Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, hypebot, Mr. Bill, GhostOnTheHalfShell, Victator, Simon and Cad, Trixi Schutzo and Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Unus Nemo likes this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Trixi Schutzo, Lisa Melton, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Ham on Wry, ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES, diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱, hypebot and RiaResists❌ 👑 reshared this.
He got sicker and sicker and there were pretty much zero support services for the poor outside temperamental churches there. Public transport was dismal. He had horrible chronic health problems the ERa couldn’t address.
I wish I could have gotten him out but he wasn’t in a mental state to consent.
Witchzilla reshared this.
reshared this
Witchzilla and RiaResists❌ 👑 reshared this.
i'm so sorry...
it's unconscionable that these politicians are so heartless. it's worse that they cloak this in claims of religion and morality. they have no morals; just hate.
💔 My heart breaks.
More than half my friends died on the streets because of institutional and state neglect.
They were awesome people.
No one would help them out and off the streets. The demands imposed for assistance were onerous and arbitary, and they could be ejected from aid programmes on a whim.
People are cruel.
People with authority are more cruel.
It must stop.
I am so sorry for your loss. The lack of essential health services is indeed shocking.
Here in Europe I started calling the USA the 'fourth world' because in key aspects the situation seems worse than what we see in many 'third world' countries these days.
So sorry to hear that.
Our (I live in Nashville) state legislature is horrible. What they did in Memphis today is the same thing they did to Nashville a few years ago, when my district was carved up. Nashville and Memphis no longer have urban districts of their own. They’ve been split up and absorbed into the surrounding rural districts.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Lisa Melton, hypebot, Ham on Wry and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
archeologists discovered the earliest form of t-posing for dominance at gobekli tepe
One ancient culture with very few remains was known to call the same influence “big dick energy”
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
peelinggecko, GhostOnTheHalfShell, G. Gibson, Lisa Melton, Trixi Schutzo, bellegraylane, hypebot, ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES, Kirk and Khurram Wadee ✅ reshared this.
@TimWardCam
Not all of them pooled their assets. Lying about holding back some assets was a grievous sin. Note not the holding back, the lying.
Hmmm... Let's see. They won't be able to spend time sneering at poor people, demeaning the sick, chuckling with pals about buying off the Government, cornering markets, competing with fellow fat rats over the most expensive car/ airplane/ villa /island/ ranch/ wardrobe/... , savoring that the "losers" aren't eating caviar...
They won't have any of their pleasures!
But real Christians can enjoy thinking of them surrounded by other fat rats, all singing hymns, 24/7 ➡️ ♾️
@ennopark
The bible often states Gods shows no favoritism. There is also the parable of the poor man in heaven and the rich man suffering in hell.
Marxism also emerged from the Abrahamic monotheistic tradition, only with heaven relocated from the afterlife to the human world. The United States is a right-wing country that has long been hostile to welfare policies, yet its culture core is also so called WASP — which is, in fact, a contradiction in itself.
However, in reality, many countries that have implemented Marxism have turned into entities where a small clique monopolizes the distribution of resources.
@TurquoiseC it's why marxism and "communism" will never work.
Human beings suck, universally.
@Scrimshaw9 I think what you miss in animal farm, presuming you've read it, is that the pigs are also the animals that interface with the human world and their behavior becomes ever more like that of the farmer who they revolted against in the first place. Are they inherently corrupt or is their sway towards capitalism the corrupting force?
I feel Orwell was a better writer than most of the people who quote him.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
I didn't know you drank wine at all.
I should've figured you'd try to brew it.
You could further ferment it into white wine vinegar. There's lots of uses for that.
reshared this
AI6YR Ben and a.k.a. low-profile reshared this.
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
or maybe just 50-60 squirrels shoved into one big raincoat...
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
reshared this
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
reshared this
AI6YR Ben reshared this.
Not quite long or convoluted enough for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest. But a good start.
"It was a dark and stormy night..."
something, something wine corks and squirrels...
Can you tell the time on an analogue clock?
Boost for my sanity
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Furbland's Very Cool Account™, Alex is Adjusting, Quotey McQuoteface, Aristotelis Tzafalias, kwayk42, Anthony David, , Ludwig Vielfrass, Androcat, JonChevreau 🇨🇦, Kotes, 🍑 😈, Rachel Wright, Democracy Matters, Ham on Wry, GayDeceiver, , Trixi Schutzo and Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
time ? 🤔🤷
@MsDropbear42 not if you’re desperate for something at the chemist’s! 🤭
Time takes a cigarette ....
fedi poet laureate! @MelissaBearTrix@gives.hugz.online
Don’t blink though!
the most terrifying monsters ever, imo 😱😱😱
@MelissaBearTrix@gives.hugz.online
@MsDropbear42 @feather1952
Vashta Nerada probably more scary
Wrong spot ... This toot has been moved
Hugz & xXx
@MsDropbear42 @feather1952 @level98
amievergoingtoseeyourfaceagain@nowaygetfuckedfuckoff.world ... A real email address... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@MsDropbear42 @ireneista
And, of course, the best response to that - at least, if it's about 3:34 or 3:35 AM...
youtube.com/watch?v=bgDDbpmB-N…
Provided to YouTube by Rhino25 or 6 to 4 (Steven Wilson Remix) [Edit] · ChicagoChicago IX: Greatest Hits Expanded℗ 1970, 2025 Rhino Entertainment Company, a ...Chicago - Topic (YouTube)
I sadly have to admit that I always have to think about it. It is not automatic reading a analog clock. Simply the offset in hours to military time is something I always have to convert in my brain.
So I prefer digital clocks or a combination.
Yes, but not always. Sometimes it feels like nonsense.
Can I tell you? Yes. Fast? No. Do i consider it obsolete to not use digital clocks, that just show the numbers directly? Yes.
Its just more convenient to use digital.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
That it is, I have a digital clock that I use to set the time of all other clocks and watches
Hugz & xXx
@mdione Yeah, thats true and I basically forgot that @TechConnectify has made a video (that I even watched) about that. But to make a point; I never spoke about "banning" the technology either.
Tbh "analogue" watches are also somewhat of an "Accessibility"-layer, since technically "reading" the clock is easier with clockhands, when it comes to disabilities (like memory issues or impairment of vision/brain function, or just simple dyslexia).
And I am ALWAYS for accessibility.
I voted yes, but I find digital clocks much more convenient. The digital (24h) representation is pretty much how time is stored in my brain, reading an analog clock requires 'translation' for me to 'get' it, and that after taking longer (a few seconds rather than just a glance) to see what it says. So I'll get by with analog but digital is way more convenient for me.
Interestingly, my husband has it the other way round.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I have to say, I do like the 24 hours time and digital better, it's easy to set other timepieces by
Hugz & xXx
@Eka_FOOF_A @wynke I'm perfectly OK with analogue 24 hour clocks as well. I hate clocks that are wrong, so my house is filled with clocks that show time derived from atom clocks. All clocks in my house, 'analog' as well as digital are accurate to within milliseconds, and two are accurate to ~50ns from TAI
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@dxzdb You mean like ten to five in the afternoon instead of 16:50?
Absolutely!
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
That's the clock's fault ... It might be too busy ... Hugz
Like the hands are similar and nearly the same size
Hugz & xXx
Why is this even a question?
Oh right, boost for sanity. Don't tell me. I wanna keep the shreds if mine.
Keep up the great work people ... And sorry if you keep seeing this poll in your feed ... Nah, I'm not ... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
@phranck Even that one on your oven? And in your car? And on your mobile phone in the upper left corner? I'm deeply impressed 😀
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I can also tell the time on this #Counterclock…
I really should put a new battery in that sometime…
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix and Kotes reshared this.
When I see a reverse clock it gives me a nightmare ... A had a customer that I had to source 30 of them
And all different, pre internet too ... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
Chortle. I bought one because I was a fan of the Spider Robinson Callahan’s stories.
When I first got it I pulled a classic funny-once prank at work by sneaking in early one morning to replace one of the wall clocks there. The expressions on my co-workers faces as they tried to work past the “DOES NOT COMPUTE” messages their brains were giving them were hilarious.
But it’s very much a funny-ONCE joke, I never did that again. 😀
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Sometimes I mix up some stuff for whatever reason, also I need longer to read the time on an analog one.
As I was still wearing smart watches I always used an analog watch face as I think they look better as a worn clock than digital ones.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I have a collection of braille and watches for the sight impaired, and yeah they are hard to work out ... Hugz
Hugz & xXx
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
That would be nice, but with real diamonds ... Giggles
I've seen pictures of very old pocket watches that used some unusual ways to help sight impaired people to feel the time
Hugz & xXx
I mean, I _can_ but I feel annoyed about it. When they taught me as a kid I kept thinking "but we can write the numbers now, why do I need to learn to read it this way?". I still mostly feel the same way.
In a sense you could say that an analogue clock is... anachronistic?
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I say no, nope ... No way
I'm finding a lot more people wanting an analogue clocks
Hugz & xXx
I'm sure that's true, but that doesn't mean there's any deeper reason to use analogue time pieces except as jewelery. I believe it's a lot quicker and more effective to read numbers than to parse a clock with hands.
Doesn't mean I don't appreciate the beauty of a mechanical clock, or that people shouldn't buy them, just... It's not mainly about keeping time, is it? Nothing wrong with that.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix and Kotes reshared this.
