excuses for the bully and just cut them off. They can't act like the sole arbitrator of the network/protocol and everyone keep bowing to them. In that way, the hidden quotes is a similar hijack to what they did with the subject/description field. Taking what they made and altering it to something they don't want.

At worst, you can always take ap-next, add some FEPs, strip JSON-LD and call it LitePub 1.0.

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @silverpill @a @fish @icedquinn @light @sampler @strypey

> The Fediverse part I care about does not include Mastodon

SECONDED

> So if they want to split from me into some normie mainstream network, their loss, I didn't care anyway.

SECONDED

> This Fediverse will continue to exist and arguably be better without them.

SECONDED

> At worst, you can always take ap-next, add some FEPs, strip JSON-LD and call it LitePub 1.0.

SECONDED

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @phnt @strypey @light
The nice thing about quote retweets is they let people repost without necessarily putting it in on their timeline. If your account is followers only and all your posts are followers only but you retweet public posts there is still data leaking.

Pleroma slept on the implementing quote retweet, so I even though it took Mastodon like 6 years to add them, it's our punishment that we need to stick with their way of doing them because we dropped the ball.

in reply to Clint Eastwood

@Leyonhjelm @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey zogbots quoting stuff is like throwing up the bat signal to call for help when they're getting trolled. Or for whatever reason they want to promote stuff, but they can't just use repost - I need my comments on top instead so I can play theater kid. This post was actually about me, it's mine now.
in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

@sampler @silverpill @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @strypey

> If your account is followers only and all your posts are followers only but you retweet public posts there is still data leaking.

I'd be cool to give people more fine-grained control of scopes at the user-level, and I don't think anyone can force you to federate an RT, but there's no foolproof way to solve "data leaking" when something has to leave its origin. Superficial ways of making things not show up might be enough to satisfy most people: personally I'd like it if I didn't have to look at one-sided conversations on my timeline because it's private and I don't follow everyone involved. But people are bound to complain when they find out something doesn't *really* work the way they expected it to. And that's what's going to happen with Mastodon's proposal.

> it's our punishment that we need to stick with their way of doing them because we dropped the ball.

I don't like the idea of being punished over a feature I never liked anyway. I think QRTs are stupid and if anything I'd gut them out, but I get this is mostly a culture-clash between people who treat fedi to varying degrees more like Twitter and people who don't. But at least QRTs as they are now work exactly the way you'd expect them to, and Mastodon wants to do something else that won't.

in reply to Beer Engineer

@sicp @sampler @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @silverpill @strypey

> I think QRTs are stupid and if anything I'd gut them out

So, my suggestion for this was just "If an object[type:"Note"] is linked to in a post, the server can determine this by doing a very fast lookup of the object URL and then decorate it with metadata the same way that replies and quote-posts are decorated with metadata and the frontend can decide if it feels like displaying it as an inline quote or an abridged inline quote". This makes it easy to use them in frontends that don't support quote-posts (you just put the /objects/ URL in), it's performant (every single backend, even mine, has a really fast "Does this object exist anywhere?" lookup, because they all have to), and then support for creating them can be as easy in the frontend as it is currently: you just put the quote-posted URL at the end of the post. I will probably end up doing this, at least on the backend and on FediBBS; I might add it to FSE's Pleroma-BE and the patches will be public.

in reply to Beer Engineer

@sicp @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey

> I figured you could achieve something to that effect with an MRF

It's a little farther into the post ingestion than MRF; I think you could do it with an MRF, though.

> but I don't know how to write those.

It is really easy if you look at your instance's Noop MRF.

> Do tag me if you do it so I can shove it into FBE.

I promise to attempt to remember to tag you but I am terrible at remembering who thought a thing was a good idea when I write something.

in reply to Beer Engineer

@sicp @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light Just the fact that people complain about leaking data on this network is proof that trying to prevent it is a never ending battle. Truth is, you cannot enforce what is effectively DRM on your posts in this network, this network is purely operated on implied trust everybody puts on all instance administrators without even thinking about it.

evilmaid.net/blog/trusting-tru…

Also related to more scopes, Pleroma develop now support scoping of repeats ported from Akkoma. IMHO a dumb feature that shouldn't exist, but to each their own.

>But people are bound to complain when they find out something doesn't *really* work the way they expected it to.

Once again, "We must not claim to prevent what we cannot prevent." Warnings that posts may leak when trying to compose a lockpost or a DM are the only solution to that. Users will freak out, but that's the reality. You cannot lie yourself out of reality.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light

> evilmaid.net/blog/trusting-tru…

Good writeup.

> Also related to more scopes, Pleroma develop now support scoping of repeats ported from Akkoma. IMHO a dumb feature that shouldn't exist, but to each their own.

Neat. I also think it's dumb but I figured it's the kind of thing people'd want anyway. People can do dumb things as long as I don't have to join them (QRTs, private posts)

> You cannot lie yourself out of reality.

Again as long as I don't have to, if they want to screw everyone else out for choosing not to drink the kool-aid then I say let them: I share the sentiment if there was a big netsplit I can't imagine shedding any tears; nobody can make me upgrade anyway and I think its funny there's an overtone on their side of a netsplit being a worst-case scenario whereas over here most people are indifferent to the idea.

in reply to silverpill

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@silverpill @phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light

> Like, what's the plan? Let Mastodon/W3C do their thing until incompatibilities accumulate and the network splits?

They are not meaningfully a part of the fediverse at this point. They have made a Twitter. It is no longer a platform that you use to communicate with friends: it is a broadcast-only circle-jerk and when it fails to be a broadcast-only circle-jerk people that want to "control the experience" and that can't distinguish between startup dipshittery and tech built by people to communicate with each other. Look at the early posts by the hachyderm dipshit, that guy's like "Oh, this isn't going to work, we have to eject these people and we have to make it advertiser-friendly because if we don't then fedi will never replace Twitter!" I don't want to replace Twitter with a shitty clone of Twitter: I want to replace Twitter with something good.

I intend to have a platform to communicate with friends and strangers. I don't really care if Mastodon decides to create a desert and call it peace. They have fundamentally different goals. Nobody complained when Gab fucked off (and they were, in many cases, fucked off before that: pastebin.com/E0k5fcd6 ), but somehow Mastodon is important? Go look at what they're putting onto the network: mastodon.social/explore .
gab_fears_the_fse2.png
gablins-fear-fse.jpg
trannydemonhackers.png

in reply to Mystic

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@Mammal @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey Nothing of value was lost.

There was a lot of the same hand-wringing: "they're the most active instance!" and it's like...do you want to see that activity? For at least a month, the *majority* of their activity was a single account that posted three times per second. I saw the bot, killed the bot, could not tell Gab about the bot because Gab blocked FSE. (Gleason was working at Gab at the time, I told Gleason and offered to help Gab quell the bot problem and told him to pass along the offer to Colbert; Gleason agreed but Colbert says Gleason never relayed the message. At the time, it was in my own interest to stop the flood at the source because Gab was essentially DoSing FSE by constantly flooding us with bot shit. I got to do k-means and come up with interesting ways to automatically detect bots, I was having fun.)

And now it's handwringing, what if we lose Mastodon? What *if*? They're as bad as the Gablins. There are people using fedi to communicate and there are people using fedi to broadcast and try to push their agenda and, you know, fuck the latter category.
FSE vs GAB.jpg
blockfse.png
blockrecommendation.png
fse--subversive_neonazis_and_communists.jpg
gold.png
high_iq.png
make_fediverse_great_again.png
whole_mentality.png

in reply to Mystic

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@Mammal @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey The main issue with federation was that Gab was cramming shit in that no one wanted and they had the clunkiest UI (which Gleason turned into Soapbox, which is still the worst fedi UI) so they were bleeding users into fedi. They had to cut it off to stop people from going "I can still talk to my friends but I don't have to use Gab?" and hopping to a sane instance. Regular shit on fedi was a "pro" feature on Gab, they were suffering massive downtime, they botched federation (by putting Gab on as many relays as would take them, so they were spending all their bandwidth delivering bot posts to the rest of fedi) and they covered it in ads for whatever low-rent hustle Torba was doing. They expected that they could use fedi to get people to join Gab, based on the way they were talking, and when it went the other direction, they had to kill federation.
torbasnitch.jpg
in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light Gab was under intense pressure to be able to stay online after multiple hosts deplatformed them over allowing total free speech, aka criticism of zog, woke etc. Gab was a pilot program for the regime to eventually produce today's post-woke musk version of twitter. Free speech was winning the argument against the regime shills on gab so its federation was killed to recreate a scenario where gatekeeper guys could maintain authority.
in reply to Mystic

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@Mammal @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey

> Gab was under intense pressure to be able to stay online after multiple hosts deplatformed them over allowing total free speech

"Complete freedom of speech unless it is anime or you ask questions about glowies or you notice how many bots there are or you are FSE, which is a hive of subversive neonazis and communists, or you point out a hole in Epik's VPN or you investigate Gab's finances or you point out that deleting your account silently fails if you have been verified."

They weren't kicked off for freedom of speech. They were kicked off because they antagonized literally everyone in order to prop up the persecution story. I met Utsav--having a PR guy that couldn't stop saying gamer words to journalists when they declined to go to his hotel room was a really stupid move to begin with--and half the sentences that come out of his mouth start with "We must fight the". They fork Mastodon and their announcement is them shitting on Mastodon. They fork Brave and they shit on Brave in the announcement. They were insular when they weren't antagonizing literally everyone. The only reason anyone heard of Gab was that there was a "left-wing bias in the tech press and Silicon Valley" thing going around in 2015 and so after Torba had Gab built, he started spamming an HN networking board (that is, a private board for people that had been HN-funded startup founders at some point) with "BUILD THE WALL I HOPE YOU ALL GET DEPORTED TRUMP MAGA 2016" and ignoring "Please stop that, this is a business board, not a politics board" until he got banned. That is, he committed suicide by janny in order to have a hook to call up journos and go "They banned me just for being a Republican! That is why I am making my own Twitter that doesn't have the left-wing censorship" and do a bunch of interviews. Literally no one would have heard of Gab if that PR push hadn't succeeded and that was the only move in his playbook: he shits on people so that he can complain about their reactions. It gets attention but it ensures that he has no friends, so when the social justice pitchforks come out (because he spends time antagonizing them too), he has no one willing to say a word in his defense: if you're in a position to do something about it, Torba had either burned you or burned one of your friends.
animeavatars.jpg
billstclair_v_pussyslayer2.png
fse--subversive_neonazis_and_communists.jpg
gold.png
gtfo.png

Strypey reshared this.

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light @Mammal I never took any of this stuff seriously 6 years ago. A lot of us were younger and thought this was all dumb drama about shitposting and blowing off steam when these people were trying to genuinely trying to subvert American culture.

But these days Torba seems to be exclusively running in these weird astroturfed "trad" circles whose only consistent position is shilling for random 3rd world countries. "Save the White race by siding against White countries no matter what the issue. In fact, don't even look into the issue. Being a misinformed vibes based gonzo idiot is BASED!"

It makes me wonder if all the deplatforming from those days that everyone said was "leftist" was actually targeted at people receiving foreign money.

You look at these types of people from back then and where they are now and they're all shilling for Orban when that election was totally irrelevant to everyone except Hungarians and Russians, they all have Russian wives for some reason, or they're promoting pro China, pro Iran, pro pan-Arab propaganda.

Basically anyone that has influence that isn't in the core American geopolitical coalition, the old Far Right influencers are carrying water for those people. I'm thinking more of these Torba types than we thought are just paid agitators of foreign governments. Even back then a lot of them were being promoted by RT.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Candlemaker 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@AngelCelt @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light @Mammal Well, you wanna fuel that paranoia, Gab silently *pretends* to delete your account if you click the button but if you have a Pro account or a Verified account--that is, if Gab has your dox--they don't actually delete it.
gab_doesnt_delete_your_shit_if_they_have_your_dox.png
in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light @Mammal She's some Asian who was running a company called Tenent Media, it was funding Tim Pool and Lauren Southern and others in that sphere $100K per show and it was uncovered that it was a Russian shell company just promoting anyone that would sew distrust in American/Western institutions. Just the typical Russian shit.

And yes, she is cute, but married to a mystery meat European.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Mystic

@Mammal@shitposter.world @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @p @strypey @silverpill @light Woke isn't real. The Left in America hasn't pushed it in like 5 years. GamerGate is over, this thing you hate only exists on the Internet and Netflix.

The only people who haven't shut the fuck up about it for the past half decade are Rightists. You're the exact demographic foreign agitators prey on to destroy the morale of White countries. This is why everything has been so rapidly enshittified.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @SilverDeth @silverpill @light @Mammal

> Do share.

For your enjoyment: fsebugoutzone.org/objects/55b9…


:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:
:smb64_i::smb64_f::smb64_t::smb64_a::smb64_s:
:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:

:elliotmanic: NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN :tyrellyelling:

@taoeffect ran the IFTAS thread ( fsebugoutzone.org/objects/ad4d… ) through a clanker and the clanker suggested that a lot of the information was unverified by hedging all to hell.

So, let's dig up the citations: it turns out that IFTAS is big business! $1,408,877.86, in fact. Not bad for a side-hustle that isn't even your day job, right?

Bringing up the head, the Social Web Foundation, of which @evan is the head ( socialwebfoundation.org/team/ ), doesn't list their EIN on their website. But their donation page ( socialwebfoundation.org/donate… ) says:

> The Social Web Foundation is a fiscally-sponsored project of Exchange Point Institute, a US 501(c)3 non-profit.

The Exchange Points Institute's EIN is 87-1028685. Their Form 990-N on IRS site says they have "Gross receipts not greater than: $50,000" for 2023; ProPublica says ( projects.propublica.org/nonpro… ) that they got $527,410 in 2024, per their 990. Pretty fuckin' heavy! $120k of that was from the Ford Foundation⁰. Congrats, @evan ! If you like, you can also read Mallory Knodel's "Announcing the launch of Social Web Foundation" in the Association for Progressive Communications blog. The bold part from that blog post: "To fight inequality, participate in democracy, build an equitable society and economy, we can’t rely on a few corporate-owned, profit-driven spaces. The Social Web Foundation is our best chance to establish the conditions in which the new social media operates with zero harm." In the following paragraph, Eugen "John Mastodon" Gargamel-Rochko, is quoted as being proud to back the Social Web Foundation and their work.

