Find one?

Over here you call (just be happy they don't require sending a fax) to order one friday evening, and if you're lucky it shows up around noon sunday.

Pricing seems to be intentionally set to keep DUI competitive, though to be fair it's probably because they are only interested in customers who are too rich or too drunk to care.

But Uber or anything else that smells like competition for the taxi monopolies is illegal, presumably because without income from DUI fines, the government would have to raise taxes (ok, maybe that's not the official reason, but it's what it feels like*).

*) especially when you hear again and again that the government has a goal of reducing CO2 by significantly increasing the number of people who travel by train, but every time someone suggests something that would do that, it gets shot down immediately because that would require investing in more rail cars. But no worries, we are on track to hitting the goal sometime after the year 8000. Yes, that's eight.

a business model deliberately designed to extract value from labour while avoiding the obligations that normally protect and pay workers, in order to "maximise shareholder value". The capitalists wet dream. FInancialising human effort so it can be treated like a raw material, traded and optimised for returns.

If society leaves it to “the market,” these people will keep doing it, because the system rewards them. If society changes the rules of the game - through law, governance, and culture - then the people pushing these models either adapt or lose their licence to operate.

Or there is always guillotines.

And how did they get there? Infinite money.

They undercut their prices to bancrupt competition for more than a decade.

This is not the free market, this is cartels.

Uber y Rappi (una APP de entregas) dejan de ser la "solución" para el desempleo en la Argentina!

agenda365.com.ar/noticia/uber-…

Bu-buh-buht, muh "communist socialist woke Democrats!"

Every accusation is a confession with these Repussycunts, Istg

#Fascist is as fascist does; without corporate complicity WW2 could never have happened.

Fiat and Siemens outlived those tyrants, so Intel may be hoping to be as lucky.

People aren't going to get any power over the means of production here.

This feels more like "Italian/traditional fascism" and so it's really not much of a surprise.

I'm convinced US administration will bankrupt in a few years. Import tariffs solution won't work as expected.

Companies working shoulder to shoulder with them will go after it. Sorry for all the people in the US. In Spain, after XVI-XVIII imperialism, had 150 years of nothingness and recovered partially with our EU union. History repeats like spicy sausages.

I don't think this is how communism or even socialism works. Even if the government held 100% of Intel, Intel would not be worker owned and managed, they would still overproduce to satisfy the market, be opaque with respect to their internal mechanisms and extract profits.

Even if Intel was an entity that somehow is socialist they would still operate in a capitalist system, potentially even be abused for its benefit, because there is a whole economy running besides it.

Poor, poor, poor Big Corporations/Industry. Woe is them. :::sad violin music:::

After dumping BILLIONS of dollars into Trump’s campaigns and after-election bribes, gave expensive gifts, wasted time listening to his crazy bullshak, flattered his ego, and kissed his…um…ring, in hope that Trump would screw over workers, consumers, and the environment by ditching all the pesky rules, laws, & regulations which protect them, they are are shocked to discover they’ve been screwed.