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.Maarten Baas (YouTube)
@dwillanski
You can make one of your own...
I will be able to work out your password, date of birth and shoe size ... Giggles
Because I had a customer that said that they can't ... She finds it very difficult
Hugz & xXx
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.jidderbug2028 (YouTube)
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
You should just get one and a good brand, even if it's a bit more expensive... It shouldn't leak, it will run longer and it's best not to have "spare" ones, as they only have a short shelf life ... Hugz
And if you need to ask me, I'll help
Hugz & xXx
That is a bit of a trick ... Give it a day or three ... Giggles
Do yourself a favour, dust it regularly ... If you have compressed air, make sure it isn't moist or drops when the air comes out
Why, the dust will turn to concrete, and the moisture will swell the "wood"
Hugz & xXx
It has just 3 wheels (and 2 pinions). The internal teeth mean they all turn the same direction. I am in awe of Clayton Boyer’s design skills - he has built so many wildly different clocks.
And published plans for them all!
I promise to keep dusting mine.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@yourfutureex In her defense, she’s an art teacher.
But still…
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Is your question a serious question, and why question a poll ... Are you one of those people that when someone asks you a question you dismiss them ... Is your question serious ?
And yes it is, I had a client in today that said they couldn't tell the time ... You know what I did, I helped them, and didn't put them down or return with something dismissive
Hugz & xXx
Buy GARDEN FRIENDS at Swatch Europe.www.flikflak.com
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Sensitive content
Sensitive content
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@duncan_blues
I've noticed it's a bit harder to use a rotary phone than most people who've never used one think. Not hard, but you have to know not to impede the dial as it returns.
You sometimes see people reenacting olde-times who pause to say something with their finger still in the dial half way returned and I think, well that's not going to work!
@swift @duncan_blues much easier if the number you're calling doesn't have many digits greater than five.
But works well to show why the padlock in the 1 isn't as useful as one might think, even when @Alice isn't around.
@gabe @swift @duncan_blues @Alice
Tried multiple times on this British Telecom 8746 (it is live and connected to a PBX) but without success even for 3 digit extensions, its a late model (from 1980s, they were still in use until mid 1990s) and I think BT may have altered the switchhook design to make this practice harder.
Decided to abandon the experiment in the end before I inadvertently send 112 down the register, and have to tell the Operator "apologies, engineer misdialled emergency number whilst testing VOIP equipment, no Emergency Services required" - which they are generally OK with as its not that uncommon an occurrence, but I'd rather not take up their resources..
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
this made me wonder about something... before mechanical time pieces, how did people keep time after the sun went down or on days cloudy enough to make a sundial unreadable?
Surely there were some attempts to keep time under those conditions!
@lnr I'm not familiar with those. I presume those are candles that are made with segments indicating X number of hours?
Besides reliability how common would these be in pre-industrial times? I heard a podcast once where they tried to illustrate how expensive light was in pre-industrial times by making their own candles the old fashioned way.
@sysop408 It's hard to search for, because I just keep finding links to fake LED candles with timers instead, but this looks like a basic little video on using candles to mark time:
youtube.com/shorts/7VnfdU8hHtg
I think people would have informally marked time to some extent with how long they had to work in the evening before their candle burnt out! Or how long their lamp would burn before needing refilling.
Aha, look:
@lnr OK, wow... that alarm clock bit of trivia in that video was something I didn't not expect!
I actually had wondered a bit about that too. There had to be people who needed some way to wake up reliably before the first rooster crowed.
reshared this
Sheldon and Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@musevg, how is this analogue? It is using base of 5, similar to the face of an analogue clock, but that's about it.
Very cool though, thanks 😄
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I have no idea ... And would think they are people's names ... And how confused I would be every minute ... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I see time in clock faces. I convert digital readouts into analog hands to understand them.
My university, UCL got rid of clocks in our teaching spaces twenty years ago “on ground of cost” (seriously? WTF?) The stress of being time-blind and trying to fit into 50 mins gracefully has plagued me ever since.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@Snapai Oh no - I'm sorry… I shouldn't have said “corrected”. Another colour / color moment. 😊
grammarist.com/spelling/analog…
How do you spell Analog vs. analogue? Learn the correct spelling of Analog vs. analogue & other commonly misspelled words & phrases in the English language. Learn more!Grammarist (GRAMMARIST)
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Some clocks are harder to read ... I read them all day and some I have to have a dibble take ... Hugz
Hugz & xXx
Sensitive content
@KrucaKafejo 3:57:28?
I don't get why they had to subdivide the smallest division into *four* instead of *five* though! That threw me for a bit 😵💫
Yes and it feels more… natural? intuitive? 🤷🏻
When I'm doing time mental "math" (for instance to take timezones into account), I always do it through visualizing an analog clock in my mind, it feels easier to mentaly move the hands of the clock than do actual math.
Edit: watched the Technology Connextras shared above and I’m the same as him, that’s a great explanation.
I miss having an analogue watch, I should get a new one…

That's like me ... I use a digital clock with all the watches I have to set ... Hugz
Hugz & xXx
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
It's just something you have to keep doing to get good at it ... Hugz ... Have you seen the time teacher clock faces
Hugz & xXx
I have a *cat* that I swear is teaching herself to read my longcase clock's dial
the other day, it was 11:45 and it chimed the :45 quarter bells, and she was just *staring* at the dial. (note that she is *extremely* dramatic about food, and the automatic dispenser was scheduled to go off at 12:00.)
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
One of my favourite times 4:20pm ... Giggles
It's 4:46 pm ..
Silly me
Hugz & xXx
@d_a_n_a huzzah 24 hour watches! Who makes that one?
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@d_a_n_a this one's Soviet from Paketa/Raketa... 😁
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@IanAMartin the second knob adjusts the outer dial. I use the inner dial to show UTC and adjust the outer ring for my local time zone. Helps with correlating server logs.
A lot of watch faces will have double numbers like 12 with a 24 smaller
A lot of the Swiss made them, normally not as a larger production run
Hugz & xXx
I am very smart and searched "sweden 24 hour watch" and it looks like this is from akerfalk.com/ which is a new one for me. I did some looking into it a while back and only found like.. 5 companies that had made them.
Explore Akerfalk’s 24-hour watches from Sweden – Scandinavian design that combines simplicity, balance, and timeless style. Shop now with free shipping.Akerfalk
Pope Bob the Unsane reshared this.
Braille watches aren't easy to read ... I've got several and have repaired many ... Hugz
Hugz & xXx
reshared this
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Just gone sodium to neon o'clock.
Yes, this is on my living room wall.
reshared this
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈 reshared this.
Yes, I realise that isn't quite how we'd say it for a "normal" clock: just gone five to ten not just gone eleven to ten.
The other reading, just gone sodium past fluorine also doesn't quite work: just gone nine fifty-five not just gone eleven past nine. That's completely different!
I can, but slowly.
A fun piece of my lore is that I somehow moved from a school where they taught it in the grade above where I was, to one where they had just taught it the previous year - in the same state no less! So I just... never learned, and there were enough digital clocks everywhere in the 80s and 90s that it didn't matter.
I started learning in my 20s, and I still occasionally get unsure and have to count around by 5.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I can, but it's not very useful when most that I encounter aren't working. I don't trust them unless I can see a second hand actually moving. (We have *8* of those cheap plastic analogue clocks up around the main room at work... only problem is, 6 of them need new batteries, and the 2 that don't aren't facing my area so I can't see them. So they're not exactly helpful.)
I can also use 24 hour time (partly cheap digital alarm clock, partly from setting 473636 reminders on my phone for everything) and people think this is a superpower but it really isn't. (It is helpful though. Sometimes 6am and 6pm can look the same in winter.)
I've thought about getting a watch, but I keep remembering how many I ruined in high school by forgetting to take it off before getting into the shower, or getting too much water on it while washing my hands. Smart watches seem too expensive for something at such high risk of being ruined. (And I guess smart pocket watches aren't a thing?)
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I think you can get a pocket watch like a strap for smart watches ... I kind of remember 10 years ago I saw one with my LG smart watch
Hugz & xXx
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Waterproof is a myth ... Water resistant yes ... And truthfully I wouldn't take any watch into the water these days
Hugz & xXx
I’ve developed a habit of reading digital clocks as if they were analog: quarter ’til the hour, half past, and such.
Most of the time, 15 minutes of precision is plenty, and it’s easier to recall later what time it was when I checked.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
At least they don't complain about arabic numbers like I have had a customer do ... Crazy
Hugz & xXx
@amd
The original design was by Clayton Boyer in Hawaii.
lisaboyer.com/Claytonsite/Clay…
I started with his Leeds clock and modified it a little. It’s the third one of his I have built. Other people have built amazing versions of his clocks but mine are more basic.
I have at least one person ask if it was battery powered, since they couldn’t see any power cord.
Come on let's get to 5000 votes ... 💋
Hugz & xXx
Thank you all ... Hugz
The comments and replies are what we are here for ... And you all never let me down ... 💋
Keep up the great work !
