Skip to main content


The biggest trick the (far) right pulled off is to convince many people that anti-fascism is politically left. It isn't. Anti-fascism is a politically neutral, foundational requirement for any non-fascist society. Yes, you can be conservative AND anti-fascist. You should be. That is the bare minimum. If you are conservative and do not loudly oppose fascism, you are almost a fascist yourself. Simple, innit?
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

I agree! Treating people with respect and dignity and making sure human rights are valued became an utopian left wing idea.
in reply to Patrick

@lordkhan This! These are republican values (small r), as opposed to authoritarian or monarchical systems.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

You're rebranding Conservatism in a way that suits you, instead of what e.g. Paxton shows in his The Anatomy of Fascism: Conservatism is the grand enabler of fascism.

@axeln @lordkhan

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

If EUropeans were (properly) taught in schools or had proper cultural references/pop culture about their common past not passed through the Hollywood filter, perhaps one look at Konrad Adenauer or Alcide De Gasperi's wikipedia portraits would be enough. "You know who really fucking hated nazis? This guy. Does THIS guy look like a hippy to you?"
in reply to Veza85UE

@Veza85UE
Here's another anti-fascist. Same thing.

Does this guy look like a hippy to you...?

in reply to Davey

@davey_cakes @clintruin idc because he's not relevant to us. I was talking about *EU*ropeans and the need to de-hollywoodise our understanding of how our Union started for a reason. Anglos are the main characters in enough Hollywood films but no longer any kind of characters in our Union.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Veza85UE

@Veza85UE @clintruin speaking as an Irish person I wouldn't say we were fully disentangled just yet, but I get your meaning
in reply to Davey

@davey_cakes @Veza85UE @clintruin famously Churchill isn't a founding father of the EU or anything 🙄
in reply to zbrown

@zbrown @davey_cakes @clintruin The Council of Europe doesn't count.
If we ever have the kind of EU-wide civics ed we need, he'd be a footnote. Perhaps older students can then get into details of how the Brits later pushed the Council of Europe in an attempt to sabotage the actual proto-EU, but that's advanced studies.
in reply to Veza85UE

@Veza85UE @davey_cakes @clintruin the literal EU themselves cite Churchill, the Council of Europe pre-dates the EU, and what harm is the Council of Europe supposed to have done exactly? Provide a flag for the EU? Moderately effective enforcement of human rights that has improved the lives of millions?
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Issit?

Jeder hat das Recht, seine Meinung frei zu äußern. Das inkludiert das Recht, von diesem Recht keinen Gebrauch zu machen.

Natürlich ist mir jeder lieb, der sich entsprechend äußert.

Aber es ist sehr wichtig, dass dieses Recht, sich eben nicht zu äußern, absolut respektiert wird. Warum? Das wirst du sehen, wenn die Faschisten dran sind und sich nicht äußern oder pro forma positionieren verdächtig wird. Und das ist leider kein exklusives Rechte-Dings.

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

so you're saying that the only way for conservatives to not be labeled as fascists is to loudly support anti-fascism. Does that apply to other groups as well or are you targeting conservatives specifically?
in reply to Derek

@biscuit_overlord No targeting here, except: if you declare yourself to be not „anti-fascist“, then you are, by definition, fascist and should be excluded from the political debate.
This is the tolerance paradox: you are entitled to any opinion unless you hold the opinion to abolish any other opinion.
It is on display in the news daily, right now.
in reply to axel.

@axeln my point is that OP stated that being a conservative doesn't mean being a fascist, and yet only states that conservatives must loudly reject fascism in order not to be labeled as fascists themselves, but why only conservatives? Also, we're losing sight of the real problem here. Everyone is fixated on what Trump's doing, but he's not the problem. The problem is that millions of people voted for him. If I remember correctly he won the popular vote. That's the real problem.
in reply to Derek

@biscuit_overlord "Loudly supporting anti-fascism" is obviously the barely decent thing to do. Why even bother communicating with someone who doesn't?
in reply to Axel Gutmann

@virbonus You're missing my point. OP only stated that conservatives must do it, not just everyone.
in reply to Derek

@biscuit_overlord I say that regardless of your political stance, in a democratic society being anti-fascist is a requirement, not an option.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Agree on almost everything but that real life shows that conservatism and fascism are more normal than conservatism and antifascism.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

This is the same game as convincing STUPID that WOKE is bad. It involves fundamentally misrepresenting, redefining what a good word means changing it into something evil that appeals to the target audience for political advantage. And it can’t be over emphasized how important STUPID and self-serving is in this equation.
Anti-democracy power struggle? The capitalism end game? Keeping stupid guessing? It all seems related. 🤔
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Known examples of conservative-and-anti-fascist are abundant, on top of all of it!
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Well, it's left of far-right.

And thus if someone tells you they think antifa is purely left-wing, you should listen to them.

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Which raises questions... were the Republicans always like this and we just didn't want to believe it? Remember the McCarthy era description of people the right accused of being communists as "Premature Anti-Fascists"?
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Maybe 'conservative' always was an euphemism for 'fascist'. To some extent.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Derek
@axeln similar parties are popping up all over europe, hence my point that Trump (or any other politician) is not the problem, just a consequence. The question to ponder is why do so many people feel voting for them is their best choice?
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

This is a bad take in my opinion, since it has nothing to do with propaganda tricks. Conservatives will always be much closer to fascists than anti-fascists, because they value capital and private property way more than they value individual rights and freedoms.
in reply to JakeKb

@JakeKb Property is an individual right without which all other liberal freedoms can't survive; because the opposite of private property is statism.

The idea that fascists value private property contradicts history. Germany's Nazis, Italy's fascists and others, such as Romania's Iron Guard were considering themselves socialists and had strong, virulent criticism of capitalism.

“Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” — Mussolini

@jwildeboer

in reply to Alex Nedelcu

@alexelcu @JakeKb I give you a little benefit of doubt here that you simply don't know.

Nazi criticism of capitalism was not socialist, but a fundamentally bastardized version. I can recommend you the excellent essay "National socialism and antisemitism" by Moishe Postone.

Basically, Nazis said that capitalism had two distinct spheres. They criticized the abstract, Jewish, profit-driven, international, artificial finance capital and tried to eradicate their human representatives. They loved the concrete, natural, industrial, manufacturing capital, so they cooperated with that capital, crushed worker organization and provided slaves.

The German Reich was no worker's paradise nor a worker's state.

And by the way, there is no private property without a state.

in reply to skaphle

@skaphle Since 18th century, socialism was understood as social and political reforms advanced by the state in order to improve life for citizens. Only later, after the advent of Marxism, it began to mean social ownership of the means of production.

You have no capitalism without a free market. Oligarchies are not capitalism. Yes, you need a state, regulations to keep market free and taxing of externalities. Which is why it's in the centre of political spectrum.

@JakeKb @jwildeboer

in reply to Alex Nedelcu

@alexelcu @JakeKb Are you talking about a specific country? Can you name concrete examples about the "center" of the political spectrum?

The countries I'm most familiar with are Germany and the US. The US is a two-party system oligarchy that refuses to keep the market free of monopolies and to price in climate and health externalities. In Germany, the center is the social democrat party, spineless bureaucrats who refuse to price in climate externalities, which gets worse further right. Revolving doors between parties and industry are common. White-collar crime is tolerated to the tune of 100 billion Euros a year.

in reply to skaphle

@skaphle I know, but there are examples of externalities being taxed, such as land use or water consumption.

Taxing greenhouse gas emissions is hard as it shakes society, making people poorer (for now). We rock the boat enough, we get populism & fascism, e.g., AfD in Germany, or Trumpism.

We may not have time for incremental reforms, but the alternative may be society tearing itself apart. This is Edmund Burke's conservatism 🙃

@JakeKb @jwildeboer

in reply to Alex Nedelcu

@skaphle The centre in western society is (classic?) liberalism on which our democracy and capitalism are based. Political ideologies that respect liberal values and want gradual reforms instead of revolution are close to the centre.

For example, Trump's administration does not seem at the centre to me, and the Republicans, realigned for Trumpism, seem to be going against Anglophone conservatism. I hope US citizens see the danger in what's happening right now.

@JakeKb @jwildeboer

in reply to Alex Nedelcu

@alexelcu @skaphle @alexelcu Every post you made proves my point. In your posts you tried to equate nazism with socialism, which indirectly legitimizes nazism and discredits many antifa groups that defend their communities against nazis and would identify as socialists. You also supported neoliberal policies that widen the wealth gap and create an environment where fascism can grow. Liberals and centrists like you will always enable fascism in the end, even if unwillingly.
in reply to JakeKb

@JakeKb It's a classic, which is why my first reply to my post was social.wildeboer.net/@jwildebo…

Thank you for challenging one of them so I can safely add him to my blocklist 😀

@alexelcu @skaphle


(Please ignore and block the trolls in the replies that try to justify being conservative and not anti-fascism)

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

@alexelcu @skaphle Sadly, I don't think he is a troll. Many people have the delusion that they are resisting fascism by staying in the middle and both siding. People who don't understand history are doomed to repeat it.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

