mastodon - Link to source
The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

I'm an electrician.

I dare you to use ChatGPT to wire a plug.

This is why AI is absolute horse shit.

#chatgpt #aibullshit #aiisdangerous

#chatgpt #aibullshit #aiisdangerous
This entry was edited (19 hours ago)

Unus Nemo doesn't like this.

in reply to Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁

mastodon - Link to source

Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

looks like Google's Gemini got it right.

g.co/gemini/share/c0bcb787ae74

This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
in reply to Dave Rahardja

mastodon - Link to source

Elias Probst

@drahardja even AI itself doesn't know, since it doesn't understand, conceptualize, think...

It just replicates and generates what, statistically most likely, matches the recipients expectation.

@skyfire747 @nomenloony

@Dave Rahardja @Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁 @Nömenlōony
This entry was edited (16 hours ago)
in reply to Dave Rahardja

mastodon - Link to source

Raineer 🦆

@drahardja @skyfire747 @blogdiva

My favorite quote about LLMs is that they are extremely effective for people who already are domain experts on the topic

The UX fail of the century is for every one of these companies to not append “teach me how I would verify this is true?” to every single prompt.

The skill it takes to use the tech is higher than the avg user is going to invest. Every single maker of chatbots has ignored this from day one.

@your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 @Dave Rahardja @Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁
in reply to Raineer 🦆

mastodon - Link to source

Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫

@raineer @drahardja @skyfire747 @blogdiva

Domain expert here: they aren't extremely effective for me in my field (programming) because to tell an LLM precisely enough what to do, I'd have to use a verbose English description, and I've already constructed the solution in my head in a more structural form that isn't words. Turning it back into words to tell an LLM what code to generate is a step backwards.

@your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 @Raineer 🦆 @Dave Rahardja @Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁
in reply to Matt Hardy 3.11 for Workgroups

mastodon - Link to source

Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫

@technicaladept @raineer @drahardja @skyfire747 @blogdiva

No, a duplicate explanation of what the code is doing is not what comments are for.

Comments are more for "why" one method or choice than another, sometimes "why not", than "what".

Except doc comments, which are closer to spec i.e. "what". The code itself is "how", and it doesn't necessarily come via a verbal description in natural language.

@your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 @Raineer 🦆 @Dave Rahardja @Anthony 🇦🇺🦘🐨🪃🌟✨️🕯🏏🧩🎭🪁 @Matt Hardy 3.11 for Workgroups
in reply to Hans Zelf 🇪🇺🌻

mastodon - Link to source

Alex@rtnVFRmedia Suffolk UK

@hans_zelf @cyplo

it is not unlikely the 32A breaker on the ring final circuit (used for the UK sockets) opens before the plug top fuse, and if its RCD protected it will definitely open (often putting the building in darkness if the RCD is not part of the 32A breaker or its not a split board with two incomers and lighting circuits on a different one)

@cyplo @Hans Zelf 🇪🇺🌻
This entry was edited (17 hours ago)
in reply to Justin M

mastodon - Link to source

Chao-c'

@Jam123 But in a way, it repeats the "Facebook effect", where all content, never mind how crazy or fake, looked equally neatly formatted, typographically correct and somehow... professional. It was such a big difference, compared to wild aesthetics of eg. older Geocities, which made even serious content look like collage by madman.

And in the same way: all stuff presented by AI looks neatly formatted, visually consistent... yes, only looks, but how many people really analyze it or compare it?

@nomenloony

@Justin M @Nömenlōony
in reply to Nömenlōony

mastodon - Link to source

Indyzign 🏳️‍⚧️ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

for those of you that don’t know, or won’t remember a pic of the correct one, it’s super easy - from the back of the plug - BLue = Bottom Left, BRown = Bottom Right

It amazes me just how … shit … this AI nonsense is. Happy to say aside from one try when it first launched, never used it since. Crapola

in reply to Nömenlōony

mastodon - Link to source

BigD

My understanding of AI ( which is none really) is that it generates a solution, answer, whatever is being sought, from a vast source of data.
So then , is the vast source it collects it from, wrong to begin with. Or at least the majority is wrong, being non human the IT machine can't see that, so it assumes it's giving the correct answer or solution to the request and so the human who requested it believes it to be correct because it's IT.

I'll stick to human to human for now.

in reply to Nömenlōony

akkoma - Link to source

potentially hazardous object

i hadn't zoomed in or read the post or alt text and am a *very* unsophisticated user when it comes to anything electrical, and at first glance i thought the correct chart was on the left and the AI-generated pic was on the right

once i read the text body and inferred that the thing labelled so confidently "correctly wired" must be the slop, then read the alt text and confirmed it was so, everything made so much more sense

AI infographics are such an awful case of "we can lie faster than you can fact-check"

in reply to Nömenlōony

mastodon - Link to source

essjax

as a kid in the UK, I was at my aunts house and a power plug had its back removed. I plugged it in, with the palm of my hand on the contacts, to see what would happen. Massive explosion, kicked across the room. There's a blue/green colour I saw that doesn't exist. I can taste it, still, today. I'm not even entirely sure I survived.
This entry was edited (3 hours ago)
⇧