Hugz & xXx
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
You may be old ... I see myself as old yet ... Giggles
But yeah, we need to get more of the youths here
Giggles
Hugz & xXx
I wonder how many of the 1% who voted no are dyslexic. My sister has dyslexia and she couldn't read analog clocks till she was almost a teen. She still kinda struggles with them from time to time
(Tho that's not to suggest dyslexia automagically prevents one from reading them, just part of my sister's struggles with it)
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I would think a lot of the dyslexic people voted yes, even tho it takes a bit long to double and triple check ... Hugz
I for one is dyslexic
Hugz & xXx
Yep ... There are the ones that like to kid with me, 0.25 %, and the rest that can't ... Hugz
Hugz & xXx
It took me a second to adjust to the dial ... Giggles
My brain went hey what's the 6 doing there ... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
@queenofnewyork Ancient!
I think it was Jimmy Kimmel who did a segment the other night getting young people to write in cursive and it was pretty hilarious. I know I can read it, but I'm not sure if I can remember all the letters, especially some of the capitals.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
It's a bit like that ... I would just do a fancy J and then move on ... Giggles
Hugz & xXx
I can read an analogue, but my brain stalls for a moment as soon as someone says something like "a quarter till" while the only clock near is a digital. Your really asking me to on the spot to do division with an already weird 60:1 system lol
edit: grammar
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I have discovered that the easiest way for me to tell time is analogue clock with Roman numerals, because it's even clearer what side is lopsided in what way then.
I have dyscalculia, that probably factors in. I /can/ read digital clocks, but it's far harder and takes longer and the chance I misread it goes up by a lot.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
I've got at least five of them in my house.
I would love to get mechanical pendulum clock.
Melissa BearTrix reshared this.
The “Daily Show” host took on the president for “trauma-dumping” in front of several youngsters at the White House.Ben Blanchet (HuffPost)
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Seven candidates who want to be California’s next governor traded sharp attacks Tuesday in a wide-ranging debate that touched on issues from gas prices to raising taxes to healthcare in a contest that has no clear leader.PBS News
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Melancholic Mediocrity, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈, hypebot, Lisa Melton, Jess Mahler, Christine Lemmer-Webber, Steve, Trixi Schutzo, Trixi Schutzo, Furbland's Very Cool Account™, Evan Prodromou, Mar Hicks, Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) , Stuart Celarier ❌👑, 👁Pooka🫣Boo🫵, millennial fulcrum and Androcat reshared this.
Josh.
Jo sh.
Jos osh.
Josh Josh.
Q: What did the Brother Cell Say to the Sister Cell when she stood on his toe?
A: My Toe Sis!
🤣
tRump’s ICE is flooding tech companies with subpoenas demanding they unmask anonymous online critics of his deportation machine—no warrant, no judge, no First Amendment.
Hundreds already sent. EFF & ACLU are suing to stop it.
Dictator vibes. Dissent = enemy list.
msn.com/en-us/news/us/ice-want…
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
GhostOnTheHalfShell, Trixi Schutzo, SpaceLifeForm, tend2wobble, McSpocky and Simon and Cad reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
a.k.a. low-profile, Broadfork, Cassandrich, hypebot, cyplo, Alton Barrett, Lisa Melton, Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈, ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES, Trixi Schutzo, Furbland's Very Cool Account™, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Blippy the Wonder Slug 🇩🇪, Witchzilla, Kim Possible, GlennMG, RiaResists❌ 👑, kat donegan (she/her) 🇵🇸✊, and Barbara Monaco reshared this.
Like this shit: techcrunch.com/2026/04/27/meta…
Don't worry guys, the CEO says you can stare right into the infrared beam and it's totally safe! I trust him, don't you?
(How you transmit usable amounts of power with a beam that's so diffuse that you can look at it I have no fucking idea.)
Paul Cantrell reshared this.
@mayintoronto
Beamed microwave power would be a space laser, using a microwave resonant cavity to make a coherent beam.
But those tubes are infamously unreliable and need a lot of maintenance; and cannot be run in vacuum without melting themselves (on the ground, we run them by boiling lots of water to soak up the heat).
And the inefficiencies mean that Earth-based solar and batteries always win.
Not that the operators of these scams care about physics or practicality.
Or this shit: cnn.com/science/space-forge-fa…
I guess factories in orbit are already a thing? Tiny factories, for now. Which then have to drop their precious cargo back through the atmosphere somehow and recover it? How does this make any sense economically at all?
reshared this
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈, Witchzilla, diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱 and kat donegan (she/her) 🇵🇸✊ reshared this.
Or this shit: spacedaily.com/sd-n-nasa-backs…
The Moon's gravity is much weaker than Earth's so it'll be easy to accidentally launch rocks into Moon-escape orbits, making the Earth-Moon trip even more hazardous than it is already. Fun!
Interlune has secured a $6.9 million NASA award to build what the company says will be the first payload designed to extract solar-wind volatiles, including helium-3, directly from lunar regolith on the moon.Space Daily
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈 reshared this.
Or THIS shit which is really shit: harvardtechnologyreview.com/20…
Many companies are looking at different ways to do this (like the stare-into-the-IR-beam company above). All of them have huge safety, tech, and/or feasibility issues.
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
But of course nothing beats SpaceX's drunk teenager scifi novel of an FCC filing about how we need AI data centres in orbit to ascend into Kardashev civilization land. Which the FCC took totally seriously, opened for public comment in 4 days (record-short time!) docs.fcc.gov/public/attachment…
and the FCC will probably approve despite a couple thousand comments from the public and at least two petitions to deny opposing it. Fuckers.
Broadfork reshared this.
reshared this
GhostOnTheHalfShell and Broadfork reshared this.
I'm disappointed that one of the "all satellites everywhere all the time" companies hasn't just thrown a bunch of cheap-ish telescopes into orbit and opened them up to you lot.
But then Elon did promise to end world hunger and when the quote arrived he went very quiet and never paid up. It was only ~$6B IIRC, which even at the time was less than 5% of his wealth.
Oh. This is orbital enshittification.
Shit.
reshared this
Alton Barrett and Juggling With Eggs reshared this.
In the 2010s everybody got a social media account and now there are no more offline humans to focus your onboarding efforts on. These funds have existed for 30 years by growing cloud services. But now it's just the inert bottom of the ocean where there is no more whale carcass left.
So they try to keep the lights on by absorbing whole large infrastructure sectors. It's not that they have anything useful to offer space. It's that space has government money that is useful to them.
You are doing the work journalist are not 😔
Thank you
reshared this
AI6YR Ben, AkaSci 🛰️, Mastodon Migration and Witchzilla reshared this.
there are people making better batteries, but not tech bros.
Space shit gets headlines and Davos bragging rights, very little actually is aimed at anything except ego stroking at the moment.
"Space. The Final Frontier."
The last new continent, there for the grab. And, this time, no d--- "first peoples" or regulators.
Vocabulary question: can you call it a "mindset" if there's no mind involved?
it's a betting game. You don't bet on things that just work, because everyone could do it, and you're not seen as a genius coming up with fancy ideas.
But importantly *also* don't bet on the very-unlikely things that theoretically could work in some distant future... you persuade *other* *people* to pour money into your batshit-crazy ideas which you claim will yield a 10000x return on investment later.
Then you'll use this inflated stock as collatoral to buy your new yacht.
Fresnel lenses in space!
How large will these panels of lenses be for practical use?
Here is a good article on space power, including designs to beam power to earth, some spanning multiple square kilometers.
bbc.com/future/article/2025102…
Harvesting solar energy in orbit and beaming it down to Earth is a decades-old idea. Now, a raft of companies say they could make it a reality.Jonathan O'Callaghan (BBC)
Glyn Moody reshared this.
I do see evidence of your well thought out point. I do amateur astronomy when weather permits, a few days a month. And for the last several engagements my views have been interrupted by a rather bright satellite streaking through the field of view. Typically this occurs within the first 30 minutes of observing.
Mind you that's not a naked eye view when a large section of sky is within eyesight, but traveling through the very limited field of view of my telescope.
because cheap crap faster and faster has been the latest craze since the 70's.
- Clothes are crap and don't last for years.
- Kitchen blades are crap, if nothing else the plastic handles or the planned obsolescence side paint starts to crack.
- Home appliances don't last for 20 years and don't have 10 year warranty by default.
The list goes on and on.
THAT WOULD BE NICE
See, my dad is an engineer.
This gave me the impression that anyone who cares about science and math and facts and goodness and humanity feels it like an actual physical fucking PAIN when something isn't being done in the best, most efficient and helpful and logical way.
What the fuck is fucking WRONG with the people who are building shit that is DESIGNED to break and waste and hurt?? What is wrong with them?? Something is broken! Something is deeply and terribly broken!
Broadfork reshared this.
On April 1st 2024, I proposed a crypto scheme to shoot moon dust near the Earth–Sun L1 Lagrange point as a possible climate-change mitigation measure. And to "find" a Warhol, or a whole museum holding six works of art rather.
That was kind of what EUMETSAT did when I was working there (and they still do). Their satellites are hugely expensive one-off builds for climate research as well as weather forecasting.
But I left in 2011, in the before times.
What bothers me, is that in matters which effect all of mankind, like the millions of satellites Starlink wants to shoot into orbit or what Reflect Orbital is trying to do, nobody but the FCC seems to have a say in this.
Shouldn't such things be regulated by a global organization?
Money not only corrupts, it also stupefies. In this giddy moment, they can throw a pile of money at the President and then all laws that restrict them just vanish. MoneyBros now think physical and chemical laws can be ignored as well. Anything they imagine will become real, it they just spend money. Or so they assume.
