"We here at Microsoft are simply making punching motions in the air and walking in a direction. If you happen to occupy the air we are punching, you are solely responsible for any results or consequences."
The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
If they tell me that something is "for entertainment purposes only," while selling it to me as a revolution in the way people write software and/or conduct business, they have established that lying for the purposes of covering their ass is how they do business.
I have other sources of entertainment, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that leopards who offer to shave your beard for entertainment purposes only always wind up having your face for lunch.
Only a completely corrupt and captured legal system would ever accept "For entertainment purposes only" as a disclaimer conferring immunity from liability.
C'mon. Who spends literally billions of dollars to make AI just to entertain people? Can they show the jury their business plan to pivot to entertainment? Is this the xbox division?
"Here's Excel. It's buggy. Go ahead and use it for the pro-forma cash flow and income statements you need to raise funds, but if _our_ code screws up and _you_ are arrested for fraud, leave us out: Excel is for entertainment purposes only."
If that is ridiculous, so is the Copilot weasel-clause.
> we make this tool but we cannot guarantee that it does something and if it does we cannot guarantee that it does it correctly. Use at your own risk also it's not a tool.
"For example, we can’t promise that any Copilot’s Responses won’t infringe someone else’s rights (like their copyrights, trademarks, or rights of privacy) or defame them."
Remember that little period when Microsoft was promising to compensate Github Copilot users if they were sued for IP violations for Copilot output?
"We don’t own Your Content, but we may use Your Content to operate Copilot and improve it. By using Copilot, you grant us permission to use Your Content, which means we can copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, edit, translate, and reformat it, and we can give those same rights to others who work on our behalf."
We don't technically own your content, but we absolutely can do anything we want to with it. So can anyone else if we want them to. Suck it, peons.
Blaise
in reply to mhoye • •@mhoye
eestileib (she/hers) likes this.
Darius Kazemi
in reply to mhoye • • •mhoye
in reply to Darius Kazemi • • •soc
in reply to mhoye • • •John True Connection
in reply to mhoye • • •Im Having A Good Day (assertive)
in reply to mhoye • • •Reginald
in reply to mhoye • • •If they tell me that something is "for entertainment purposes only," while selling it to me as a revolution in the way people write software and/or conduct business, they have established that lying for the purposes of covering their ass is how they do business.
I have other sources of entertainment, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that leopards who offer to shave your beard for entertainment purposes only always wind up having your face for lunch.
mhoye
2026-03-31 19:22:57
Reginald
in reply to Reginald • • •Only a completely corrupt and captured legal system would ever accept "For entertainment purposes only" as a disclaimer conferring immunity from liability.
C'mon. Who spends literally billions of dollars to make AI just to entertain people? Can they show the jury their business plan to pivot to entertainment? Is this the xbox division?
Reginald
in reply to Reginald • • •"Here's Excel. It's buggy. Go ahead and use it for the pro-forma cash flow and income statements you need to raise funds, but if _our_ code screws up and _you_ are arrested for fraud, leave us out: Excel is for entertainment purposes only."
If that is ridiculous, so is the Copilot weasel-clause.
Meu
in reply to mhoye • • •Ejner Borgbjerg
in reply to mhoye • • •Julien / Sphinx
in reply to mhoye • • •Marianne
in reply to Julien / Sphinx • • •mhoye
in reply to Marianne • • •@noodlemaz @Sphinx_Pouet
www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse
Julien / Sphinx
in reply to mhoye • • •datarama
in reply to Marianne • • •Copilot - Terms of Use
Microsoft CopilotJulien / Sphinx
in reply to datarama • • •datarama
in reply to Julien / Sphinx • • •@Sphinx_Pouet @noodlemaz I might have gone through the same reaction as I think you did.
"This can't possibly be real. It *must* be satire."
"..."
"Apparently, in the grim future of 2026, Poe's law is the only law."
Matthew Lyon
in reply to mhoye • • •Donald Ball
in reply to mhoye • • •"For example, we can’t promise that any Copilot’s Responses won’t infringe someone else’s rights (like their copyrights, trademarks, or rights of privacy) or defame them."
Remember that little period when Microsoft was promising to compensate Github Copilot users if they were sued for IP violations for Copilot output?
Anyway.
Donald Ball
in reply to mhoye • • •"We don’t own Your Content, but we may use Your Content to operate Copilot and improve it. By using Copilot, you grant us permission to use Your Content, which means we can copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, edit, translate, and reformat it, and we can give those same rights to others who work on our behalf."
We don't technically own your content, but we absolutely can do anything we want to with it. So can anyone else if we want them to. Suck it, peons.
Reed Mideke
in reply to mhoye • • •"Copilot is for entertainment purposes only"
mhoye reshared this.
Que
in reply to mhoye • • •Sjoerd
in reply to mhoye • • •I found the *one* area where copilot doesn’t respond like a grovelling sycophant
Mark Harris
in reply to mhoye • • •Bruce Mirken
in reply to mhoye • • •