An AI just told me that my prose is "punchy". I responded with a smart-ass comment denying pugilistic tendencies on my part. It began its answer with, "I suspect you already knew the difference, but were joking..." Then, it gave me a large treatise on the distinction anyway, just in case.
I'm less worried about an AI takeover than I am about AIs treating us all like they're our disappointed parents!
Holy crap. If you're thinking you really want to know every possible technical detail of the submersibles owned by a redacted person who may or may not have directed 'Titanic', now's your chance!
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) are both routing protocols used to exchange routing information between routers on the same network, but they have some key differences:
1. OSPF is a link-state routing protocol that uses Dijkstra's algorithm for calculating the shortest path tree from each router to every other router in the network. It divides an autonomous system into areas and exchanges topology information using Link State Advertisements (LSAs). OSPF supports Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) and is widely used on large, complex networks due to its scalability and robustness.
2. EIGRP, developed by Cisco Systems, is a distance vector routing protocol that uses the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL). It supports both Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) and Classful network addressing. Unlike OSPF, EIGRP does not divide networks into areas but instead divides them into different versions based on their metric values.
Key differences b
... show more
Explain OSPF vs EIGRP.
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) are both routing protocols used to exchange routing information between routers on the same network, but they have some key differences:
1. OSPF is a link-state routing protocol that uses Dijkstra's algorithm for calculating the shortest path tree from each router to every other router in the network. It divides an autonomous system into areas and exchanges topology information using Link State Advertisements (LSAs). OSPF supports Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) and is widely used on large, complex networks due to its scalability and robustness.
2. EIGRP, developed by Cisco Systems, is a distance vector routing protocol that uses the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL). It supports both Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) and Classful network addressing. Unlike OSPF, EIGRP does not divide networks into areas but instead divides them into different versions based on their metric values.
Key differences between OSPF and EIGRP:
a. Metrics: OSPF uses cost as its routing metric (based on bandwidth), while EIGRP calculates the composite metric, which considers factors such as delay, load, and reliability. This makes EIGRP more suitable for smaller networks where these metrics can be accurately measured.
b. Scalability: OSPF is generally considered better suited to larger, complex networks due to its hierarchical structure based on areas. In contrast, EIGRP's flat network topology may not perform as well in large-scale deployments.
c. Administrative overhead: EIGRP requires less configuration and maintenance compared to OSPF since it does not require the creation of different area types or LSAs for each router within an area. However, this can also be a disadvantage if network complexity increases significantly.
Written in a more conversational style, here's how you would explain these differences:
"Imagine OSPF and EIGRP as two different methods of organizing your neighborhood to determine the fastest route from one house to another. OSPF is like having an organized system where each street (area) has a detailed map that shows every single path between houses, allowing you to quickly find the shortest route using Dijkstra's algorithm. This makes it great for larger neighborhoods with many streets and houses.
On the other hand, EIGRP is like having an intuitive understanding of your neighborhood based on factors such as how fast each street (metric) is, which can change over time due to construction or traffic conditions. It doesn't need a detailed map for every house but rather focuses on finding the most efficient route between two points using its DUAL algorithm. This makes it more suitable for smaller neighborhoods where changes are less frequent and easier to manage."
In summary, OSPF is generally better suited for larger, complex networks due to its hierarchical structure based on areas, while EIGRP can be a good choice for smaller networks with fewer routes. However, the best choice depends on your specific network requirements and constraints.
Very accurate. And good to assist since VSCode is integrated in system.
In a minutes-long strike Sunday inside the world’s most-visited museum, thieves rode a basket lift up the Louvre’s facade, forced a window, smashed display cases and fled with priceless Napoleonic jewels, officials said.
MTG recently started making statements that don't sound completely insane. Possible explanations: 1) A handler has recently shoved their hand up her ass. 2) A new handler has their hand up her ass. 3) She recently escaped her handler.
Some notes for the "UX" people out there designing user interfaces:
1) Don't mix menu options and gestures in the same workflow. 2) Don't mix menu options and gestures in the same workflow. 3) Don't mix menu options and gestures in the same workflow. 4) For pity's fucking sake, don't mix menu options and gestures in the same workflow!
When everyone uses a developers library a developer thinks 'Great they all love my work!'. When someone does something similar in UI/UX the UI/UX design expert screams 'plagiarism, how dare they!'
UI/UX design experts are different breed. I believe the only one that really give a sh@t about them are other UI/UX designers. They are really the outcasts of the development community. By their own choice.
In the global theater of economics, one narrative repeats with stubborn frequency: that of the elite who, in their insatiable quest to accumulate more capital and power, end up undermining the very foundations of their own empire. This isn't just a matter of ethics or social justice; it's a principle of pure economic logic and systemic stability. The unchecked greed that seeks to concentrate wealth by draining it from the middle classes is not only an act of inequity but an act of self-sabotage.
