The biggest trick the (far) right pulled off is to convince many people that anti-fascism is politically left. It isn't. Anti-fascism is a politically neutral, foundational requirement for any non-fascist society. Yes, you can be conservative AND anti-fascist. You should be. That is the bare minimum. If you are conservative and do not loudly oppose fascism, you are almost a fascist yourself. Simple, innit?
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
reshared this
Patrick
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Court Cantrell prefers not to reshared this.
axel.
in reply to Patrick • • •Court Cantrell prefers not to reshared this.
Jan Wildeboer 😷
in reply to axel. • • •Court Cantrell prefers not to reshared this.
Caro S.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •You're rebranding Conservatism in a way that suits you, instead of what e.g. Paxton shows in his The Anatomy of Fascism: Conservatism is the grand enabler of fascism.
@axeln @lordkhan
Veza85UE
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Kid Mania
in reply to Veza85UE • • •@Veza85UE
Here's another anti-fascist. Same thing.
Does this guy look like a hippy to you...?
Davey
in reply to Kid Mania • • •This one works less well with Winston Churchill
Veza85UE
in reply to Davey • • •Davey
in reply to Veza85UE • • •zbrown
in reply to Davey • • •Veza85UE
in reply to zbrown • • •If we ever have the kind of EU-wide civics ed we need, he'd be a footnote. Perhaps older students can then get into details of how the Brits later pushed the Council of Europe in an attempt to sabotage the actual proto-EU, but that's advanced studies.
zbrown
in reply to Veza85UE • • •Saupreiss #Präparat500
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Issit?
Jeder hat das Recht, seine Meinung frei zu äußern. Das inkludiert das Recht, von diesem Recht keinen Gebrauch zu machen.
Natürlich ist mir jeder lieb, der sich entsprechend äußert.
Aber es ist sehr wichtig, dass dieses Recht, sich eben nicht zu äußern, absolut respektiert wird. Warum? Das wirst du sehen, wenn die Faschisten dran sind und sich nicht äußern oder pro forma positionieren verdächtig wird. Und das ist leider kein exklusives Rechte-Dings.
Derek
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •axel.
in reply to Derek • • •This is the tolerance paradox: you are entitled to any opinion unless you hold the opinion to abolish any other opinion.
It is on display in the news daily, right now.
Derek
in reply to axel. • • •Axel Gutmann
in reply to Derek • • •Derek
in reply to Axel Gutmann • • •Jan Wildeboer 😷
in reply to Derek • • •Poloniousmonk
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •ProScience
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Huntn00
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Anti-democracy power struggle? The capitalism end game? Keeping stupid guessing? It all seems related. 🤔
Decenta Lyzed
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Ryek Darkener
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Dan McDonald
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Juho Mäntysalo
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Well, it's left of far-right.
And thus if someone tells you they think antifa is purely left-wing, you should listen to them.
#?.info
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •pino
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Derek
Unknown parent • • •JakeKb
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Alex Nedelcu
in reply to JakeKb • • •@JakeKb Property is an individual right without which all other liberal freedoms can't survive; because the opposite of private property is statism.
The idea that fascists value private property contradicts history. Germany's Nazis, Italy's fascists and others, such as Romania's Iron Guard were considering themselves socialists and had strong, virulent criticism of capitalism.
“Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” — Mussolini
@jwildeboer
skaphle
in reply to Alex Nedelcu • • •@alexelcu @JakeKb I give you a little benefit of doubt here that you simply don't know.
Nazi criticism of capitalism was not socialist, but a fundamentally bastardized version. I can recommend you the excellent essay "National socialism and antisemitism" by Moishe Postone.
Basically, Nazis said that capitalism had two distinct spheres. They criticized the abstract, Jewish, profit-driven, international, artificial finance capital and tried to eradicate their human representatives. They loved the concrete, natural, industrial, manufacturing capital, so they cooperated with that capital, crushed worker organization and provided slaves.
The German Reich was no worker's paradise nor a worker's state.
And by the way, there is no private property without a state.