Total (gross¹): $527,410

Next up, IFTAS itself, $384,375 in 2023, and then another $7,733 in 2024, but they spent $302,567 that year, per projects.propublica.org/nonpro… . The ridiculously circuitous pathway for the money includes the National Endowment for Democracy (:cia:) and the Open Society Foundation (Soros)². If you rolled your eyes when I said that the glowies were funding IFTAS, I invite you to come dislocate your jaw trying to fit my goddamn dick in your mouth. Looks like plenty of cash for just 40 hours a week, @jaz . Way to hustle!

Total (gross): $919,518

Two of the bigger instances in the "Fediverse Governance" glowop are social.coop and hachyderm.io. There were nine more³, I didn't check, presumably they're worth less money.

The budget for social.coop is, per opencollective.com/socialcoop#… ) £71,952.29 ($97,373.03), of which they have so far spent £42,306.86 ($57,253.87).

Total (gross): $1,016,891.03

hachyderm.io is a little more convoluted: they're owned, per their about page, by the Nivenly Foundation, EIN 92-2345439 (which you've gotta dig out of the IRS because they do not list that on their website). They've pulled in $17,697.88 and haven't touched any of it yet. Way to show some self-restraint, @nova !

Total (gross): $1,034,588.91

Now, this one's trickier! For an undisclosed sum, NewsMast purchased indieweb.social ( timothychambers.net/2025/03/27… ). They claim to have done no trading any of the years they've filed, but they bought indieweb.social in March 2025. They filed as dormant for 2025 and then borrowed £276,575 ($374,288.95 at time of writing), which is currently about . So, unless they've made any big purchases other than that, it looks like they've paid a quarter-million pounds sterling sixabong quidbob for indieweb.social. As noted in the prervious post, NewsMast paid Tim Chambers for this site and Tim Chambers is the...the Executive Director, per the NewsMast site ( about.iftas.org/2024/07/12/tim… ). Now, *that's* how you flip a $10 domain and like a few hundred in hosting costs, @tchambers !

Total (gross, including speculative valuation of indieweb.social): $1,408,877.86

So, you know, cram that in whoever's pipe next time @graf spends a handful of bennies on Crunchbits/Frantech boxes.

⁰ "CORE SUPPORT FOR THE SOCIAL WEB FOUNDATION TO INCREASE THE REACH AND SUSTAINABILITY OF OPEN SOURCE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS" was worth $70k to the Ford Foundation and "CORE SUPPORT TO SURVEY AND INTERVIEW GLOBAL INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE MEMBERS OF THE INFRARED NETWORK THAT PROVIDE ALTERNATIVES TO MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE TECH PLATFORMS TO DEVELOP A LONG TERM AND SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE NETWORK" was worth $50k. So, that fediverse governance survey, that was a $50k survey! No big deal, though, the Ford Foundation (EIN 13-1684331) sneezes that on the hour; they control about $17.5B.

¹ I mean that I am totaling the amount of money they receive, but also: I am vomit. 🤮 Not that making money is wrong, per se, but these are people getting foundation money to kill fedi.

² Real ugly goddamn URL, fuck's sake: datarepublican.com/expose/?cus… .

³ The Individual Eleven:

cosocial.ca/ (cosocial.ca/) | fedilist.com/instance/cosocial… (fedilist.com/instance/cosocial…)
hcommons.social/ (hcommons.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/hcommons… (fedilist.com/instance/hcommons…)
hachyderm.io/ (hachyderm.io/) | fedilist.com/instance/hachyder… (fedilist.com/instance/hachyder…)
masto.donte.com.br/ (masto.donte.com.br/) | fedilist.com/instance/masto.do… (fedilist.com/instance/masto.do…)
mspsocial.net/ (mspsocial.net/) | fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia… (fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia…)
piaille.fr/ (piaille.fr/) | fedilist.com/instance/piaille.… (fedilist.com/instance/piaille.…)
sfba.social/ (sfba.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc… (fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc…)
social.coop/ (social.coop/) | fedilist.com/instance/social.c… (fedilist.com/instance/social.c…)
tooting.ch/ (tooting.ch/) | fedilist.com/instance/tooting.… (fedilist.com/instance/tooting.…)
wandering.shop/ (wandering.shop/) | fedilist.com/instance/wanderin… (fedilist.com/instance/wanderin…)
woof.group/ (woof.group/) | fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro… (fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro…)


in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light @Mammal

“For at least a month, the *majority* of their activity was a single account that posted three times per second. I saw the bot, killed the bot, could not tell Gab about the bot because Gab blocked FSE.”

Gab used to have a bot account called “jsheistydiety” that posts hi-res screenshots of low res boomer memes at multiple times per minute. And it had a comped yellow circle during imagocaust 2024.

in reply to StarProphet

@StarProphet @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light @Mammal

> Gab used to have a bot account called “jsheistydiety” that posts hi-res screenshots of low res boomer memes at multiple times per minute.

So, that's something I saw; I suspected that the Gab Trends was gamed so I did some analysis but it was really difficult to get some sort of clean view of Gab Trends (clickwrapping plus downtime plus their shit was difficult for both humans and bots to read). But I found this group of accounts that would all post the same set of Pepes and then randomly they would post the same link as all the others did, and then that link would show up on Gab Trends.

There was some recipe bot that would shit recipes scraped from recipe sites and the guy was claiming to be a Vietnam War sniper (his account was something like "sniperss"), right, a member of a unit that didn't exist during the Vietnam War, and now he's a "hotel chef" and he purported to be posting his own recipes but he wasn't even using the same units consistently; his top posts were all spelled and punctuated properly but his replies were all weird shit definitely not written by an American and he'd end them with "thank you,,david", weird shit. So I noticed a lot of accounts had that pattern, their top-level posts were

The most reliable indicator was that the bots would engage in some really easy-to-analyze behavior: they'd post uniformly around the clock (humans sleep), the overwhelming majority of their activities would be posts/reposts. That is, very few likes and very few replies to people that didn't tag them, very few follow/unfollow/block; this is expected of spambots, right, they aren't going to put any effort into something that doesn't put something on your screen, but they would reply when you interacted with them because it's worth their time to evade detection. So their replies read like they were written by offshore clickfarm dudes, like someone was running a few hundred bot accounts and then they'd send the replies to some sort of centralized place, right, like so they could reply "no im not bot" or "thank you,,david". You could plausibly run a massive farm like that, like several hundred accounts per guy. (They didn't have an obvious commercial interest, so it's possible that people were right with their suspicion that Gab was using clickfarms to look more active than it was.)

But the behavior made it easy to detect them: I wrote a little script that would look at all of the activity an account did, look at the ratio of normal activity to broadcast-style activity and how flat their activity was over 24 hours, and then draw a sparkline graph so I could visually inspect. This was really helpful for identifying bots, no ML stuff required even. And then once that was easy to do, I could do k-means clustering to see who was following them, and I iced about a hundred accounts on FSE that had posted just gibberish or nothing at all but were following only Gab spambot accounts. (I hated the spam and it actually cost me money by forcing me to upgrade boxes on Frantech, but it was fun to come up with bot-detection stuff.)

> And it had a comped yellow circle during imagocaust 2024.

I don't know what that is, like I heard something had to do with making image-posting a "Pro" feature, but I also don't really have any interest in Gab except where they intersected with fedi.

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light I applaud your anti spam efforts. I think ai spam was a bigger problem on gab in the past because they were trying to disguise the loss of users that killing federation represented. I can understand why gab today is being given the truth social treatment on modern fedi.

Originally the dissent memes were on discord, and they only moved to gab once discord got taken over, so gab is now like a historical host for dissent content. The regime is going to promote mainstream twitter over alt twitters.

This was the argument I had with graf which is that to survive as an alt twitter you have to have anti-regime moderation. Otherwise it's a step backwards into discord era. I'm defeded from poast because in my view they run things like a woke website and it's insincere spirit of dissent. Gab was basically a middle finger to trump, nobody was gatekeeping shit on there, the regime guys were just getting dog walked over and over again until they quit.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Mystic

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@Mammal @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey

> so gab is now like a historical host for dissent content

I went there for a few days in 2016 or 2017. I posted some images and then I wondered aloud how Gab was different from Twitter: Twitter was alleged by Jack and Biz to be "the free speech wing of the free speech party" and that was bullshit eventually. So then I saw this "Gab" thing and it was supposed to be like that but forreals this time and I checked it out and I wondered aloud, "How is this any different from Twitter? There's no real guarantee except a promise and we had that with Twitter and look how that turned out." and I got screamed at by some guy with a Bible quote in his bio and wraparound sunglasses in his avatar. I knew it was full of bots because years later, I started getting inundated with "StormGirl1488 has followed you". I didn't see any "dissent". I do know a lot of people that think ranting about Jews qualifies as dissent but I saw enough of that on fedi, I didn't need to go to another website to see that.

> Originally the dissent memes were on discord

Discord didn't exist when dissent memes were getting passed around.

> I'm defeded from poast because in my view they run things like a woke website and it's insincere spirit of dissent.

I'm not sure what this means, but before Poast arrived on fedi, people were accusing me of being "woke" or being "another Torba" and that shit didn't land on FSE and it doesn't land on Poast, though they're a little quicker with the block button. niggy (SAY HER NAME) hacked UMN and CUNY and lives on Poast and that's dissent (and a fun time).

> Gab was basically a middle finger to trump

Gab was shilling for Trump from its inception until Trump was unbanned from Twitter. I got those emails, too. I got the "Please beg President Trump to join Gab!" and then I got this one where the subject line was wishful clickbait:
president_trump_not_on_gab.png

in reply to pistolero

@Mammal @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey Yeah Gab courted Trump, and when the Trump campaign looked at their non-bot engagement/users laughed them outta the room.

Torbu then made up some bullshit story about Trump wanting Blab censored and started barking about how freezepeach was under attack, begged for money, then set up a mirror that reposted every one of Fat Orange Carnie's CAPS RIDDLED tweets.

Pepperidge Farm 'membas...

in reply to SilverDeth

@SilverDeth @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light @Mammal I gotta ask but does a majority of mastodon even see anything said on this side of the fediverse? I was under the assumption that they've probably blanket defederated a majority of instances or people on this side of the fedi anyways.
I don't think anything changes too much in the event of a split at this point.
in reply to :seven:

@vii @Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey

> Always trying to figure out what the heuristic is that lands fse in permapreminorityreportban and dsmc just skates by.

IFTAS. The IFTAS people put FSE at "Tier 0".

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @Spooke @fish @vii @phnt @sampler @SilverDeth @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light there are no nazis, there's just zionists pretending to be one. nazis don't have any government resources to throw at you. it's more splc fuentes type stuff
in reply to Mystic

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey @vii

> there are no nazis, there's just zionists pretending to be one.

I have had this discussion with about a dozen people a day, every day of my life, starting with the day that I decided to name a Pleroma instance "free speech extremist".

Curiously, there's always a flare-up of this sort of conversation in threads where I have noticed glowies. Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action, and it stops at three but I think if I could say "every goddamn time"...Look, I don't mean to bite your head off but I'm going to if you start insisting that you're blowing my mind with the truth bombs and that I'm brainwashed and that because I don't think the shit you think now, then I must think the same shit you thought five years ago. You walk from point A to point B and you think everyone that isn't at point B with you must be at point A. "Everyone I don't agree with is a Zionist shill." Okay. "Wait, that's not what I said!"

> there are no nazis, there's just zionists pretending to be one. nazis don't have any government resources to throw at you. it's more splc fuentes type stuff

Turns out it's *exactly* what you said.

You didn't look at the image. Alex Linder tried to get the DRC admin arrested by signing up on his instance and threatening to blow up a bunch of Jewish hospitals. You don't need "government resources to throw at someone". I've seen the atomwaffles and I have seen the gablins and I have seen lil Dickie Spencer and I have seen the GLR fanboys and you can go ask what they think about me. I don't intend to engage on this topic because:

> it's more splc fuentes type stuff

YOU FUCKING DOOMSCROLLING MONKEY

WHILE YOU ARE HALLUCINATING LINKS TO THE SPLC

THIS WAS A THREAD ABOUT IFTAS

WHICH IS PAINTING A BULLSEYE ON FEDI

AND LEGIT *IS* LINKED TO SPLC MONEY

AND THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY

WHICH IS THE FUCKING CIA

AND YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT EVERY GABLIN THAT TRIED TO CAUSE TROUBLE WAS SECRETLY LINKED TO THE SPLC

IN ORDER TO DERAIL A CONVERSATION

ABOUT CONCRETE EVENTS

OPENLY

GODDAMN OPENLY

OPENLY LINKED TO THE SPLC

THIS IS VERY FRUSTRATING TO ME

datarepublican.com/expose/?cus…
GODDAMMIT_YOU_FUCKING_DIPSHIT.gif

in reply to Radians

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@DemonSixOne @icedquinn @Spooke @fish @vii @phnt @sampler @SilverDeth @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light @Mammal It is beautiful but all the people shitting on it and calling it some kind of commie paradise are encouraging commies to move there. In the middle of the chip shortage, the people voted in by those exact commies actively held up container ships from China because what if a goddamn box of PS5s has the 'rona? I saw the boats, man, you could see them from the only off-leash dog beach in LA County. The two busiest container ports in the entire continent are the port of Long Beach and the port of LA, and they're adjacent: they're only technically different ports because the city limits of LA stop and the city limits of Long Beach start. Transplants ruin everything, especially because they are too fucking stupid to realize that they should maybe look into who they're voting for and see if that person maybe got indicted last year or is possibly a complete piece of shit from the four families of Northern California that have been gradually attempting to take over the state. I don't know why all the blackpill dipshits on fedi are so eager to cede turf but it is a good sign that someone's done got astroturfed or psyopped if they agree with NYT opinion columns.
fourfamilies.jpg
in reply to pistolero

This is a good infographic but I feel like it is also one you could make for most states. certainly nevada, just sub in pat millroy, clark co water and the reid family.