For people who live within the confines of Reality, this is an exasperating era. It's no comfort, but we can look forward to Reality hitting back -- hard.
Every time I see those tech boy hallucinations I want to yell at them that combining coke and booze results in serious brain damage.
Saddest part is that they have access to enough money to actually cause real serious harm
@Unsightly3055 no, it's not a joke. JAXA had been working on orbital power since the 80's.
kenkai.jaxa.jp/eng/research/ss…
The Japanese OHISAMA will launch in 2026. It'll use microwaves to transport energy.
asahi.com/ajw/articles/1629314…
Caltech MAPLE had their microwave model tested a few years ago.
caltech.edu/about/news/in-a-fi…
A space solar power testbed launched into orbit in January has transmitted energy wirelessly using fabric-like transmitting arrays.California Institute of Technology
@nemeciii
We already have have solar power at night in the form of storage and grid interconnections.
My point is it is almost certainly going to be cheaper to build out storage and/or high voltage grid interconnect between sunny and not sunny places than it is to build anything remotely financially viable in space.
@sleepy62 there's also a limit on how much solar power can exist on country like Japan without risking local food production.
In addition out of control climate change might put terrestrial solar plants in risk due to worsening storms and increasing hailstorms.
there is also the distinct possibility (state fascism, "space force", department of war, etc etc) that any tech able to concentrate large amounts of sunlight and aim it at the ground would of course be used as a weapon.
And of course even when not used as a weapon, it wouldnt be a public, tax funded service, it would put a chain and a price tag on *sunlight* and solar. This isnt the solar we all need.
Checking; that grant to Interlune is for a system to measure volatile gases in lunar regolith in situ?
Nothing about mining the Moon for helium-3.
The media coverage remains appalling.
@jappel
It would probably take more energy to extract helium-3 from lunar regolith than would be released by fusing it.
Even if a reactor to fuse it existed.
@michael_w_busch
Also ignoring the fact that there is literally no functional market for He3 as a fuel and will not be until a fusion reactor exists that can burn it which there won’t be because no one is working on that because the temperatures required are way too high. Could it work? Maybe, but it’s decades further away than DT or DD fusion.
Anyone dangling the ‘He3 lunar regolith mining’ idea is a huckster looking to part the gullible from their money.
I learned in ~1997*, while a student, that for 1kg of He3 one needs to extract regolith 2 m wide, 2 m deep, and 100 km (!) long.
We know how mining sites on Earth are left behind.
(*I just recalculated this, checks out)
These companies remembers me the Panama scandals at the end of 1800:
It sounds like they are trying to produce very high quality seed crystals that are
used as part of the manufacturing process for microelectronics. The seed crystals are much smaller than the wafers. The whole process is very expensive, but you can get a lot of chips per wafer. Often they'll produce a lot of chips per wafer and throw out the bad ones (the result of randomly placed defects on the wafer).
waferpro.com/the-czochralski-p…
At WaferPro, we utilize the Czochralski process (CZ process) to produce our advanced silicon wafers that power technologies across the electronicsWaferPro
Because what our planet needs right now is more and More and MORE launches!
Ffs 😓🤬
This is actually something that I'm OK with... They're short lived LEO platforms that are launched in low volume and not using huge amounts of RF spectrum or blasting laser beams or sunlight or whatever around the ground.
The descent capsule returns to earth relatively intact, and the mass of the remaining bus components burning up on re-entry is small compared to even one starlink much less thousands of them. They deorbit in a controlled manner after only a few months so minimal long term orbital pollution.
Crystal growth (of both pharmaceuticals, see some work from Varda Space, and semiconductors) is something that legitimately works better in microgravity since you can get a really stable melt with no convection to grow ultra high quality specimens from. The materials are sufficiently pricey and low volume that it's not something you will be launching tens of thousands of satellites to make.
IMO this is the kind of commercial space system we *should* be encouraging, at the expense of the more shark-jumping stuff elsewhere in this thread.
Genuinely that’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. 😂
Someday I hope we see serious studies on how having absurd amounts of wealth and influence literally destroys people’s brains.
IIRC the early SPS concepts relied not on beam density but on 365-24-7 power delivery vs. ground-based solar (of course they also relied on NASA's lying-through-their-teeth Shuttle launch cost / frequency projections). There were claims that birds could fly safely through the beam.
Whatever handwavy argument there might have been for SPS during the 1973 oil embargo was rather overtaken by cell efficiency improvements and battery storage, though.
That’s what I was wondering myself, in another post you wrote about „several times the brightness of a full moon“, and well, that’s nothing you can use for anything, really.
A full moon throws roughly 1/3 lx onto the ground.
For reference:
German regulations mandate 500 lx for office desks.
An overcast winter day in Northern Europe can be something like 3000-6000 lx.
A sunny day in summer can easily reach above 100‘000 lx
1/2
The same tech bros ducking up space and astronomy are also ducking up everything in my industry (open source software), with their thieving AI bullshit generators, covering us in generated manure in vast amounts, while also taking no care of software reliability or security.
It's such a shitshow, which will get worser before it might all fall apart.
Your goat and aurora photos, and everybody else creating fabulous photos and art of nature and animals is what's keeping me going.
Space, the oceans, some wormhole to Andromeda. Its a time of unhinged speculation, infinite money, destruction of ground truth and any meaningful discourse.
arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/sil…
Panthalassa aims to test floating AI computing nodes in the Pacific in 2026.Jeremy Hsu (Ars Technica)
My observations are:
Money and intellect are at best casually related.
Money and ethics have no correlation.
Let's build a Ballroom Bunker, that flushes them all down to the bottom of Mariana's Trench!
A fitting depth for those Space Cadets!!
several years ago I jumped to the conclusion that something's mere existence on a techbro website means it's probably horseshit.
In an odd way, we already went through this. Look at tech magazine ads circa 1982. Like, when we still had print magazines.
Browse our latest products
ABOUT DEVAVACCI
Devavacci is more than just a clothing brand it’s a statement. Built on the belief that style is one of the most powerful forms of self-expression, Devavacci was created for individuals who move with confidence and aren’t afraid to stand out. In a world where trends come and go, we focus on creating streetwear that feels authentic, modern, and built for everyday life.
Our vision started with a simple idea: clothing should represent the energy, ambition, and creativity of the people who wear it. Devavacci is inspired by street culture, individuality, and the constant evolution of fashion. Every piece we release is designed with the goal of helping you express your style while staying comfortable and confident wherever life takes you.
Devavacci offers a curated collection of high-quality apparel and accessories. Find unique, stylish pieces for any occasion. Explore the collection and redefine your wardrobe.Devavacci
The techbro version of flooding the zone.
I hate it all, and them, so much.
All those you've mentioned!!!
Maybe I've missed some, but these here are very worrying to me as well:
* Kessler Syndrome, cascading damage once a threshold has been triggered, endangering *everyting* in the adjacent orbit(s).
* Impact on the atmosphere and global warming due to aluminium ablation of de-orbiting satellites.
For Big Tech and tech bros, this is all a land grab right now, driven by FOMO and perceived 'street creds' (redeemable in Silicon Valley and with the Tangerine Tyrant).
#satellites #SpaceInsanity #pollution #enshittification #BigTech
Sensitive content
Utterly agree.
Suspect that history reveals rapid change and increasingly centralised power as key factors in the end of past civilisations.
We are just rushing along that path at an insanely reckless pace with drunk psychopaths at the wheels.
create Website: Orbital Enshittification Watch
"They get the valuation. We get the debris."
Main goal:
Make every reckless satellite proposal look like a bad investment.
By showing:
cheaper Earth alternatives
regulatory delay risk
insurance/liability risk
public opposition risk;
astronomy/ecology backlash
technical feasibility gaps
reputational harm
weak customer demand
bad unit economics
There won't be any. Licenses or not. Take a look at the radiators needed by the ISS for just a few people and computers. Scale it up for the monstrous needs of even a small datacenter.
Datacenters in space aren't even impractical, they're impossible. It's all hype. Nobody is actually going to try doing it. You can't cheat physics.
It's a scam to get more funding from gullible investors. Just ignore it.
At the risk of sounding too Seinfeldian, what's the deal with chefs on the food network mispronouncing common ingredients?
MARscapone
TOOmeric
ChipolTAY
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Furbland's Very Cool Account™ and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Try working in a scientific profession.
NEW-kew-lur.
TEMPA-choor.
ARE-tick.
LAB-a-tory.
YOU-ler.
Worchestershire!
The worst part is that there are at least two valid pronunciations.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
James M., Ham on Wry, Joy_intl, Mr. Bill, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES, SpaceLifeForm and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
washingtonpost.com/news/magazi…
These judges aren't necessarily afraid of Trump, an old goat fading fast.
They're terrified of the billionaires behind MAGA fascism.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_net…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_F…
publicintegrity.org/politics/d…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaife_F…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelson_…
publicintegrity.org/politics/d…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolph_C…
projects.propublica.org/nonpro…
The Epstein Class have left behind decades-long trust funds to mess with elections, ...
1/
Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from over 1.8 million nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as well as download tax filings going back as f…ProPublica
Cassandrich reshared this.