The premise is simple: no company, however visionary, can flourish in a desert. Its survival and growth depend on a healthy consumer base with purchasing power and the ability to spend. When the obsession with cost-cutting, tax avoidance, or wage suppression is taken to the extreme, it creates a deadly paradox: it weakens the very crowd that is expected to buy the products and services that generate the profits. A Case Study: Elon Musk and the Consumer Dilemma
Let's put this principle into a modern context with a tangible example: the empire of Elon Musk, specifically Tesla
... show more
In the global theater of economics, one narrative repeats with stubborn frequency: that of the elite who, in their insatiable quest to accumulate more capital and power, end up undermining the very foundations of their own empire. This isn't just a matter of ethics or social justice; it's a principle of pure economic logic and systemic stability. The unchecked greed that seeks to concentrate wealth by draining it from the middle classes is not only an act of inequity but an act of self-sabotage.
The premise is simple: no company, however visionary, can flourish in a desert. Its survival and growth depend on a healthy consumer base with purchasing power and the ability to spend. When the obsession with cost-cutting, tax avoidance, or wage suppression is taken to the extreme, it creates a deadly paradox: it weakens the very crowd that is expected to buy the products and services that generate the profits. A Case Study: Elon Musk and the Consumer Dilemma
Let's put this principle into a modern context with a tangible example: the empire of Elon Musk, specifically Tesla and Starlink.
1. The Tesla Customer: Who Buys a Premium Electric Car?
Tesla's vehicles, despite their long-term mission of accessibility, remain, for the most part, luxury or high-end products. Their natural customer is not the person struggling to make ends meet, but the upper-middle and upper class: well-paid professionals, small and medium-sized business owners, technologists, and investors. These are individuals whose purchasing power relies on a robust economy and a healthy flow of capital within the middle strata of society.
Now, imagine a scenario where corporate and economic policies—whether through wage suppression, mass outsourcing of jobs, or the erosion of small businesses—achieve their short-term goal: concentrating even greater wealth in the hands of a few. As a side effect, the middle class shrinks. Savings evaporate, debt accumulates, and discretionary spending plummets.
The question becomes inevitable: who will buy the next Tesla Model Y or the futuristic Cybertruck? If the consumer base that aspires to these products is financially wounded, sales stagnate. Orders are canceled. Factories, built with enormous investment, operate below capacity. Undermining the very people who can afford your products isn't a strategy; it's shooting yourself in the foot.
2. Starlink: Connectivity That Relies on a Connected Economy
The same reasoning applies to Starlink. Its satellite internet service, while vital for rural areas, has a monthly cost and an initial equipment outlay that places it out of reach for households in financial difficulty. Its subscribers are, again, rural businesses, remote workers with good salaries, expatriate communities, and technology enthusiasts. All of them are links in an economic chain that depends on consumption and services.
If the prosperity of these classes is compromised, Starlink becomes a dispensable luxury. People will seek cheaper alternatives or simply cut that expense. The vision of a global connectivity network crashes against the wall of an impoverished local economic reality. The Historical Lesson: The Walls of Prosperity are Fragile
Economic history is full of examples where extreme wealth concentration precedes crisis. The Great Depression of 1929 wasn't just due to a stock market crash, but to deep-seated inequality that left the real economy—the one of consumers—without the strength to sustain growth.
The "Robber Barons" of the Gilded Age, as Mark Twain called them, amassed legendary fortunes, but they did so in an environment of brutal social tensions and instability that ultimately threatened the entire system. A castle cannot stand if the foundation it's built on is crumbling. Conclusion: Self-Destruction by Design
Greed that ignores the economic ecosystem is short-sighted. To believe that value can be extracted indefinitely without replenishing it or caring for the health of the market is like cutting down a tree by its roots to sell the wood, while expecting it to keep bearing fruit.
Visionary entrepreneurs like Musk build technological marvels that, in theory, could benefit humanity. But if the model that supports them contributes—directly or indirectly—to eroding society's ability to pay for those marvels, the project is doomed. The self-destruction doesn't come from an external competitor or an obsolete technology, but from an internal miscalculation: the failure to understand that prosperity, to be sustainable, must be shared to some extent.
In the end, the greatest risk for the powerful is not government regulation or social protest, but their own predatory logic. In their attempt to hoard the entire pie, they may end up destroying the oven it's baked in.
En la era de la hiperconexión, las redes sociales han tejido una realidad dual, actuando como una gran ventana al exterior para algunos y como una sutil prisión de cristal para otros. Su impacto no se define por la tecnología en sí, sino por la relación que cada individuo establece con ella y, crucialmente, por las circunstancias que lo rodean.
La Ventana Salvadora: Cuando el Afuera Llega a Dentro
Para un sinnúmero de personas, el mundo físico es un territorio inaccesible. La edad avanzada, una enfermedad discapacitante, una situación de reclusión o vivir en comunidades remotas y aisladas pueden convertir las cuatro paredes de una habitación en los límites de su universo. Para ellos, las redes sociales no son un pasatiempo, sino un pasaporte.