Feel like this needs some branches out into some of the other rot points that are older such as mullholland, ladwp and the water kikes that turned the owens valley into a salt flat, or the "fuck you got mine" policy effects of prop 13.

in reply to Radians

@DemonSixOne @icedquinn @Spooke @fish @vii @phnt @sampler @SilverDeth @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light @Mammal Ah, the Prop 13 shit is partially about Chinese investors shoveling tons of cash at real estate developers. The real estate developers owned both of the candidates for mayor last election if that gives you an idea.

You know what's probably the best show about what happened to Southern California is Lodge 49. Highly recommended.

in reply to :seven:

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@vii @Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey Do...do you think that factors in?

Because A LOT OF THINGS WOULD LINE UP IF ALL OF THE POOP-FETISHISTS HATED ME BECAUSE I AM A TIT-ENJOYER
milk.mp4

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @Spooke @fish @phnt @sampler @SilverDeth @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light @Mammal I mean it might. Having people fixate on Jews seems to be one of the games out there, but it’s really hard to fixate on Jews and nice tits at the same time.
in reply to :seven:

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@vii @Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey Goddammit, I am all over the map tonight, sorry.

> but it’s really hard to fixate on Jews and nice tits at the same time.

COUNTERPOINT:
milker_of_khazar.jpg
nazi_milk_office.jpg
time_machine_milkers.jpeg

in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @Spooke @fish @vii @phnt @SilverDeth @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light @Mammal

The worst part about getting targeted by feds is they will send dozens of beautiful women to you to try and take you down. They'll take you out on luxurious dates and try to spoil you with fancy bottles and the drugs celebrities take. Trips to Vegas

I managed to cheat the system, enjoying the beautiful women and their gifts with none of the jail time or cooperation.

in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

@sampler @Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @silverpill @strypey @vii

> The worst part about getting targeted by feds is they will send dozens of beautiful women to you to try and take you down. They'll take you out on luxurious dates and try to spoil you with fancy bottles and the drugs celebrities take. Trips to Vegas

...So, uh...

in reply to Instant Creamer

in reply to ​

@dorkvalized @ForbiddenDreamer @Mammal @SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey @vii

> Took me some time to recognise the Red pill w

Oh, shit, ha, I didn't realize it until you mentioned it. That is clever.

> Wait, I have a commercial idea!

DO GO ON

in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

@sampler @Mammal @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @silverpill @strypey @vii

WTF?

I was ripped off. All I got was 200k+ in legal bills, permeant admission to the no-fly list and yearly visits from the FBI.

How do I get this "hawt special agent" package?

in reply to Spooke

@Spooke @Mammal @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey

They probably don't see 90% of what we or I write. So it goes.

Speaking personally, I'm not posting for reach, validation or recognition. I'm ranting to blow of steam and chilling with mutuals - people who I am constantly learning from.

Frankly, my chief "hobby" is reading the musings of my carefully curated collection of techies, online racists, brilliant skitzos and hilarious shit-posters.

"It t'ain't much, but it t'ain't nuthin' 'neiher."

I might be, no exaggeration, one of the most blocked, shadow-banned and throttled people on the entire internet. I an so black-listed in the much benighted "real world" that re-entering any professional career in my field(s) is laughably impossible. (I am not allowed to fly on planes, and between 2006 and 2017 I was locked out of any bank except small credit unions).

Whether I should be proud of that or not, I leave to each person's interpretation.

But, to loop back to the beginning, if there was only me and my small google buried website screaming into the void to nobody, I'd probably still do so, because I am simply that much of a belligerent Scotsman/stupid Irish potato-nigger.

in reply to SilverDeth

@SilverDeth @icedquinn @Spooke @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @silverpill @StarProphet @light I didn't really have any awareness of gab's spam behavior on other instances as one of their local users. There was a real lefty censorship problem at the time that you needed a no-ban server to combat. Now that twitter version 2 is around gab does not have much purpose anymore as a test ground, the gatekeeper paradigm has already been updated. If you tell fed loyalists to go fuck themselves, you get banned anywhere else, and you don't get banned on gab, but it's been made irrelevant since nobody is there anymore and you can't interact with anyone on the wider internet without federation.
in reply to Mystic

@SilverDeth @Spooke @StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey I miss the gab vibe after getting purged by woke discord mods one after another, we finally had a server that felt like it was /ourguys in charge. Of course you knew the mods were really fed connected, but the community culture was whole heartedly fuck the regime. Torba probably wanted Trump on board for business reasons, but the reality is team trump tried and failed to win over "groypers" and other alt right types on gab and eventually just gave up on trying. Now you have instances where every mod is a fed loyalist and you get banned for challenging them. You can just tell we're back to HR karen in charge. Everything promoted on twitter is astroturf slop, it doesn't feel real. Being able to go full edgelord was exciting and now it's just back to getting deplatformed.
in reply to Mystic

@StarProphet @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey We went through all this effort to cancel-proof our anti-woke speech, and just because they killed torba's audience doesn't mean I have to listen to graf karen me about how to oppose zog. How many regime shills do you think I've fought with over the years online? He is nothing special, I've already surpassed a dozen others just like that.
in reply to pistolero

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @light

The point I am trying to make is not about Mastodon specifically. It's about network effects. I believe that in case of a network split almost all developers and users will defect to the Mastodon side, even those who are making fun of Mastodon today.

It's not going to be like Gab.

Of course, this situation is mostly theoretical, I don't expect it to happen within the next 2-3 years. And obviously, I don't think that we should be especially concerned about being cut off from the Mastodon Network. I am talking about building a viable alternative.


"If you don't implement this feature, the glowies will defederate and fork the protocol and you will have no glowies or pedophiles or mutualaid hashtags."

Oops.


in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @strypey @light

> I believe that in case of a network split almost all developers and users will defect to the Mastodon side, even those who are making fun of Mastodon today.

Almost all users are on Facebook or Twitter. Fedi is a tiny, tiny speck by comparison. "More users" doesn't mean "better fedi".

:gnujihad: It is true that Gab didn't have a lot of hackers, but I've never heard someone discuss Pleroma's "user acquisition strategy".

Numbers don't mean a lot if they're not qualified. If most of the webshits go to Mastodon and the weird hackers stick on the rest of fedi, the rest of fedi is where I'd like to be. Most developers are on Busky and Twitter. Most users are on Twitter. Facebook has more users than that.

> It's not going to be like Gab.

:gnujihad::smug2::blacksam:

> I don't expect it to happen within the next 2-3 years.

Sure. Bridge crossed when came to.

> And obviously, I don't think that we should be especially concerned about being cut off from the Mastodon Network. I am talking about building a viable alternative.

Then I'm not sure what you mean.

I would like everyone that wants to be free to be free. I am less interested in trading that to accommodate a larger number of people. First thing, I intend to have a place for myself: I am going to be somewhere. There are people like me and I can be in the place with those people. There are people that want a place that is not like the place I want; I don't need to be in the same place as them.

Monterey Park has some of the best Chinese food in the US. Wonderful place, fun to just wander around. There's nowhere quite like that area. So even after I moved up to Arcadia, when I went somewhere to eat, I'd usually go somewhere around Monterey Park, Alhambra. The city council in Monterey Park was trying to increase tax revenue by bringing in more franchises: they wanted an Applebee's and a TGI Friday's. This got shat on by the people that lived there because the reason they lived in Monterey Park was that it was Monterey Park. If it turned into Irvine or whatever, there'd be no reason to live in Monterey Park. And for people that didn't live there, there was a reason to go to Monterey Park: it was unique. There's no reason to go to Irvine (unless you want to see the world's first beige Walmart--city building codes, all buildings are beige, all signs are brown, so this was the first Walmart to not have a grey-blue facade and blue sign). But the Beijing Pie House was in Monterey Park. Late-night meat-skewers place I went to with fluffy. Hot pot places, tea shops, etc. Things unique to the western half of the San Gabriel Valley. So people that lived in Monterey Park didn't want it, people that visited Monterey Park didn't want it, but the city council did, because it was much more tax revenue than the noodle stands.

Now, I left Twitter in 2016. At that point, it was largely carried by momentum, so I left later than I should have. All of the reasons I joined Twitter to begin with were present on fedi, and more: I could hack shit, I could talk to the other people that were hacking shit. Here we are: we wouldn't be having this conversation if we were just Twitter users. There's a reason to be on fedi: the hackers and artists and weirdos are here. I don't have a tenuous place, because I'm here as long as I run the pipes. That eliminates an entire class of reasons to second-guess myself when I speak. And everyone here is like that. No one's really worried about saying something that gets them shadowbanned. This is a unique and wonderful place. If glowies want to coopt it and use "but you can't diverge from *Mastodon*", I'm not budging a goddamn inch, and I'm going to encourage people that value fedi to do the same. "Shittier version of Twitter" isn't the network I joined. I have put money and time and work into fedi and Rochko and Gleason and Pincus and Kissane and Jaz-Michael King and Even Projomout and the rest of them can eat shit if they want to turn fedi into a worse hell than the one I left when I finally bailed on Twitter.

So, that's my flag planted: :gnujihad:

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light Oh, I am sure this is just a misunderstanding. Nothing a couple of joint events couldn't fix

j12t.social/users/j12t/statuse…


I want to applaud @rose.bsky.team and @mellifluousbox for appearing on stage together and expressing a desire to cooperate. As I've said for a long time, #Bluesky and #Mastodon, #ActivityPub and #ATProtocol should not be fighting each other. The real opposition are the oligarch-controlled, enshittified, manipulating major commercial platforms. We have no chance of making a dent into their dominance if the revolution fights itself instead.

in reply to silverpill

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light The will surely love that decision. Bsky users already hate bsky leadership and Fedi is too complicated to them in their own words. Mastodon thinks they aren't decentralized and doesn't like the bsky leadership. Now they can hate both.

Tbh, picrel is probably the best solution anyway.
bluesky-refugees-grass.png

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Chaotic Good-ish Barbarian

@Deplorable_Degenerate
> What if they join our instances though?

Instances are like pubs. People like to hang out in different kinds of pubs, and that's OK. A pub stops being what it is if the social centre of gravity shifts. But that just means it becomes something else, and that's OK too.

As long as our city has space for many different kinds of pubs, everyone can find 1 or more they enjoy.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @p @silverpill @Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital @light @coolboymew

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @Deplorable_Degenerate @icedquinn @fish @sampler @silverpill @light @coolboymew

>A pub stops being what it is if the social centre of gravity shifts. But that just means it becomes something else, and that's OK too.

I disagree with this, instances are communities and those that try to shift the culture of the community unnaturally should be expelled from it and find another community. This is how hostile takeovers of communities happen and has been called invading or being a disruptive guest in forums for a reason. You will get kicked out of a pub for being disruptive as well.

in reply to Phantasm

(1/?)

@phnt
> those that try to shift the culture of the community unnaturally should be expelled from it

Sure, but that's clearly not what I'm talking about. Culture change in any community is slow but constant, as the people in them change. If some people leave and others join, this contributes to the same effect. The social centre of gravity in a loose-tie community is always shifting.

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @p @silverpill @light @coolboymew

in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

@phnt
> You will get kicked out of a pub for being disruptive as well

Sure, but not for being at one end of the bell curve of people who hang out in that pub. Well, unless it's one of *those* kinds of pubs. But a growing city has space for those too, for people who want to be insular;

nora.codes/post/the-fediverse-…

These are all perfectly fine variations in the pub life of a city.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Strypey

(3/3)

I mean, I remember when the cluster of people represented in this conversation arrived in the fediverse en masse. Mainly by joining quitter instances which ... weren't really the right pub for them. What did the veterans do? Did we try to have you banished from the city altogether?

No. We helped you set up your own pubs, and then some of you started Pleroma (and postActiv, RIP), or forked Misskey, etc. The tension between your needs and ours was handled creatively, to mutual benefit.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey
>Sure, but that's clearly not what I'm talking about.
>The social centre of gravity in a loose-tie community is always shifting.

I misunderstood what you meant in that case.

>nora.codes/post/the-fediverse-…

I'm very conflicted about that post. It has a point that "Fediverse" outside of people developing it means very little (usually called the Mastodon™ network anyway) since it is a half-split network at this point. On the other hand it actively promotes this split, even gives it a name. The Fediverse the writer and I want are different in that regard. Fediblock effectively turning into a harassment tool with minimal value instead of its supposed original goal can probably be attributed to that.

Not that it matters much these days anyway since the two halves barely talk to each other now, but I still want the Fediverse where breaking federation isn't a design goal (signed fetch domain enforcement) and where the content users see is controlled by the user and not by the instance administrators as it usually is the case in the Mastodon side. It's not something that will probably ever become reality, but it's a worthy goal I think. The wild west banter I like isn't something everyone can handle though.

>These are all perfectly fine variations in the pub life of a city.

All it boils down for me is: "I don't agree with the Fediverse you want, but I won't try to prevent you from having it." I'm fine with anyone being here as long as they aren't disruptive guests in the community I'm in. If they want help, I'm happy to help.

>What did the veterans do? Did we try to have you banished from the city altogether?
>No. We helped you set up your own pubs, and then some of you started Pleroma (and postActiv, RIP), or forked Misskey, etc. The tension between your needs and ours was handled creatively, to mutual benefit.

Sadly this ability to handle tension seems to be mostly gone now. You see the desire to resolve conflicts and tensions rarely, instead the network keeps irrationally burning more and more bridges between the already split islands of what are the remnants of the Fediverse of the past.

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @p @silverpill @light @coolboymew

in reply to Phantasm

(1/?)

@phnt
> Fediblock effectively turning into a harassment tool with minimal value instead of its supposed original goal

I would say it's been both simultaneously. Which is why it needs to be replaced by a standard protocol that keeps moderation decentralised, but enables newbie admins/mods to find and use automated support provided by veterans.

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @p @silverpill @light @coolboymew

in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

I got much less worried about IFTAS when I started looking into the details of what they're building;

wedistribute.org/podcast/trust…

Bear with me as I lay out a nonpartisan case for what they're doing.

in reply to Strypey

(3/?)

