RE: lingo.lol/@StefanMuelller/1159…
@futurebird
I thought you might appreciate this:
Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
reshared this
RE: lingo.lol/@StefanMuelller/1159…
@futurebird
I thought you might appreciate this:
Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
reshared this
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to Fred • •Chuckle-worthy but there is a grammatical error. "Rational" and "Real" are adjectives, and numbers ARE countable.
m'ughes
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan • • •I think numbers (real or rational) ought to be grammatically countable when we're talking about a finite number of them. If we're talking about the size of an infinite subset of the real numbers, then I think it sort of does flip over to making sense to talk about those numbers as grammatically uncountable. "Much of the real numbers were contained therein" makes perfect sense to me. But I think this is true of pretty much any infinite set, not just (mathematically) uncountable ones.
myrmepropagandist
in reply to m'ughes • • •@sovietfish @claralistensprechen5th
"Much of the real numbers less than one."
:/
IDKATOC
Bitslingers-R-Us likes this.
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to myrmepropagandist • •The numbers still count. 😛
myrmepropagandist likes this.
m'ughes
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •myrmepropagandist
in reply to m'ughes • • •@sovietfish @claralistensprechen5th
I Don't Know About That One Chief?
I guess it's a little obscure.
m'ughes
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
m'ughes
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •