openclaw is so weird. like. you have to already be neck-deep in the silicon valley ecosystem and take a lot of things for granted for it to even be useful.

don't have systemd? it's not prepared for that eventuality.
want to use IRC as an interface? good fucking luck.
want to use ollama as a backend? oh we're going to fail back to whatever API costs money for completely inexplicable reasons
what do you mean you don't have gh, clawhub, weebo, porkle, flipflap, and zsh installed? Are you a fucking troglodyte?
why isn't your e-mail server gmail? openclaw has panic attacks when it has to talk to something that isn't gmail
ask it for help with itself? I'm sorry dave I'm a dumbfuck.

in reply to Feβ‚‚πŸ¦€β‚ƒβ‹…Hβ‚‚πŸ¦€

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@RustyCrab

> actually why do you not have ZSH installed?

I've never installed zsh on purpose. It's worse fluoride than goddamn bash. You'd think these fuckin' things would be trained on some Bourne-alike, yeah, you expect it, but if it can't function with whatever plain /bin/sh exists on the machine, it's designed by idiots. readline and shitty multi-color prompts are not features a machine needs; most bashisms are not features required for programming.

Most of the LLMs have succeeded in creating the median Redditor, something no one wanted, but like the median Redditor, it's also crippled without its Mac:germanB:ook:germanB:ro.
reddit_is_fucking_terrible_at_programming.png

in reply to pistolero

@pistolero @Feβ‚‚πŸ¦€β‚ƒβ‹…Hβ‚‚πŸ¦€ @:seven: Zshell is just graphical preference, I use it in some of my containers where I do graphical things but rest is as native bashrc.
ZSH good for some extensions as fuzzy 10K power level as you said the colors and Bat (stupid) etc.. I don't use most extensions but it's just like do you prefer Gnome or KDE thing for me frankly.
But as base all remain Ptyxis bash 3.5 as base
People could argue about nano or Vim also.
in reply to 🌈ᚩ🌈

@bonifartius @RustyCrab @syzygy @mischievoustomato

> they usually just do their hacking and don't bother anyone, contrary to the rust evangelism strike force πŸ˜€

"Why I Hate Advocacy" is an excellent read and it came from the Perl people: perl.com/pub/2000/12/advocacy.…

Unfortunately for the Rust Evangelism Strike Force, the discussion of NIH and mindless advocacy was not invented by Rust and was thus completely ignored; apart from that, it was written in 2000 and, although human nature hasn't changed, everything older than the most recent push to cargo is too old to consider.

in reply to pistolero

@p

Advocacy is the biggest problem in computing. Once they force whatever it is into all the mainline things the mainline things are not much better than the closed alternative because by then the option to go without it is taken away from any but the most devoted resistance.

@RustyCrab @syzygy @vii @bonifartius @mischievoustomato

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @mischievoustomato
that was a nice read!

> The best glues can stick to everything.

hehe

> They want other people to join the Tribe. If they meet someone who doesn’t like Perl, it’s an insult to the Tribe and a personal affront to them.

i don't even have any good argument against rust itself as i didn't even really look at it in the first place. sole reason for this is that from the get-go the rust people were insufferable, just like poettering.

in reply to 🌈ᚩ🌈

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@bonifartius @RustyCrab @syzygy @mischievoustomato

> i don't even have any good argument against rust itself

LLVM is enough for me. But the thing is it has nothing really to recommend it: it's just a kinda shitty hybrid of the worst parts of C++ and JavaScript, the two languages Mozilla loves.
i_do_not_care_for_rust.png

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @bonifartius @mischievoustomato >compile rust project
>installs 56,274 crates
>32 threads spawn
>CPU's are running at 120% usage
>compiler getting dangerously close to being killed for eating 60 GB of memory in 1.2 ms
>19 hours pass
>done
in reply to 🌈ᚩ🌈

@bonifartius @p @RustyCrab @syzygy @mischievoustomato that goes both ways, there are also some really retarded anti-rust cultists, as you can see if you go into lunduke's comments, where you see nocoders who think it's some conspiracy because the institutions that for decades have sponsored formally validated software without garbage collection are sponsoring rust, or that the compiler that can be bootstrapped from source in two different ways has a trusting trust injection, and such bullshit
in reply to πρωτος

@protos @RustyCrab @syzygy @p @mischievoustomato i think whatever the language brings in positive aspects (not all that much imo) is more than negated by the cultist community.

i'm not up to date, does rust have a spec now or is it still just the one implementation? is bootstrapping done from C or does one need to download binaries?

in reply to πρωτος

@protos @bonifartius @RustyCrab @mischievoustomato @syzygy Jithub is their Discord. 4chan is their Discord. The entire interwebs is the Rustposter's Discord. No one is safe. People have done that to me on *fedi*.
in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @bonifartius @mischievoustomato is this your spambot? the immediate context should be sufficient to know that "discord" was not the important part but rather "if you just write rust code" without caring about any community.
if I write some rust code and then some faggot comes to my github complaining about how my code fails the clippy lints or I used unsafe flippantly, I don't see that as a reason to drop the language.
in reply to πρωτος

@protos @RustyCrab @bonifartius @mischievoustomato @syzygy

> is this your spambot?

Do you read context? The remark was that the community is irritating and they jump out of the bushes to ask if you'd like to buy a vegan timeshare. So jumping in to say "But what if you write Rust code *anyway*?" is unrelated as well as exactly the complaint.

> but rather "if you just write rust code" without caring about any community.

If I *don't* write Rust code, I still can't get away from their :glowinthedark: "community" :threeletteragentglowsobright:.

Touching Rust on purpose is orthogonal to the process.

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @bonifartius @mischievoustomato are you illiterate? the context was "I don't want to use rust *because the community is bad*". the obvious response being "you are a dumb goy if other people can vicariously prevent you from enjoying something".

I get that the anti-rust cult needs to contrive any reason to hate rust, but this just isn't it.
especially when the reverse goes for C, I remember getting a rust hellthread from saying "LLVM is good because it allowed rust to exist in a way GCC couldn't have".

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @bonifartius @mischievoustomato @protos

p, how do you know you don't like heroin if you don't inject the heroin? You can't just look at the people nodding off around you, you have to take the heroin to have a valid opinion about heroin. Just shoot up heroin without caring about any heroin community.

in reply to πρωτος

@protos @RustyCrab @syzygy @p @mischievoustomato big question is why would i use rust ❓starts with the ecosystem where you have a centralized package registry. you aren't politically correct enough? did something "wrong"? package name gets taken away by glowies, cf. left-pad fuckup.

go did take long to get their packaging stuff, there was some mild drama, but it resulted in getting things right 90%.

hell i'd rather use a language with NO official package management instead of a registry.

in reply to 🌈ᚩ🌈

@protos @RustyCrab @syzygy @p @mischievoustomato registries worked for the perl and tex hippies because they were sane people interested in hacking.

"modern" devs are political first, hacking second and you can't escape this in the walled gardens they build. only way is to jump over the wall, and roam the wilderness, as well as one can.

in reply to πρωτος

@protos @RustyCrab @syzygy @p @mischievoustomato still the default is centralized, but fine.

why should i use rust and not say, ocaml or pascal or something else which doesn't has bad vibes defining their stuff?

because it's "memory safe"? cargo uses libcurl and openssl iirc, and those two things are prime targets for a memory safe implementation.

see, you can use rust if you want, that's fine. i have zero interest in it, i rather learn the next fringe language.

in reply to 🌈ᚩ🌈

@bonifartius @RustyCrab @syzygy @p @mischievoustomato it's not just about what it brings, but what it doesn't (40 years of bloat as in C++).
it does not have a spec, but I don't see why it should have one either
bootstrapping is done from ocaml or C++
in reply to πρωτος

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@protos @bonifartius @RustyCrab @mischievoustomato @syzygy

> there are also some really retarded anti-rust cultists

Unhinged people sometimes have a smaller, unhinged backlash. There is no widespread problem with anti-Rust people showing up to bother people that are writing in Rust.
rust_bot_astroturfing.png

in reply to pistolero

Perhaps one of the worst things about advocacy is it leads to really bad software. Remembering back to the Java haydays, j<everything> was generally worse than the code it replaced, likely because its objective was to replace something, not to make great software. I'm seeing that happening with rust-<everything> now.

Not that I don't use Rust myself, but "X but written in Y" software has a bad tendency to be slop.

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @bonifartius @mischievoustomato

Tangent...
I attended a Perl conference around the time that post was made where MJD was a speaker and he gave us a choice of a few talks he could give. I don't remember what the other choices were but pretty much everyone decided they wanted to hear his talk on Lambda Calculus. So he talked about that, and like maybe 10% of the talk was Perl specific with him providing implementation examples using Perl since that's what the attendees were most familiar with. But it really had more to do with conceptual stuff like, how do you implement an `if` statement when there's not already an `if` statement, etc, and building a language grammar from the ground up. I don't remember all the details, but it really opened my eyes towards FOD.

in reply to evil syzygy β€Ž

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@syzygy @p @mischievoustomato PACKAGES ARE THE LEAST OF YOUR CONCERNS IM IN ROUTE RIGHT NOW YOU'RE WAKING UP WITH A SYSTEM FULL OF FLATPACKS
in reply to Plan-AΜ΅ΜΏΜ•Ν‹ΝƒΝ›Μ›ΝˆΜ¬Μ₯

@zer0unplanned You don’t know me, but I do research on training LLMs that succeed at specialized tasks for phones and on gaming hardware for fun, but I also have a job that has people in it and I like to keep up with what they’re doing to be able to communicate about the technology without actually having to take part in the ecosystem.
Unknown parent

pleroma - Link to source

Clint Eastwood

@ins0mniak

Anyone who is in programming and is considering doing Rust should instead go back to college and get a bachelor’s degree in the arts. There is literally less chance of being a gay communist and getting the AIDS from that than from any exposure to Rust.

@RustyCrab @syzygy @vii @p @bonifartius @idiot @mischievoustomato

Unknown parent

gotosocial - Link to source

pistolero

@ehhh @RustyCrab @bonifartius @mischievoustomato @syzygy

> less trustworthy of linux nowadays

Well, like, I think Linux has been borderline intolerable for a decade at least. I started treating Linux like Windows in the late 90s, you know, "Here's this thing I have to run for work shit but I hate touching it." But as soon as they forced their CoC down Linus's throat, I figured it was over.

> The Germans and I guess the upper hierarches of Arch Linux decided that completely rewriting ALPM in Rust was a good idea.

Ew.

There's always crux.nu/ if you want the thing that Arch forked off from. CRUX has stayed good so far. :crux:

> they opt to completely convert to Rust... For handholding?

Well, like, I never had a good time with pacman personally. I switched from Arch back to Slackware for shit I don't care about.

> It's only a matter of time when petty infighting happens that fractures the whole project and then people will just go back to C again because they cannot trust the community to be run by competent people.

Python fell apart completely when it lost its competent management and it is now less stable than *Ruby*. This didn't actually stop people from using it, though.

in reply to pistolero

@p @RustyCrab @syzygy @bonifartius @mischievoustomato @ehhh

> Python fell apart completely when it lost its competent management and it is now less stable than *Ruby*. This didn't actually stop people from using it, though.

I still long for the parallel universe where julia wasn't written with llvm and was the lingua franca for ML.

Unknown parent

gotosocial - Link to source

pistolero

@RustyCrab @bonifartius @ehhh @mischievoustomato @syzygy It is one of the few languages where the first program I wrote was useful; was checking the Spamhaus PBL for IPs that were blocked, and thankfully nobody uses Spamhaus any more. (Postscript was another; Postscript had the added bonus of actually being useful for a real-world task for a person that was not me.) Much more enjoyable than Haskell, anyway, and more convenient than OCaml, much more legible than Erlang. The extremely low-friction C function calls made it really easy to deal with.

using system;
extern hostent *gethostbyname(char *name);
pblize addr = (join "." (reverse (split "." addr))) + ".zen.spamhaus.org";
check domain::string = gethostbyname (pblize domain) ~= NULL;
pcheck addr::string =
if check addr then ((puts(addr + " is blocked!")) $$ 1)
else ((puts(addr + " is fine.")) $$ 0);
count_pbld args = foldr (+) 0 $ map pcheck $ tail args;
main = exit $ count_pbld $ tail argv;
if compiling then () else main;

⇧