Skip to main content


A Few Bad Apples...

... Spoil the bunch. - Why do police and police enthusiasts use the first half of this idiom to describe officers who act unethically/immorally/illegally, get caught, and then are protected by the police? Does it not occur to them that *they* are the "bunch"?

in reply to Blaise

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
plan-A
 — (Proud Eskimo!)
@Blaise
No one hates police officers, they hate what they enforce. So they caught into that barrage of hate due to repression by stupid people. You can fight the system but riots etc is not the way at all.
Those are people just doing their job, is what many do not understand.
Ann of course, the herd is dumb.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Blaise

But breaking the law and violating people's civil rights is not "just doing their job". It's "being a fucking criminal". That's kinda the whole point.
in reply to Blaise

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
plan-A
 — (Proud Eskimo!)
@Blaise
Those are the corrupt ones but not all at all.
And I agree about what you say, breaking the law ordered by who?
As a soldier a cop or any federal entity has to follow simple orders and not go out that.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to plan-A

@plan-A " but not all " - This is the basis of the irony. If the "not all" ones accept and protect the behaviour of the corrupt ones, then *they* are the corrupt ones, too.

"*I* didn't shoot a peaceful, unarmed woman point-blank with a rubber bullet just because she wanted to go into her home" is only an acceptable defense if it's followed by, "but I recommended the officer who did for punitive action", or, "and I tried to stop the officer who did". Any other answer means our 'good' officer is as guilty as the trigger-happy officer...

in reply to Blaise

I'm not sure why this became a separate post instead of a reply, but look at my next post for examples:

friendica.rogueproject.org/dis…

in reply to Blaise

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
plan-A
 — (Proud Eskimo!)
@Blaise
Yeah I seee in Inspect the watch screen, or did you not knew I knew? So?
I know is Anonymous.. waow, if he so anonymous then why does he have a profile on tiktok??
the rest does not hurt me and authority is welcome to look.
Both pages yes.
A slightly silent change on original post.
Inspect source code each page.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to plan-A

@plan-A "if he so anonymous then why does he have a profile on tiktok??" - "Anonymous" isn't a description, it is the name of an organization that acts publicly, but hides the identity of its members to protect them from illegal reprisals from governments or corporations.

"rest does not hurt me" - I'm not sure what this means... Are you trying to say that since you personally are not being shot by a cop for trying to peacefully enter your own home, then it's OK for them to do to others?

in reply to Blaise

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
plan-A
 — (Proud Eskimo!)
@Blaise
Not at all, I was even mistreated by cops and Justice multiple times, thing that gets me now shielded is higher ranked ones that are not assholes. But even them I do not trust 100% even family not.
Repression is not ok, the dogs of war are brought by crying Havoc! "Seneca*" Media and gov is main evil, not their servants as they recruit more if needed and have cash for it, out cash. That is repression.
In fact those low rank 'foot soldiers' are just a well-payed and assured for their security in their mind to do their job which is follow orders.
Take Snowden e.g. Do you call him evil? Yet do not commit a crime where he see it..
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Blaise

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
plan-A
 — (Proud Eskimo!)
@Blaise
I think we misunderstand each other by the classification in rankings.
imo. A Healthy Society without Corruption needs no Regression, there they are to protect.
So the blame remain higher up.
Also, I know very well who is or not a real Anon, just believe me on that one please.
If you just saw how I unmasked many on former X (Twitter).. you would not even mention that.
My point bout this profile I know btw, is not really anon..
I can contact the real ones, yes.
Do I do it? No
Why? I do NOT* need them.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)