Esta "gran ventana al exterior" es literalmente su conexión con la vida. A través de ella:
Un anciano postrado en su cama puede presenciar, en tiempo real, la graduación de su nieto en otro continente, sintiendo la emo
... show more
En la era de la hiperconexión, las redes sociales han tejido una realidad dual, actuando como una gran ventana al exterior para algunos y como una sutil prisión de cristal para otros. Su impacto no se define por la tecnología en sí, sino por la relación que cada individuo establece con ella y, crucialmente, por las circunstancias que lo rodean.
La Ventana Salvadora: Cuando el Afuera Llega a Dentro
Para un sinnúmero de personas, el mundo físico es un territorio inaccesible. La edad avanzada, una enfermedad discapacitante, una situación de reclusión o vivir en comunidades remotas y aisladas pueden convertir las cuatro paredes de una habitación en los límites de su universo. Para ellos, las redes sociales no son un pasatiempo, sino un pasaporte.
Esta "gran ventana al exterior" es literalmente su conexión con la vida. A través de ella:
Un anciano postrado en su cama puede presenciar, en tiempo real, la graduación de su nieto en otro continente, sintiendo la emoción como si estuviera en primera fila.
Una persona con movilidad reducida puede explorar los museos del Louvre o el Prado a través de visitas virtuales, accediendo a una belleza que de otra manera le estaría vedada.
Un joven en una zona rural puede conectar con comunidades académicas globales, acceder a conocimiento especializado y encontrar mentores que transformen su perspectiva y sus oportunidades.
En estos casos, las redes sociales son un instrumento de libertad, empatía y equidad. Democratizan experiencias, acortan distancias físicas y emocionales, y proveen un sustituto vital para la interacción y la exploración que el mundo real les ha negado. Son el cordón umbilical que los mantiene anclados a la corriente principal de la humanidad.
La Prisión Voluntaria: Cuando el Adentro Simula un Afuera
Paradójicamente, para quienes tienen la salud, los recursos y la oportunidad de salir y abrazar el mundo, las redes sociales pueden convertirse en una celda cómoda pero alienante. Es la trampa de encerrarse en "un mundo grande y a la vez pequeño".
Este mundo es "grande" por su inmensidad digital: miles de millones de usuarios, contenido infinito y la ilusión de estar en todas partes a la vez. Pero es "pequeño" por su naturaleza: un ecosistema curatorial que nos muestra una versión distorsionada de la realidad, basada en algoritmos que refuerzan nuestras burbujas ideológicas y consumistas.
El peligro reside en que, teniendo la oportunidad de "contemplar con sus propios ojos y sentir", muchos eligen la simulación:
Prefieren ver un video de un atardecer en Bali antes que salir a caminar al parque para sentir la brisa en su propia piel.
"Asisten" a un concierto a través de la pantalla de su teléfono, más preocupados por la grabación que por perderse en la música.
Sustituyen las conversaciones profundas y los matices de una charla cara a cara por la gratificación instantánea de un "me gusta" o un comentario efímero.
Se quedan encerrados tras sus monitores, confundiendo la observación pasiva con la experiencia activa. La vida se convierte en un escenario que se observa desde butaca, no en un campo que se pisa y se vive. La riqueza sensorial del mundo real—el olor de la lluvia, la textura de la corteza de un árbol, la complicidad de una mirada—es reemplazada por una experiencia plana, bidimensional y mediada por filtros.
El Equilibrio: Ser Usuario, No Habitante
La reflexión final nos lleva a un punto de consciencia crítica. Las redes sociales son una herramienta magnífica, pero un sustituto pobre para la vida. Su valor real se manifiesta cuando las usamos para complementar nuestra experiencia en el mundo, no para reemplazarla.
Debemos recordar que la ventana, por más grande y clara que sea, no es el jardín. Podemos usarla para planear nuestro próximo viaje, para mantenernos cerca de los que están lejos o para aprender. Pero cuando llega la oportunidad, debemos tener el valor de cerrar el portátil, apagar el teléfono y salir a respirar el aire, a sentir el sol y a vivir las historias que, más tarde, quizás, merezca la pena compartir. No dejemos que la inmensidad del mundo digital nos haga olvidar la profundidad insustituible del mundo real, que está esperando, literalmente, a la vuelta de la esquina.
Took a mini-vacay from here to watch both hours of #TheDirtyWork produced by #RachelMaddow production team and it's something people skeptical of #Boomers absolutely need to watch before they pop off with #OKBoomer . All the freedoms you later generations have been taking for granted as if they've always existed WE fought for and WON. You're welcome, ingrates.
So when you take in all the #NoKings coverage tomorrow and you hear that grannies are involved, know ye that we've done this before and it ain't our first rodeo.
But also the folks in the 1950's .... building. I was a new teacher in Culpeper VA first year holiday for MLK. I watched Eyes on the Prize. HOLY MOLY That was not so long ago!!!! (My motrher also informed me that Ralph Abernathy spent the night in our basement....)
In case you were wondering if ICE had transitioned to full-on Gestapo, they are now literally using "Papers please!" as an excuse for fucking up your whole day and squeezing a few more dollars out of you!
The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges the Trump administration is monitoring and punishing non-citizens who express social media views that the government disfavors.
plan-A
in reply to Blaise • •