2/
... & careers, from beyond the grave. For decades.
nytimes.com/2019/08/14/us/cord…
It's to preserve their dynastic wealth with a side of class warfare, eugenics, & bigotry.
popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5…
All these judicial nominees were groomed from law school onwards by Koch Network.
They have every right to be scared stiff of these dynasties.
They only have to spend $1.6 billion in Irish tax evasion, and they can erase the civil rights of 50% of the American population.
propublica.org/article/dark-mo…
In the largest known political advocacy donation in U.S. history, industrialist Barre Seid funded a new group run by Federalist Society co-chair Leonard Leo, who guided Trump’s Supreme Court picks and helped end federal abortion rights.Andrew Perez (ProPublica)
Cassandrich reshared this.
So instead of firmly founding a third, middle d#DemocraticSocialism party, just increase the accelerating destabilization of the overextended #duopoly
No thanks.
the #USA is an #FPTP #voting system
meaning there can only be 2 parties
it's not corruption, it's just math (not saying corruption doesn't exist, but even if all corruption magically disappeared, we'd still have only 2 parties)
a 3rd party on the left would divide the left vote and #MAGA would win
i want 3rd parties
to get that we need #rankedChoiceVoting
to get ranked choice voting, we have to elect #Democrats who support it
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
if not Ranked Choice, then at a least a run off between the two candidates with the most votes if no one gets more than 50% outright in the vote.
this keeps the effect of vote splitting in FPTP to a minimum and closer to actual voter intention.
Alaska ended up with a Dem governor fairly recently as the GOP ran two candidates. All the candidates got 30-something percent of the votes, but the Dem got the most votes and won office despite nearly 2/3 of votes going to another party. A run off could have prevented that and elected a candidate more inline with voter intention.
but you still need politicians with the political will to change the system.
I've used when I used to live in the UK - it's great. Only at the council level but quicker and easier than run-offs
Wish they had it in Canada.
@maya_b @benroyce @numodular
One might ask what was the distribution of second choices among those not voting for the Dem.
It isn't wholly unlikely that many of the voters for the two GOP candidates would rather have a Dem than the other GOPc.
All the GOP factions and fractions look rather nasty from here, but I suspect the divisions are as toxic as those in our parties.
True, and the run-off would have reflected that.
Same result could come out of ranked choice as well.
it would not happen in ranked choice voting
if a third party was on the table, negativity would go way down, out of fear everyone's second choice could win
this isn't a theory, it's what happens in ranked choice districts:
newscentermaine.com/article/ne…
ranked choice removes toxicity
it becomes a battle to be nice and sing kumbaya
literally
there was 2013 race in minneapolis after adopting RCV where the candidates stood together and sang "kumbaya"
If you don't fully understand what Ranked Choice Voting is - here's your chance: a simple, and funny way to 'get it.'Kristina Rex (newscentermaine.com)
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@maya_b @benroyce @numodular
We already have run-offs in our FPTP system.
Those are generally terrible b/c it's an entirely different electorate voting a month later than in the general.
Ranked Choice is the best solution I've heard of.
1. It functions almost exactly like FPTP if there are only 2 candidates.
2. It provides a winner with true majority support
3. And It's literally cheaper to run.
you don't get many alternative solutions that check all those boxes.
no, this is not true
yes the UK is also FPTP, but it's a parliamentary system
a parliamentary system lends stability to 3rd parties (coalitions and such)
the USA does not have a parliamentary system, so the lessons of the UK and 3rd parties does not apply to us
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @IanMoore3000 @numodular
I'm not from there, but doesn't the bicameral Congress constitute a Parliament?
France has a President and many parties.
Other examples or models exist.
no
the usa is not a parliamentary system. it is a presidential system with separation of powers (unlike parliamentary wins picking the head of govt for example)
there is no lesson from 3rd party working in the UK that applies to the USA
if we want stable viable 3rd parties in the USA, we need to change something
changing the constitution is a heavy lift, and ranked choice voting has a head of steam, slow adoption, so we accelerate the adoption
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @Photo55 @IanMoore3000 @numodular
The reason I support Ranked Choice for our Parliamentary system is because I think it easier for voters to understand and easier to convince people to support than Proportional representation which I believe is better. The same logic applies to non-Parliamentary systems.
the5thc.blogspot.com/2024/11/w…
After four years studying Political Science at Laurentian University and over thirty years working for the House of Commons I tended to appr...the5thc.blogspot.com
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
zero argument
Canada, the UK, etc, should also adopt ranked choice
it's impossible to capture every intricacy of the popular will, but ranked choice is a huge step up towards that from FPTP, everywhere and anywhere
i'm only focusing on the USA because I'm American
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@a_cubed @the5thColumnist @Photo55 @IanMoore3000 @numodular
i'm confused or you're confused
ranked choice voting is not in conflict with proportional representation
in fact proportional representation can use ranked choice voting
or i'm missing what you're referring to
exactly
RCV isn't the best voting system
but it has a head of steam in the USA, and it's massively better than FPTP
people can finally vote their conscience for 3rd parties, unencumbered by dreary strategy, which is a huge turn off for many. because their 2nd choice can flow through in RCV. they aren't essentially voting for MAGA with a 3rd party vote in our current system
so i support RCV. it's better, not perfect
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@a_cubed
Less than what though?
Less than the existing FPTP: very much not.
Less than the complicated Condorcet system: everything is, at least slightly.
STV/RCV offers the chance to vote for our preferred candidate, failing their election, for our second-best, failing that third etc, all the way down past the Monster Raving Loony to the Breakaway-Re-Reform at the bottom.
It elects one candidate, it isn't a system to elect multiple Members in proportion per area.
I wouldn't say "not true". What he said was true, although perhaps not contextually applicable. Saying "FPTP means there can only be 2 parties" is technically incorrect.
It's the combination of FPTP and a presidential system that creates conditions for 2-party dominance.
And to add, FPTP is problematic in parliamentary systems as well.
@IanMoore3000 @numodular @c @georgetakei
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
In Canada, Trudeau campaigned on a promise of electoral reform, then abandoned the notion as soon as he gained power. Coalitions mean little when a party wins a majority anyway.
Yup. Well said
"FPTP means there can only be 2 parties" is true in the context of the USA but the fediverse is not only the USA, obviously, so there is no need to scope the thread to just the USA
And yes, ranked choice for Canada and the UK as well, not just the USA. It better captures the popular will than FPTP, regardless of the system
@lazysupper Up here in Canada we have a parliamentary system. We have dozens of Federal parties, including one that just represents Québec, the Greens, and the New Democratic Party that have yet to win a Federal election.
FPTP is absolutely problematic in Canada, but so far the two major parties—Liberals and Conservatives—cling to the status quo with an iron grip.
@lazysupper Americans will be amused to know that we have not one but TWO federal communist parties!
The Communist Party of Canada, and;
The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)
The RCMP used to harass them during a period when our police openly worked to break up and suppress any and all worker organization, but nowadays they are too fringe to attract much pushback.
Wait
Two different parties same name?
At the same time?
@benroyce @numodular The other useful option is multi-seat constituencies, as practiced at least in Scandinavian nations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election… has a useful summary.
In US terms this would be mean abolishing "congressional districts", keeping the number of seats per state but make the election proportional-by-state.
(IMO transferring the 2 senate seats for each state to the pool of representatives to elect would also be a good idea)
@pitrh @benroyce @numodular Honestly the US need to increase the number of represenatives to reflect populsyion growth since 1920 ish when we stopped increasing the number. 1 rep for every 200,000 would be an improvement over today where 1 can represent somwhere between 400,000 and 600,000.
It also it more permissable and achivavle under the systems that exist already. No need to go through a constitutional amendment.
the #USA is an #FPTP #voting systemmeaning there can only be 2 parties
I’ve written a lot about this in other posts, so I’m not going to repeat it all here, but Duverger's Law is absolute nonsense. Anyone with a basic understanding of game theory can see that it describes an unstable equilibrium state. Anyone who has paid attention to political history of the last century can point to a large number of examples of this equilibrium collapsing. It was pretty indefensible as an idea when Duverger published it, it’s been repeatedly shown to be false since then.
if you have 100 people
45 vote for red, 55 vote for blue:
blue wins
but if
45 vote red, 40 vote blue, and 15 vote green:
red wins
in FPTP
could you show me where this situation does not support duverger's law?
you can be brief. give me a hint
because i don't see what the problem is. it seems solid and unarguable
are you coming from a UK perspective?
yes, a parliamentary system lends stability to 3rd parties
but not in the USA
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @numodular
You're talking about a single round of elections. The claim is about repeated rounds.
Let's play through your example:
After losing to red, what does the blue team do? They can move their policies to be more red or more green. Duverger predicts that all of the parties will move to some centre point, and people will abandon the green team because the red and blue teams are close to some average.
The problem with this is that it leaves an increasing number of people disenfranchised. So it's easy for voters on the bluer or redder end to look at the blues and reds and not be able to tell the difference between them. At this point, a green party can start peeling off a lot of votes from either the red or blue party, depending on what policies it goes after.
The big thing that Duverger's Law misses is that the red team isn't just competing against the blue team, they're competing against apathy. If the red team moves to some arbitrary middle and the blue team doesn't, the red team may have more support, but the blue team will have more enthusiastic support. You don't win an election because people like your platform, you win an election because people think your platform is worth bothering to turn up and vote for (compulsory voting changes this slightly).
That green party from your example isn't taking voters from the red or blue party, they're picking up people who don't like the red or blue team enough to bother to vote for them.
The red and blue team can pick up some apathetic voters by scaring them: vote for us or the other team wins. But that works only in the short term if the reds and blues are moving together. After a while, voters don't care.
Once you have 30% of the voters in the apathy box, you're in a very unstable situation: a third party that can pick up a lot of those voters can start winning.
The reason this rarely happens in the USA is that third parties keep aiming at the highest-risk races first. A third party with no track record stands almost no chance of winning the US Presidential election, but that's not where you start. You start in local elections. Then you get a track record in city councils and so on. Then you go for state senates and legislatures. Then state governorships. Then for the US house and senate. Then you aim for President. And that takes a long time, and will be slower in a country the size of the USA.
@david_chisnall @numodular
"At this point, a green party can start peeling off a lot of votes from either the red or blue party, depending on what policies it goes after"
and in many more mature democracies, this is fine, as 3rd parties are viable and stable and can form coalitions, etc
in the USA, what happens is this green party winds up dividing the left leaning vote, and the green party helps MAGA win
you're making an argument here in defiance of the straightforward math
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
i want 3rd party in the USA
we have to get ranked choice voting to do that, which is creeping in in places
in RCV your vote can flow to your second choice, rather than flowing to MAGA in FPTP
that's the problem
i don't have any argument with the dynamics you are describing
they are accurate and i agree with them
but, at least in the USA, it's a nonstarter because of the winner take all primitive voting structure the USA has
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @numodular
The things I'm describing are happening in the UK, right now, for the second time in the last hundred years. We're having an election tomorrow where the polls predict a wipeout for the two major parties.
But that's because the two insurgent parties (and the existing third party) have spent decades losing elections and winning small numbers of candidates in local elections.
But third parties in the USA keep trying to rush through. They don't put in the effort of trying to win the smaller lower-stakes elections and building a track record.
How many US State Senates have a third-party majority? Last time I checked: Zero. One you've got one of those, you can start looking at the national level, but third parties in the US keep not putting in the work to do steps 1-9, and then complaining that they're failing step 10. And that has nothing to do with FPTP and everything to do with strategy.
i think this is the crux of our disagreement
i can get behind everything you say. for the UK
parliamentary systems where parties can form coalitions lends stability to 3rd parties, in the UK, even though you're also FPTP, in ways it can't happen in the USA. the USA pure winner-take-all
3rd party can never gain any traction in the USA, until we go to ranked choice voting
it's simply a matter of the spoiler effect in our shitty voting system
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @numodular
I don't know why you think the US and UK systems are so different. The UK draws the executive from the legislature, but both elect their legislatures in almost identical ways: candidates stand in geographical constituencies where they are elected in FPTP. In both cases, coalitions are extremely rare and most of the time one party wins an outright majority.
The difference is in scale and therefore the time taken to win credibility. And the fact that none of the US attempts at third parties are putting in this effort.
In the 2024 election, the largest third party was the Libertarians (Greens a distant fourth). How many state Senators and Representatives did they have going into the election? How many town mayors did they get elected? How many people who had the option to vote for a Libertarian or Green Representative for the US House was already represented by any Libertarian or Green politicians at local or state levels?
@david_chisnall @numodular
1. a parliamentary system is very different than a presidential system with many subtle, and many glaring, knock-on effects. they are not remotely interchangeable, especially on this topic. you can't gloss over that
2. if a 3rd party in the usa followed every suggestion of yours, all that would happen is they would divide the left, or the right, and guarantee the opposite side wins
i repeat myself
but please understand: this is a hard wall
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@david_chisnall @benroyce @numodular Did you miss Ben’s use of the word “coalition”? That cannot happen in the US system.
Yet again we have foreigners who _think_ the US system operates likes theirs, but haven’t taken the time to understand that it’s not. It’s an archaic, structurally anti-democratic system that becomes more and more bonkers the more layers you unpeel.
@pmonks @benroyce @numodular
I did not. Coalitions are also incredibly rare in the UK and completely irrelevant. Coalitions happen after you get candidates elected. The discussion is about getting the candidates elected.
And, for the record, I studied Politics at A Level in the UK with one year devoted to the UK and one year devoted to the US system, so I suspect I understand your political system a lot better than most of your country mates.
that's all well and good but i find it even harder then to understand why you don't see that 3rd party, in the current US system, divides the right, or the left, and guarantees the opposite side wins
you can't beat that with the sort of aspirational ground game you describe. you need to change the voting system, like to RCV. then everyone can vote 3rd party to their heart's content and 3rd parties will thrive
but not before that
it's impossible
@benroyce @pmonks@sfba.social @numodular @georgetakei
that's all well and good but i find it even harder then to understand why you don't see that 3rd party, in the current US system, divides the right, or the left, and guarantees the opposite side wins
Again, what scale of election are you talking about? Presidential? Senatorial? State government? Town dog catcher?
You can't have a third party stand in a US Senatorial election without a track record and expect to win. This will, absolutely, divide the vote.
But you can win smaller elections.
Switching to another electoral scheme also won't fix things in the USA because no one wants to vote for a party with no track record of governing.
@david_chisnall @numodular
i'm confused
if the election is hundreds of millions, or the election is only hundreds of people, the effect of dividing the left, or dividing the right, and guaranteeing the opposite side wins (in hard FPTP like the USA) still holds
no?
please, i welcome a shift in understanding if you have it
@benroyce @numodular
No, because you're ignoring psychology. There are three factors that matter:
If the vote is for something on a smaller scale, people are more willing to take a risk. Voters are much less concerned about wasting their vote in local elections than they are in big ones. Voting for a candidate who has a good chance of losing and having your less-preferable candidate win in a local election is far less of a risk than doing the same for President.
Equally importantly, the candidate is much more able to talk to voters face to face. If you start with the smallest local elections, your third-party candidate can knock on enough doors and convince people that they're a reasonable person. A third-party candidate for President, or even State Senator, has a massive constituency. They're reliant on press coverage to get their message across. That's really expensive and you're fighting establishment bias. A candidate for a small election can actually meet a lot of the electorate.
Finally, turnout in smaller elections is often much lower. Even in the US, where these elections are often scheduled with the big ones and people often vote a straight ticket, the proportion of eligible voters that you need to convince to vote for you is smaller.
And when you're talking about the two main parties, they're the main parties because they won previous elections. You think they have a chance of winning because they won previous times. But that's transferrable knowledge. If candidates from a new party have won the low-stakes elections, consistently, for a few rounds, now they're no longer third parties, they're the new second party in the elections one layer up.
focus on local politics, psychology
i hear you
so 3 candidates
1. a MAGA chud
2. a spineless centrist democrat
3. a serious left candidate
the left vote, whether 20 people or 20 million, is divided. the MAGA chud wins
howabout:
do what you say, with local psychology
but instead the serious left candidate beats the spineless centrist in the primary
takes over the Democrats
and beats MAGA
no?
this is AOC, Bernie, Mamdani, etc
not a theory
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @numodular
Once again, you're talking about an election. To go back to my very first post in this thread: the important thing is what happens across N rounds of elections.
You can't model any of this usefully when you think about an election, you have to think about the behaviour across multiple elections. Someone else did this elsewhere in the thread.
@david_chisnall @numodular
sure but then what you're saying is that across N rounds of elections, you're ok with MAGA winning while the drama unfolds on the left of a 3rd party (theoretically) supplanting the Democrats
and the problem with that is that MAGA is trying to demolish democracy itself
so you're ceding vast areas and a vast amount of time to MAGA control. and they don't play fair. they change the rules such that the democrats, or the 3rd party, are locked out
@david_chisnall @numodular
so why not just use everything you say to take over the democrats instead?
why cling to the notion of 3rd party? (before we get ranked choice, after ranked choice, absolutely, because the spoiler effect is gone)
we want the same results
just my path is more feasible, i would argue faster, and absolutely much much safer
@benroyce @numodular
You've gone a long way away from my original point:
You said that this two-party end point was intrinsic to FPTP.
I said that it isn't, it's an unstable equilibrium and it will eventually tend towards disruption.
You disagreed with this, but what you actually care about is not the long-term state of the system but how you get rid of MAGA in the next election cycle.
I am completely on board with the idea that kicking out MAGA should be the most urgent priority. Electoral reform may help with that, but that's completely orthogonal to anything I claimed and that you disagreed with.
@david_chisnall @numodular
correct. i changed the topic
because i honestly could care less about theory, i care about results. i don't care how we do it, we need to save the USA from fascism. so i welcome challenges from other points of view like yours because it keeps the mind fresh. i don't know everything
and i don't care if duverger's law is the biggest farce in the history of political science, or an iron clad "law"
i just know that if we divide the left vote, MAGA wins
i just know that if we divide the left vote, MAGA wins
The problem is that both the Republican and Democratic strategy (and the Labour and Conservative strategy in the UK) is predicated on the assumption that Duverger's Law is accurate.
This is why the Democrats have spend the last few decades chasing some imagined centre. And this led to disenfranchising most voters, which led to the MAGA Party replacing the Republican Party and led to the Democratic Party being centre-right and most voters holding opinions further to the left of either on a wide range of opinions.
If you don't understand both what the political strategists in the parties are doing, why they're doing it, and why they're wrong, then persuading them to do something different is hard.