The video posted elsewhere in this hellthread demonstrates that there is a need for newbies setting up fediverse servers to have a simple way to protect themselves from spammers (including griefers). The obvious example is people spewing racist bile (no one needs to see that kind of low-effort toddler dickwaving). But from my POV, it equally includes identi-Moonies haranguing me for being a racist just for being in this conversation, or talking to folks from the 'Dark Side' at all.

This entry was edited (23 hours ago)
in reply to Strypey

(5/?)

It would be easy to dismiss IFTAS as an attempt to impose BS-style centralised moderation on the fediverse. But I think that's a mistake. They're trying to solve the same problem, yes, but in a much more fediverse-esque way. Using standardised protocol plumbing that admins/mods can opt-in to, unlike the ATmosphere where BS's labeler is imposed on the whole network.

Maybe I'm naive and I haven't dug deep enough into the technical details to see the evil. If so, by all means, educate me.

This entry was edited (23 hours ago)
in reply to Strypey

(6/?)

@phnt
> Sadly this ability to handle tension seems to be mostly gone now

There's a lot more partisanship, for sure, something that comes with a larger population. But the veterans are still here! Still trying to get people to talk to each other and find win-win solutions that enable us all to peacefully coexist, instead of muttering in dark corners spreading scuttlebutt about each other.

in reply to Strypey

(7/?)

One of those veterans is Evan P who was one of the founders of the original fediverse. Creating identi.ca, StatusNet which became GNU social, and pump.io which was the basis of AP. Yes, like all the veterans who were here before you lot, Evan's socially liberal and has very little time for alt-right brainworms. But we're also carefully nonpartisan when it comes to the tech.

I would be very concerned about what the SWF or SocialCG had planned if Evan wasn't such a prominent actor in both.

in reply to Strypey

(8/?)

Jaz is a different story. An arrival on one of the 2017 ships, so not an OG like Evan, DeadSuperHero and Mike McG, or even CLM. But not, as often characterised, an opportunist who turned up as part of Eternal November.

Yes, Jaz is part of Newsmast as well as IFTAS, and toot.wales. But relatively speaking we're still a tiny dev community, so it's neither surprising nor suspicious that some really enthusiastic people have their fingers in a lot of pies.

in reply to Strypey

(9/?)

I mean shit, if we're going to be wary of people for turning up all over the place, I'm suspicious AF!

I'm a longtimer at SocialHub (from before it was reestablished at the current subdomain), and at fediverse.party, where I'm now Lead Goose. I mouth off regularly in the Fediverse Ideas repo, and the.socialmusic.network. I turn up in a bunch of fediverse-related Matrix rooms, etc, etc.

in reply to Strypey

(10/10)

What can I say? I'm autistic AF and the verse is one of my special interests. Maybe the same is true for some of the people getting shade cast on them here?

I don't want to propose anything radical but ... Have any of you tried the same kind of calm and reasonable discussion we're having here with any of the people you're suspicious of?

That said, some people do seem to be here to seed division, notably Pincus. But they tend not to contribute anything other than fountains of invective

in reply to Strypey

@strypey
>but enables newbie admins/mods to find and use automated support provided by veterans.

I don't think "veterans" should have a say in moderation of an instance they aren't on. The instance administrator/mod team should do the moderation and that's it. The issue with outsourcing your moderation to someone, like Evan wants, and IFTAS and others are pushing (even Mastodon with its new grant for FASPs and content scanning), is that you have to fully trust those people and keep them constantly in check to not overreach/overreact/get biased etc. To use their favorite word, you need very good governance around those people. Worst of all, IFTAS is completely non-transparent in their moderation aggregation sources, receipts or reasons. They are a black box you either fully trust or don't trust at all. I'm very tempted to set up a throwaway instance just to have a look at their walled of CARIAD thing that requires admin privs to your instance.

>replaced by a standard protocol that keeps moderation decentralised

FIRES is that, but immediately after it released to the public in a usable form, I've already seen what people are interested in it. Namely Oliphant and his island networks (read: isolated echo chambers) project. I would be fine with FASPs and FIRES, if there wasn't such a large opportunity to misuse this for state-level censorship of the network years down the road. Something like Pleroma MRF which can optionally talk to some API server to make decisions, is something very similar in nature, but smaller in scope. It can still be abused, but it doesn't have that large of an impact and certainly not influence when compared to size of Mastodon.

>But from my POV, it equally includes identi-Moonies haranguing me for being a racist just for being in this conversation, or talking to folks from the 'Dark Side' at all.

Yeah that sadly happens and its those tensions and refusal to resolve conflicts I talked about. From experience you cannot be the bridge between the two "sides", it is simply impossible to walk the thin rope. One post with a slightly out of place joke and your efforts are now worthless.

>The video posted elsewhere in this hellthread demonstrates that there is a need for newbies setting up fediverse servers to have a simple way to protect themselves from spammers (including griefers).

There is a lack of documentation on how to host a Fediverse instance in general, which is something I would like to work on eventually. Something like resurrecting fediverse.express and making it more resource-centered then getting started centered. That said newbies will probably first join an instance and then consider making their own, which makes the moderation/defederation decisions visible to those users (even when Mastodon blocks access to those without an account) besides being able to ask others.

It is a need for sure, but I think there's more important needs than that currently.

>Supporting newbie admins/mods - and especially self-hosters running single-tenant instances - is particularly important if we want a fediverse of many small-to-medium instances.

100% agreed.

>It would be easy to dismiss IFTAS as an attempt to impose BS-style centralised moderation on the fediverse. But I think that's a mistake. They're trying to solve the same problem, yes, but in a much more fediverse-esque way. Using standardised protocol plumbing that admins/mods can opt-in to, unlike the ATmosphere where BS's labeler is imposed on the whole network.

I'm very hesitant with this considering their weird funding through various US and EU government agencies. Considering that Mastodon now received grants to implement these very shortly after they were released to the public, sponsored by some agency you've never heard of which has ties to the German government. It can be an honest and genuine interest in helping the Fediverse, or government-sponsored control of a decentralized network. Which one is it to you, I will leave you to decide:
fsebugoutzone.org/objects/55b9…
fluffytail.org/objects/d89c032…
And now different parts of the same thread:
fluffytail.org/objects/dcd4037… (Excerpts I took from Jaz's recent blogpost which I recommend to read for more context to this thread and IFTAS in general: jaz.co.uk/2026/03/13/there-are…)
>Have any of you tried the same kind of calm and reasonable discussion we're having here with any of the people you're suspicious of?
fluffytail.org/objects/9acf376… (I and @silverpill tried two months ago to have a similar conversation with Evan, I ended up getting blocked by Evan. Besides that my account is deactivated on Mastosoc after replying to a post made by Pincus (his Privacy Nexus blog to be precise), which is where most of these people are. cwebber blocked me after making a darker joke about ActivityPub extensibility and rubber law paragraphs a year or more ago which I'm fine with, I can be unhinged at times and was much more in the past. I have alts and now also SH if I really want to insert myself into a discussion, so none of this bothers me.)

>Maybe the same is true for some of the people getting shade cast on them here?

I would certainly want to know that, but so far everyone that is involved in this (Evan) and doesn't block me or this instance already for reasons was very touchy about the subject.

>I mean shit, if we're going to be wary of people for turning up all over the place, I'm suspicious AF!

That's not how this works. You aren't suspicious based on what places you show up, it's the actions and language used that speak to me. Otherwise I would also be suspicious of silverpill which I'm not despite him showing up basically everywhere where there is a discussion about AP. But I get your point, I'm basically a walking red flag to some of these people when I regularly talk to @p, have fun in hellthreads, shitpost, sometimes talk to Poasties and also join AP/FEP threads when they are interesting.

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @p @silverpill @light @coolboymew


:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:
:smb64_i::smb64_f::smb64_t::smb64_a::smb64_s:
:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:

:elliotmanic: NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN :tyrellyelling:

@taoeffect ran the IFTAS thread ( fsebugoutzone.org/objects/ad4d… ) through a clanker and the clanker suggested that a lot of the information was unverified by hedging all to hell.

So, let's dig up the citations: it turns out that IFTAS is big business! $1,408,877.86, in fact. Not bad for a side-hustle that isn't even your day job, right?

Bringing up the head, the Social Web Foundation, of which @evan is the head ( socialwebfoundation.org/team/ ), doesn't list their EIN on their website. But their donation page ( socialwebfoundation.org/donate… ) says:

> The Social Web Foundation is a fiscally-sponsored project of Exchange Point Institute, a US 501(c)3 non-profit.

The Exchange Points Institute's EIN is 87-1028685. Their Form 990-N on IRS site says they have "Gross receipts not greater than: $50,000" for 2023; ProPublica says ( projects.propublica.org/nonpro… ) that they got $527,410 in 2024, per their 990. Pretty fuckin' heavy! $120k of that was from the Ford Foundation⁰. Congrats, @evan ! If you like, you can also read Mallory Knodel's "Announcing the launch of Social Web Foundation" in the Association for Progressive Communications blog. The bold part from that blog post: "To fight inequality, participate in democracy, build an equitable society and economy, we can’t rely on a few corporate-owned, profit-driven spaces. The Social Web Foundation is our best chance to establish the conditions in which the new social media operates with zero harm." In the following paragraph, Eugen "John Mastodon" Gargamel-Rochko, is quoted as being proud to back the Social Web Foundation and their work.

Total (gross¹): $527,410

Next up, IFTAS itself, $384,375 in 2023, and then another $7,733 in 2024, but they spent $302,567 that year, per projects.propublica.org/nonpro… . The ridiculously circuitous pathway for the money includes the National Endowment for Democracy (:cia:) and the Open Society Foundation (Soros)². If you rolled your eyes when I said that the glowies were funding IFTAS, I invite you to come dislocate your jaw trying to fit my goddamn dick in your mouth. Looks like plenty of cash for just 40 hours a week, @jaz . Way to hustle!

Total (gross): $919,518

Two of the bigger instances in the "Fediverse Governance" glowop are social.coop and hachyderm.io. There were nine more³, I didn't check, presumably they're worth less money.

The budget for social.coop is, per opencollective.com/socialcoop#… ) £71,952.29 ($97,373.03), of which they have so far spent £42,306.86 ($57,253.87).

Total (gross): $1,016,891.03

hachyderm.io is a little more convoluted: they're owned, per their about page, by the Nivenly Foundation, EIN 92-2345439 (which you've gotta dig out of the IRS because they do not list that on their website). They've pulled in $17,697.88 and haven't touched any of it yet. Way to show some self-restraint, @nova !

Total (gross): $1,034,588.91

Now, this one's trickier! For an undisclosed sum, NewsMast purchased indieweb.social ( timothychambers.net/2025/03/27… ). They claim to have done no trading any of the years they've filed, but they bought indieweb.social in March 2025. They filed as dormant for 2025 and then borrowed £276,575 ($374,288.95 at time of writing), which is currently about . So, unless they've made any big purchases other than that, it looks like they've paid a quarter-million pounds sterling sixabong quidbob for indieweb.social. As noted in the prervious post, NewsMast paid Tim Chambers for this site and Tim Chambers is the...the Executive Director, per the NewsMast site ( about.iftas.org/2024/07/12/tim… ). Now, *that's* how you flip a $10 domain and like a few hundred in hosting costs, @tchambers !

Total (gross, including speculative valuation of indieweb.social): $1,408,877.86

So, you know, cram that in whoever's pipe next time @graf spends a handful of bennies on Crunchbits/Frantech boxes.

⁰ "CORE SUPPORT FOR THE SOCIAL WEB FOUNDATION TO INCREASE THE REACH AND SUSTAINABILITY OF OPEN SOURCE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS" was worth $70k to the Ford Foundation and "CORE SUPPORT TO SURVEY AND INTERVIEW GLOBAL INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE MEMBERS OF THE INFRARED NETWORK THAT PROVIDE ALTERNATIVES TO MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE TECH PLATFORMS TO DEVELOP A LONG TERM AND SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE NETWORK" was worth $50k. So, that fediverse governance survey, that was a $50k survey! No big deal, though, the Ford Foundation (EIN 13-1684331) sneezes that on the hour; they control about $17.5B.

¹ I mean that I am totaling the amount of money they receive, but also: I am vomit. 🤮 Not that making money is wrong, per se, but these are people getting foundation money to kill fedi.

² Real ugly goddamn URL, fuck's sake: datarepublican.com/expose/?cus… .

³ The Individual Eleven:

cosocial.ca/ (cosocial.ca/) | fedilist.com/instance/cosocial… (fedilist.com/instance/cosocial…)
hcommons.social/ (hcommons.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/hcommons… (fedilist.com/instance/hcommons…)
hachyderm.io/ (hachyderm.io/) | fedilist.com/instance/hachyder… (fedilist.com/instance/hachyder…)
masto.donte.com.br/ (masto.donte.com.br/) | fedilist.com/instance/masto.do… (fedilist.com/instance/masto.do…)
mspsocial.net/ (mspsocial.net/) | fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia… (fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia…)
piaille.fr/ (piaille.fr/) | fedilist.com/instance/piaille.… (fedilist.com/instance/piaille.…)
sfba.social/ (sfba.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc… (fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc…)
social.coop/ (social.coop/) | fedilist.com/instance/social.c… (fedilist.com/instance/social.c…)
tooting.ch/ (tooting.ch/) | fedilist.com/instance/tooting.… (fedilist.com/instance/tooting.…)
wandering.shop/ (wandering.shop/) | fedilist.com/instance/wanderin… (fedilist.com/instance/wanderin…)
woof.group/ (woof.group/) | fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro… (fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro…)


in reply to Phantasm

Just want to point out the Nazi Bar allegory is bunk. Fascists operate by courting wealth, then buying the bar and turning it into a Nazi bar; they are the bartender, and they fool you into thinking they're just "tolerating" the Nazis who come in and bully people out.

Invaders don't arrive as a guest. They come in force. Hostile takeovers of communities by refugees fleeing disaster has n e v e r happened. If there's no army, there's no invasion. Invasion won't work without some military operations.

