Gold is trading above $4800 and I can tell you that almost no one who actually owns physical gold is happy about this
My old boss at the hedge fund who owned a LOT of gold used to say, approximately, "Gold at $2500 is good for our investors. Gold at $5000 is bad for everyone"
reshared this
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to Kim Scheinberg • •Because of why, exactly?
like this
ShadSterling and Full Metal Archaeopteryx like this.
oldguycrusty reshared this.
James M.
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan • • •Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to James M. • •Hmmm...as in, demand far outstrips supply, then.
I'ma go rummage through my jewelry since I never wear any anyway. Gold is just a rock, anyway.
Kim Scheinberg
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan • • •Because if gold is at $5000, the dollar is collapsing. Gold isn't an investment, it's a hedge against bad monetary policy (or in this particular case an insane president)
Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 reshared this.
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to Kim Scheinberg • •I find that odd since the dollar is the benchmark currency for international trade. Now, here I was under the impression that the dollar didn't lose ground until international bond holders sold off their treasuries--and sell off they did.
like this
Gax, Anthony David, Mitex Leo, TransitBiker and Full Metal Archaeopteryx like this.
oldguycrusty reshared this.
Ariaflame
in reply to Radio Free Trumpistan • • •Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
Karl Heinz Häsliprinz
in reply to Ariaflame • • •Nothing in international politics gives me more hope than the collapse of the petro dollar. There is no route out of climate disaster without that currency collapsing.
Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
reshared this
Radio Free Trumpistan and G. Gibson reshared this.
Hermey G
in reply to Kim Scheinberg • • •@claralistensprechen5th
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to Hermey G • •Not forgotten, actually; it's why we have Fort Knox, preserving the paradox of gold's value being defined only by sovereign currencies, not the other way around. When you get to brass tacks, gold is just a rock.
Of course there are those attempting to elevate crypto to trade currency franca, so to speak, but we all know that's even riskier than sovereign currency.
So, if sovereign currencies are basically gold-based, higher gold value would elevate the value of the currency--and we all know that simply isn't the case. The more of a denomination you need to buy an ounce of gold, the less valuable the denomination is, so that leaves gold without an actual value, which is required to be in terms of sovereign currency. The ouroboro eats its tail here.
Mx. Chara Aznable (they/them) of Pnictogen
in reply to Kim Scheinberg • • •