Alex Nedelcu
in reply to skaphle • • •@skaphle Since 18th century, socialism was understood as social and political reforms advanced by the state in order to improve life for citizens. Only later, after the advent of Marxism, it began to mean social ownership of the means of production.
You have no capitalism without a free market. Oligarchies are not capitalism. Yes, you need a state, regulations to keep market free and taxing of externalities. Which is why it's in the centre of political spectrum.
@JakeKb @jwildeboer
skaphle
in reply to Alex Nedelcu • • •@alexelcu @JakeKb Are you talking about a specific country? Can you name concrete examples about the "center" of the political spectrum?
The countries I'm most familiar with are Germany and the US. The US is a two-party system oligarchy that refuses to keep the market free of monopolies and to price in climate and health externalities. In Germany, the center is the social democrat party, spineless bureaucrats who refuse to price in climate externalities, which gets worse further right. Revolving doors between parties and industry are common. White-collar crime is tolerated to the tune of 100 billion Euros a year.
Alex Nedelcu
in reply to skaphle • • •@skaphle I know, but there are examples of externalities being taxed, such as land use or water consumption.
Taxing greenhouse gas emissions is hard as it shakes society, making people poorer (for now). We rock the boat enough, we get populism & fascism, e.g., AfD in Germany, or Trumpism.
We may not have time for incremental reforms, but the alternative may be society tearing itself apart. This is Edmund Burke's conservatism 🙃
@JakeKb @jwildeboer
Alex Nedelcu
in reply to Alex Nedelcu • • •@skaphle The centre in western society is (classic?) liberalism on which our democracy and capitalism are based. Political ideologies that respect liberal values and want gradual reforms instead of revolution are close to the centre.
For example, Trump's administration does not seem at the centre to me, and the Republicans, realigned for Trumpism, seem to be going against Anglophone conservatism. I hope US citizens see the danger in what's happening right now.
@JakeKb @jwildeboer
JakeKb
in reply to Alex Nedelcu • • •Jan Wildeboer 😷
in reply to JakeKb • • •@JakeKb It's a classic, which is why my first reply to my post was social.wildeboer.net/@jwildebo…
Thank you for challenging one of them so I can safely add him to my blocklist 😀
@alexelcu @skaphle
Jan Wildeboer 😷
2025-08-26 18:57:33
JakeKb
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Jan Wildeboer 😷
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •axel.
Unknown parent • • •The main struggle today is not left vs right, but fascist vs anti-fascist. See eg Liz Cheney, John Bolton. They are not left in any conceivable meaning.
Of course, people should be allowed to vote. But it should not be possible to vote for fascism, ie it should not be possible to vote for the abolishing of voting.
axel.
in reply to Derek • • •If you allow the vote for the (fake) easy way out, how can the actual hard solutions compete?
Derek
in reply to axel. • • •Also, I'm confused. what do you mean by allowing to vote for the easy way out? Are you saying people shouldn't be allowed to vote?
axel.
Unknown parent • • •nfilipes
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •M. Grégoire
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Sure, #conservatives in liberal democratic societies are anti-fascist. You can't want to conserve parliamentary democracy/monarchy/individual liberty/the constitution and support fascism.
There is the problem however that #fascism is a bit of a slippery term. "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable’" Orwelll cautioned. Conservatives do care about law and order and tradition, and some people will call them fascist for doing so.
Derek
in reply to axel. • • •@axeln and yet not allowing to vote for fascist parties / politicians is also restricting people's right to vote and a very slippery slope.
What we need is more education.
Derek
Unknown parent • • •Jan Wildeboer 😷
Unknown parent • • •Derek
in reply to axel. • • •Xayah
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •this is not true. Anti-fascism is inherently left-wing because any serious anti-fascism necessarily includes a rejection of the values that underly fascism: A desire to oppress racial minorities, women, queer people, disabled people and anyone they consider to be lesser.
And unless you want to strip the word "conservative" of all real meaning, any conservative anti-fascism has to be inherently hollow, since conservatism agrees with these underlying values of fascism.