@david_chisnall @numodular
"which led to the MAGA Party replacing the Republican Party"
yes
and why can't we do something similar to the Democrats from the left?
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
Understood. And you can teach me.
But you agree taking over the Dems is a more feasible approach, yes?
I'm not coming at this from science, I'm coming at tbis from engineering
@vgoller @david_chisnall @numodular
You're talking about spineless centrists. And I agree. But they aren't "the democrats"
That label can be filled with whatever you want to fill it with. which depends upon us showing up and getting those left candidates in
If no one votes, because magic bogeyman "the democrats" fills people with empty cynicism, then yes, you get spineless centrists
@wynke @david_chisnall @numodular
Well yeah. And I agree
But it's one thing to say that, another thing to do it. The question is how, it's not merely about making the aspirational statement
@david_chisnall @benroyce @numodular electoral law won't kick out MAGA because MAGA controls all three branches of the government, so if anything electoral law will be used to entrench them, as we just saw in Louisiana. That and ICE stormtroopers posted near voting booths to intimidate the electorate.
At best electoral law can be changed to prevent a recurrence of MAGA, but we have to get to the kicking out part first. All the checks and balances carefully laid out in the Constitution have failed us, I suppose 236 years was a good run. The only saving grace is that discontent is overwhelming in the US, not because of moral qualms but because of economic incompetence and corruption on a truly breathtaking scale, which would make vote-tampering obvious.
@fazalmajid @david_chisnall @numodular
as long as that discontent results in people showing up and voting
if the discontent instead results in spineless cynicism, and not voting, that's simply acceptance of fascism by weak people
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
but pmonks is actually soft selling the simple reality:
a 3rd party vote is not a nonvote, it's a vote for MAGA
ross perot in 1992
ralph nader in 2000
the third party only divided the right, or the left, and handed the win to the opposite party
everything you say crashes like waves on this rock, and renders everything else you say aspirational, but unfeasible
at least for the USA. maybe what you say can work in the UK
Nationally we do need RCV, but locally it's not always necessary. A third party could take entire states if people stopped thinking of elections solely in terms of national conditions.
Here's the 75 state rep races from my state in 2024. Pick some at random, there's a 2/3 chance you'll find only one candidate running. A third party isn't gonna hand MAGA a victory in places where MAGA doesn't run and Dems take 98% of the vote by being the only ones on the ballot.
ri.gov/election/results/2024/g…
...Is it even fair to call it a "third" party when you're in a one party state? I just want a SECOND party right now!
as a nutmegger i got nothing but love for Rhode Island, and i like you
i will grant that in areas massively GOP, or massively Democrat, a 3rd party can serve as a nice protest
but that's more of a secondary function of how sick we are as a country
so RCV is necessary, regardless
because then we can just vote 3rd, 4th, 5th party, etc, and not worry about this endless dreary strategy
because, you have to admit, you could help the GOP win in RI
@benroyce @david_chisnall @numodular Yeah, although I think the financing in a bigger part of the sickness than FPTP.
People running unopposed will raise $50k for their campaign. If you're actually gonna campaign that's a 40 hour a week job (at least!) on top of your actual job. And if you win the salary is $20k. How well does that math work out if you ain't already a millionaire? Or at least have a lot of wealthy "friends". (At least if you're trying to do the job honestly.) That's surely a big part of why so many of these races are unopposed.
@admin @david_chisnall @numodular
i know little of Rhode Island politics that you know a lot of. but i hear the rumors that it's a machine, and it's dirty
i would say to you: just come from the left and take over the Democratic party rather than venturing off with the romantic notion of a 3rd party
AOC beat a colossus of the establishment
*working in a bar*
don't undersell how many are sick of the machine as much as you are. campaign on it in fact
but beat it from the inside
but it is straightforward
you're describing a system where a 3rd party can exist in harmony with the 2 dominant parties
what happens instead is the right leaning 3rd party rewards the democrats, such as perot in 1992, or the left leaning 3rd party rewards the republicans, such as nader in 2000
that is, indeed, straightforward math
so your every argument is sound
*but* only in democracies where 3rd parties can coexist. they can't in FPTP like the USA
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
@benroyce @david_chisnall @numodular Hypothetically I guess you could start a third party as a regional thing. If said third party would start exclusively in deep red states where Democrats can't win anyways, it wouldn't matter so much that the left vote gets split at first, and if the third party can win enough support from non-Democrat voters to surpass the Republicans, you now would have three parties in total from a national view.
But we are now firmly in magical christmas land
i would love to see 3rd party in deep red states
but this is not coming from a position of "yay third party"
this is coming from a position of: "you're giving democrats a win in deep red states"
a discussion of the emergence of 3rd parties in the usa is a nonstarter (until we get ranked choice), simply because all that happens is you divide the left, or right, vote, and guarantee the opposite side wins
this is a hard wall
@benroyce @david_chisnall @numodular
Also important to state that a lot of the people clamoring for a green party or any kind of third party…aren’t seriously invested in creating one. Not at all.
And they are also often denying the reality of the USA’s current system. Which is that the awful people in the Republican party will vote in lockstep for their cult leaders, and it helps them when their opposition divides and dilutes their votes.
@mister_shade02X2 @david_chisnall @numodular
enthusiasm for 3rd party in the usa breaks into two groups to me:
1. international observers who fail to grasp exactly how fucked up our shitty FPTP system is
2. domestic observers who fail to be educated on exactly how fucked up our shitty FPTP system is
that's it
i want 3rd party
but we can't have it until we get ranked choice
before ranked choice, 3rd party only succeeds in helping MAGA win
this is a hard fact, not an opinion
ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES reshared this.
clearly an 'originalist' would say
- doesn't mention a penalty so it's technically unenforceable
- who does the electing? not the president, not his problem if somebody else decides to break the law.
- presence of fraud in an election doesn't invalidate the election
- says nothing about who's able to run for president, just who somebody else is advised not to elect
- up to the supreme court to determine who 'has been elected twice' but nobody has standing to ask until after that person wins
@wesdym
i don't disagree with you, but our court's 'originalist' majority think they're very smart and also love sophistry.
the court have become determined attackers against past congresses who definitely didn't envision a threat model of bad faith nitpicking.
@dingusbat
As source and some context on Ketanji Brown Jackson, during her 2022 Supreme Court confirmation hearings:
politico.com/news/2022/03/22/b…
I'll add that as we get new science, we change definitions. Most people have chromosomes XX or XY, and most are female or male, respectively. But there are a whole lot of exceptions.
So, I could see how an earnest candidate would decline to answer.
@raganwald @lazysupper @IanMoore3000
I refuse to join any administration that would have me as a member
🤭
@benroyce Under Marxism, the most important post in the administration goes to the Secretary of Transportation:
youtube.com/watch?v=o_QkC2PKkQ…
@lazysupper @IanMoore3000 @georgetakei
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.Jonathan Lyons (YouTube)
@benroyce Before you vote, carefully review "The Laws of His Administration."
youtube.com/watch?v=uSsUoxlSAD…
@lazysupper @IanMoore3000 @georgetakei
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.Movieclips (YouTube)
For more laughs, check out the history of Canada's Conservative Party. They've gone through more changes than the ~~Oakland~~ ~~L.A.~~ ~~Oakland~~ Las Vegas Raiders.
That's a hate crime. ❌
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
hypebot, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Lisa Melton and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
President Donald Trump has reached record-low approval ratings amid his wildly unpopular war against Iran, and according to a prominent insider and former ally of his, the president “knew” launching the conflict would be “the end of his presidency” –…Alexander Willis (Raw Story)
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
JonChevreau 🇨🇦 and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Jacebillo, GhostOnTheHalfShell, hypebot, xs4me2, McSpocky, Mr. Bill, Trixi Schutzo and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
How about this: Let's not use ableism to fight against transphobia. Opposing one bigotry does not excuse perpetrating another.
Yes, the first reply means to call trans people mentally ill: both bigotries in one. But the joke of the second reply turns on disparaging mentally ill folks.
@viviansequeira @deFractal
I'm mentally ill and transgender and I understood the joke as:
Being conservative is more like a mental illness than being transgender which is ironic since it used to be called gender identity disorder in the DSM while being conservative has never been classified as being detrimental to those experiencing it even though it is demonstrably worse for both the person experiencing it and those around them.
If only there was an effective treatment for it.
If only there was an effective treatment for it.
There is. Except for cases caused by dark triad personality disorders, the treatment for conservativism is very similar to that for attachment disorders and the related phobias and emotional and social disorders.
@deFractal I would like to read the source for that.
@riley @jrdepriest @viviansequeira I made it up, based on my decades-old hobby of applying methods of psychology and therapy, atop methods of foreign intelligence and undercover law enforcement, to socially engineer people into changing their minds about political issues.
It always comes down to healing the emotional harms that made the craving for domination by corporate, government, and religious daddies emotionally resonate and thus feel true.
@deFractal @jrdepriest @viviansequeira claiming that calling out actual mental illness is 'ableism' is beyond counterproductive, and ACTIVELY harmful.
There is not a one of them that doesn't very solidly tick all three boxes for delusional disorder.
- certainty
- refusal to accept any contrary proof or argument
- obviously false or impossible belief
"Gas was $6 under Biden" is delusional disorder.
"They're making the kids gay" is delusional disorder.