(Please ignore and block the trolls in the replies that try to justify being conservative and not anti-fascism)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
axel.
@biscuit_overlord The other side is of course doing the same, that is the whole point of the fascist take over.
The main struggle today is not left vs right, but fascist vs anti-fascist. See eg Liz Cheney, John Bolton. They are not left in any conceivable meaning.
Of course, people should be allowed to vote. But it should not be possible to vote for fascism, ie it should not be possible to vote for the abolishing of voting.
in reply to Derek

@biscuit_overlord Yes, I agree. And exactly because of that, it becomes more important than ever to exclude the fascists from political discourse to allow for that answer to be found.
If you allow the vote for the (fake) easy way out, how can the actual hard solutions compete?
in reply to axel.

@axeln do you really think that's a solution? What's stopping the other side from doing the same?
Also, I'm confused. what do you mean by allowing to vote for the easy way out? Are you saying people shouldn't be allowed to vote?
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
axel.
@biscuit_overlord It is, but not by voting.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

growing up in Portugal in the decades that followed the revolution, antifascist was a word used by the far left (communist) parties. In Spain the word "facha" was used to denounce anyone that was a "nacionalist". I'm a socialist myself but I think it's become a token word to cancel any debate with people from across the aisle.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Sure, #conservatives in liberal democratic societies are anti-fascist. You can't want to conserve parliamentary democracy/monarchy/individual liberty/the constitution and support fascism.

There is the problem however that #fascism is a bit of a slippery term. "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable’" Orwelll cautioned. Conservatives do care about law and order and tradition, and some people will call them fascist for doing so.

in reply to axel.

@axeln and yet not allowing to vote for fascist parties / politicians is also restricting people's right to vote and a very slippery slope.

What we need is more education.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Derek
@axeln and what's stopping people with influence start calling whatever party they don't like fascist to remove them from the board? This is not a solution. People are very susceptible to propaganda, I thought we'd learned that at least by now.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Jan Wildeboer 😷
@biscuit_overlord No. I don't want to be forced to accept to "live together" with people that want to overthrow fundamental human rights. Tolerance has limits. Those who act against fundamental human rights have no place in society. @axeln
in reply to axel.

@axeln also, being unwilling to debate anyone because we're supposed to fight them is not going to solve anything. All it'll do is exacerbate this us vs them feeling. At the end of the day we still have to live together, whether we like it or not.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

this is not true. Anti-fascism is inherently left-wing because any serious anti-fascism necessarily includes a rejection of the values that underly fascism: A desire to oppress racial minorities, women, queer people, disabled people and anyone they consider to be lesser.

And unless you want to strip the word "conservative" of all real meaning, any conservative anti-fascism has to be inherently hollow, since conservatism agrees with these underlying values of fascism.

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

you are absolutely right. Fascism / authoritarianism can spring from both the far right and the far left.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

i've had to explain to some people on the right that if they felt attacked when someone said "fuck nazis", it was a them problem, there are actual (sometimes self-described) nazis out there, they don't need to stand in solidarity with them because the left doesn't like them either. Yes, some people on the left will sometimes use the word too easily, and that's a problem, but unless there are hints that it's the case in that particular situation, they shouldn't assume that.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Gabriel Pettier
when discussing the kind of people the statements should apply to, they agreed that they were nuts, and didn't share their ideology, they just are not really aware of these people existing and supporting the same politicians as they do, as people will often have rose colored glasses about their political family and ignore the problems. So they think that the left is insane, because it calls the right-wing fascists, they think it's about them, not the actual nazis out there.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

the reaction of people to the term "antifascism" is really g̶e̶t̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ alarming.

I'm frequently wearing a neutral black t-shirt with "Antifaschist" written in white and a few days ago that triggered an encounter, where a guy reacted with shouting "so you're the opposite of me". People started to be proud of being fascists again 😟

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Mysturji
@axeln @biscuit_overlord@mastodon.social
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Let's try this: all the isms, ist's, ey's are of no value, we can fight all F'ing day over this faction and that. What is important, is that the government whatever you call it allows for indiviual freedom, compassion and seeking to have equity of all people. Capitalism worked between WWII and mid 70's it was controlled by rule of law so it had limits, when you remove limits is when there are problems.The conservatives of that time were more liberal than many liberals of today.