So yeah you can get kicked out of a pub for being disruptive. If your community's so weak it can't welcome outsiders though, that's not a problem with the outsiders.

CC: @icedquinn@blob.cat @fish@detroitriotcity.com @Deplorable_Degenerate@eveningzoo.club @sampler@freebeerextremist.com @p@fsebugoutzone.org @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @silverpill@mitra.social @light@noc.social @coolboymew@shitposter.world

in reply to Cy

@cy @icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @strypey @light @coolboymew

Have you noticed that the part of the thread you are replying to is mostly apolitical? Nobody is talking about a "Nazi Bar" or about "fascists".

>Hostile takeovers of communities by refugees fleeing disaster has n e v e r happened.

Factually incorrect, if you want the best example of that, look at furry communities and/or Tumblr exodus after its porn ban.

>If your community's so weak it can't welcome outsiders though, that's not a problem with the outsiders.

Outsiders are expected to respect the already existing culture of the community, that's it. Also a curious use of "weak". Weak to what, takeover?

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @cy @sampler @strypey @light I can't believe we're this long gone from the early 00s era of the Internet that we need to reiterate that "Lurk Moar" was an important netiquette that was more or less true to most random communities you'd find around
in reply to Phantasm

In their defense I posted that video of the first round of twitter refugees showing up and having Nazi imagery flashed at them.

Yeah I still remember one of them saying "we need to chase these racists back to the dark corners of the internet"

That absolute retarded motherfucker didn't seem to realize where they were. Neither do they.

in reply to Phantasm

(1/2)

@cy
> Hostile takeovers of communities by refugees fleeing disaster has n e v e r happened

@phnt
> Factually incorrect, if you want the best example of that, look at furry communities and/or Tumblr exodus after its porn ban.

Can you expand on that? Who were the refugees here? What disaster were they fleeing? Whose communities were taken over?

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @light @coolboymew

in reply to Strypey

(2/2)

@phnt
> Outsiders are expected to respect the already existing culture of the community

How true this is and what it means depends entirely on context and scale.

If you're talking about people joining a fediverse service, or coming into a pub where everyone doesn't know their name, then sure. If you're talking about people standing up new services to join the fediverse, or starting a new pub in a city a bunch of them just moved to, then no. They're free to enact their own culture there.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @strypey
>Can you expand on that? Who were the refugees here? What disaster were they fleeing? Whose communities were taken over?

None of this happened here on a large scale, I was speaking generally about communities all over the Internet. Some examples would the various imageboards where previous users got displaced by refugees coming from dying imageboards, same with various forums over the years. Or the probably worst, Tumblr refugees turning places like Twitter communities (yes those exist) to porn infested cesspools.

The closest we have here is people fleeing Twitter before and after Musk got it, starting dumb (de)federation drama/fediblock witch hunts etc. and making Fediverse more political than it already was. I don't know if Twitter qualifies as a "disaster" though. (If it wasn't apparent from this thread yet, I don't like politics and discussions about politics in general. To me Fediverse is a place to have fun, post memes, have interesting discussions and relax, not to indulge and ragebait myself with politics. So feel free to take this with a huge grain of salt.)

>How true this is and what it means depends entirely on context and scale.

Context and scale is a single Fediverse instance, or a small number of very close instances. Neither of you will probably remember the sleepy.cafe gang, or even knew that it existed, but it was a close community of handful instances with close relations and that's what I mean by close instances.

>If you're talking about people joining a fediverse service, or coming into a pub where everyone doesn't know their name, then sure. If you're talking about people standing up new services to join the fediverse, or starting a new pub in a city a bunch of them just moved to, then no. They're free to enact their own culture there.

The first one.

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @light @coolboymew

in reply to Pawlicker 🐾😹

@PurpCat
> mastodon users can't go 4 minutes without thinking about nazis in some way shape or form

Goddammit you just made me think about Nazis. Now I just have to go 5 minuted (don't think about Nazis, think about Nazis ...)

I mean, it could be that the current Executive of the US (and various other countries) are LARPing 1930s Germany that's making us think about Nazis. Just saying ...

@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @cy @phnt @sampler @light @coolboymew

in reply to Haelwenn /элвэн/

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@lanodan @coolboymew @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill @strypey Their entire deal is they love yelling about how terrible everything is, so this should be helpful.
abyss-vs-void.png
in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @silverpill @light what's happening the most is they're fucking off back to Twitter.

Mastodon offers them nothing, Twitter offers a lot of the same social media breaking features like reply disabling along with the chance you might get your post in someone's For You feed and the advantage to them of being on the same site.

It's a literal meme that there are Twitter artists with I'M LEAVING THE SITE FOR BLUESKY GUYS posts followed up by a few months later with new posts like nothing happened.

in reply to silverpill

(1/?)

@silverpill
> Nothing a couple of joint events couldn't fix

Sounds good to me. Although we might need to supply the Mastodon Homeowners Association and the Public Not Public folks with some entheogens stronger than ganja, before they can get out of their own heads and gain the ability to question their own assumptions ; }

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @p @light

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

But I agree with Johannes here.

The fediverse emerged from an understanding that no *one* ethical platform can replace the network effects of the megafauna (as CoHost quickly learned). Forcing Ryan to make BF opt-in - after years of causing no problems whatsoever as an opt-out bridge to the IndieWeb - was a ludicrous self-punch by the Mastodon HOA. If we can fully integrated ATProto stuff into the fediverse, so much the better.

This entry was edited (2 days ago)

pistolero reshared this.

in reply to Strypey

(3/3)

ATProto is in the process of being standardised at IETF. Even if BS is killed tomorrow, and broken up and sold for scrap by its Venture Capitalist owners, ATProto is not going away. Any more than Nostr is.

The AP fediverse came about as a merger of OStatus, Diaspora and DFRN/Zot networks. It seems logical to me that in 10 years time we could be looking back at the AP, ATProto and Nostr networks the same way. From within a fediverse that somehow transcends and includes them all.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey ATProto is fundamentally different in how it works, it is only decentralized to the smallest extent it can be. Moderation is purposefully more or less centralized with labelers. Which in no doubt is what IFTAS and Mastodon want to effectively build with FIRES and FASPs, it being more decentralized is just a side-effect of AP not being centralized by design. Blocking the central bsky labeler earns you a ban on bsky. These two networks are incompatible in how they operate and want to operate.

Now to the second part, this idea of replacing the status quo with Fediverse is a good idea on paper. Over the years I've watched the Fediverse get worse and worse in both its userbase and the content the userbase puts on the network because of this mentality. First it was years of Twitter refugees going to Mastodon and promoting heavy-handed moderation, breaking federation on purpose, creating fediblock and now IFTAS/FIRES/FASPs. All of these are the result of Fediverse's desire to replace the status quo with itself and it is a death sentence given enough time. Now imagine what bsky refugees will make of this place when they are even more opinionated in their views than the majority of Mastodon users. If Mastodon is what is left of the Twitter left leaving since ~2021, then Bsky is those that didn't leave Twitter because Mastodon was too much of wild west and Mastodon refugees. Opinionated extremists of the already opinionated.

Call it gatekeeping, because that's what it is, but these people should have their own walled of garden they can play in and not bother anyone else. The irony of being part of development of a network that lets anyone say anything they want, where users have no control over other users, while promoting gatekeeping users is not lost on me, but bsky users are a net negative to this network, just like the majority of Mastodon users are.

I don't really care about Nostr since they are just Bitcoin maxis high on $current_llm_model (+ CP), but they are mostly harmless. That said, my timelines were dramatically improved since Gleason went there.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Strypey

(3/?)

I'm all for finding ways to make ATProto and Nostr accounts fediverse-native, for the same reasons I'm against the Anti-Fedi Meta Pact. The fediverse is for facilitating connections between any 2 people who want to interact, regardless of where they choose to host their accounts. Like email. This has been the pitch since Evan and the Identi.ca folks launched Status.Net to encourage community-hosting. Discriminating against hosts is an account/instance-level concern, not protocol-level.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Strypey

(4/4)

I don't think we want protocol engineers and software devs to be making decisions about who "should" be able to talk to each other. For reasons explained in some detail here;

disintermedia.net.nz/ethical-t…

But we absolutely need to enable people to control what they see at account *and* instance level. To control spam, if nothing else.

I think it's reasonable to file instances full of people posting slurs to get attention as 'spam'. But even if I didn't, it's not up to me, nor should it be.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey
>But this kind of architecture has its place, for those who want to use it.

I agree and bsky is that place in my opinion. There is one large difference between what ATProto users want and what AP users (at least those than been here for a few years) want. AP leans a lot on user-level moderation where the user has almost absolute control over what their view of the network is. There is only one exception and that is the instance administrator who can force moderation on users of that instance. And even then a user can simply make their own instance and put the administrator out of the equation. ATProto is very different in that regard and uses almost centralized content labelers to first filter content, then allows users to subscribe to blocklists not managed by the user (a dumb idea that Mastodon will likely copy soon) and only after that allows user-level moderation. And users of the respective networks expect and want this difference. AP user mostly wants to moderate their own view with small exceptions done by the admnistrator, meanwhile ATProto users expect the moderation to be mostly done for them. That is the incompatibility in how they operate I talked about; you can interoperate between the two networks, just like Nostr, but the expected way of moderation is the polar opposite.

>The fediverse is for facilitating connections between any 2 people who want to interact, regardless of where they choose to host their accounts. Like email.

I agree and adding bsky-esque moderation centralization into AP throws a wrench into this mostly working system. At that point it no longer is about facilitating connections between users, but facilitating connections between users only if an overseer and some amount of instance administrators all agree. It is no longer email.

>This has been the pitch since Evan and the Identi.ca folks launched Status.Net to encourage community-hosting.

And I agree with that pitch, but Evan either lost his plot in the last few years, got paid to loose his plot or simply doesn't understand yet what the consequences of what he wants are. He may have create Status.Net, created OStatus(2), co-created GS and co-authored ActivityPub, but what he wants now removed a lot of the credibility he accumulated over the years at least for me.

>I don't think we want protocol engineers and software devs to be making decisions about who "should" be able to talk to each other. For reasons explained in some detail here;
>disintermedia.net.nz/ethical-t…

Since I contribute to Pleroma and also am a Fediverse user for more than 5 years now, I have two hats that I wear depending on what the topic and context in question is.
I agree with what you wrote in that article, mostly, which was a good read. Software should stay apolitical and impartial to who uses it and that is my stance and has been for a very long time. And that's the mentality I will always put ActivityPub to, I'm in no place to dictate who should use the Fediverse or who is allowed to use Pleroma. Neither do I want to have that power, I'm not interested in it. My stance on gatekeeping bsky users away isn't a stance on the software dev or protocol engineer side, but on the user side as a long time user of the Fediverse. I've seen the effects of similar users joining in en masse and don't want it to happen again.

>But we absolutely need to enable people to control what they see at account *and* instance level. To control spam, if nothing else.

My stance is, users should control almost all of this and administrators should only get involved in controlling spam or getting rid of illegal content from their server and making sure it doesn't come again from the same source. That is what instance-level moderation should be used for in my opinion. Software devs and protocol engineers shouldn't have control over who uses the Fediverse, nor should administrators have intrusive control over what users of an instance see unless its for the above.

@icedquinn @fish @sampler @p @light @silverpill

pistolero reshared this.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey ATProto is not that good. Nobody would want to use it without the network effects of Bluesky.

AP and Nostr are different and may indeed merge in the future. It is possible to use Nostr identities (public keys) in nomadic ActivityPub, and likewise it is possible to use Nostr relays for storing nomadic ActivityPub data.

Ecologia Digital reshared this.

in reply to silverpill

> ATProto is not that good. Nobody would want to use it without the network effects of Bluesky. AP and Nostr are different and may indeed merge in the future

I remember the same sort of partisan claims being made in fediverse 0.1 (before AP);

mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/116…

But this focus on protocols means you're not seeing the forest for the trees. The fediverse is not a network of protocols. It's a network of *people*, who have agreed to communicate over a protocol(s) (if indirectly).


(1/?)

@phnt
> ATProto is fundamentally different in how it works

So were the 3 networks that merged to form the current fediverse;

* OStatus: public-only, broadcast-orientated, like ATProto

* Diaspora: private-also, connection-orientated, like ActivityPub

* DFRN/Zot: private+encrypted, connection+broadcast-orientated, shit UX, like Nostr


This entry was edited (1 day ago)

Ecologia Digital reshared this.

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill
> Let Mastodon/W3C do their thing until incompatibilities accumulate and the network splits?

I don't understand how these 2 very distinct galaxies of factions can be seen as some unified Other. Who from Mastodon is involved in SocialCG/ WG? What evidence is there of W3C specs having any impact on what Mastodon does?

Like @p's OP, these perceived webs of relationships and connections just don't exist. At least not in the way you think.

@phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @light

I didn't say that Mastodon and W3C are the same thing. They are just two organizations whose interests are not aligned with ours.

Historically, there wasn't much collaboration between them (despite the fact that all W3C regulars are Mastodon users). I think Gargron, as a builder, has no patience for bureaucracy and linked data nonsense. But now he is removed from his CEO position so I expect things to change. They are already changing, as the recent announcements show.

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill @icedquinn @fish @sampler @strypey @light The new CEO just seems to be a sockpuppet to Newsmast/Flipboard etc, just from his introductory post. He seems completely sterile in his views.

I don't know what the thought process was for putting a guy that has supposedly been in the Mastodon team for years and made a couple hundred posts over more than half a decade on Mastodon into the CEO position. Other than that he possibly is easily manipulated, but that pure speculation on my part.

in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @silverpill @fish @icedquinn @light @sampler @strypey

> I don't know what the thought process was for putting a guy that has supposedly been in the Mastodon team for years and made a couple hundred posts over more than half a decade on Mastodon into the CEO position.

