Skip to main content

in reply to stux⚡

I live in a big city, I come across a lot of tanks like that (and bigger), it's scary and tiring.
in reply to stux⚡

might be good for a country setting but I bet in the city it's just pointless.

and all that extra metal is going to be shit for fuel efficiency when you constantly have to start+stop tha giant hunk of metal.

in reply to stux⚡

saw one of these out in the wild and had to admire the beauty of it
in reply to stux⚡

For a compensating device, it's not even good looking and has the worst possible color.
in reply to stux⚡

sigh From svelte sprinter to a cross between a shot-putter and an Abrams tank. Somewhere in Germany there's an automotive engineer crying while writing up those design docs.
in reply to stux⚡

What do they put inside of them? Like, there's so much room in the right car, what do they fill it with? Is it just full of empty space?
in reply to stux⚡

Good lord. What people think they need. That’s just butt ugly.
in reply to stux⚡

The fossil fuel industry does all it can to inflate gas demand.

Hyperthyroidal gas guzzlers are part of that.

The oil industry has some very reliable go-to consumers. Religious bigots. Fragile men. Price gouging billionaires. The superficial dark triad types.

Overcompensating masculinity?
sociology.stanford.edu/publica…

news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/…

inc.com/chris-matyszczyk/think…

lsureveille.com/221458/opinion…

thesun.co.uk/motors/21026699/m…

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to stux⚡

"Unnecessary engineering"

more like customer demand. As long as there are idiots buying these cars, the car manufacturers will produce them. So don't only blame the manufacturers on that, which are yet partly responsible for creating them in the first place.
It started with the SUV hype. Never understood, why you'd need a SPORTS UTILITY vehicle in a city. Not that there's a lot of hills, woods and rough terrain you'd have to drive through, besides the total ugliness of these models.

in reply to stux⚡

I’m reminded of the Ford Edsel which wouldn’t fit in most suburban garages of the time.
in reply to stux⚡

Is that an X7? Those things are insanely huge. And drives like a house that transforms into an unreasonably large race car. Fun to drive but too large for any practical use at all outside of use as a getaway car.
in reply to stux⚡

BMW is going for the infantile market with enough ketchy bling to reveal it's design origin as a crayon sketch on a child's placemat.
in reply to stux⚡

At first i thought i was looking at a car and a pickup truck. That giant grey thing is just a passenger car?!?!
in reply to stux⚡

@stux⚡
That thing should be classified as an RV and pay the proper road tax for the extra tonnage.
in reply to stux⚡

we need some GLP-1 treatments for modern vehicles.
in reply to stux⚡

Tax is based on car weight in the Netherlands.

Might be good to add size to that. Like occupied space and amount of empty interior. Of the car, not the driver.

in reply to stux⚡

What is the model of the BMW grey car (and the other too) ? I try to obtain the real dimension of it because it's enormous and incredible. But the SUV witch is closest to this is the BMW XM (same front). When I read spec, his width is early 202 cm when a BWM 318i build in 2002 (for example) has a width of 173 cm. This photo suggest there is at least 100 cm of difference, maybe more, so it's strange.

(and Yes, in all the case SUV are useless)

in reply to stux⚡

This is what happens when sales draft the engineering requirements...
in reply to stux⚡

Penis extensions for the genitally challenged. The Bin-Juice Grey is, well, appropriate.
in reply to stux⚡

BMW sedans are so big now! I noticed this recently, they're as tall as a truck!
in reply to stux⚡

Ah, the BMW Overcompensator. For the distinguished man of diminutive endowment and questionable tastes.