reshared this

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

anti-fascism is anyone who is against...fascism. If you are against it, you are anti....fascism. Not sure why that's so hard to understand.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Mastodon Migration
@RebelGeek99
Sometimes a word gets co-opted and attached to negative connotations. Antifa, short for Anti-fascist is one of these terms. Long ago the right successfully equated Antifa with an imaginary quasi militant left organization and since then use of the term has been subject to this mis-interpretation. Ask a normal suburban left of center person what they think of Antifa, and it will congure images of bomb throwing anarchists. It is too late to fix this.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

There used to be wide agreement that fascists were bad, until the racist GOP found common ground with Nazis
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Absolutely clown shit. Conservatism is the establishment of a permanent underclass, it cannot function without that. Conservatism is the establishment of laws that protect but do not restrict the upper class, and that restrict but do not protect the lower class. Conservatism is the foundation and the root of fascism. Conservatives who claim to be anti fascist are like candy shops that claim to be anti cavity. It’s only plausible deniability because liberals demand that plausibility.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

The issue here is that the left/right spectrum is woefully inadequate to capture reality.

Left-authoritarians (Pot, Mao, Lenin, Stalin) are every bit as dangerous as right-authoritarians (Hitler, Mussolini, Franco).

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

I mean, if there is a person that would refrain from being anti-fadcist to avoid being associated with the left it's on them too
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Yes, conservatives are almost fascists. News at eleven.

Maybe a little more serious in the interest of debate, what do you think conservatives are? In my view and experience, conservatives believe in heterosexual marriage family as the basis of society, the right of capital to exploit workers, competition as a natural state, and where people get rights and value via their passport and ethnicity. Those values are adjacent to fascist values, which are essentially the same but in overdrive and antithetical to left values of free expression of love, worker organization, solidarity and universal human rights and equality.

Studies have shown over and over again that the best anti-fascist policy is investment in public services and social security, and conservatives hate that too.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
michele_sollecito

these sound more like some principles that described what it looked like.

What about ideas? Which political ideas, if any, qualify you as a fascist?

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Isn't anti-facism always right?

You can be neutral to coal power plant or eating animals, fascism is boolean, everything else is arguable.

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

the problem is you can't be anti-fascist and racist, anti-fascist and *phobic, because fascism relies on the fearmongering and hate of a scapegoated collective to advance their agenda (or other non-egalitarian mechanisms). If you are not *phobic, the left has a much easier chance to resonate with you, whereas conservativism, which in the US by the definition is non-egalitarian, resonates with fascism with ease; they kinda had it coming.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

I almost agree, yet: if you are a conservative and do not oppose fascism, you are a fascist yourself - not: almost a fascist.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

Depends.

Antifaschistische Aktion in Nazi Germany were communist, and the social democratic Iron Front (three arrows) were enemies. Iron Front was anti communist and antifascist, so the AFA who were communists saw them as enemies.

Not to be confused with UK AFA and ANL!

I'm an anarcho-syndicalist so the nazis, fascists, and communists would all have come after me - but I support antifa within our current political context. Solidarity against the common enemy, fascists are scum.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ

I disagree, anti-fascism has a specific political meaning that historically is absolutely left. Historically, most antifascist partisans were collectivists, communists and socialists.

If you just mean anti-fascist as a word game, that's another thing altogether.

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

being anti-fascist after the inception of fascism was about the most American thing you could do.

There’s a not pretty history of America reluctantly pretending to be anti-fascist and joining in for WW2. Once they did join the rally cry was anti-fascism. The fascist dictators must be stopped.

The ones who cheered for eugenics and kindled friendship with the fathers of fascism left a long lived line of power that we are now being ruled by today.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Jan Wildeboer 😷
@Nowhereman @ianrogers In my humble opinion there is a very clear cut between anti-fascism before the end of WW2 and after. While before it has clear origins in revolutionary/anarchist movements, WW2, especially here in Germany, where I live, moved anti-fascism from revolutionary to a fundamental axiom. Fighting fascism and totalitarianism became part of the definition of establishing a democratic society. Ant-fascism as civic duty, demanded by the constitution. And that makes it neutral to me.
in reply to Ian K. Rogers ikr?╭ರ_ಠ

@ianrogers
It appears to me that you are not up to date with this topic.
It is true that it started with socialists etc in Italy against Mussolini but even at that time some conservative and catholic groups started calling themselves anti-fashists.
With the WWII the complete British conservative party does.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-fas…

@jwildeboer

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷

@Nowhereman That's a good explanation. I myself did not grow up in Germany but my nascnet understanding of antifascism was heavily influence by the punks vs skinheads type of antifascism I saw going on in Germany as a teenager. It definitely lacked political depth but its immediacy inspired me, as we had our own nazi skins problem in Canada at the time. I agree that antifascism is core human decency and should not be evaluated against a political spectrum.