The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

This infographic about how to pick up a snail is going viral, but it was AI-generated and numerous biologists have chimed in to say it is wrong.

(I previously boosted it, but have un-boosted. The post author has been informed, and has even boosted the biologists' comments, but has not taken down the original post. I have reported them and will mute them for everyone with my admin powers.)

Source: g.co/about/jb9fd7
Biologists countering:
- functional.cafe/@kupac/1161296…
- ecoevo.social/@ubi/11612981635…

in reply to neville park

Remember, when you post misinformation and refuse to take it down because of all the engagement or fake Internet points, *you are part of the problem*!!!

In this case it could have been avoided by reverse image searching, which shows the image was recently created with AI. Always look up the original source and corroborate the claims with reliable sources! I should have done this before boosting, but was lazy.

reshared this

in reply to neville park

There's a lot of stuff about AI-generated image, video, or text "tells", but—as with good old Photoshopped images and emailed urban legends—the most reliable method is not to look at the content itself, but *find the original source*.

The source may show the content was:

- real but taken out of context (e.g. had a caption attached stating something false)
- real but unethically produced (e.g. posed/harassed wildlife)
- real and by an actual human being who should be credited
- originally from an ad agency, special effects artist, satire site, obscure TV show, generative AI, etc.
- called out as false by people in the comments

in reply to neville park

I'm one of those expressing skepticism. I'm going off my experience with snails and my understanding of their biology (which is I can teach an Invertebrate Biology course but not at the level of a Gastropod specialist).

But is there a Malacologist that can confirm that the information is incorrect?

The only Fediverse Malacologist that I'm aware of is our Clam Man Dan @dantheclamman

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Quinn Comendant

reshared this

in reply to ubi

@ubi @NatureMC @com that's interesting. I have heard it about L. fulica but I don't have expertise to know if it's true or not, maybe it is more common for them based on their extreme morphology, being so large and terrestrial. if it is real and more common for them, another piece of evidence of why they aren't good pets aside from the more widely known invasiveness and disease vector issues.
in reply to neville park

This is what makes me so immensely tired. I'm not a scientist. But as a journalist, I have to get the facts. And meanwhile, this work of untangling and debunking takes more of my time than what I really had to do: writing!
And after writing, I have to deal with people questioning the facts because they heard something "completely different on Facebook", and those sites have many more followers, so "they must know better."
I'm so extremely tired of #AISlop and #LLM

@ubi @dantheclamman @com

in reply to RadAufheber*in 🚴 🚲 🎡

@radaufheber ah. But that's fine in this case because Facebook IS the source. Where else would it point?
On my device I get

"About this image
No results were found to help you learn more about this image. This could be because it's private, very new, or doesn't appear on many pages."

Maybe because I have redirection blocked.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to neville park

That account deleted the post but repeated the same slop now in words (I think just for "cutting" the critics). The hashtags there speak for pure click-hunt.
Therefore; I also reported it and even blocked it. I no longer tolerate the posting of misinformation after the person has been informed by several parties and should be aware of the facts.
It made me so angry that I wrote an article: steady.page/en/naturematchcuts…