It is very easy to get some people to agree to agree that "You should leave management to the professional managers and you can just get on with the coding" and it always turns out the same way.

in reply to pistolero

> "You should leave management to the professional managers and you can just get on with the coding"

As @cy pointed out elsewhere in this hellthread, this is not how it works. Bean counters take over projects by coercive means, and push engineers into subordinate positions. This happened at Goggle around the time they dropped "don't be evil", killed 20% time and most of the resulting projects, and assimilated the remaining ones into G+.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to pistolero

> We either put Glass-Steagall back or we stop letting the government print money

Since you're talking about US policy I don't get a vote, but I'd go for the first one. Even Moldbug has acknowledged that fixed supply currencies are fundamentally broken.

Also, in modern economies it's banks that issue new money, not governments. Under neoliberal norms govts have to issue bonds (ie create debts) when they have a budget deficit.

@icedquinn @PurpCat @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill
> all W3C regulars are Mastodon users

I'm guessing you mean SocialCG/WG. Not true, the Chair of the newly announced SocialWG is Darius, who's a Hometown user. Also, this appears to me to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. If devs from other projects refuse to take up the open invite to join SocialCG/WG, then there won't be representation from a diverse range of AP implementations there 🤷‍♂️

@p @phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @silverpill @phnt @icedquinn @fish @sampler @light

> Who from Mastodon is involved in SocialCG/ WG?

cwebber -> social.coop -> Pincus

> these perceived webs of relationships and connections just don't exist

I cited all of them. You can click the links or not, but you probably shouldn't confidently announce that it's fake without reading it. I have also just CC'd you on the other post that I said I'd CC you on a few days ago and then did not do so until now because I'm all over the map but am coalescing today.

in reply to pistolero

(1/?)

Me:
> Who from Mastodon is involved in SocialCG/ WG?

@p
> cwebber -> social.coop -> Pincus

CLW has never been involved in Mastodon, and regularly gripes about their distortions of the drafters intentions for AP. Particularly Mastodon devs refusing to support the AP C2S API. They came into fediverse dev as a GNU MediaGoblin maintainer, then set up Spritely.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

This entry was edited (1 hour ago)
in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

Social.coop is a platform co-op that emerged from the Buy Twitter campaign, and is aligned with the Platform Co-op Consortium. They also regularly gripe about Mastodon, and they're more aligned with Bonfire (see bonfire.social.coop), which was started by and is advised by a group of social.coop members. Some of them are keen to experiment with hosting ATProto PDS, because "we're not mastodon.coop".

Incidentally their Loomio is another place I pop up.

This entry was edited (1 hour ago)
in reply to Strypey

(3/?)

AFAIK CLW hasn't been involved in any AP standards work since Sebastian's account chased them off SH. I don't think any social.coop members are active in SocialCG/WG, can you name any?

As for Pincus, a) you're giving them way too much credit to assume they have any interest in or aptitude for standards work, and b) they are one of the most vicious critics of SWF on SH, and see SocialCG/WG as controlled by them (because Evan).

in reply to Strypey

(4/4)

@p
> you probably shouldn't confidently announce that it's fake without reading it

Agreed, and if you mean the scuttlebutt in your OP, I read it. I didn't click the links, because most of what your speculations just don't matches my experience of dealing with the fediverse dev community. Which I've been doing since before Mastodon existed, and intensely since I got involved with fediverse.party in 2017.

This entry was edited (1 hour ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @phnt @icedquinn @fish @silverpill @light
Can you prove that you have an autism diagnosis? A lot of people online just pretend to be autistic so they can get free money (see #mutualaid tag) and get away with being rude. I'm not saying you're a liar, but I've seen some things on here before.
in reply to 🐝🐝🐝

@sampler
> Can you prove that you have an autism diagnosis?

Can you prove you're a human and not a Trained #MOLE?

> A lot of people online just pretend to be autistic so they can get free money

I'm sorry, I seem to have forgotten posting requests for money. Can you link to some of these posts to jog my memory?

Way to utterly miss the point dude. You're not even in same country as the point. I'm not sure you're even on the same planet.

@p @icedquinn @phnt @light @silverpill @fish

in reply to pistolero

> It's an expression, you know

Indeed. It's an expression that associates being autistic with various negative personality traits (in this case being obsessive to the point of breaking UX). Like calling anyone who does dysfunctional shit "skitzo" associates that behaviour with being schizophrenic. FTS.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

> It's an expression that associates being autistic with various negative personality traits

Likewise with "bastard". I mean, look at it: the colloquial use of the term is describing someone as amoral or brutish and the implication of using the word "bastard" for that is "You act as if you were raised without a father".

Mainly, though, look: uphill battle trying to get normies to care or to stop being shitty and it is a complete and utter mistake to use their viewpoint as the frame of reference. As far as I'm concerned, they're the ones with fucked-up heads, not me. I don't care whether they have a negative evaluation of me because it is not something that I can alter and it turns out that it's not something that affects my life and I refuse to pretend that I'm not a fucking weirdo. It's more goddamn harmful to let normies define the terms of anything than it is for people to use hyperbole or figurative language.
autism_and_gun.png
waronautism.jpg

in reply to pistolero

> uphill battle trying to get normies to care or to stop being shitty

No doubt. Most ambitious things worth doing are.

If people avoided uphill battles, the US would still be (openly) enslaving black people, South Africa would still have Apartheid, and most people would still have an islampaphobic view of the IDF's genocide, where the Palestinians are getting their just rewards for being mean to Middle Eastern Jews (which they weren't).

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

> No doubt. Most ambitious things worth doing are.

It's an ambitious *PR campaign*. The fact that it's difficult to do and that things worth doing are also difficult to do doesn't imply that it is worth doing.

You do what you want, you know, but the only thing that matters is whether or not they can stop you. They can't stop me.

> If people avoided uphill battles

If people *didn't* avoid wasting time and energy on shit that doesn't matter, we'd be extinct.

> the IDF's genocide

I JUST LOVE

WHEN PEOPLE DRAG ISRAEL INTO THE THREAD

BECAUSE THAT NEVER CAUSES AN ARGUMENT ON FEDI

Here: slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/… . Consider it a supplement to "Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths", and then round it off by watching the BBS documentary.

In closing, normies delenda est. @p locuta est.

in reply to pistolero

> It's an ambitious *PR campaign*

All the examples I listed could be dismissed in that way, and even more so before they succeeded.

> I JUST LOVE WHEN PEOPLE DRAG ISRAEL INTO THE THREAD

I'm presuming I'm in sensible company here, in which no one will object to a simple statement of fact about how majority perceptions have changed. Am I wrong?
slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/…

Read it. Agree it's insightful.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light Because of the Israel Slavery Apartheid thing, I'm going to split this:

> All the examples I listed could be dismissed in that way, and even more so before they succeeded.

All of the things you mentioned remain contentious issues, not settled matters of public opinion.

At any rate, my point was that you feel free to try to win the normies' hearts and minds: I'm not going to stop you. But I would like to convince you that it is fruitless (though you do not seem inclined to agree; that is fine, I don't push, I'm not interested in PR campaigns or advocacy but I think for your own sake you should tell the normies to fuck themselves). I do find it moderately insulting that you default to their opinion being the frame of reference; I think this is misguided because it will cause you problems but I think being called a spergy retard is *less* insulting than the presupposition that a thing is not real until the normies agree, so I'd like to convince you to stop that presupposition, but I am also not really going to try too hard at that, either. I do think you should not try to police the rest of us spergy retards on the grounds that normies might get the wrong idea; I intend to ignore any such concerns and it's irritating to hear them brought up, not least of all because the presupposition that it matters what they think is incorrect. They are defective: LLMs demonstrated this. But that doesn't matter: what matters is you're trying to squeeze reciprocity from a stone that hates you, and you will not get reciprocity from them by letting them decide the game and then playing by the rules that they have constructed specifically to constrain you.

> Read it. Agree it's insightful.

I like it; I think it is a reasonable piece to bring up for discussions of scope creep.

in reply to pistolero

@strypey @fish @icedquinn @light @phnt @sampler @silverpill Now, the third rail:

> All the examples I listed could be dismissed in that way

No, slavery in the US ended because of a war, not a PR campaign. The PR campaign to end it was a spectacular failure because Cash Rules Everything Around You. A lot of people say a lot of things about what happened and who started it and the Civil War and slavery. Here it is, civilwarcauses.org/judah-farew… .

> most people would still have an islampaphobic view of the IDF's genocide

This is the most circular: "if the PR campaign to change people's opinions hadn't succeeded, then people wouldn't have changed their opinions".

> I'm presuming I'm in sensible company here

Sir, you have mentioned Israel on the Internet. Of course you can presume that everyone will be sensible: no one treats Israel emotionally and only sophisticated and rigorously honest interlocutors ever jump into threads on the internet. Threads are *never* derailed by people that care very much about Israel and that will shit all over any other topic just because they saw someone mention Israel. Israel is definitely not one of fedi's Third Rails.

I know one of the babka.social admins and *they*, a *Jewish* instance, essentially allllllll the way on the other side of fedi from FSE in the farthest corners, cannot manage to keep people from losing their entire shit when Israel is mentioned. 75% of all UN resolutions that mention at least one polity by name mention either Israel or Palestine, because *diplomats* cannot manage to keep their opinions about Israel in their pants.

Everyone on earth is very angry at either Israel or Palestine and they all feel it is very important that everyone else on earth have exactly the same opinion.

> a simple statement of fact about how majority perceptions have changed

A "statement of fact" doesn't include characterizations: public opinion has shifted away from Israel due to astroturfing; public opinion before was strongly pro-Israel due to astroturfing. These are facts. "It's a genocide. It's islamophobic." These are characterizations, not facts.

in reply to pistolero

(1/2)

@p
> All of the things you mentioned remain contentious issues, not settled matters of public opinion

Slavery is illegal in the US. The SA Apartheid regime was defeated. Public opinion on the IDF genocide has shifted. These are facts. People's opinions on these facts are neither here nor there.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @silverpill @light

> Slavery is illegal in the US.

Because of a war, not a PR campaign.

> These are facts.

That public opinion on Israel has shifted is a fact; that it is a genocide is a characterization.

Geopolitics is amoral. Trying to use terms associated with morality to describe it is about as useful as describing a computer as evil.

> People's opinions on these facts are neither here nor there.

My point, yes. Nihil est incertius volgo.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light
Slavery is not illegal in the US when the slave is someone like a free beer extremist who is incarcerated.

Public opinion on the idf doesn't matter. Material actions are what change history. Only Iran took action against Israel and it's not working out too well for them.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @fish @phnt @silverpill @light
> defense
i tend to favor education in how controllers work as a cybernetic concept, because people do understand they are being predated upon but they keep thinking winning one vote means anything.

it doesn't, really, because they're more like advanced persistent threats or systems that specialize in taking over systems.

i think i outlined this already with the note that sociopaths are morally comfortable using everyone for their own ends, while normal people don't really do much to stop this, which is probably also the whole point of the mops vs geeks article

its hard to blame them though because schooling in the USA was literally co-opted to produce easily controlled morons, and the model is replicated worldwide to varying degrees of success.

in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @strypey @fish @light @phnt @silverpill

> i think i outlined this already with the note that sociopaths are morally comfortable using everyone for their own ends, while normal people don't really do much to stop this, which is probably also the whole point of the mops vs geeks article

My takeaway was "this is the lifecycle of subcultures".

in reply to pistolero

> My takeaway was "this is the lifecycle of subcultures"

I would say the main point was 'this is why subcultures are unsustainable as a mode of meaningness'. One that can eject sociopaths becomes something else.

> sociopaths are morally comfortable using everyone for their own ends, while normal people don't really do much to stop this

... is just an assumption baked into common usage of the term, which is followed by its use in the article.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

in reply to Nicholas Conrad

@nicholas
>...the rest of the story.

Pavlov's dogs drooled on queue regardless of whether the situation actually calls for that. Maybe we can be more aware of context that? *sigh*

mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/116…

@icedquinn @phnt @p @silverpill @light


> I also don't tend to buy "If you don't agree with my conclusion, you must not know what I know" arguments

I'm just rolling with the playful banter style of posting you folks seem to favour. I hope it didn't distract you from the point I was making.

> that was Quinn's point and I think it's a reasonable point

Sure, but it's totally orthogonal to the point I was making. We don't need to follow the script here folks, we can improv. Go wild! ; }

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light


in reply to Nicholas Conrad

@nicholas @icedquinn @phnt @strypey @silverpill @light karl just spent two volumes explaining why Plato and much of the downstream philosophy (western culture) was 'intolerant', 30 tyrants etc. 90% garbage, it's purpose is to nudge us to a lame combo of fabianism with a pretend libertarian shell. they gave him an OBE for licking the boots of the royals. Read Robin Collingwood, forget Popper.
in reply to Waughhead Rex

(1/?)

@WaughheadRex
> Plato and much of the downstream philosophy (western culture)

Firstly, there was never was a "West". Plato and other Greek writers saw themselves as part of a Mediterranean civilisation, with no connection to anything going on in what we now think of as Europe;

theanarchistlibrary.org/librar…

According to David Miles, to classical Greeks, Europeans were among the Keltoi; the barbarians to the north;

hardtofind.co.nz/book/xxbbaa41…

@nicholas @icedquinn @phnt @p @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

(2/?)

@WaughheadRex
> Plato and much of the downstream philosophy (western culture) was 'intolerant'

Platonism has very little to do with anything we'd recognise today as a democracy or a republic. Plato was a fan of a Brave New World style society where parenting is abolished and the state raises kids without families to breed loyalty to the Republic.

Contemporary anglophone society is more the intellectual descendant of Socrates than Plato.

in reply to Strypey

(3/?)

@WaughheadRex
> [Popper's] purpose is to nudge us to a lame combo of fabianism with a pretend libertarian shell

Sounds OK to me. Would be a big improvement on the self-terminating state-corporate hellscape we've been living in so far in the 21st.

> they gave him an OBE for licking the boots of the royals

Popper lived in the UK. They hand out OBEs like plastic straws. I think even Spike Milligan got one, a man who never licked anyone's boots, except maybe to take the piss out of them.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @WaughheadRex @nicholas @icedquinn @phnt @silverpill @light

> there was never was a "West". Plato and other Greek writers saw themselves as part of a Mediterranean civilisation, with no connection to anything going on in what we now think of as Europe;

Well, Hellenic. But the philosophical foundations of what is now considered "Western" (that is, just Europe plus the Anglosphere, regardless of whether it's in "the West" or not, because the term is wrong) has Plato, the Corpus Juris Civilis, etc.

I don't like the term either, but I know what people mean when they use it; that's sufficient.

> theanarchistlibrary.org/librar…

I hate Graeber so I don't plan to read it because the man is a simpering idiot and a sophist but if he means that there never was a unified Europe, sure.

in reply to pistolero

NGM 👀🤔

NGM The best weather forecasting computer model from the 1980's-1990's. While the GFS and ETA would be off sipping tea on some trade wind, NGM rolled up his coarse calculus sleeves and resolved the biggest and baddest storms! No one could ever fathom, for even one second, of surpassing the accuracy of it's forbidden dance with the primitive equations. NGM had been lonely, wandering the cold, dry jet stream for years; until one day it crossed paths with the sultry weather.com temperature forecasts! Finally they would join in beautiful consensus, and lovingly forecast for years to come. Then the evil WRF corrupted NCEP into unplugging NGM, making it spasm, spewing all it's macrophysical genius down the drain. But wait ... a new light shines as rumors lurk that a 768-hour, 24-member NGM will soon crunch again... "Guys hurry up and finish your forecast! ... Yo Nikolai what the hell is this? Mostly Cloudy...? Didn't you see the RUC says scattered showers and thunderstorms..?"

"No NGM will lead us to verification, yes yes - de RUC is pointless!"

"Uh no you need to chan"--"No! Todd said to use NGM!"

in reply to Waughhead Rex

@WaughheadRex @nicholas @icedquinn @phnt @strypey @silverpill
Can't see what you're replying to but sounds based.
To be libertarian/liberal you must first be tolerant of (not be or support violence towards) different ideas. Don't see what's so 'pretend' about it.
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn @strypey @fish @light @phnt @silverpill

> the whole book is very much against authoritarian solutions to problems. unlimited tolerance is spoken next to societies that literally did the "someone is a threat to our power with their words, kill them" behavior people actually misquote the paradox to justify.

That is more reasonable than the popular definition.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light See, that's extending the concept of "tolerance" to "unconditional acceptance to the point of death". Nobody that intends to have a tolerant society can *possibly* mean "radical absolute acceptance of the society's death". A tolerant society means what, precisely?
in reply to pistolero

> What do you mean when you use that term?

A tolerant society is what it says on the tin. One in which there is tolerance of difference. That *includes* tolerating a minority who hold onto intolerant views, in the hopes that the various factors that generate such intolerance can be understood and alleviated.

Why do you ask?

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

> A tolerant society is what it says on the tin.

"These words mean different things to different people. What do you mean when you use the term?"
'I mean what the term says.'

It's like "nazis", you know, someone says "That guy's a Nazi" and you have to ask what the hell the guy means by that--does he like authoritarianism, or specifically Hitler's version, or specifically Hitler, or does he hate Jews, or does he just mean that the guy voted for Hillary instead of Bernie, or did he just see him use a slur once and he's inferred beliefs? I have seen *all* of those meanings attached to the word "nazi" and I don't really care what words a person uses to get their meaning across as long as I know what they mean when they use those words.

> That *includes* tolerating a minority who hold onto intolerant views, in the hopes that the various factors that generate such intolerance can be understood and alleviated.

Well, sure, but which things count as intolerance and what is tolerance? Which things should be tolerated? Have you tolerated someone if you've tried to alter their views?

People treat a tolerant society as a good one, but some people have a view of tolerance that doesn't sound good. I think, you know, as long as people can go about their business without the coercive use of force, no matter how weird or unpopular their business is, that's tolerant.

> Why do you ask?

Mainly the discussion of the paradox of tolerance introduced some ambiguity.

in reply to pistolero

(1/2)

@p
> don't really care what words a person uses to get their meaning across as long as I know what they mean when they use those words

Meanings are not inherent in words, but endowed on them by usage. So I'm not sure how else one could sensibly use language.

> Have you tolerated someone if you've tried to alter their views?

Yes, of course, as long as you haven't tried to alter them with coercion. Tolerance is not necessarily acceptance.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

> Meanings are not inherent in words, but endowed on them by usage. So I'm not sure how else one could sensibly use language.

Sure, but this is why I say things like "I don't like that term" or "I don't use that term" rather than trying to police someone's use of the term. I say "people" instead of "users" when discussing FSE, for example, and I bristle a little when admins say "my users" instead of "people using my instance" or "people on this instance" or something. I don't like when people call LLMs "AI", because they do not model knowledge, they're just really good at predicting which word comes next. I'm comfortable saying "Don't call it that" when it's a term that has meaning in my profession and then is used sloppily but that's an uphill battle. People used to refer to the box the monitor plugs into as a "CPU" or a "hard drive", and these are incorrect uses of the term because there's not an agreed-upon colloquial use.

People refer to an obsession with detail as "autism" and I don't argue with them. I've got the 'tism and my 'tism flares up and I start taking things apart or trying to analyze systems or gibbering wildly about whatever (usually computers or the CIA or something; someone sends me a Youtube link and I used to dump six paragraphs about Google at them but I do that a little less now) and that is something that can probably be ascribed to mild autism, but they're using the world colloquially, same way "bastard" is used colloquially.

> Yes, of course, as long as you haven't tried to alter them with coercion. Tolerance is not necessarily acceptance.

In the sense that an evangelist tolerates a non-believer, perhaps. But living and letting live is a different thing from persistent attempts to shape someone else; I think it crosses the line from tolerance to soft-intolerance if you persist too much or if you attempt to influence without accepting that you may be wrong yourself. Not saying that's you, just saying I'd call those intolerant; this is one of my complaints about the topic from the beginning of the thread, people with opaque agendas that pretend to engage but are actually just pushing. The issue is summed up by this attempt at dissecting the end of Usenet and a proposal for a future system ( archive.is/vJaEG ):

> Conversations became one man with one microphone attached to a thousand megaphones, and replying was like talking back to the national news broadcast, because you could reply to a shill, but the man giving the shill her script was not listening, because he was running a hundred similar shills, and his shill would just stick to her script, the script he had assigned to her no matter what you replied to her script.
> Her replies to your reply would be unresponsive, because they came from a script written by a man who had never thought about or foreseen your reply.
> Conversations came to resemble the conversations you have with a non player character in a video game, a scripted robotic simulation of actual conversation, or the conversations on a help line with an unhelpful third world help line worker to whom English is a second language, and who is reading from a script, a script written by a man whose native tongue is English, but his script is designed to deal with certain common problems that do not in the slightest resemble the problem you have with the product, because the man writing her script did not foresee your problem.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @light @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill

> the paradox of tolerance

I don't think the paradox of tolerance is a real paradox; it requires a really terrible premise that eliminates human agency and consequentialists/utilitarians/positivists love to use it to play three-card monte.

> reducing the capacity of the community to be inclusive?

I think it's okay to stop people from exploiting fedi, you know?

in reply to pistolero

(1/2)

@p
> I don't think the paradox of tolerance is a real paradox

Then I suggest you learn a bit more about the history of the 20th century, or read Chapman's piece about how subcultures fail again. Because it absolutely is. Just not in the way centrist authoritarians claiming to be liberals spin it.

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

in reply to Strypey

(2/2)

@p
> I think it's okay to stop people from exploiting fedi, you know?

Exactly what I'm saying. In defence of the inclusiveness of the verse, we need to exclude sociopaths from having any role of influence in fediverse dev. Including but not limited to actual fascists, and pseudo-liberal authoritarians.

But to avoid this being divisive, and exploitable by sociopaths, it needs to be based on identifying patterns of *behaviour* not Othering and demonising people or groups/ types of people.

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

> Then I suggest you learn a bit more about the history of the 20th century

I also don't tend to buy "If you don't agree with my conclusion, you must not know what I know" arguments. I'm pretty familiar with the Malthusian nihilist utilitarians that took power in the 1930s and defined the post-Bernays world.

> or read Chapman's piece

I have read it at least twice. I refer people to it frequently.

> Just not in the way centrist authoritarians claiming to be liberals spin it.

Well, that was Quinn's point and I think it's a reasonable point.

in reply to pistolero

> I also don't tend to buy "If you don't agree with my conclusion, you must not know what I know" arguments

I'm just rolling with the playful banter style of posting you folks seem to favour. I hope it didn't distract you from the point I was making.

> that was Quinn's point and I think it's a reasonable point

Sure, but it's totally orthogonal to the point I was making. We don't need to follow the script here folks, we can improv. Go wild! ; }

@icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @icedquinn @fish @phnt @silverpill @light Yeah, I mean, I think "You're trying to get us all killed and you're being paid ungodly sums of money for it so I no longer am interested in speaking to you" is a reasonable thing to say to someone that is trying to get us all killed and being paid ungodly sums of money for that.
in reply to pistolero

> @strypey shows up in some of those threads and says sensible things

Should it worry me that the self-described "free speech extremists" say that, and everyone else seems to think I'm an aspy-hole? It doesn't.

I try to assume good faith with everyone, always, and ask probing questions in search of deeper understanding. When I get aggressively defensive non-answers, I tend to feel bad, and assume I'm doing it wrong. But maybe I ought to get suspicious instead? Hmm.

@fish @phnt @silverpill

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Strypey

@strypey @fish @phnt @silverpill

> Should it worry me that the self-described "free speech extremists" say that

Well, obviously, in my opinion, no. :terrylol2:

> and everyone else seems to think I'm an aspy-hole?

:facesofautism: Sir... :autismapproved:

> I try to assume good faith with everyone, always, and ask probing questions in search of deeper understanding. When I get aggressively defensive non-answers, I tend to feel bad, and assume I'm doing it wrong.

My 'tism flares up and I am pretty good at reading incentives and terrible at reading affect. "This is not what you'd do if you wanted this; you'd have to want that or the other."

in reply to pistolero

I want to speak up for Evan P, who I think has also been a juicy target for identi-Moonies (eg Jon Pincus, who I wouldn't piss on if they was on fire). Resulting in apparently evasive behaviour on Evan's part that's actually defensive, and a level of sensitivity to the normal rough and tumble of online dev debate that's caused by it triggering memories of being brigaded.

Eg the SWF hellthread on SH. The people gunning for Evan, mostly the same who later targeted me.

@p @fish @phnt @silverpill

in reply to Strypey

@strypey @fish @phnt @silverpill Well, I'm willing to believe he's a little overly cautious but I see the FEP thread, he's suggesting that everyone use a proprietary Microsoft service, I see reasonable discussion, then I see him back out and then say "I was personally attacked and they didn't merge my FEP, how do I get them banned from Codeberg?" And not just once, I see that same style in the other thread: cosocial.ca/@evan/116019337987… .
in reply to silverpill

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@silverpill @phnt

> Hmm. I see Aug 8, 2023 7:40 PM.

Yeah, it makes me think that the post was created in order to get ready; you notice he claimed that the discussion was unproductive and then went back to that thread to claim that he was personally attacked (which I don't see in the Codeberg thread) and that the FEP was not allowed to be merged, almost like he decided to withdraw it and make the complaint beforehand.
aug1.png

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill I like how the guy opened the PR, and the discussions were really well structured and well laid out, brought up lots of other ideas and the ups and downsides thereto; and the freak closes it with:

> This conversation is not very fruitful, so I'm withdrawing the PR. I'm going to rework this proposal and submit it to the SocialCG directly instead.

Yeah, of course. Because there's nothing worse than quality discussions poking holes at your proposal, allowing you to learn and adapt. :pinkwojakrage:

in reply to silverpill

@silverpill JFC, a few weeks ago I was joking "Countdown to first public server on the Fediverse with Persona-provided age verification", and now I'm finding out some jokers tried to get endorsement for servers running every user-uploaded image by §$#!§-ing PhotoDNA two years ago already. I'm reeling, honestly.
in reply to pistolero

> the .de government refers to fedi as "The Hydra on the Web"

Projection sounds the same in every language.

> They are trying to present "Choose the color of the bikeshed!" as a choice before you've agreed to let them build a house.
> They are trying to push an agenda. The agenda is to kill fedi by turning it into a centrally controlled system, these are the mechanics.

They would have to change the spec to accomplish their goals though, or that’s at least what it seems like to an idiot like me; wouldn’t that just create an isolated fediverse that is partially-incompatible with, well, literally everything that already exists, and dies slowly like BlueSky? You said

> No action item

but it really seems like no action is necessary, only vigilance.

in reply to :seven:

@vii

> Projection sounds the same in every language.

:bruceforsythe:

> wouldn’t that just create an isolated fediverse that is partially-incompatible with, well, literally everything that already exists, and dies slowly like BlueSky

Worth noting, all of these people list Busky accounts alongside their (often only partially disclosed) fedi accounts.

> but it really seems like no action is necessary, only vigilance.

I could come up with some action suggestions, but the main one I have is "get back to work, Pete" and suggesting to other people that I get back to work is kind of absurd.

Mainly I think it's better to point a flashlight. I am frustrated that people constantly take the bait and then the servers get blocked so you can't say things like "Why didn't you disclose that you are on the board?" or "You paid these people to conduct this research or build this product and you're talking it like the results have come out of nowhere and shocked you and you've just had a huge realization" but I can't really control other people so I am flooding my personal wiki with shit. (Side-effect of FediBBS: it is easy to copy and paste bios and threads into my wiki, especially since I'm running FediBBS in acme anyway.) So if I were to suggest something that other people do, it's "Here are the dots I have connected, please add dots or draw more lines" and "These people should be ignored: they're sockpuppeting their way into fake mandates and trying to set up a governing body."

in reply to :seven:

@vii

They would have to change the spec to accomplish their goals though, or that’s at least what it seems like to an idiot like me; wouldn’t that just create an isolated fediverse that is partially-incompatible with, well, literally everything that already exists, and dies slowly like BlueSky? You said


Yes, that's how it would play out if they didn't have large projects interested in their agenda. Issue is, Mastodon is onboard with this and Pixelfed is in SWF so I guess dansup also agrees to some extent. So the partially incompatible isolated Fediverse would be us. They don't necessarily have to change the protocol either, only implement "features" in such a way that a large network split will happen.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Phantasm

@phnt @vii

> Yes, that's how it would play out if they didn't have large projects interested in their agenda. Issue is, Mastodon is onboard of this

And Masto is more than comfortable to pretend to participate in the process and then swerve into doing something inexplicable and worse.