Not 'they're scared.'
@erinaceus @deFractal interesting; that’s two of you I see taking it that way. I took it as conservatism/transphobia suggested as *one* kind of mental illness and didn’t see that as throwing all mental illnesses in with those views.
I accept and acknowledge it made you both feel that way, and I only mention this because I’m genuinely interested to learn your thoughts on that.
(Just for clarity: I don’t consider myself mentally ill, though some people might due to my AuDHD and, if unmedicated, depression.)
: It's not chatbot psychosis, it's 'math and engineering and neuroscience'Liam Proven (The Register)
like this
Trixi Schutzo and Foxis The Cookie Dragon like this.
reshared this
peelinggecko, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Jay Miller, Charlie Stross, David Gerard, Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, M Schommer, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦, Robert Kingett, Cassandrich, Jürgen Hubert, jestem Julka, cyplo and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
One quote in the article above stuck with me: “teenager … increasingly running circles around me”. Yes, that totally is something that teenagers do. Btw. dude, when was the last time you saw rather than imagined a teenager?
And these are the people who feel qualified to raise something they consider a sentient being. One really has to be grateful for the fact that LLMs aren’t sentient by any means. The humankind is responsible for enough atrocities as it is.
Hey You
Yeah, You
You are magical! Don't forget that!
Carry on.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Theosuwb and Trixi Schutzo reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Jess Mahler, Paul Cantrell, Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈, mhoye, hypebot, Mr. Bill, Dusk to Don, Furbland's Very Cool Account™, Mother Bones, Mariya Delano, Juggling With Eggs, Trixi Schutzo, Kim Possible and your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 reshared this.
kat donegan (she/her) 🇵🇸✊ reshared this.
Folks, I recommend looking at Kat's website - very cool!
curiousthing.net/hello-its-my-…
rad scribes, rad agitators, rad filmmakers including james baldwin, dorothy parker, jean cocteau, simone de beauvoir. art by curiousthing.katd (CURIOUSTHING.NET)
kat donegan (she/her) 🇵🇸✊ reshared this.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Mother Bones, hypebot, Lisa Melton, Trixi Schutzo, derptron and your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦 reshared this.
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
hypebot, Lisa Melton, Trixi Schutzo, ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES, Kim Possible, Aleksandr Koltsoff, Tanya, salvari, your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Zaphod Beeblebrox, TinJar, Alex is Adjusting, peelinggecko, Admiral Memo, Furbland's Very Cool Account™, Deadly Headshot, Space Catitude 🚀, Witchzilla, Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, Unnamed TNG skant beefcake and Kotes reshared this.
Perhaps a truer line might be
"Scientific journals don't want you to know this fact... without paying for it."
I recall seeing a scientist here saying how they're willing to provide free copies of their paper upon request, avoiding this cost to the reader.
This, of course, supports your hypothesis about scientists sharing. 😀
Deadly Headshot reshared this.
Corollary:
Anyone saying "(Phenomenon/Thing) defies physics" is about to get an earful from a physicist.
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Scientists are people. Some are notoriously secretive (Tesla,) while others can’t seem to shut up (Kaku.) Some work where they aren’t allowed to share (pharmaceuticals,) and some must “publish or perish. (Academia)
Most likely to overshare: science educators and popularizers. Least likely: researchers on the edge of esoteric disciplines.
the idea that scientists ‘don’t want you to know a fact’ is statistically incompatible with their behavior
they publish ~2.5m papers/yr, upload 200k+ preprints, make >3m figures, and generate so many supplements that journals added file‑size limits because people kept submitting appendices the size of small video games
i once heard of 14gb of raw data uploaded ‘in case someone might care.’
A related joke (originally about engineers):
Scientists make terrible magicians because they always want to explain how the trick works before they show it to you.
whether or not they've met scientists is irrelevant. they're still getting paid to write the click-bait headline.
more likely, it's an llm doing the writing and the poor guy who may or may not have met a scientist is out on his ass.
Another scientist I know of runs a clam facts mastodon account with all the clam facts you could ever want to know
Oh, I know a LOT of scientists who don't want to know an important fact or two!
Fact 1: The genetic clock of a species and its line of ancestry is NOT automatically the same as its generation to generation mutation rate, and cannot be assumed to be so.
Fact 2: The 1,500 fossil individuals known form Africa between 2 & 4.5 million years old, all supposed to be nearer the human lineage than the chimp or human lineage, are not. Many are chimp or gorilla ancestors.
while this is true, there are some facts that I do not want to know from scientists.
(that are usually not related to their field)
How would oversharing relate to being open to listen? Doesn't oversharing imply a failure to be aware of and care for others' needs?
I don't get it.
In fact, one scientist I know of has started a Squid Facts hotline where you send a text message and get free Squid Facts texted to you.
"Get Squid Facts text "SQUID" to 1 833 SCI TEXT"
There have been a few asbestos, tobacco, fossil fuels emissions and by-products, teflon, nano-materials, thalidomide, oxycodone, cancer researcher, respiratory masking, & respiratory disease transmission vector scientists who seem to have wanted some things not shared or known.
"Kids are channeling the eras of their parents by increasingly turning to retro tech when it comes to music"
Portable CD players and mp3 players.
Retro tech.
Grind my bones to ash
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
reshared this
Trixi Schutzo and Klaus Frank reshared this.
Reviewers 1 (8yo) and 2 (6yo) both have own CD players in their rooms and regularly come with stashes of discs from the local library with audiobooks.
We've been considering getting them portable MP3 players.
They don't seem to associate this with retro, just damn useful 😀
New-fangled stuff!
My portable cassette player must be somewhere in this house …
Trixi Schutzo likes this.
Came here to make youth with Victrola tech jibe, but now I am shopping.
From record players to speakers, and radio to vinyl, we create lifelong music memories in every home. Shop record players online today.Victrola
Reiner Jung 🇬🇱 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
in reply to Vee • • •Vee
in reply to Reiner Jung 🇬🇱 🇺🇦 🇪🇺 • • •jeSuisatire neindochohh ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
in reply to Vee • • •funfact?
That's just the truth and how we are.
funfact
.. humans ..
Vee
in reply to jeSuisatire neindochohh ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ • • •George Dinwiddie
in reply to Vee • • •ALT-TEXT
post by darebear.23:
Fun fact: Bonobo monkeys,
who we share 98.7% of our
DNA with, are matriarchal
and very peaceful. There
has only been one record of
them killing one of their
own and it was a group of
females beating the brakes
off a male monkey for
touching an infant. In light
of the Epstein files, | do
believe it is time we start
taking notes ladies.
Vee
in reply to George Dinwiddie • • •Vee
Unknown parent • • •Vee
Unknown parent • • •Guy on the run
in reply to Vee • • •WesDym
in reply to Vee • • •Unfortunately, we are much more closely related to chimpanzees, which are horrible animals just like us. Every evil known to man that does not require our intellect or dexterity has been witnessed in chimps, including war.
This is the challenge for humanity, to figure out how to overcome our primitive instincts.
HappyCrow13
Unknown parent • • •cozmos
in reply to Vee • • •noplasticshower
in reply to Vee • • •Alliat
in reply to Vee • • •Unfortunately, power also corrupts women, but I do think (without having any proof of it) that women are generally less susceptible to corruption.
Here in Iceland we have a female President, all three leading political parties are lead by women (they call themselves “the valkyries”), the major of our only city is a woman as well and then some of the chiefs of police for various regions are women too. Most of them are doing an excellent job but a couple have been caught abusing their power. I think it just shows how alike the sexes really are. No one is from Mars and no one is from Venus, we’re all humans with our individual strengths and flaws.
skedarwarrior
in reply to Vee • • •@BillMcGuire@mastodon.social
in reply to Vee • • •@BillMcGuire@mastodon.social
in reply to Vee • • •David Esposito
in reply to Vee • • •Vee
in reply to David Esposito • • •𝙽𝚘𝚊𝚑 𝙼𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚍
in reply to Vee • • •Sensitive content
Okey dokey, here we go.
Firstly, Bonobo are chimpanzees, not monkeys. Chimpanzees are apes and part of the Hominidae family while to get to common relatives you have to move up to the order of primates before you get monkeys and apes in the same family tree so to speak.
While bonobos are known for using sexual behavior to resolve conflict, they have the capacity to be just as lethal as any other chimpanzee and there are far more than just one record of them killing their own.
Primate scientists are actually reconsidering some of the original works that labeled them as more peaceful than other chimpanzees as a recent study showed that the wild bonobos in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve were almost three times as violent as other chimpanzees (measured by recorded incidents of punching, kicking, and biting).
Interestingly, group acts of aggression are almost exclusively led by female Bonobo while solo acts of aggression were more commonly carried out by males.
They are definitely less prone to infanticide than other chimpanzees, but again it's been recorded before and they do kill infant chimps of rival groups, just at a much smaller rate than with other chimpanzees.
Anyway...all that being said, I am a huge proponent of people beating the absolute shite out of any of the people found in the Epstein Files to have been a part of the horrible things that were enabled by Epstein and his money. We just don't need to make things up to do so. That all can happen entirely on its own without made-up facts about Bonobos.
Vee
in reply to 𝙽𝚘𝚊𝚑 𝙼𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚍 • • •Sensitive content
AutistiCritic
in reply to Vee • • •Vee
in reply to AutistiCritic • • •