Skip to main content


It goes a long, long way to explain Rwanda.


King Leopold III planned to rule over a mini-Belgium aligned with Adolf Hitler byteseu.com/934951/ #Belgium
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan

@Radio Free Trumpistan
Congo.
Also, that Belgium was invaded and under German rule as The Netherlands and A big part of France unless Vichy government in the Provence, With General Petin that ruled over colonies in North Africa. Belgium colonized Congo, not Rwanda.
Also Spain was under rule of yet another fascist, Franco.
And occupied Europe had collaborators (Waffen SS were primarily from occupied Nations that choose the right side) but as well The resistance in each Nation.
This entry was edited (7 hours ago)
in reply to plan-A

@plan-A
Sorry, but Belgian colonization of Rwanda was not required for its massacre. Simply being accused of being a Belgian collaborator was responsible.
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan

@Radio Free Trumpistan
Could not read whole page as it's locked by mail sub etc wall, did not knew any of that.
This entry was edited (45 minutes ago)
Unknown parent

@plan-A
Doesn't matter that Rwanda wasn't colonized. The massacre was based on accusations of being collaborators with Belgium.
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan

@Radio Free Trumpistan
Yes, now I do! why were there a department of para commando's (Belgian) massacred along with the embassy they should have fought out till last bullet? Rwanda.