> and Pixelfed is in SWF

:pressf:

> So the partially incompatible isolated Fediverse would be us.

Free fedi.

in reply to Phantasm

@Phantasm @:seven: @pistolero @lainbot, random Lain screenshots @whereverbot His mails to sign up to any of his instances have bad site certificates btw. was surfing there a few days ago.
It's a security flaw marked by my mail as phishing.. they don't maintain it.
TILvidz was the instance.
in reply to Q.U.I.N.N.

@icedquinn

so what do you get when posix sh and elixir have a baby, raised by a lispy nun in a perl convent?

github.com/elizafairlady/ish

I'm refactoring the whole ast, lexer and parser currently so don't like. don't use it. but I thought it was stupid that only elixir really made good use of erlang features like that when I get most of it for free with a kernel and can compensate for what I'm missing with goroutines.

so it's a shell that you can write a genserver in.

in reply to pistolero

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

>If you have noticed that these people get hostile and instance-block you if you ever question their premise (as happened in that thread when phnt asked some pretty obviously good-faith questions), this is because they are pushing an agenda.

Way to state the obvious.

> why all the press about the "CSAM problem" on fedi, where did that come from?
>These people built a detector...

It's less of building one and more to have witch hunt to throw out on people they hate.
It's the fedi equivalent of WMDs.
The obvious ones are reported and blocked, because let's be honest. Every pedo I see here are retarded and love showing off their fetish that should get them shot in the head as a result.
No, it's just to wage war on instances that they can't control.
Simple as.

>They are trying to push an agenda. The agenda is to kill fedi by turning it into a centrally controlled system, these are the mechanics.

Again stating the obvious.
When has the government, especially ours, ever wanted to downsize their surveillance?

>I think revolver should probably include some kind of "import/mirror git repo" feature in v2, or anyway I have "git support" in there somewhere

Is revolver coming out this year?

in reply to NonPlayableClown

@NonPlayableClown

> It's less of building one and more to have witch hunt to throw out on people they hate.

That was what I said, yes.

> No, it's just to wage war on instances that they can't control.

This is my reasoning, yeah.

> Again stating the obvious.

A lot of stuff seems obvious but a lot of people don't notice it until you spell it out. It can be difficult tot ell what's obvious. Anyway, I had to tie it off; it's just rambling unless I make the thesis explicit.

> When has the government, especially ours, ever wanted to downsize their surveillance?

Stating the obvious, yes.

> Is revolver coming out this year?

Yes.

in reply to pistolero

>Oliphant's blocklist is dead now. "Note: As of April 15, 2026, the Oliphant Unified Tier 0 Blocklist has been retired
Coincidentally, Rohan Kumar's blocklist has stopped getting updated since July: archive.ph/CLPo1 "Last updated 2025-07-01."
He's been active since (e.g. blocked cum.estate and dsmc.space just recently). Considering how his list is imported on pelago.1sland.social/blocklist (appears to be a flagship FIRES server from Oliphant) together with automated "consensus" lists, I wonder if he's been on board of all this crap.
in reply to ​

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@mint
> "Last updated 2025-07-01."

Wonder why he stopped. Did he get the full Paula?

> blocked cum.estate and dsmc.space just recently

:kaz: "What took you so long?"

> appears to be a flagship FIRES server from Oliphant

Dear god.

> I wonder if he's been on board of all this crap.

Maybe the got him to join up.

In the midst of all of this, Evan Polomolodor updated his head and his head makes me want to fight him:
evanagain.jpg

@
in reply to pistolero

@pistolero It was for another post where you were all playing with unicode chars and I've put a Cursed text as post but twice in the wrong topic > now I can't find it anymore.. I've put complexity to max so it overrides post above and under me. making them unreadable.
I've deleted the injection in time but I still can't find the right post so it's unrelated to this thread.
Again unrelated to this topic and by accident I replied here instead of in the right topic
U+0300–U+036F
creepy pasta to overlord that thread I can't find anymore.
in reply to Greg Slepak

@taoeffect @feld @lain

> I'm using latest `develop` and I clicked on "External source" for this post but it takes me to this nonsense. It's supposedly from a #Pleroma server. Why is that? Bug?

That's actually served by Revolver but the point of the objects URLs is that you can paste them into the search box on your instance and then they will show up on your instance. That's covered near the beginning.

in reply to pistolero

@taoeffect @feld @lain Incidentally, put this into your search box if you are still interested: fsebugoutzone.org/objects/55b9…


:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:
:smb64_i::smb64_f::smb64_t::smb64_a::smb64_s:
:glowing::glowinthedark::threeletteragentglowsobright::glowing::glowinthedark:

:elliotmanic: NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN :tyrellyelling:

@taoeffect ran the IFTAS thread ( fsebugoutzone.org/objects/ad4d… ) through a clanker and the clanker suggested that a lot of the information was unverified by hedging all to hell.

So, let's dig up the citations: it turns out that IFTAS is big business! $1,408,877.86, in fact. Not bad for a side-hustle that isn't even your day job, right?

Bringing up the head, the Social Web Foundation, of which @evan is the head ( socialwebfoundation.org/team/ ), doesn't list their EIN on their website. But their donation page ( socialwebfoundation.org/donate… ) says:

> The Social Web Foundation is a fiscally-sponsored project of Exchange Point Institute, a US 501(c)3 non-profit.

The Exchange Points Institute's EIN is 87-1028685. Their Form 990-N on IRS site says they have "Gross receipts not greater than: $50,000" for 2023; ProPublica says ( projects.propublica.org/nonpro… ) that they got $527,410 in 2024, per their 990. Pretty fuckin' heavy! $120k of that was from the Ford Foundation⁰. Congrats, @evan ! If you like, you can also read Mallory Knodel's "Announcing the launch of Social Web Foundation" in the Association for Progressive Communications blog. The bold part from that blog post: "To fight inequality, participate in democracy, build an equitable society and economy, we can’t rely on a few corporate-owned, profit-driven spaces. The Social Web Foundation is our best chance to establish the conditions in which the new social media operates with zero harm." In the following paragraph, Eugen "John Mastodon" Gargamel-Rochko, is quoted as being proud to back the Social Web Foundation and their work.

Total (gross¹): $527,410

Next up, IFTAS itself, $384,375 in 2023, and then another $7,733 in 2024, but they spent $302,567 that year, per projects.propublica.org/nonpro… . The ridiculously circuitous pathway for the money includes the National Endowment for Democracy (:cia:) and the Open Society Foundation (Soros)². If you rolled your eyes when I said that the glowies were funding IFTAS, I invite you to come dislocate your jaw trying to fit my goddamn dick in your mouth. Looks like plenty of cash for just 40 hours a week, @jaz . Way to hustle!

Total (gross): $919,518

Two of the bigger instances in the "Fediverse Governance" glowop are social.coop and hachyderm.io. There were nine more³, I didn't check, presumably they're worth less money.

The budget for social.coop is, per opencollective.com/socialcoop#… ) £71,952.29 ($97,373.03), of which they have so far spent £42,306.86 ($57,253.87).

Total (gross): $1,016,891.03

hachyderm.io is a little more convoluted: they're owned, per their about page, by the Nivenly Foundation, EIN 92-2345439 (which you've gotta dig out of the IRS because they do not list that on their website). They've pulled in $17,697.88 and haven't touched any of it yet. Way to show some self-restraint, @nova !

Total (gross): $1,034,588.91

Now, this one's trickier! For an undisclosed sum, NewsMast purchased indieweb.social ( timothychambers.net/2025/03/27… ). They claim to have done no trading any of the years they've filed, but they bought indieweb.social in March 2025. They filed as dormant for 2025 and then borrowed £276,575 ($374,288.95 at time of writing), which is currently about . So, unless they've made any big purchases other than that, it looks like they've paid a quarter-million pounds sterling sixabong quidbob for indieweb.social. As noted in the prervious post, NewsMast paid Tim Chambers for this site and Tim Chambers is the...the Executive Director, per the NewsMast site ( about.iftas.org/2024/07/12/tim… ). Now, *that's* how you flip a $10 domain and like a few hundred in hosting costs, @tchambers !

Total (gross, including speculative valuation of indieweb.social): $1,408,877.86

So, you know, cram that in whoever's pipe next time @graf spends a handful of bennies on Crunchbits/Frantech boxes.

⁰ "CORE SUPPORT FOR THE SOCIAL WEB FOUNDATION TO INCREASE THE REACH AND SUSTAINABILITY OF OPEN SOURCE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS" was worth $70k to the Ford Foundation and "CORE SUPPORT TO SURVEY AND INTERVIEW GLOBAL INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE MEMBERS OF THE INFRARED NETWORK THAT PROVIDE ALTERNATIVES TO MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE TECH PLATFORMS TO DEVELOP A LONG TERM AND SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE NETWORK" was worth $50k. So, that fediverse governance survey, that was a $50k survey! No big deal, though, the Ford Foundation (EIN 13-1684331) sneezes that on the hour; they control about $17.5B.

¹ I mean that I am totaling the amount of money they receive, but also: I am vomit. 🤮 Not that making money is wrong, per se, but these are people getting foundation money to kill fedi.

² Real ugly goddamn URL, fuck's sake: datarepublican.com/expose/?cus… .

³ The Individual Eleven:

cosocial.ca/ (cosocial.ca/) | fedilist.com/instance/cosocial… (fedilist.com/instance/cosocial…)
hcommons.social/ (hcommons.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/hcommons… (fedilist.com/instance/hcommons…)
hachyderm.io/ (hachyderm.io/) | fedilist.com/instance/hachyder… (fedilist.com/instance/hachyder…)
masto.donte.com.br/ (masto.donte.com.br/) | fedilist.com/instance/masto.do… (fedilist.com/instance/masto.do…)
mspsocial.net/ (mspsocial.net/) | fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia… (fedilist.com/instance/mspsocia…)
piaille.fr/ (piaille.fr/) | fedilist.com/instance/piaille.… (fedilist.com/instance/piaille.…)
sfba.social/ (sfba.social/) | fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc… (fedilist.com/instance/sfba.soc…)
social.coop/ (social.coop/) | fedilist.com/instance/social.c… (fedilist.com/instance/social.c…)
tooting.ch/ (tooting.ch/) | fedilist.com/instance/tooting.… (fedilist.com/instance/tooting.…)
wandering.shop/ (wandering.shop/) | fedilist.com/instance/wanderin… (fedilist.com/instance/wanderin…)
woof.group/ (woof.group/) | fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro… (fedilist.com/instance/woof.gro…)


Unknown parent

gotosocial - Link to source

pistolero

@NonPlayableClown @lnxw37b2

> (I hope every prosecutor at that goddamn courthouse on Hill shat their pants when Hobo Zero got arrested and spread that shit to their shitty building),

Incidentally, Women's Central in Lynwood off Imperial, the only county jail that houses women, has an entire courthouse built into it. And they still get the women up at 4 a.m., cuff them to each other, strip, squat and cough, all that shit, and put them on a bus to downtown instead. Why? The county has a side-hustle renting that courthouse out for movies and TV shows, so they keep it closed down to keep it available to rent out.

Unknown parent

gotosocial - Link to source

pistolero

@NonPlayableClown @lnxw37b2

> They should just make shanty town again like in the depression. Outside the city, do whatever you want, just as long it is within perimeter.

I think that's, like, actually legitimately reasonable.

> I don't really give a shit about going to a city, unless it has something historically significant like Boston or Philly.

The main things LA has going for it if you're *visiting* are food and music. There's some historic stuff but it's not founding fathers stuff like Philly has. The Reagan Library and the Nixon Library are in the area; I regret not getting to visit the Nixon one when I was close, but time and chance happen to all men. The Spruce Goose is down in Long Beach. There's a lot of shit if you're an aerospace nerd; weather and proximity to the Pacific made it into an ideal place for testing aircraft, though the AFB is up near Lancaster. There's JPL, they do tours once in a while, that's very cool. I essentially never had a reason to go to Hollywood unless I was working in Hollywood: they have food and they have the nicest ArcLight I've seen but you'll spend more time trying to get out of the parking garage than you spent on the movie. Not a big tourist town; nice place to live, though.

> I love seeing the worst of what a place has.

That'd be Skid Row. Periodically the County Health Department tries to hose it down and then the cops have to fight the hobos and the hobos have nothing to lose. I'm sure that's entertaining to watch, though. But it's a strip of a single block, right, and LA's pretty huge.

> At least it wasn't in places like Kenosha or Portland, where mom and pop were burned down.

Shit, right? LA's not a very political town, so the worst LA got was, like, it looked organized to me (that is, an operation, not a spontaneous demonstration) but they looted Beverly Hills during the George Floyd deal. And like...lemme find the world's smallest violin so I can play "My Heart Bleeds for You" for the Porsche/Rolls/Ferrari dealerships near Rodeo Drive.

> Lmfao oh yeah. Aren't the film location fees absurdly expensive too in California?

Nah, not really. That sort of thing is pretty cheap, I think; you just go to the national forest if you want to do vikings or hobbits and you go to the hills if you want to do a western or a post-apocalypse. That's free. Indoors, like, there are so many dang sound stages in Burbank and there are a lot of historical mansions and whatnot that are available for filming because it's lucrative to offer that if you're in a place studios wanna film.

> Fuck man, what terrible time. And worse this is becoming the norm nation wide.

Got me all fucked up.

Anyway, that's intentional but I'm doing IFTAS so I don't wanna do too much :tinfoil:, and I think you may have heard this rant.

> Oh will do

Yeah, like, you've gotta really hit that site hard if you wanna find a reasonable place. The SGV used to be pretty cheap; you could get a little one-bedroom for $600 or or a room in a house for $300-400 or something and have your rent covered on minimum wage.

> Could be worse could be the Mr. Hands and tub girl crossover

I don't think that'd be something that a professional studio would film.