Peter Brown
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •el Celio 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Gabriel Pettier
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Gabriel Pettier
Unknown parent • • •Konstantin Weddige
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •the reaction of people to the term "antifascism" is really g̶e̶t̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ alarming.
I'm frequently wearing a neutral black t-shirt with "Antifaschist" written in white and a few days ago that triggered an encounter, where a guy reacted with shouting "so you're the opposite of me". People started to be proud of being fascists again 😟
Alfred J. Kwak (audiokontor) ☕
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Noortje Van Leeuwen
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Mysturji
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Mysturji
Unknown parent • • •A_Minion
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Radio Free Trumpistan likes this.
reshared this
Radio Free Trumpistan and millennial falcon reshared this.
Radio Free Trumpistan
in reply to A_Minion • •Well said! Hear hear!!
Knut 🏳️🌈 🇳🇴🧸
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Mastodon Migration
Unknown parent • • •Sometimes a word gets co-opted and attached to negative connotations. Antifa, short for Anti-fascist is one of these terms. Long ago the right successfully equated Antifa with an imaginary quasi militant left organization and since then use of the term has been subject to this mis-interpretation. Ask a normal suburban left of center person what they think of Antifa, and it will congure images of bomb throwing anarchists. It is too late to fix this.
CaptMorgan
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 reshared this.
WhichOne'sPink 🇫🇮
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Moss Wizard
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Duncan Bayne
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •The issue here is that the left/right spectrum is woefully inadequate to capture reality.
Left-authoritarians (Pot, Mao, Lenin, Stalin) are every bit as dangerous as right-authoritarians (Hitler, Mussolini, Franco).
Sashin
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •skaphle
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Yes, conservatives are almost fascists. News at eleven.
Maybe a little more serious in the interest of debate, what do you think conservatives are? In my view and experience, conservatives believe in heterosexual marriage family as the basis of society, the right of capital to exploit workers, competition as a natural state, and where people get rights and value via their passport and ethnicity. Those values are adjacent to fascist values, which are essentially the same but in overdrive and antithetical to left values of free expression of love, worker organization, solidarity and universal human rights and equality.
Studies have shown over and over again that the best anti-fascist policy is investment in public services and social security, and conservatives hate that too.
michele_sollecito
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •michele_sollecito
Unknown parent • • •these sound more like some principles that described what it looked like.
What about ideas? Which political ideas, if any, qualify you as a fascist?
OMG 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Isn't anti-facism always right?
You can be neutral to coal power plant or eating animals, fascism is boolean, everything else is arguable.
Alonely0 🦀 🇪🇺
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Fietsbel
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •Depends.
Antifaschistische Aktion in Nazi Germany were communist, and the social democratic Iron Front (three arrows) were enemies. Iron Front was anti communist and antifascist, so the AFA who were communists saw them as enemies.
Not to be confused with UK AFA and ANL!
I'm an anarcho-syndicalist so the nazis, fascists, and communists would all have come after me - but I support antifa within our current political context. Solidarity against the common enemy, fascists are scum.
Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ
Unknown parent • • •I disagree, anti-fascism has a specific political meaning that historically is absolutely left. Historically, most antifascist partisans were collectivists, communists and socialists.
If you just mean anti-fascist as a word game, that's another thing altogether.
Hey Gus
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •being anti-fascist after the inception of fascism was about the most American thing you could do.
There’s a not pretty history of America reluctantly pretending to be anti-fascist and joining in for WW2. Once they did join the rally cry was anti-fascism. The fascist dictators must be stopped.
The ones who cheered for eugenics and kindled friendship with the fathers of fascism left a long lived line of power that we are now being ruled by today.
Jan Wildeboer 😷
Unknown parent • • •nowhereman (nicht der andere!)
in reply to Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ • • •@ianrogers
It appears to me that you are not up to date with this topic.
It is true that it started with socialists etc in Italy against Mussolini but even at that time some conservative and catholic groups started calling themselves anti-fashists.
With the WWII the complete British conservative party does.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-fas…
@jwildeboer
opposition to fascist ideologies, groups and individuals
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷 • • •